• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 07:42
CEST 13:42
KST 20:42
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - The Finalists9[ASL21] Ro16 Preview Pt1: Fresh Flow9[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt2: News Flash10[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt1: New Chaos0Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - Presented by Monster Energy21
Community News
2026 GSL Season 1 Qualifiers6Maestros of the Game 2 announced22026 GSL Tour plans announced4Weekly Cups (April 6-12): herO doubles, "Villains" prevail0MaNa leaves Team Liquid18
StarCraft 2
General
Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - The Finalists 2026 GSL Tour plans announced Maestros of the Game 2 announced Weekly Cups (April 6-12): herO doubles, "Villains" prevail MaNa leaves Team Liquid
Tourneys
Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament 2026 GSL Season 1 Qualifiers Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2) SEL Doubles (SC Evo Bimonthly) $5,000 WardiTV TLMC tournament - Presented by Monster Energy
Strategy
Custom Maps
[D]RTS in all its shapes and glory <3 [A] Nemrods 1/4 players [M] (2) Frigid Storage
External Content
Mutation # 521 Memorable Boss The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 520 Moving Fees Mutation # 519 Inner Power
Brood War
General
ASL21 General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Data needed A cwal.gg Extension - Easily keep track of anyone [ASL21] Ro16 Preview Pt1: Fresh Flow
Tourneys
[ASL21] Ro16 Group B [ASL21] Ro16 Group A [ASL21] Ro24 Group F [Megathread] Daily Proleagues
Strategy
What's the deal with APM & what's its true value Any training maps people recommend? Fighting Spirit mining rates Muta micro map competition
Other Games
General Games
Battle Aces/David Kim RTS Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread General RTS Discussion Thread Starcraft Tabletop Miniature Game
Dota 2
The Story of Wings Gaming Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
G2 just beat GenG in First stand
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas TL Mafia Community Thread Five o'clock TL Mafia
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books [Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion!
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion Cricket [SPORT] Tokyo Olympics 2021 Thread
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
[G] How to Block Livestream Ads
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Reappraising The Situation T…
TrAiDoS
lurker extra damage testi…
StaticNine
Broowar part 2
qwaykee
Funny Nicknames
LUCKY_NOOB
Iranian anarchists: organize…
XenOsky
ASL S21 English Commentary…
namkraft
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 2364 users

PvP is going to change in the next Patch ! - Page 9

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 7 8 9 10 11 56 Next
Ribbon
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States5278 Posts
April 22 2011 10:20 GMT
#161
On April 22 2011 19:03 Dommk wrote:

Show nested quote +
On April 22 2011 17:46 Mailing wrote:
Suggested this weeks ago and people said it was a stupid idea =/

Gateways already SHOULD make units faster than warpgates.

Warpgates should make units SLOWER because it has instant reinforcements. This would allow protoss to even play a macro gateway style where they never even get warpgates because they build units faster off gateways and can defend easier, but cannot be super aggressive.


They will _never_ do this. They made it pretty clear that Protoss are meant to use warpgates, the research is just there for balance reasons,


Besides, Protoss will just get an extra warp-gate, so it wouldn't even be a choice except for in the early game (which the research time nerf would address anyway).
barth
Profile Joined March 2008
Ireland1272 Posts
April 22 2011 10:22 GMT
#162
On April 22 2011 19:06 Anomandaris wrote:
This is awful. Changing warpgate will break any other matchup.
PvP is very fun at the moment (as a player). There is a defender advantage and 4 gates can even be held with 3 gates (with good micro tough). Blink stalkers and phoenix make this matchup very fun. Altough the games are often short, they are very intense and require a lot of skill.
If any change is really needed, Blizzard should remove the warpin-on-highground mechanic.

How would this break other match-ups? If gateway build times were reduced it would definitely make up for it. I can't see any potential problems it would cause PvZ or PvT, besides the 4gate itself being weaker. Ask any top protoss player and he will tell you PvP is his least favorite match-up for being so volatile. Ask any non-protoss spectator and he will tell you PvP is his least favorite match-up. So far there doesn't seem to be a solid solution to 4gate PvP despite so much effort from protoss players put into finding one. Let's wait and potentially give it a try before absolute judgments.

