In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up!
NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious. Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action.
Being in IT I see no real way to keep such tools 'safe'. If they exist they WILL be obtained and used by bad actors.
But the government has long been pushing companies in this way. From encryption, ISPs, companies like Apple and Google. And it isn't just our government either.
I distrust these agencies anyways. They have a long record of abusing their power and lying to congress / the courts about it.
On February 17 2016 12:24 Jibba wrote: In case anyone's wondering, Samantha Bee's new show on TBS is really good. Probably #2 among late night shows behind John Oliver.
If Oliver's is the new Daily Show, Bee's is the new Colbert Report.
John Oliver is the most grating person in the world. Bee is indeed number two judging by the video you posted. These shows all need to die off, they are seriously the worst thing for liberals. If Clinton wins the election I blame the legacy of Jon Stewart, John Oliver et al.
Jon Stewart was great :[ and Oliver has some good stuff as well. I dunno about Bee yet since I haven't watched her show but Colbert was good too.
I liked Jon Stewart as a comedian, and his appearance on Crossfire was pretty cool. His semitic good looks, to quote Lisa Simpson, helped too! But the whole shtick of "criticizing the media as much as the politicians" became 1) a game of "look at FOX being stupid haha!" 2) just another level of perpetuating the status quo ("isnt the world terrible? now continue to do nothing about it but laugh with us!"). RIGHT NOW would be the time to drop the pretense of above-it-all-comedian and just go out and shout WE WANT YOU DO TO BECOME AN ACTIVIST FOR BERNIE SANDERS (I am saying that in the sense that Stewart, Colbert and so on all clearly align with him politically, yet try to be the smart/cynical "oh he wont win" guy in the room), OR BLACK LIVES MATTER, OR ANY LOCAL ISSUE IN YOUR AREA. Instead we get terrible jokes about republicans, or Bernie Sanders' hair. Thanks Colbert.
I have sympathy for Last Week with John Oliver in theory - its like the The CBS Evening News segment on the grain deal in the 1970s: devote an extended amount of TV time to carefully explain something that usually slips through the cracks of news (if you want to know more about that, theres a chapter on that in Timothy Crouse's Boys on the Bus). BUT INCESSANT INTERMITTENT JOKES ARE NOT THE WAY TO GO ON ABOUT THIS. This show would have to be called "Last Week Without John Oliver" to be any good.
And seriously, he is just so fucking punchable. Why does anyone like this style of humor? Aaargh.
You want comedy shows to become "deep" newsshows and blame them for not being that... interesting...
Yes yes, Stewart always used that line (most hilariously on crossfire - "our lead in show is *puppets making crank phone calls!*") to defend himself too. its bullshit. If the audience of The Daily Show had wanted comedy they would watch The Simpsons, or Seinfeld, or read Carl Barks. Not incidentally, all of those things are not just funnier but also more insightful than the Daily Show.
I am of two minds on this. Part of me wants privacy at all time. The other side of me doesn’t want law enforcement having to push through 64+ bit encryption with every search warrant. But this needs to be handled by both the court and law enforcement. Of course there should be a key to get into an Iphone/Ipad, but apple should only be required to provide it to the FBI if judge orders it for each specific case/piece of evidence.
Except that it really doesn't work that way. If Apple intentionally builds in a backdoor to your phone, then that backdoor will be accessible to any 16 y.o. script kiddie. If it's not a general backdoor but instead a separate encryption key for each iDevice, you're still opening it up to abuse, but more to the point, it adds a serious level of complexity to the OS and an onus of administration at Apple. Moreover, neither of these solutions does anything at all to prevent app level encryption (unless you're dumb enough to store your encryption key on the same device).
It's the kind of dumb decision made by judges who don't really understand technology. It sounds like a good idea, but in practice will not prevent those who actually want their data encrypted, while opening everybody else to serious abuse. Imagine some random hacker gaining access to all the data on your phone, including your credit card data, because apple pay, and in the not too distant future, the code to open your front door (and of course, your address, becausé they have access to all the data on your phone).
Finally, the government today is fully capable of brute forcing a 64bit AES encryption, given sufficient incentive, in a few days. However, it'll take a random script kiddie, even with a decent bot net somewhere between a fwe months to a few years, which seems like a sufficient tradeoff.
People went to the daily show because they wanted to be mildly more informed, but also didn’t want to deal with the screaming and pundits. Once news became so “expert” focused, if you can call anyone of those people experts, a large number stopped to them for information.
And people under estimate the power of how earnest John Stewart was about the role that was weirdly forced upon him. That viewers always felt he was trying to do the best job he could being totally not qualified for the role. The Daily Show was a joke show that turned into a place that people went to during the elections for real coverage. John didn’t seek out that role, it just happened to him and you could always see he was deeply uncomfortable with it. That he didn’t feel qualified and that got more pronounced as time went on. People talk shit about him, but he was there and people trusted him, so he tried to do something that he never really wanted to do.
