|
|
bench lustboy, get xpecial back
throw money at kakao.
Really interested in hearing amazing's explanation later, even if there are a ton of haters (admittedly I hated on him quite a bit during the season) but I wouldn't want to miss the free streaming money coming with being on tsm.
|
On October 12 2014 06:33 The_Red_Viper wrote: So if they change him for an NA player, they could change another NA player for a foreign one right?
Nah they would have to change Lustboy/Bjerg as well.
|
I somehow wouldn't be suprised if Amazing ended up in Wasted Talent bin. Guess I should be glad Forgiven didn't get picked up by a better org and I can romanticize him forever, unlike Morris :p
|
On October 12 2014 06:26 MagnusWolf wrote:reddit seems to think it'll be http://www.lolking.net/summoner/na/21542029because he duoed with bjerg a lot over the summer and apparently scrimmed with TSM when AMazing had to go back to EU for his visa They duo'd on stream a couple days ago as well Don't think TSM has to rush this decision, especially with the expansion tournament right around the corner which will let them evaluate players like a Thinkcard since I don't believe lolpro is LCS ready
Edit: Apparently Grigne is 16, rule him out
|
turtle to jungle then bring in doublelift
|
On October 12 2014 06:34 AsnSensation wrote: bench lustboy, get xpecial back
throw money at kakao.
Really interested in hearing amazing's explanation later, even if there are a ton of haters (admittedly I hated on him quite a bit during the season) but I wouldn't want to miss the free streaming money coming with being on tsm. Dude, I fucking wish man. That'd be the only thing that makes Kakao leaving KT bearable to me. Too bad he's already on a Chinese team.
|
In terms of raw mechanical ability, Inori is probably TSM's best option. Thinkcard isn't at Inori's level mechanically, but he's more consistent and we've already seen the fact that he can play on the big stage without letting nerves get to him. And then, there is always Xmithie as well if he is not too rusty.
|
United Kingdom50293 Posts
On October 12 2014 07:13 ExceliosBeyond wrote: In terms of raw mechanical ability, Inori is probably TSM's best option. Thinkcard isn't at Inori's level mechanically, but he's more consistent and we've already seen the fact that he can play on the big stage without letting nerves get to him. And then, there is always Xmithie as well if he is not too rusty. I want to see inori's legendary 4 longsword tilt vi in LCS :>
|
TSM Saintvicious hype, takes the shot calling pressure of bjersen
|
oddone will be back on starting roster
|
Who is available and of the proper caliber for TSM? Thorin suggested Xmithie. Maybe Kez, if COL doesn't get back into LCS. Brokenshard was saying they should get IWD. Not amazing choices (no pun intended), but they could work.
|
TSM HotshootttGGG
Cho Jungle all dayu
|
On October 12 2014 09:44 Takkara wrote: Who is available and of the proper caliber for TSM? Thorin suggested Xmithie. Maybe Kez, if COL doesn't get back into LCS. Brokenshard was saying they should get IWD. Not amazing choices (no pun intended), but they could work. I don't know, Xmithie was pretty good before the worst player swap in league history happened and Mancloud suddenly got stuck in the gutter when they swapped back.
|
Whatever happened to TSM Nightblue? For a while I was hearing that he was one of the best junglers in North America, but then he just kinda vanished.
|
United Kingdom50293 Posts
Nightblue decided to focus on streaming
|
On October 12 2014 06:44 Numy wrote:Show nested quote +On October 12 2014 06:33 The_Red_Viper wrote: So if they change him for an NA player, they could change another NA player for a foreign one right? Nah they would have to change Lustboy/Bjerg as well.
I thought their entire current roster counted as NA, for grandfather reasons?
not to mention we STILL don't have a definition of what an NA resident is, and Bjergson has lived her for a year so it's possible he doesn't count against them either way
|
On October 12 2014 12:06 Slusher wrote:Show nested quote +On October 12 2014 06:44 Numy wrote:On October 12 2014 06:33 The_Red_Viper wrote: So if they change him for an NA player, they could change another NA player for a foreign one right? Nah they would have to change Lustboy/Bjerg as well. I thought their entire current roster counted as NA, for grandfather reasons? not to mention we STILL don't have a definition of what an NA resident is, and Bjergson has lived her for a year so it's possible he doesn't count against them either way http://na.lolesports.com/articles/interregional-movement-policy-official-rule
|
On October 12 2014 12:06 Slusher wrote:Show nested quote +On October 12 2014 06:44 Numy wrote:On October 12 2014 06:33 The_Red_Viper wrote: So if they change him for an NA player, they could change another NA player for a foreign one right? Nah they would have to change Lustboy/Bjerg as well. I thought their entire current roster counted as NA, for grandfather reasons? not to mention we STILL don't have a definition of what an NA resident is, and Bjergson has lived her for a year so it's possible he doesn't count against them either way Resident = resided in NA for 2 out of the past 3 years.
