|
On June 06 2012 23:38 Shiori wrote: Here's a question: did anyone even watch NASL when they basically had no Koreans? I know I didn't.
I don't think I watched a single game of NASL S2 (before the finals), The Gathering, Copenhagen Games or any other tournaments with no Koreans in it.
|
On June 06 2012 23:37 Swipe wrote: Okay, I need help getting something. What makes Koreans so faceless? They're still people with backstories and motivation and dreams, and I love watching my favorite players win regardless of nationality. I mean, I still love rooting for my foreigner favorites in mostly Korean tournaments, but that's more because I like to root for the underdog than because I prefer foreigners. I look at MLG's brackets and see 16 players; I don't really care about nationality. Why's it make a difference where a player is from? (Except the U.S., my underdog thing goes CRAZY with U.S. players because of how bad our pros are on the whole when put next to the rest of the world.)
[To anyone thinking I'm being condescending and saying we shouldn't care and nationality doesn't matter, etc., that's not what this is. I actually don't get why being Korean matters, and it would be most cool if a logical person who thinks it does matter could explain it to me.]
I guess for those SC2 fans it comes down to language and cultural barrier.
|
Title: "Stop the Korean Invasion!"
Why did I open this thread :\ Definitely not worth the warning, but entertaining nonetheless!
|
Norway361 Posts
On June 06 2012 23:04 JinThevalley wrote: While many people watch sports (including e-sports) because they enjoy the games and the sport in itself, few (I hope) would disagree that if it becomes important to you who wins the match this increases the overall entertainment value of the match. Thing is that people often root for people related to geography or nationality.
To use a real sport example, the European football championship is coming up. The level of football is likely to be very high and I will probably have a look, but i won't really care who wins the games as Norway did not qualify (as usual). However, if Norway by some sort of miracle should qualify the next time the tournament would become much more interesting because I would have someone to root for (certainly not because their good).
Same thing with Korean only vs. mixed tournaments. I enjoy to watch GSL or GSTL because they provide excellent games but i only really care who wins if there are foreigners included. MLG on the other hand may not have the same level in their games, but the entertainment value is upped as a result of having someone to root for. If MLG becomes a korean only tournament this will serve to alienate those who primarily watch because they cheer for some foreigner ,while removing much of the entertainment value for those who enjoy both the game and have someone they root for. Thus, this type of tournament will only serve those who only watch because they enjoy good matches. This would probably result in decrease in viewers already following Starcraft while at the same time it is likely that SC will attract fewer new viewers.Besides, we already have top notch, jetlag free tournaments in GSL and GSTL to provide the highest level of SC2 games.
On the other hand, no one I know gives a shit that Norway didn't qualify because we all cheer for The Netherlands/Spain/England/Portugal or Germany. Different strokes for different people.
|
On June 06 2012 23:39 CDR wrote: Yes, let's limit the number of Koreans in MLG so we can see more low level players like Haypro, Idra or pretty much anyone from NA. What would be the point of watching something like that? I don't care about people who aren't good enough to compete with top Koreans. If I wanna watch games like that there are EU daily cups everyday. I want to see top level games and plays, not random foreigners. Even if there are only 3 or 4 players from KR they will still dominate it. And I don't feel like watching epic battles Haypro vs Jinro or InControl vs IdrA, it is a waste of my time.
Your post makes no sence sorry to tell you :/ My english isnt good as well but your last sentence is just fucket up i guess. Its a missin "," i guess
|
What i find funny is how divided the community is when it comes to supporting their heroes, the "foreigners" compared to naniwa's depiction of the korean pride and how they always all team up to destroy the foreigner. That is rather interesting to say the least. ( Tho i am not linking this up with korean "racism against foreigner" and posts like these:+ Show Spoiler + On June 06 2012 21:33 Fatmofo wrote: This is literally the same shit spilled out by right-wing white nationalist against immagrants in real live. Hope that puts your oppinion in prespective. or anything, it's just ... weird. Maybe it's because we are "the rest of the world" and not "korea" or "USA" or "countryX" that makes rooting for "our" players more difficult ?)
Also interesting to note how big tournaments are willing to pay money to get koreans to come and play whereas foreigners have no such help. ( Well this one is faaar more understandable but, i feel like it might be relevant somehow )
Also, while restricting the amount of black people per team in the NBA seems ludicrous, know that korean ( and i think japanese too, someone correct me on that please ) baseball teams have a limitation on the amount of foreigners that can play for a team.
