• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 16:49
CEST 22:49
KST 05:49
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 1 - Final Week6[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0
Community News
Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed14Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission extension3Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation17$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced7
StarCraft 2
General
Who will win EWC 2025? The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread Server Blocker Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll
Tourneys
FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series $5,100+ SEL Season 2 Championship (SC: Evo)
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome
Brood War
General
BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Flash Announces (and Retracts) Hiatus From ASL BW General Discussion Soulkey Muta Micro Map? [ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall
Tourneys
Starcraft Superstars Winner/Replays [Megathread] Daily Proleagues Cosmonarchy Pro Showmatches CSL Xiamen International Invitational
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile Nintendo Switch Thread CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project The PlayStation 5
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
We are Ready to Testify: Emergence Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! Korean Music Discussion [Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 591 users

Why so much Terran success in GSL? - Page 3

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 23 24 25 Next All
jeeneeus
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
1168 Posts
January 20 2011 11:02 GMT
#41
On January 20 2011 19:44 PraetorianX wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 20 2011 19:36 aznwolfstein wrote:
On January 20 2011 19:33 PraetorianX wrote:
The argument about player preference doesn't hold because protoss is the most played race, even in Masters league. Source:

http://www.sc2ranks.com/Stats/league/all/1/all

The argument about Terran being strong in the "early meta-game" and Protoss and Zerg players not being mature is just silly. Silly, silly.

Terran is clearly OP, specifically marauders, stimpack, mules and planetaries.


http://www.sc2ranks.com/Stats/league/kr/1/all

Not an overwhelming number but GSL is a Korean tournament and there are more terrans in masters.

I'd say terran strategies are just more refined right now.


Well, the Korean masters is 37% Terran and 35% Protoss, to be specific.

So the argument "More players pick T, so more T succeed" is faulty. Which is why it's strange that it has 24% of the votes, at the time of writing this.


OK, I guess you're never going to read my posts. I think it's preferable to use the top 200, as that is more indicative of the GSL caliber players. For the top 200, 41% are terrans. Of the top 20, 50% are terran. Of course the ladder isn't the greatest measure of the top players, as most of them practice with their team more.

I think the most important reason that terrans are doing so well is that there are just so many more great terran players. Here's a list of some of the greatest Korean players by race:

Zerg: Nestea, FruitDealer, IdrA

Protoss: MC, Genius, HongUn, Tester

Terran: BoxeR, Jinro, MarineKing, MVP, NaDa, Rainbow, Cliiiide

Obviously you could say that the reason there are so many good terran players is because terran is op, but I think these players would be really good regardless of race, as they all have really solid macro and micro.
Mercury-
Profile Joined December 2010
Great Britain804 Posts
January 20 2011 11:03 GMT
#42
[Gold League]Clearly it's because Terran is imba, I mean Marauders got stim and they have MULEs![/Gold League]
Deadlyfish
Profile Joined August 2010
Denmark1980 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-01-20 11:05:29
January 20 2011 11:04 GMT
#43
Better player playing terran. MVP, Jinro, MKP, Nada, Boxer. You could say that these players are good because of a race imbalance, but that would be silly. Zerg and protoss just dont have alot of really good people playing.

The third or fourth most sucessful protoss player is ChoyafOu, pretty sad : /

Zerg dont have alot of really good players either, atleast not compared to Terran.

Ofc maps also play a big role. But in EU and NA, terran isnt dominating like this, mainly because they distribution of good players is more even, if that makes sense.

I think it's pretty stupid to imply that Terran is imbalanced this much. Balance is almost perfect, the only problem is the maps.
If wishes were horses we'd be eating steak right now.
Tyree
Profile Joined November 2010
1508 Posts
January 20 2011 11:05 GMT
#44
As a Terran player, i voted that Terran is "OP". I hope no TL mods tackle me now for this and beat me with a banhammer =P

The OP part i feel is the early game against Protoss where we can kill them unless they do perfect forcefields. Against Zerg i feel things have evened out more, but i still say we have the upper hand, and we only get in trouble if we let Zerg macro up.