I feel like reducing stalker and sentry build by 5-8 seconds while leaving the zealot build time as it is (not to fiddle with double proxy gate) and having a cooldown for warpgates before the first warp-in would be interesting. Or just having warpgate upgrade take a little more time. Still, I don't think this would make gateways a viable option opposed to warpgate for mid and late game.

God, I feel guilty for theorycrafting.
"Somebody you are talking to disappears mid sentence, and the universe shoots you because you talked to someone that wasn`t there." - MasterOfChaos
WhiteDog
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
France8650 Posts
April 22 2011 10:23 GMT
#163
On April 22 2011 19:16 Binabik wrote:
I don't think you can change the warpgate research time without breaking the game. Things like RoachRush and 2Racks All Ins only become defendable by warping in a sentry as soon as the warpgate tech is finished. You don't have time to wait another 40 seconds for the sentry to produce, because your first Force Field will be timed out and heÄs going to destroy you.

PvP is going to be retarded without a fast Warp Gate and here are the reasons:
-ProxyGates will be played more often because of reduced unit cooldown and on maps like close Meta/Shattered a 3 Gate Opening without gas will become standard.
-Without 4Gate you can't punish an opponent who's going for some ridiculous tech such as 1 Gate DT or Phoenix. It's going to become a coin flip because you have to blindly chose which tech you get. With 4Gate that's not a big problem because you can just go Robo and defend against everything.
-FE builds which make the other 2 Mirror MatchUps more enjoyable won't be used anyways. Warp Gate tech will still finish before the expansion gives any benefits.

I think the only change which would improve the matchup is a good way to use static defense. Just give the Photon Cannon 7 range and Protoss can defend a ForgeExpand in PvP.

But I hope I'm mistaken and PvP is going to be as interesting as TvT after the next patch.
(I'm Protoss btw)

edit:
I actually like playing PvP as much as I like PvT and PvZ. But I understand that it is boring from a spectator's perspective and therefore it should be changed.

That's wrong,you could just go for 1 gate 1 cyber 1 gate then chrono sentries like 3stalker play in PvP and you will have enough sentries. Just because most of the protoss go for a fast warp gate tech then warp in sentries doesn't mean you can't have unit without warp gate.
You just need to change your style of play.
"every time WhiteDog overuses the word "seriously" in a comment I can make an observation on his fragile emotional state." MoltkeWarding
theBullFrog
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States515 Posts
April 22 2011 10:25 GMT
#164
patch date: two days before MLG Columbus
thebullfrog
gnutz
Profile Joined November 2010
Germany666 Posts
April 22 2011 10:25 GMT
#165
On April 22 2011 19:12 done wrote:
lol @ everybody saying it will break the other matchups. At least one of them (probably both) already IS broken, so what harm could it possibly do? Nerfing Protoss at this moment can only lead to a better balanced game, simple as that. I am not even whining or complaining here, but at this stage its pretty much obvious protoss is the strongest race atm.

and lol @ the zergs who think this will break the matchup more or what.
Don't you even think about what this change is?

- You get NOT more units out as Protoss.
- With warpgates, you get LESS units out.
- Protoss strategy is more obvious.

- Proxys are no problem. They are not.


The people complaining (Zergs and Protosses) don't realize what the change is, what they said. It is no buff to gateway-units. It is no nerf to gateway units. As far as i understand, it will just be a switch between gateway buildtimes and warpgate "buildtimes". And if you realize, that the problem now is, that warpgates are superior to gateways in every way. So you basically need to rush to warpgates as Protoss in every matchup, because it is balanced around warpgate buildtimes.

It WILL be a huge change in design. But if it is balanced or not, if there will be problems or not, we cannot say. And there could be more patches with tweaks.

I just think, as a Protoss player, this is a needed change. For the viewers. For the Protoss. And for the other races.
Archvil3
Profile Joined September 2010
Denmark989 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-04-22 10:32:51
April 22 2011 10:26 GMT
#166
Why, proven with the power of math, gateway production time does not need to be buffed in order to rebalance the Protoss after warpgate research nerf.