That means Berj, the whole of LMQ, and Dexter all become residents some time in the next year provided they continue residing in NA. Before then, neither TSM, LMQ nor CLG can bring in further imports. TSM and LMQ cannot swap out an existing import for another import, ONLY a resident or another grandfathered player. That means TSM can technically replace Amazing with Dexter, any other non-residents hanging around NACS that were brought in before the rule or Noname, though doing the last option would be beyond dumb.
Final way of bringing in imports in to drop two non-residents from the roster, replace with one NA resident and one import.
|
On October 12 2014 12:56 ShootAnonymous wrote:Show nested quote +On October 12 2014 12:06 Slusher wrote:On October 12 2014 06:44 Numy wrote:On October 12 2014 06:33 The_Red_Viper wrote: So if they change him for an NA player, they could change another NA player for a foreign one right? Nah they would have to change Lustboy/Bjerg as well. I thought their entire current roster counted as NA, for grandfather reasons? not to mention we STILL don't have a definition of what an NA resident is, and Bjergson has lived her for a year so it's possible he doesn't count against them either way Resident = resided in NA for 2 out of the past 3 years. That means Berj, the whole of LMQ, and Dexter all become residents some time in the next year provided they continue residing in NA. Before then, neither TSM, LMQ nor CLG can bring in further imports. TSM and LMQ cannot swap out an existing import for another, unless they drop a minimum of one import in addition to the swapping.
Implementation of Rule Change; Grandfathering. Any player on the Active Roster of an LCS team or a CS team who participated in the most recent Promotion Tournament at the time of this policy change who would not satisfy the Resident definition in 1.2(a) will be considered an "exempt non-resident", which allows such a player to count towards the three Residents required
Lustboy, Bjerg and Dexter all count as NA as well as whatever members of LMQ stay on the team if the org still exists?
|
On October 12 2014 12:58 Slusher wrote:Show nested quote +On October 12 2014 12:56 ShootAnonymous wrote:On October 12 2014 12:06 Slusher wrote:On October 12 2014 06:44 Numy wrote:On October 12 2014 06:33 The_Red_Viper wrote: So if they change him for an NA player, they could change another NA player for a foreign one right? Nah they would have to change Lustboy/Bjerg as well. I thought their entire current roster counted as NA, for grandfather reasons? not to mention we STILL don't have a definition of what an NA resident is, and Bjergson has lived her for a year so it's possible he doesn't count against them either way Resident = resided in NA for 2 out of the past 3 years. That means Berj, the whole of LMQ, and Dexter all become residents some time in the next year provided they continue residing in NA. Before then, neither TSM, LMQ nor CLG can bring in further imports. TSM and LMQ cannot swap out an existing import for another, unless they drop a minimum of one import in addition to the swapping. Show nested quote +Implementation of Rule Change; Grandfathering. Any player on the Active Roster of an LCS team or a CS team who participated in the most recent Promotion Tournament at the time of this policy change who would not satisfy the Resident definition in 1.2(a) will be considered an "exempt non-resident", which allows such a player to count towards the three Residents required Lustboy, Bjerg and Dexter all count as NA as well as whatever members of LMQ stay on the team if the org still exists? Resident =/= exempt non-resident.
Found it, my earlier post stands.
Here are some examples of impermissible roster changes:
Team is starting three exempt non-residents(Lustboy, Berj, Amazing) and two residents. Team wants to replace one exempt non-resident(Amazing) with one non-exempt non-resident (KAKAO?! Gillus, Svenskaren, Mithy or whoever).
The team cannot do this - However, they can replace the exempt non-resident(Amazing) with another exempt non-resident(Dexter) or a resident(Meteos).
LMQ's in the same situation, except worse, except Tian Ci wants to haul them back to China.
source:http://na.lolesports.com/articles/interregional-movement-and-expansion-tournament full set of examples in source + Show Spoiler +Here are some examples of permissible roster moves:
Team is starting five residents and wants to replace one with a non-exempt non-resident as a starter. Team is starting five residents and wants to replace three of them with exempt non-residents. Team is starting three residents, two non-residents, and wants to replace a resident with an exempt non-resident. Team has three exempt non-residents, two residents, and wants to replace a resident with an exempt non-resident. Here are some examples of impermissible roster changes:
Team is starting three exempt non-residents and two residents. Team wants to replace one exempt non-resident with one non-exempt non-resident. The team cannot do this - However, they can replace the exempt non-resident with another exempt non-resident or a resident. Team has five exempt non-residents, and wants to replace one of them with a non-exempt non-resident player. The team cannot do this - if a team has two or more exempt non-residents, they cannot add an additional non-exempt non-resident. Team has three exempt non-residents and two residents, and wants to replace a resident with a non-exempt non-resident. The team cannot do this - if a team has two or more exempt non-residents, they cannot add an additional non-exempt non-resident.
|
|
|
|