Late game against both i feel that Terran is lacking, we cant compete with Zerg macro late game, whereas a 200/200 Protoss army with Colossi and HTs is our worst nightmare, even perfect EMPs against Toss would barely make the playing field even.

I still think Blizzard has done a great job by giving Zerg a significant buff (Roach range) and recently buffed Phoenix and lowered the cost of Observers.

A slight nerf to early Terran aggression and a slight buff late game i feel would go a long way into making all the matchups better for everyone.
★ Top Gun ★
lastmotion
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
368 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-01-20 11:10:00
January 20 2011 11:05 GMT
#45
On January 20 2011 19:42 Gigaudas wrote:
Because Terran is overpowered. Blaming maps and saying that Terran is OP is pretty much the same thing as you can throw everything around by changing maps.

Terran has been overpowered since release and the only reason people aren't crying more about it is that lone Zergs won the first two GSL. The first GSL was still an indication that Terran was overpowered (Terran domination in the brackets) while the second GSL was during the few weeks in October that represent the only time that Terran didn't dominate. The same can be said about the foreign scene:

http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/sc2-international/individual-leagues

This was after a balance patch that Terran players needed a few weeks to figure out.

The last few weeks represent a change as well as European Protoss players have been doing very well.


exactly what i wanted to say. the entire sc2 community was complaining about Terran being OP and then few patches come that doesn't change the inherent problems like mule, PF, marauder and T supporters over-exaggerate what the patch did so people actually started to believe everything was balanced...and then over time, people are still curious why T is still dominating?

imo, nothing drastic changed. I have been praying to blizzard to nerf marauders since beta and the only thing that they do is make concussive shells a 50/50 tech. I say this and I USE marauders in all three matchups very often so it shows how serious it is

On January 20 2011 20:05 Tyree wrote:
A slight nerf to early Terran aggression and a slight buff late game i feel would go a long way into making all the matchups better for everyone.


this is how i feel too. take away from T's early game and give a slight buff to T's late game.
Nerfing Marauders = Hinder's T's early game
Give T a decent T3 unit that can be massed like Ultras (Thors is out of the question because they can be neural parasited)
Deadlyfish
Profile Joined August 2010
Denmark1980 Posts
January 20 2011 11:10 GMT
#46
On January 20 2011 20:05 lastmotion wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 20 2011 19:42 Gigaudas wrote:
Because Terran is overpowered. Blaming maps and saying that Terran is OP is pretty much the same thing as you can throw everything around by changing maps.

Terran has been overpowered since release and the only reason people aren't crying more about it is that lone Zergs won the first two GSL. The first GSL was still an indication that Terran was overpowered (Terran domination in the brackets) while the second GSL was during the few weeks in October that represent the only time that Terran didn't dominate. The same can be said about the foreign scene:

http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/sc2-international/individual-leagues

This was after a balance patch that Terran players needed a few weeks to figure out.

The last few weeks represent a change as well as European Protoss players have been doing very well.


exactly what i wanted to say. the entire sc2 community was complaining about Terran being OP and then few patches come that doesn't change the inherent problems like mule, PF, marauder and T supporters over-exaggerate what the patch did so people actually started to believe everything was balanced...and then over time, people are still curious why T is still dominating?

imo, nothing drastic changed. I have been praying to blizzard to nerf marauders since beta and the only thing that they do is make concussive shells a 50/50 tech. I say this and I USE marauders in all three matchups very often so it shows how serious it is

Show nested quote +
On January 20 2011 20:05 Tyree wrote:
A slight nerf to early Terran aggression and a slight buff late game i feel would go a long way into making all the matchups better for everyone.


this is how i feel too. take away from T's early game and give a slight buff to T's late game



I rarely use marauders, almost only against a roach Z. Marauders arent the problem. Actually terran imbalance isnt the problem. If there even is a problem, it has to be the maps.
If wishes were horses we'd be eating steak right now.
teamsolid
Profile Joined October 2007
Canada3668 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-01-20 11:14:00
January 20 2011 11:10 GMT
#47
On January 20 2011 20:02 jeeneeus wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 20 2011 19:44 PraetorianX wrote:
On January 20 2011 19:36 aznwolfstein wrote:
On January 20 2011 19:33 PraetorianX wrote:
The argument about player preference doesn't hold because protoss is the most played race, even in Masters league. Source:

http://www.sc2ranks.com/Stats/league/all/1/all

The argument about Terran being strong in the "early meta-game" and Protoss and Zerg players not being mature is just silly. Silly, silly.

