| Forum Index > Closed |
|
Gahlo
United States35172 Posts
On October 12 2014 12:58 Slusher wrote: Lustboy, Bjerg and Dexter all count as NA as well as whatever members of LMQ stay on the team if the org still exists? Exempt non-residents still count towards the cap, they just can't be forced off because of it. | ||
|
Slusher
United States19143 Posts
ok I see, I still think using the wording "count towards the three Residents required" is pretty awful all things considered | ||
|
krndandaman
Mozambique16569 Posts
| ||
|
cLutZ
United States19574 Posts
| ||
|
ShootAnonymous
1948 Posts
On October 12 2014 13:14 Slusher wrote: the wording says otherwise, I'm either right or the article is very poorly written ok I see, I still think using the wording "count towards the three Residents required" is pretty awful all things considered sketchy/ambiguous/less-than-optimal rule wording from Riot, what's new. I'm just glad they gave multiple examples, so at least we know for sure in these specific circumstances what can & cannot happen. inb4 TSM Dexter He's the best option TSM has right now (since I don't see Berj or lustboy being dropped), unless someone knows of a really good NACS/Challenger jungle player? | ||
|
Slusher
United States19143 Posts
| ||
|
ShootAnonymous
1948 Posts
On October 12 2014 14:02 Slusher wrote: I don't think in a million years it will happen but I want Azingy oh that jungle karthus player! (that's the only thing I rmbr about him from the few matches his team played against LMQ >_>) Why do you think it'll be unlikely? Things, like TSM picking up Gleeb as a replacement for Xpecial, have happened before. It's not like TSM has a lot to choose from with the 3/5 rule restricting them. | ||
|
Gahlo
United States35172 Posts
On October 12 2014 13:39 cLutZ wrote: They need a jungle shotcaller to ease some of the burden off Bjergson IMO so he can, crush lane like he is supposed to (and does when they win) more consistently. I think barring getting somebody in a Dexter-like situation, Xmithie is the best option. | ||
|
Fusilero
United Kingdom50293 Posts
Deft to leave samsung blue? | ||
|
krndandaman
Mozambique16569 Posts
| ||
|
Gahlo
United States35172 Posts
On October 12 2014 17:26 Fusilero wrote: https://twitter.com/insideKLoL/status/521177060849369090 https://twitter.com/insideKLoL/status/521177162364116992 https://twitter.com/insideKLoL/status/521177214390243328 Deft to leave samsung blue? Given the shift to 1 team orgs, Samsung will probably drop all of Blue. | ||
|
krndandaman
Mozambique16569 Posts
| ||
|
Zizoz
United States232 Posts
1. switch Bjergsen or Lustboy for an NA player, 2. switch Amazing for an imported jungler, 3. switch back to Bjergsen/Lustboy? I think this is permissible by Riot's rules, but maybe I'm missing something since I don't follow the scene much or anything. | ||
|
Fusilero
United Kingdom50293 Posts
| ||
|
Gahlo
United States35172 Posts
On October 12 2014 22:48 Zizoz wrote: Could TSM: 1. switch Bjergsen or Lustboy for an NA player, 2. switch Amazing for an imported jungler, 3. switch back to Bjergsen/Lustboy? I think this is permissible by Riot's rules, but maybe I'm missing something since I don't follow the scene much or anything. 1. They could, but it's be a massive downgrade unless they could get xpecial back from Curse. 2. No, he'd be their 3rd nonresident. 3. What? | ||
|
ShootAnonymous
1948 Posts
On October 12 2014 22:48 Zizoz wrote: Could TSM: 1. switch Bjergsen or Lustboy for an NA player, 2Resident+ 3exempts -> 3Resident + 2 exempt: Possible 2. switch Amazing for an imported jungler, 3Resident + 2 exempt -> 3Resident + 1 exempt + 1 import: Possible 3. switch back to Bjergsen/Lustboy? 3Resident + 1 exempt + 1 import -> 2Resident + 2 Exempt + 1import : Not Possible? Dammit the examples didn't cover but it feels unlikely because you're replacing a Resident with an Import, which is what the rule was supposed to restrict. If going roundabout-ly like this would circumvent... Riot pls. xD | ||
|
Letmelose
Korea (South)3227 Posts
Exactly who is this for? 1) The players? Anyone with half a brain can figure out that's not the case. 2) The poor multi-billion dollar organizations like Samsung who might struggle supporting two teams? Are you kidding me? 3) To make it easier for those once a year arm-chair fans who finds it too hard to differentiate between Samsung Galaxy Blue and Samsung Galaxy White? Who cares? They're all faceless Koreans to them anyhow. 4) To cut down on the temptations of match-fixing and collusion? Seriously? This is where you start? By limiting the participation of respected, experienced sponsorships and letting unchecked "companies" like AHQ and Monster Gaming get their dirty hands on these young kids? 5) To ensure all regions are treated equally? They're not equal to start with. China never gets their patches on time. Europe and North America have money thrown at them directly by Riot Gaming. Exactly what kind of equality is Riot Gaming looking for here? There's a lot of things I hate about the E-sports scene in Korea, but Riot Gaming is the LAST organization that I'd want to fix the ongoing issues that exists over here. Blizzard fucked things up years before thinking they knew better when they obviously didn't, and it's just a tragedy how Riot Gaming just waltzes everywhere thinking they know everything just because their marketting of the game happened to be successful. | ||
|
Zizoz
United States232 Posts
| ||
|
ShootAnonymous
1948 Posts
On October 12 2014 22:57 Zizoz wrote: Would 3. not fall under "Team is starting three residents, two non-residents, and wants to replace a resident with an exempt non-resident" which is a permissible roster move? The final equation would be 2Resident+ 3exempts into 2Resident + 2 Exempt + 1import which is explicitly stated to be not possible though... Riot pls? Final Edit: interesting loophole you've discovered. inb4 this is actually TSM's plan. They even have people in the org ready to carry this out. (Amazing -> Nightblue, someone->someone foreign, Nightblue->Amazing) Maybe there's some rule somewhere along the lines of once an official Riot-sanctioned roster change has been made (be it in or out of a team) the player then goes into transfer cooldown (cannot enter/re-enter the team)? | ||
|
SimulatedAnneal
765 Posts
1. Bench Lustboy for Oddone. In order to be legal they need another resident on their bench but that shouldn't block them. 2. Sign Kakao. Legal because their team is now 3 residents, 1 exempt non-resident, 1 non-resident. 3. Promote Lustboy, bench Oddone. Legal under example 2 of permissible roster moves. "Team is starting three residents, two non-residents, and wants to replace a resident with an exempt non-resident." http://na.lolesports.com/articles/interregional-movement-and-expansion-tournament On October 12 2014 23:01 ShootAnonymous wrote: Maybe there's some rule somewhere along the lines of once an official Riot-sanctioned roster change has been made (be it in or out of a team) the player then goes into transfer cooldown (cannot enter/re-enter the team)? There is if you trade a player and want him traded back but it's relatively short(3 weeks?). Remember the Link to C9 trade. | ||
| ||
|
|
Big Brain Bouts
Bly vs TBD
TriGGeR vs Lambo
Replay Cast
RSL Revival
Maru vs MaxPax
BSL
RSL Revival
Cure vs TBD
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
BSL
Afreeca Starleague
Wardi Open
Replay Cast
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