Also, what this guy said :
On June 06 2012 21:46 Doctorasul wrote: You want fairy tales, soap operas and circus theatrics: giant vs albino, one-armed vs one-eyed, black vs trans-gendered, midget vs morbidly obese. Why are you trying to make a real competition into a spectacle? Let serious tournaments do what they do best: separate the best from the rest.
Completely unrelated : + Show Spoiler [ Had to. Blame him not me ] +On June 06 2012 21:14 marcesr wrote: How does MLG ever want to present their product to a larger audience if its all about Random Korean 1 who likes noodles and plays all day against Random Korean 2 who likes noodles and plays all day? (Sorry for the polemical phrases but im quite disappointed.)
![[image loading]](http://i.qkme.me/3plstd.jpg) Cmon don't hate me, i had to do it, he phrased it that way ON PURPOSE. + Show Spoiler +On June 06 2012 22:01 Chickenlegs wrote: I remember when a friend of mine started playing SC2, I told him he should watch some vods of pros playing, he started with Destiny and idrA, then he found out about the korean pros and never looked back. So it's really up to the person, if you care about the gameplay more than funny jokes and shit, you will enjoy the koreans more (atleast in my experience.)
Once you go black korean you never go back !
On June 06 2012 22:35 Aeroplaneoverthesea wrote: I think Russian caps the number of foreign players but this is a country where fans throw banana's at black players so what do you expect from those clowns? Ahah. What ???!!? Seriously, bananas ?
On June 06 2012 22:32 Eufouria wrote: Also everyone knows 감자탕 > Noodles Thanks, i learned something
|
On June 06 2012 21:19 Hassybaby wrote:Show nested quote +On June 06 2012 21:17 Naniwa wrote:On June 06 2012 21:16 Hassybaby wrote: Damn people who practice the game more winning!
Right? foreigners dont have same conditions as the koreans data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c81e3/c81e334f952fa6a3b77a0f55297a8c05972c04b5" alt="" shut your mouth if you just jump on the bandwagon response The EG, fnatic and TL houses would like to disagree
Add Mill, aTn*, type, ESC, MoW. And that's only the european ones.
* = assuming they still have a team house, I only remember seeing a picture of Socke in an aTn team house once.
|
In all fairness, this thread should be closed. It only serves as a publicity stunt (wanted/or totally unwanted - I do not deny the best intentions of the OP) regarding MLG and the rest. You may not see it as such, but, that's quite against the TL rules.
|
I think you're counting out Stephano, Huk, Thorzain and Naniwa in the OP, they've shown that they can compete. Regardless, MLG is supposed to be premier competition, not minor leagues. I'm not interested in watching Americans I've never heard of lose to Europeans I've never heard of. I'd much rather watch Koreans plus Stephano if that's how it turns out again.
|
I'm totally tired of this arguement, personally I think it's stupid. I mean I watch bw and nobody really made it a big deal that foriegners weren't in the tourney's. I watch to see the best players play their best, not to see some people who don't deserve to be in the tourney lose to a korean. I would love it if some of the forieners would win a MLG or GSL, but I don't root for a foriener because he isn't Korean. Maybe you should invest more time in learning about the Korean players, and you might find some you actually like. The only reason you don't know any of the Koreans, is because you refuse to know. I almost never watch SC2 currently,(do to time constraints,) but I still know most of the top Koreans and even if I don't know a player here or their. If they play an amazing game, I can become a fan instantly because I don't have the "too many Koreans" point of view. Seriously quit being racist and Just learn to love the game.
|
On June 06 2012 21:14 marcesr wrote:
With MLG coming up this weekend we have another one of our biggest events and it is totally dominated by Koreans again.
Lately every MLG and IPL have been totally Korean dominated and that makes it just so much less interesting. Yes I love to watch GSL, I also like to watch Broodwar OSL but when Im watching an international tournament it should be INTERNATIONAL.
Do you know what Koreans did when they hosted their first international tournament (WCG)? They didnt allow more than 3 players from every country to avoid a bracket with 31 Koreans in the top 32. They knew that most people would not be interested in watching a 2nd OSL which is run on 2 days. What did they do instead? They created a tournament which greatly supported esport in dozens of countries for almost a decade.
How does MLG ever want to present their product to a larger audience if its all about Random Korean 1 who likes noodles and plays all day against Random Korean 2 who likes noodles and plays all day? (Sorry for the polemical phrases but im quite disappointed.)