Also I think he lost faith traditional news agencies. I bet there was a part of him that hoped they would see all the people they lost to the daily show and think “maybe we need to try and do better.’ But that never happened. CNN looks more like a tabloid every day.
On February 17 2016 12:24 Jibba wrote: In case anyone's wondering, Samantha Bee's new show on TBS is really good. Probably #2 among late night shows behind John Oliver.
If Oliver's is the new Daily Show, Bee's is the new Colbert Report.
John Oliver is the most grating person in the world. Bee is indeed number two judging by the video you posted. These shows all need to die off, they are seriously the worst thing for liberals. If Clinton wins the election I blame the legacy of Jon Stewart, John Oliver et al.
Jon Stewart was great :[ and Oliver has some good stuff as well. I dunno about Bee yet since I haven't watched her show but Colbert was good too.
I liked Jon Stewart as a comedian, and his appearance on Crossfire was pretty cool. His semitic good looks, to quote Lisa Simpson, helped too! But the whole shtick of "criticizing the media as much as the politicians" became 1) a game of "look at FOX being stupid haha!" 2) just another level of perpetuating the status quo ("isnt the world terrible? now continue to do nothing about it but laugh with us!"). RIGHT NOW would be the time to drop the pretense of above-it-all-comedian and just go out and shout WE WANT YOU DO TO BECOME AN ACTIVIST FOR BERNIE SANDERS (I am saying that in the sense that Stewart, Colbert and so on all clearly align with him politically, yet try to be the smart/cynical "oh he wont win" guy in the room), OR BLACK LIVES MATTER, OR ANY LOCAL ISSUE IN YOUR AREA. Instead we get terrible jokes about republicans, or Bernie Sanders' hair. Thanks Colbert.
I have sympathy for Last Week with John Oliver in theory - its like the The CBS Evening News segment on the grain deal in the 1970s: devote an extended amount of TV time to carefully explain something that usually slips through the cracks of news (if you want to know more about that, theres a chapter on that in Timothy Crouse's Boys on the Bus). BUT INCESSANT INTERMITTENT JOKES ARE NOT THE WAY TO GO ON ABOUT THIS. This show would have to be called "Last Week Without John Oliver" to be any good.
And seriously, he is just so fucking punchable. Why does anyone like this style of humor? Aaargh.
You want comedy shows to become "deep" newsshows and blame them for not being that... interesting...
Yes yes, Stewart always used that line (most hilariously on crossfire - "our lead in show is *puppets making crank phone calls!*") to defend himself too. its bullshit. If the audience of The Daily Show had wanted comedy they would watch The Simpsons, or Seinfeld, or read Carl Barks. Not incidentally, all of those things are not just funnier but also more insightful than the Daily Show.
I think they're funny. Colbert, Stewart and more recently Oliver are great at giving a humorous take on current events. They are not unbiased and don't claim to bring you the news, so stop watching it as an alternative to either the news or a serious analysis of it. In fact, you should probably just stop watching them altogether, if you can't appreciate this kind of show.
On February 17 2016 12:24 Jibba wrote: In case anyone's wondering, Samantha Bee's new show on TBS is really good. Probably #2 among late night shows behind John Oliver.
If Oliver's is the new Daily Show, Bee's is the new Colbert Report.
John Oliver is the most grating person in the world. Bee is indeed number two judging by the video you posted. These shows all need to die off, they are seriously the worst thing for liberals. If Clinton wins the election I blame the legacy of Jon Stewart, John Oliver et al.
Jon Stewart was great :[ and Oliver has some good stuff as well. I dunno about Bee yet since I haven't watched her show but Colbert was good too.
I liked Jon Stewart as a comedian, and his appearance on Crossfire was pretty cool. His semitic good looks, to quote Lisa Simpson, helped too! But the whole shtick of "criticizing the media as much as the politicians" became 1) a game of "look at FOX being stupid haha!" 2) just another level of perpetuating the status quo ("isnt the world terrible? now continue to do nothing about it but laugh with us!"). RIGHT NOW would be the time to drop the pretense of above-it-all-comedian and just go out and shout WE WANT YOU DO TO BECOME AN ACTIVIST FOR BERNIE SANDERS (I am saying that in the sense that Stewart, Colbert and so on all clearly align with him politically, yet try to be the smart/cynical "oh he wont win" guy in the room), OR BLACK LIVES MATTER, OR ANY LOCAL ISSUE IN YOUR AREA. Instead we get terrible jokes about republicans, or Bernie Sanders' hair. Thanks Colbert.