Warpgates reduces the production time of all gateway units by 10 seconds. Zealot, sentry and stalkers are 38-42 seconds on gateways so a warpgate reduces it by roughly 25%. or in other words an incresed production capacity of 33%.

If you have 3 gateways and adds a fourth you are increasing your production capacity with 33% as well. Simple math right.

So basicly 3 warpgates = 4 gateways.

3 warpgates+research costs = 500 minerals+50 gas.

4 gateways= 600 minerals.

So basicly you are tradig 50 gas for 100 minerals, not that bad a tradeoff and certaintly not gamebreaking.

In order for warpgate research to be viable from a produciton standpoint you need 4 gates or more. A protoss is using 4 gates or when he:

1. is 4-gating. Which is what we are nerfing.

2. is on 2 bases. At this point warpgate should be researched so a nerf will not have any effect which is intended.

What this finally comes down to, if gateway production is unchanged while warpgate research time is increased, is that common Protoss builds like 3 gate robo or 3 gate expand becomes 4 gate robo and 4 gate expand, without warpgate and the only trade off being 100 minerals for 50 gas.

If production time on gateways remains unchanged, all builds except 4 gates will remain the same.

If producition time on gateways is decreased all builds except 4 gates are being buffed.
Let thy speech be better than silence, or be silent.
hifriend
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
China7935 Posts
April 22 2011 10:28 GMT
#167
Sounds like they're sorta buffing proxies though. :D
insolentrus
Profile Joined January 2011
Russian Federation304 Posts
April 22 2011 10:29 GMT
#168
pvp should not to be random. now its pretty random
fix it, not the wg
Pekkz
Profile Joined June 2009
Norway1505 Posts
April 22 2011 10:31 GMT
#169
Cant wait for 2 proxy gates vs zerg. You will die every single time you hatch first and prolly if you dont aswell
Samhax
Profile Joined August 2010
1054 Posts
April 22 2011 10:32 GMT
#170
On April 22 2011 17:45 dacthehork wrote:
The concept of early game warp technology was a flawed one

1. Warp Tech is required and happens at the beginning of the game
2. Warp Tech removes defenders advantage in terms of production timing / walk distance.

Who could have foreseen that Warp Gate would create rush imbalances

Warp Tech as a lategame upgrade just makes far more sense and fosters macro / skilled games (can't have that). Instead of moving warp gate to a much higher tier instead they have spent the last year balancing around having protoss able to eliminate map distance/size.



I would say that warp gate must be a mid game upgrade, and all the early game must be with normal gateway. They just have to balance the early game with normal gate, that's not that hard i think.
FarbrorAbavna
Profile Joined July 2009
Sweden4856 Posts
April 22 2011 10:35 GMT
#171
this is great news! Cant remember who but someone posted a possible fix to the whole pvp 4gate mess by doing more or less what Kapeselus suggested. The way he/she(the tl user) explained the fix and the reasoning behind it felt like it was a genuine change that fixed the whole pvp 4gate situation but didnt make protoss bad in the early game in other non mirror matchups.

I dont play protoss and enjoy the micro intensive games that happens, sometimes, when both players go 4gate but mostly watching pvp is just ridiculous and needs a change so it can evolve beyond having the failsafe that is 4gate. I am excite!
Do you really want chat rooms?
tuestresfat
Profile Joined December 2010
2555 Posts
April 22 2011 10:35 GMT
#172
fuck yea, back to the good ol' double proxy gates at 10 supply zealot rush we used to do in the beta!!
Dommk
Profile Joined May 2010
Australia4865 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-04-22 10:39:36
April 22 2011 10:35 GMT
#173
On April 22 2011 19:26 Archvil3 wrote:
Why, proven with the power of math, gateway production time does not need to be buffed in order to rebalance the Protoss after warpgate research nerf.

Warpgates reduces the production time of all gateway units by 10 seconds. Zealot, sentry and stalkers are 38-42 seconds on gateways so a warpgate reduces it by roughly 25%. or in other words an incresed production capacity of 33%.

If you have 3 gateways and adds a fourth you are increasing your production capacity with 33% as well. Simple math right.

So basicly 3 warpgates = 4 gateways.

3 warpgates+research costs = 500 minerals+50 gas.

4 gateways= 600 minerals.