Casual viewers know the top foreigners and a few Koreans like MC.
What makes GSL so great is the incredible level of play and the hard competition. What has made MLG the best tournament in the past was the great athmosphere, the interesting storylines, rivalries etc. and also the great games of course.
But really, in 2012 most of that is gone.
Yes the level of play is awesome, but I can see better games in the GSL every day. Why do you turn MLG into a one weekend GSL?
Ive bought MLG passes in the past, I will still buy GSL passes and for Homestory cup – not for MLG anymore until this changes again.
And to all the people who say that foreigners should just train harder. Do you really think that it is realistic, especially with the BW pros switching to SC2, that we will EVER have more than 3 foreigners who can keep up with the top 30 Koreans? Its not. That's like saying top athletes can't compete in the olympic games because the less good ones should have a chance too.
|
On June 06 2012 23:37 Swipe wrote: Okay, I need help getting something. What makes Koreans so faceless? They're still people with backstories and motivation and dreams, and I love watching my favorite players win regardless of nationality. I mean, I still love rooting for my foreigner favorites in mostly Korean tournaments, but that's more because I like to root for the underdog than because I prefer foreigners. I look at MLG's brackets and see 16 players; I don't really care about nationality. Why's it make a difference where a player is from? (Except the U.S., my underdog thing goes CRAZY with U.S. players because of how bad our pros are on the whole when put next to the rest of the world.)
[To anyone thinking I'm being condescending and saying we shouldn't care and nationality doesn't matter, etc., that's not what this is. I actually don't get why being Korean matters, and it would be most cool if a logical person who thinks it does matter could explain it to me.]
Well, it's mostly because we don't have the same connection to their scene as we do to the western scene. They don't market their players at all, there's little to no behind the scenes content (IN COMPARISON TO THE WEST), and for the most part, people just think of them as gaming machines who sit in their pro houses practicing all hours of the day. And while that stems from ignorance, it's still not going to go away until we get more exposed to their scene. I believe that the responsibility lies on the teams to make that happen. If they get more western market exposure, they can even start to pull western sponsorships for their teams. Stuff like GSL:OTR is a step in the right direction, but we seriously have so much content in the west that allows us to get to know the pros better, and korea has one 15 minute weekly talkshow.
|
On June 06 2012 23:35 Aeroplaneoverthesea wrote:Show nested quote +On June 06 2012 23:24 BoxingKangaroo wrote:On June 06 2012 23:19 Aeroplaneoverthesea wrote:On June 06 2012 23:15 BoxingKangaroo wrote:On June 06 2012 23:12 Aeroplaneoverthesea wrote:On June 06 2012 23:10 BoxingKangaroo wrote:On June 06 2012 23:05 Aeroplaneoverthesea wrote:On June 06 2012 23:04 BoxingKangaroo wrote:On June 06 2012 22:59 Aeroplaneoverthesea wrote:On June 06 2012 22:57 ceaRshaf wrote: [quote]
Ok, no Romainans at MLG. What about Europeans? Oh, no room for them because Korea is so dominant? Ok. No soup for me. NEEXT!
When England lose in the European Championships to Spain in the Ro8 (or maybe we'll lose in the groups) I won't stop watching because I am a football fan who supports my team but also loves to game itself. You are not a Starcraft fan. You are a fan of white people playing Starcraft. Which is racist, sad and pathetic. When my country is in the World Cup, interest in Soccer soars. Of course the hardcore soccer fans will watch the games till the end no matter what, but as soon as my country is eliminated, interest clearly wanes in the population. The casuals lose interest. Some casuals may like what they see, and continue to watch though, for the tournament and for years later....... You might say we don't need those casuals. Well then I say all you'll end up with is Korean based tournaments. MLG won't be supported by hardcore supporters alone. This might be fine for you. Others want to see MLG succeed and grow. No sporting even has ever, ever in the history of sport succeeded by not encouraging fair and equal competition based on skill. Asian Cup - Soccer. Running for 50 odd years. Only allows Asian teams. Just what criteria of success you using there? Is this a joke? No. This competition doesn't allow equal competition based on skill. It restricts by region. I contend it's successful by the length of time it's been running, therefore providing a counterexample to your statement. Rebuttal? My rebuttal is that you're really really dumb. The world cup doesn't let non Brazilians play for Brazil either, what is this madness? MLG is not a nation based competition, it is not WCG or the Blizzard knock off that's currently going on. It's an open tournament like the US open or Wimbledon. Comparing a nation based tournament like the World Cup to a non national based tournament is retarded. Fine. I'll modify my original post you replied to. It still holds true: When someone from my country is in Wimbledon, interest in tennis soars. Of course the hardcore tennis fans will watch the games till the end no matter what, but as soon as my countryman is eliminated, interest clearly wanes in the population. The casuals lose interest. Some casuals may like what they see, and continue to watch though, for the tournament and for years later.......