I have sympathy for Last Week with John Oliver in theory - its like the The CBS Evening News segment on the grain deal in the 1970s: devote an extended amount of TV time to carefully explain something that usually slips through the cracks of news (if you want to know more about that, theres a chapter on that in Timothy Crouse's Boys on the Bus). BUT INCESSANT INTERMITTENT JOKES ARE NOT THE WAY TO GO ON ABOUT THIS. This show would have to be called "Last Week Without John Oliver" to be any good.
And seriously, he is just so fucking punchable. Why does anyone like this style of humor? Aaargh.
You want comedy shows to become "deep" newsshows and blame them for not being that... interesting...
I totally disagree with your notion surth. they are comedy shows first, with the occasional lecture/raising awareness segment second. take it or leave it. you don't have to like it, you don't have to watch it. it's really that easy.
but they sure as hell hit oil with what they are and want to be in a 24/7 perpetual bullshit news cycle that is the american media. left and right. there are some outliers which are still doing an ok job but they are struggling and are mainly for smaller circles - and they struggle heavily.
the complete surrender to the for profit motif fucked just about everything the fourth estate is supposed to be - about the news and asking tough question, in doing that as much objectivity as possible.
and not each party having their own major news channel, and mainly pundits praising one side and condemning the other. that too is part of healthy discussion, but it is not supposed to be the sole essence of it.
and watching samantha bee's new show, john oliver and colbert - I have to say, the students have become the new masters. jon stewart's legacy is alive and well. I would even say more alive than ever.
On February 17 2016 23:06 DickMcFanny wrote: It's so strange to see Apple on the right side of history for once...
Only really because it would cost them boatloads of money if this actually goes through. I don't think there's anything idealistic about their defense.
I have read some analysis of Apple situation. And in my opinion (and not only mine) Apple is simply lying to its customers. Imagine they build this one time software. Its not enough, what they need is put this particaular iphone into engineering mode (or however Apple calls it) and provide hardware key (which is generated by Apple) for the forcefull update to work. You cant update sofware of locked phone in other way, You cant do this over the air, You have to connect phone via USB and force update. Unless they will do it for other cases (generate hardware keys) there is no way of using that software for other phones. And using it for other versions of iphones would simply not work, since they would require different software.
Also newer versions of Iphone have different (stronger) protoection which would require tottaly different approach, and this software would help in no way in cracking them.
On February 17 2016 23:16 Silvanel wrote: I have read some analysis of Apple situation. And in my opinion (and not only mine) Apple is simply lying to its customers. Imagine they build this one time software. Its not enough, what they need is put this particaular iphone into engineering mode (or however Apple calls it) and provide hardware key (which is generated by Apple). Unless they will do for other cases there is no way of using that software for other phones. And using it for other versions of iphones would simply not work.
Also newer versions of Iphone have different (stronger) protoection which would require tottaly different approach, and this software would help in no way in cracking them.
sure they are lying... they are simply riding the snowden freedom train. because there is a huge market in it.
let's just say it this way, if people were able to hack the icloud and expose just about every celebrity's disgusting sexual behaviours out there by leaking thousands of pictures - why should apple themselves not be able to have full access to their own god damn programs?
for the record, I am totally fine with the feds having access to those jihadi fucks phones - there was due process involved and a judge said so.
but not automatically, that's what it's unfortunately really about...
On February 17 2016 12:24 Jibba wrote: In case anyone's wondering, Samantha Bee's new show on TBS is really good. Probably #2 among late night shows behind John Oliver.
If Oliver's is the new Daily Show, Bee's is the new Colbert Report.
John Oliver is the most grating person in the world. Bee is indeed number two judging by the video you posted. These shows all need to die off, they are seriously the worst thing for liberals. If Clinton wins the election I blame the legacy of Jon Stewart, John Oliver et al.
Jon Stewart was great :[ and Oliver has some good stuff as well. I dunno about Bee yet since I haven't watched her show but Colbert was good too.
I liked Jon Stewart as a comedian, and his appearance on Crossfire was pretty cool. His semitic good looks, to quote Lisa Simpson, helped too! But the whole shtick of "criticizing the media as much as the politicians" became 1) a game of "look at FOX being stupid haha!" 2) just another level of perpetuating the status quo ("isnt the world terrible? now continue to do nothing about it but laugh with us!"). RIGHT NOW would be the time to drop the pretense of above-it-all-comedian and just go out and shout WE WANT YOU DO TO BECOME AN ACTIVIST FOR BERNIE SANDERS (I am saying that in the sense that Stewart, Colbert and so on all clearly align with him politically, yet try to be the smart/cynical "oh he wont win" guy in the room), OR BLACK LIVES MATTER, OR ANY LOCAL ISSUE IN YOUR AREA. Instead we get terrible jokes about republicans, or Bernie Sanders' hair. Thanks Colbert.