So basicly you are tradig 50 gas for 100 minerals, not that bad a tradeoff and certaintly not gamebreaking.

In order for warpgate research to be viable from a produciton standpoint you need 4 gates or more. A protoss is using 4 gates or when he:

1. is 4-gating. Which is what we are nerfing.

2. is on 2 bases. At this point warpgate should be researched so a nerf will not have any effect which is intended.

What this finally comes down to, if gateway production is unchanged while warpgate research time is increased, is that common Protoss builds like 3 gate robo or 3 gate expand becomes 4 gate robo and 4 gate expand, without warpgate and the only trade off being 100 minerals for 50 gas.

Production on all builds except 4 gates will remain unchanged.



If Warpgate takes so long that you are on two bases by the time it finishes then there will be some serious balance issues.


Bah, need to reword this
barth
Profile Joined March 2008
Ireland1272 Posts
April 22 2011 10:37 GMT
#174
On April 22 2011 19:26 Archvil3 wrote:
Why, proven with the power of math, gateway production time does not need to be buffed in order to rebalance the Protoss after warpgate research nerf.

Warpgates reduces the production time of all gateway units by 10 seconds. Zealot, sentry and stalkers are 38-42 seconds on gateways so a warpgate reduces it by roughly 25%. or in other words an incresed production capacity of 33%.

If you have 3 gateways and adds a fourth you are increasing your production capacity with 33% as well. Simple math right.

So basicly 3 warpgates = 4 gateways.

3 warpgates+research costs = 500 minerals+50 gas.

4 gateways= 600 minerals.

So basicly you are tradig 50 gas for 100 minerals, not that bad a tradeoff and certaintly not gamebreaking.

In order for warpgate research to be viable from a produciton standpoint you need 4 gates or more. A protoss is using 4 gates or when he:

1. is 4-gating. Which is what we are nerfing.

2. is on 2 bases. At this point warpgate should be researched so a nerf will not have any effect which is intended.

What this finally comes down to, if gateway production is unchanged while warpgate research time is increased, is that common Protoss builds like 3 gate robo or 3 gate expand becomes 4 gate robo and 4 gate expand, without warpgate and the only trade off being 100 minerals for 50 gas.

Production on all builds except 4 gates will remain unchanged.

I can't say I entirely disagree but I don' think that's 100% true.

Firstly you probably, depending how much time would be added to the warpgate upgrade, have to start researching warpgate fairly early for most builds which would add 50/50 to the 600 minerals. Either that or a 5th gate which is probably even worse, considering you probably want to expand if you go 3warpgate/4gateway.

Secondly, warpgates are not only different from gateways because of the build time and the ability to warp-in anywhere. For warpgates you pay for the unit at the end of the production cycle so to say. For gateways you pay for it in the beginning of the production cycle, ~40 seconds before you get the unit. 40 seconds is a lot.

Then again, if regular gateway production time is changed all I said is probably obsolete.
"Somebody you are talking to disappears mid sentence, and the universe shoots you because you talked to someone that wasn`t there." - MasterOfChaos
Ichobicho
Profile Joined July 2010
Norway79 Posts
April 22 2011 10:38 GMT
#175
I sure hope this wont make proxy gateways to strong. Because that is what this sounds like to me.
Archvil3
Profile Joined September 2010
Denmark989 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-04-22 10:42:54
April 22 2011 10:41 GMT
#176
On April 22 2011 19:35 Dommk wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 22 2011 19:26 Archvil3 wrote:
Why, proven with the power of math, gateway production time does not need to be buffed in order to rebalance the Protoss after warpgate research nerf.

Warpgates reduces the production time of all gateway units by 10 seconds. Zealot, sentry and stalkers are 38-42 seconds on gateways so a warpgate reduces it by roughly 25%. or in other words an incresed production capacity of 33%.

If you have 3 gateways and adds a fourth you are increasing your production capacity with 33% as well. Simple math right.

So basicly 3 warpgates = 4 gateways.

3 warpgates+research costs = 500 minerals+50 gas.

4 gateways= 600 minerals.

So basicly you are tradig 50 gas for 100 minerals, not that bad a tradeoff and certaintly not gamebreaking.