You might say we don't need those casuals. Well then I say all you'll end up with is Korean based tournaments. MLG won't be supported by hardcore supporters alone. This might be fine for you. Others want to see MLG succeed and grow. It's still a completely retarded point because those are naturally according scenarios. If a Japanese player qualifies for Wimbledon that's great for Japan but the ITF should not ever and would never guarentee a Japanese player at every Wimbledon round of 32 no matter how shitty he is purely to appease and increase Japanese viewers. That is fucking pathetic and a total embarrassment to the name of competition and anyone who thinks that is a good idea needs to get as far away from a position of influence as possible. China is the biggest nation on earth, India is second. They are both shit at football. Does Fifa guarantee them a spot at the world cup anyway just for viewer numbers? Of course not because Fifa is not a joke, it is serious sporting body creating serious sporting competitions. MLG hopefully wants to be more like Fifa and not the embarrassing joke you and other mindless fools want it to be.
I never advocated MLG changing their system. I was merely demonstrating that viewership is dependent on the origin of the players of a tournament. Some people here couldn't understand that these kind of people existed. If MLG wants to be life FIFA, then all the more power to them. It doesn't mean they'll be successful though given my above point.
|
On June 06 2012 23:40 Embir wrote:Show nested quote +On June 06 2012 23:37 Swipe wrote: Okay, I need help getting something. What makes Koreans so faceless? They're still people with backstories and motivation and dreams, and I love watching my favorite players win regardless of nationality. I mean, I still love rooting for my foreigner favorites in mostly Korean tournaments, but that's more because I like to root for the underdog than because I prefer foreigners. I look at MLG's brackets and see 16 players; I don't really care about nationality. Why's it make a difference where a player is from? (Except the U.S., my underdog thing goes CRAZY with U.S. players because of how bad our pros are on the whole when put next to the rest of the world.)
[To anyone thinking I'm being condescending and saying we shouldn't care and nationality doesn't matter, etc., that's not what this is. I actually don't get why being Korean matters, and it would be most cool if a logical person who thinks it does matter could explain it to me.] I guess for those SC2 fans it comes down to language and cultural barrier. koreans also show more self control in public settings because of their culture and upbringing
|
"What has made MLG the best tournament in the past was the great athmosphere, the interesting storylines, rivalries etc. and also the great games of course.
But really, in 2012 most of that is gone."
5 out of the 6 MLG's last year had GSL players at them. MLG still has a great atmosphere, there will be great storylines and rivalries (stephano v. polt and MC v. DRG and MKP v. DRG. I have loved every MLG this year so please speak for yourself.
|
On June 06 2012 23:38 Shiori wrote: Here's a question: did anyone even watch NASL when they basically had no Koreans? I know I didn't.
Hah this is brilliant.
Look at IPL FC etc. There is a reason they are almost entirely korean now. IPL is a business, and unlike what most people say, top level koreans bring the numbers, not foreigners. Even korean vs korean brought higher numbers, and IPL is a business.
|
On June 06 2012 23:43 goiflin wrote:Show nested quote +On June 06 2012 23:37 Swipe wrote: Okay, I need help getting something. What makes Koreans so faceless? They're still people with backstories and motivation and dreams, and I love watching my favorite players win regardless of nationality. I mean, I still love rooting for my foreigner favorites in mostly Korean tournaments, but that's more because I like to root for the underdog than because I prefer foreigners. I look at MLG's brackets and see 16 players; I don't really care about nationality. Why's it make a difference where a player is from? (Except the U.S., my underdog thing goes CRAZY with U.S. players because of how bad our pros are on the whole when put next to the rest of the world.)