Terran is clearly OP, specifically marauders, stimpack, mules and planetaries.


http://www.sc2ranks.com/Stats/league/kr/1/all

Not an overwhelming number but GSL is a Korean tournament and there are more terrans in masters.

I'd say terran strategies are just more refined right now.


Well, the Korean masters is 37% Terran and 35% Protoss, to be specific.

So the argument "More players pick T, so more T succeed" is faulty. Which is why it's strange that it has 24% of the votes, at the time of writing this.


OK, I guess you're never going to read my posts. I think it's preferable to use the top 200, as that is more indicative of the GSL caliber players. For the top 200, 41% are terrans. Of the top 20, 50% are terran. Of course the ladder isn't the greatest measure of the top players, as most of them practice with their team more.

I think the most important reason that terrans are doing so well is that there are just so many more great terran players. Here's a list of some of the greatest Korean players by race:

Zerg: Nestea, FruitDealer, IdrA

Protoss: MC, Genius, HongUn, Tester

Terran: BoxeR, Jinro, MarineKing, MVP, NaDa, Rainbow, Cliiiide

Obviously you could say that the reason there are so many good terran players is because terran is op, but I think these players would be really good regardless of race, as they all have really solid macro and micro.

You left out for Zerg: Zenio, Check, July and for Protoss: Sangho, InCa. Any of them would have a decent shot against any Terran on that list, except maybe MVP.
Chaosvuistje
Profile Joined April 2010
Netherlands2581 Posts
January 20 2011 11:12 GMT
#48
Most koreans picked terran because they heard it was the best race, after that stopped being the case mostly, they just sticked with terran. Thats why there are so many terrans.

The reason there are so many terrans in the ro8 and higher is mostly due to map imbalances. Jungle basin, steppes of war, delta quadrant, I mean really?
Moragon
Profile Joined October 2010
United States355 Posts
January 20 2011 11:14 GMT
#49
On January 20 2011 19:53 Phenny wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 20 2011 19:44 PraetorianX wrote:
On January 20 2011 19:36 aznwolfstein wrote:
On January 20 2011 19:33 PraetorianX wrote:
The argument about player preference doesn't hold because protoss is the most played race, even in Masters league. Source:

http://www.sc2ranks.com/stats/league/all/1/all

The argument about Terran being strong in the "early meta-game" and Protoss and Zerg players not being mature is just silly. Silly, silly.

Terran is clearly OP, specifically marauders, stimpack, mules and planetaries.


http://www.sc2ranks.com/stats/league/kr/1/all

Not an overwhelming number but GSL is a Korean tournament and there are more terrans in masters.

I'd say terran strategies are just more refined right now.


Well, the Korean masters is 37% Terran and 35% Protoss, to be specific.

So the argument "More players pick T, so more T succeed" is faulty. Which is why it's strange that it has 24% of the votes, at the time of writing this.


But we're talking about the gsl, so http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=170463 tells us;
Code S Race stats
14 Terran (43.75%)
9 Protoss
9 Zerg

and

Code A Race stats
13 Terran (40.6%)
10 Protoss
9 Zerg

Sure it shouldn't mean that 7/8 of Code S ro8 are Terran but still.