In order for warpgate research to be viable from a produciton standpoint you need 4 gates or more. A protoss is using 4 gates or when he:

1. is 4-gating. Which is what we are nerfing.

2. is on 2 bases. At this point warpgate should be researched so a nerf will not have any effect which is intended.

What this finally comes down to, if gateway production is unchanged while warpgate research time is increased, is that common Protoss builds like 3 gate robo or 3 gate expand becomes 4 gate robo and 4 gate expand, without warpgate and the only trade off being 100 minerals for 50 gas.

Production on all builds except 4 gates will remain unchanged.


Not true.

Warpgates tend to have some idle time as Protoss tech builds tend to use large sums of gas/minerals at once, so you cannot always produce out of your gateway every cooldown, thus the 10second build time increase is negligible when you start to tech.

If Warpgate takes so long that you are on two bases by the time it finishes then there will be some serious balance issues.


I am not sure how this will affect gateways but not warpgates. Production wise the only difference between 3 warpgates and 4 gateways is that warpgates warps in then gets a cooldown while gateways will have to produce the unit first. The end result is the same. Theoreticly you could say that the toss will be a round of warpins behind so up to 3 units will be delayed by 30 seconds, but I dont see how it could be any worse then that.
Let thy speech be better than silence, or be silent.
Mojar
Profile Joined January 2011
Australia185 Posts
April 22 2011 10:42 GMT
#177
2 gate proxy zvp every game, can see it now
Lotar
Profile Joined September 2010
132 Posts
April 22 2011 10:42 GMT
#178
I thought I was smart, thinking about proxy Gateways while reading this announcement. Turns out that's everybody's thinking... I hope Blizzard doesn't buff P cheese trying to fix PvP.
PopoChampion
Profile Joined November 2010
Australia91 Posts
April 22 2011 10:43 GMT
#179
It's going to be interesting to see if they're going to change the zealot build time, because that's something they changed in the beta (I think it was the beta) because 2 gate zealot rush was too powerful. This forces zerg to go pool first, which again is another buff to PvZ. It also means that the zergs who are just fed up with ZvP who all in with roaches or banelings are going to do it with a lower success rate because protoss can get that extra sentry out or that extra stalker out.

PvP seems like a coin flip for protoss players, but if a master level protoss played MC, MC would roll him. PvP can be won with good mechanics and good unit control. However, unlike PvP, there seems to be a blatant flaw in the design of ZvP, so I'm not sure why Blizzard isn't addressing it. A coin flip is 50-50, but a lot of zergs would agree to say that ZvP has a smaller chance than that.

Still, I'm glad that Blizzard is hearing that PvP is a bit of a boring match up. Protoss players are getting pretty good and we're going to see more PvP finals, and seeing that in the current patch is quite disgusting to look at. Hopefully we'll see some awesome stuff out of the next patch!
Archvil3
Profile Joined September 2010
Denmark989 Posts
April 22 2011 10:44 GMT
#180
On April 22 2011 19:37 barth wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 22 2011 19:26 Archvil3 wrote:
Why, proven with the power of math, gateway production time does not need to be buffed in order to rebalance the Protoss after warpgate research nerf.

Warpgates reduces the production time of all gateway units by 10 seconds. Zealot, sentry and stalkers are 38-42 seconds on gateways so a warpgate reduces it by roughly 25%. or in other words an incresed production capacity of 33%.

If you have 3 gateways and adds a fourth you are increasing your production capacity with 33% as well. Simple math right.

So basicly 3 warpgates = 4 gateways.

3 warpgates+research costs = 500 minerals+50 gas.

4 gateways= 600 minerals.

So basicly you are tradig 50 gas for 100 minerals, not that bad a tradeoff and certaintly not gamebreaking.

In order for warpgate research to be viable from a produciton standpoint you need 4 gates or more. A protoss is using 4 gates or when he:

1. is 4-gating. Which is what we are nerfing.

2. is on 2 bases. At this point warpgate should be researched so a nerf will not have any effect which is intended.

What this finally comes down to, if gateway production is unchanged while warpgate research time is increased, is that common Protoss builds like 3 gate robo or 3 gate expand becomes 4 gate robo and 4 gate expand, without warpgate and the only trade off being 100 minerals for 50 gas.