[To anyone thinking I'm being condescending and saying we shouldn't care and nationality doesn't matter, etc., that's not what this is. I actually don't get why being Korean matters, and it would be most cool if a logical person who thinks it does matter could explain it to me.] Well, it's mostly because we don't have the same connection to their scene as we do to the western scene. They don't market their players at all, there's little to no behind the scenes content (IN COMPARISON TO THE WEST), and for the most part, people just think of them as gaming machines who sit in their pro houses practicing all hours of the day. And while that stems from ignorance, it's still not going to go away until we get more exposed to their scene. I believe that the responsibility lies on the teams to make that happen. If they get more western market exposure, they can even start to pull western sponsorships for their teams. Stuff like GSL:OTR is a step in the right direction, but we seriously have so much content in the west that allows us to get to know the pros better, and korea has one 15 minute weekly talkshow.
These kind of ideas are the best thing to come out of this thread. Korean teams take note.
|
On June 06 2012 23:45 zefreak wrote:Show nested quote +On June 06 2012 23:38 Shiori wrote: Here's a question: did anyone even watch NASL when they basically had no Koreans? I know I didn't. Hah this is brilliant. Look at IPL FC etc. There is a reason they are almost entirely korean now. IPL is a business, and unlike what most people say, top level koreans bring the numbers, not foreigners. Even korean vs korean brought higher numbers, and IPL is a business.
Exacly :D thast what its about Money wake up ppl! And if you want to change that stop watching SC2, till there are that kind of tourneys, you want there to be
|
On June 06 2012 23:23 Aeroplaneoverthesea wrote:Show nested quote +On June 06 2012 23:23 -Archangel- wrote:On June 06 2012 22:48 oxxo wrote: How in the world is this not racist? In more instances than not people are talking about 'foreigners' as white. Not their own country, but white. It's just plain ridiculous.
The bigger tournaments are more likely than not never going to have skin color quotas. You guys really need to get over it. They're going to invite the best and the best are going to make it through open play (foreigners have plenty of chances to get in). That's only good for SC2 and viewership. Who wants to watch someone barely better than themselves? What? Who was talking about white?! Don't put words in people mouths. We want fair representation from all over the world. I would give 1-4 spots per country or region. 4 to Korea, 3 to North America, 4 to EU countries, 1 to rest of Europe countries, 2 to China, 1 to Australia, 1 to Latin America, 1-2 to middle east and so on. Qualifiers to decide who represents countries and then they fight each other to get region qualify spots. The numbers or representatives would change from tournament to tournament based on how players from their region do (like Champions league does it). In that case most of the games would be total shit. Do you enjoy talking out of your ass?
1.
It is customary In many sports to treat the host nation/players from the host nation of a tournament favorably in order to garner interest among viewers. Likewise, in many sports there are limitations (with more or less enforcement) on participants in order to ensure a field representing as wide a demography as possible. It all comes down heightening interest and getting as many viewers as possible.
From the top of my head, it happens in football, in cycling, in tennis & in golf.
2.
The 'quality of games'-argument is flawed, and in any case only pertains to a small subsection of the SC2-viewers. First, judging the 'quality' of a game is very subjective and very much influenced by anticipation. What you expect to see is what you get and, in any case, only a portion of viewers will be able to tell the difference between a game between two GSL-participating Koreans and two top 50 foreigners.
Second, did you not enjoy SC2 a year ago, when all players where much worse than now? Were the games then terrible, and we were all fooled into believing that we were enjoying ourselves?
Third, the best players does not necessarily produce the 'best' games. There have been plenty of bad GSL-finals to prove that point, and more recently, we had a run of bad games from the quarter finals and up until the final of GSL season 1.
|
On June 06 2012 23:31 Domus wrote: Closed/Regional tournaments are not a weird thing at all, in fact it is a very normal thing in any sport to have a hierarchy of competition. Like the regional level, national level, "continental" level, and international level, and then there are things like the champions league (soccer). Each level has its own rewards and benefits. The thing is, many people don't want every event to be a champions league. This is currently the case with MLG and many offline tournaments though. People want to see their favorite players compete at a level that they can actually compete at in an offline setting.
I think that MLG will facilitate this at some point in the future, but you can expect it to be PPV (not a problem for many, right?).
This. Why would u watch MLG if u just watched GSL which is pretty much the same?
The other side of the problem is that most Koreans don't speak english and it's rather difficult to like somebody just for the way he plays. You need to know his personality, too. I believe MC has more fans among foreigners than anybody else just because he is actually trying to use english and have some real communication with the audience.
|
|
|
|