I have sympathy for Last Week with John Oliver in theory - its like the The CBS Evening News segment on the grain deal in the 1970s: devote an extended amount of TV time to carefully explain something that usually slips through the cracks of news (if you want to know more about that, theres a chapter on that in Timothy Crouse's Boys on the Bus). BUT INCESSANT INTERMITTENT JOKES ARE NOT THE WAY TO GO ON ABOUT THIS. This show would have to be called "Last Week Without John Oliver" to be any good.
And seriously, he is just so fucking punchable. Why does anyone like this style of humor? Aaargh.
You want comedy shows to become "deep" newsshows and blame them for not being that... interesting...
Yes yes, Stewart always used that line (most hilariously on crossfire - "our lead in show is *puppets making crank phone calls!*") to defend himself too. its bullshit. If the audience of The Daily Show had wanted comedy they would watch The Simpsons, or Seinfeld, or read Carl Barks. Not incidentally, all of those things are not just funnier but also more insightful than the Daily Show.
I think they're funny. Colbert, Stewart and more recently Oliver are great at giving a humorous take on current events. They are not unbiased and don't claim to bring you the news, so stop watching it as an alternative to either the news or a serious analysis of it. In fact, you should probably just stop watching them altogether, if you can't appreciate this kind of show.
If people want to see the beginning of the end for US news coverage, watch the Best of Enemies.
And here you will see when networks finally figured out a way to take news and turn it into something that wasn’t “boring” and “dull”, which is to make it more like pro-wrestling. Add in the 24/7 news cycle and you get the modern theater that we pass off as news.
Ok, with those specific details, I am totally in support of the judges order. Apple created a system where evidence and valuable information could be lost and the owner of the phone was a terrorist that committed an act of terrorism. And is also dead. They are not asking for a full network key for all Iphones forever, or prohibiting Apple from updating the systems.
Companies like Apple should be prepared to disarm the booby traps they put in their software if necessary.
"Booby traps"? WTF? They're protecting their customers' privacy!
I can't believe I'm defending Apple, out of all people, but there's a reason tech companies are leaving the UK left and right when Hit... I mean Cameron wants to outright ban encryption.
This is just another attack on our privacy and I will defend even Apple in that regard.
Its not about privacy right now. Its about the fact that they mispresenting what is required of them, they are trying to get some positive PR by lying about FBI request and technical details.
That is fine, they can do that. But the order is for them to assist in retrieving data from a specific phone that was used by a terrorist. The owner is dead, killed during the act of terrorism and the FBI can’t brute force their way through the encryption because the phone will delete itself. If by opening a phone one time they undermine all protection for all phones forever, I am going to say that protection might have had a serious flaw.
I am all for Apple protecting their clients, but they created a system where time and power alone won’t let governments get into a phone without risk of it deleting itself. This was going to happen on a long enough time line. Apple needs to get creative and figure out a way to both protect their clients, but also have keys open up the phone if 100% necessary.
Edit: People need to read the order and what is being requested. Its not for them to open all Iphones. Its just one phone where the owner is super dead and killed a lot of people.
On February 17 2016 14:32 KwarK wrote: Trump is very conservative on taxes and redistribution. His tax plan will require huge cuts to public services to compensate for his tax cuts.
Have you seen budgets lately? Obamacare borrowed from Medicare, now it's going belly up. Social security administration has been writing reports on its financial straights for years now. We've got 19 trillion of debt, whose servicing will continue to increase, and 100 trillion of unfunded liabilities. As far as compensating for lack of revenue, a whole host of public services will have to be cut just based on their current state. The reforms haven't been forthcoming, both parties have avoided talking about it, so it makes little sense to talk about public services now.
Secondly, Trump couldn't be anything else in this primary environment than be a man with a tax cut plan. He strikes me as the kind of guy that would drop the tax schtick in two seconds on election if the political favorability wasn't gale-force behind it. He's got absolutely zero room on the border fence and something hardline on the overall immigration rate. In contrast, he just says he's working on the economy in other ways with his usual bluster and the dialogue centers on the next thing he mentions.
I had to chuckle at what constitutes "conservative on redistribution" these days. The debate's so skewed left if you don't want more robbing peter to pay paul, you're some kind of conservative.
He's not saying "cut public services, pay down the deficit" which is the usual line. He's saying "massively reduce taxes on the rich, make the people currently in a 0% bracket pay 0%".
I'm a bit confused on the technology. Would this thing the US government is asking Apple to do apply only to situations in which they have physical access to your phone or would it also compromise data remotely as well? The first one isn't that troubling compared to the second one.