Production on all builds except 4 gates will remain unchanged.

I can't say I entirely disagree but I don' think that's 100% true.

Firstly you probably, depending how much time would be added to the warpgate upgrade, have to start researching warpgate fairly early for most builds which would add 50/50 to the 600 minerals. Either that or a 5th gate which is probably even worse, considering you probably want to expand if you go 3warpgate/4gateway.

Secondly, warpgates are not only different from gateways because of the build time and the ability to warp-in anywhere. For warpgates you pay for the unit at the end of the production cycle so to say. For gateways you pay for it in the beginning of the production cycle, ~40 seconds before you get the unit. 40 seconds is a lot.

Then again, if regular gateway production time is changed all I said is probably obsolete.


You are correct in a way. 1 unit cycle of up to 3 units in any 3gate build will be delayed by up to 30 seconds. Past that it will remain the same.
Let thy speech be better than silence, or be silent.
Prev 1 7 8 9 10 11 56 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Kung Fu Cup
11:00
#5
RotterdaM393
TKL 176
IndyStarCraft 75
SteadfastSC74
Rex69
Liquipedia
Replay Cast
09:00
KungFu Cup 2026 Week 4
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
RotterdaM 393
TKL 176
Lowko171
IndyStarCraft 75
SteadfastSC 74
Rex 69
ProTech36
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 25690
Horang2 2105
Bisu 1168
Jaedong 926
firebathero 659
Hyuk 555
Zeus 362
Soma 311
Mini 265
actioN 249
[ Show more ]
Pusan 199
Stork 192
Snow 161
ZerO 154
Last 147
Larva 147
Light 136
PianO 118
hero 89
Soulkey 74
Rush 72
Hyun 70
Hm[arnc] 42
sorry 41
[sc1f]eonzerg 40
Sharp 36
ggaemo 33
Shinee 24
Sacsri 23
NaDa 23
Bale 22
soO 21
Free 18
Icarus 13
Terrorterran 12
Barracks 12
HiyA 12
ajuk12(nOOB) 10
Noble 7
Movie 7
Aegong 6
Dota 2
XaKoH 679
canceldota177
League of Legends
Reynor43
Counter-Strike
x6flipin431
allub182
markeloff56
Other Games
singsing1611
B2W.Neo1049
Pyrionflax259
DeMusliM247
Mew2King75
QueenE17
ZerO(Twitch)8
Organizations
Other Games
BasetradeTV1670
Counter-Strike
PGL185
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 13 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• CranKy Ducklings SOOP22
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Jankos1210
• TFBlade1108
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
12h 18m
The PondCast
22h 18m
WardiTV Map Contest Tou…
23h 18m
CranKy Ducklings
1d 12h
Escore
1d 22h
WardiTV Map Contest Tou…
1d 23h
OSC
2 days
Korean StarCraft League
2 days
CranKy Ducklings
2 days
WardiTV Map Contest Tou…
2 days
[ Show More ]
IPSL
3 days
WolFix vs nOmaD
dxtr13 vs Razz
BSL
3 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
WardiTV Map Contest Tou…
3 days
Ladder Legends
4 days
BSL
4 days
IPSL
4 days
JDConan vs TBD
Aegong vs rasowy
Replay Cast
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Wardi Open
4 days
Afreeca Starleague
4 days
Bisu vs Ample
Jaedong vs Flash
Monday Night Weeklies
5 days
RSL Revival
5 days
Afreeca Starleague
5 days
Barracks vs Leta
Royal vs Light
WardiTV Map Contest Tou…
5 days
RSL Revival
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-04-13
RSL Revival: Season 4
NationLESS Cup

Ongoing

BSL Season 22
ASL Season 21
CSL 2026 SPRING (S20)
IPSL Spring 2026
StarCraft2 Community Team League 2026 Spring
Nations Cup 2026
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Finals
ESL Pro League S23 Stage 1&2
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S2: W3
Acropolis #4
BSL 22 Non-Korean Championship
CSLAN 4
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
RSL Revival: Season 5
2026 GSL S1
WardiTV TLMC #16
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
CCT Season 3 Global Finals
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.