Those leagues were created from the players that did the best in previous seasons. In GSL season 1 protoss had the most players qualify, and didnt even make the semis. In GSL season 3 zerg had the most players qualify, and didnt even make the semis. The other races have plenty of players, they just cant beat terrans for the top spots.
KezseN
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
Singapore1450 Posts
January 20 2011 11:14 GMT
#50
Its the maps people, wait till a terran try an 2 rax scv All-in on maps like Aiur garden. Haha i wanna see how that works, a whole Zerg army will pop up by the time the Terran arrives at the ramp.
To Skeleton King: "Have you considered employment at Apple?"
idonthinksobro
Profile Joined December 2010
3138 Posts
January 20 2011 11:16 GMT
#51
id like to vote 3 of the options...
hitman133
Profile Joined October 2010
United States1425 Posts
January 20 2011 11:16 GMT
#52
Map, and stimpack is OP in my opinion
raidmaster
Profile Joined July 2010
474 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-01-20 11:18:04
January 20 2011 11:16 GMT
#53
Wow, lower skill required option in a poll is silly. I mean, sure Z has higher skill requirement, but Protoss is the easy race in Starcraft (least apm intensive, easy macro mechanics etc., something day9 said in one of his dailies). Second silly argument is about imbalance.
The reason why terran is dominant is because most of the better pros play terran. But you can see that good tosses and zergs still manage to win (MC, Whitera, Nestea). If you want to bring up the balance arguments - only zergs can complain, but only on maps like steppes and delta, still I would say the most imbalanced map in poll - Blistering Sands - is heavily zerg favoured.
freetgy
Profile Joined November 2010
1720 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-01-20 11:24:15
January 20 2011 11:17 GMT
#54
terran has the biggest comeback potential imho.

a medivac with 8 marines can do instane amout of economic dmg.
while terran can recover from economic damage way faster than the other races thanks to mules.

this gives terran in most cases an Edge in playing more risky (bringing scvs with attacks), but also more rewarding.
Also Terran has the most flexibel and easy to reach techtree, while still beeing low on cost.

having most cost efficient units also helps a ton.

don't think terran is op in generel,
(except Stimmed Marauders with Medivacs and consequtive shells! this is definitly imho)
They destroy buildings way faster than anything, cost to cost they are even better than fucking Immortals!

2 marauder
200/50 for 40dps on Armored
vs.
1 immortal
250/100 for ~ 34 dps on armored

since their techtree is so flexibel they can also "counter" the enemy composition pretty fast.

User was temp banned for this post.
FlamingTurd
Profile Joined April 2010
United States1059 Posts
January 20 2011 11:17 GMT
#55
Terran is simply OP and the Koreans just show this better. They have so many more viable strategies and are simply more powerful in so many situations. Over all this time it has been shown again and again. Simply look at all the stats for proof, it's not that difficult to understand. Up until now like 80% of all tournaments since beta have been won by Terran. Thread after thread has been created showing T domination in every category.

User was temp banned for this post.
Nerf MMMT!!! Liquid`Ret Hwaiting!!!
raidmaster
Profile Joined July 2010
474 Posts
January 20 2011 11:19 GMT
#56
On January 20 2011 20:17 FlamingTurd wrote:
Terran is simply OP and the Koreans just show this better. They have so many more viable strategies and are simply more powerful in so many situations. Over all this time it has been shown again and again. Simply look at all the stats for proof, it's not that difficult to understand. Up until now like 80% of all tournaments since beta have been won by Terran. Thread after thread has been created showing T domination in every category.


Rofl, you made my day.
Elwar
Profile Joined August 2010
953 Posts
January 20 2011 11:20 GMT
#57
On January 20 2011 20:19 raidmaster wrote:
Rofl, you made my day.

Last time I saw someone add up all known wins, what he wrote was correct.
ComTrav
Profile Joined April 2010
United States1093 Posts
January 20 2011 11:20 GMT
#58
On January 20 2011 20:10 Deadlyfish wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 20 2011 20:05 lastmotion wrote:
On January 20 2011 19:42 Gigaudas wrote:
Because Terran is overpowered. Blaming maps and saying that Terran is OP is pretty much the same thing as you can throw everything around by changing maps.

Terran has been overpowered since release and the only reason people aren't crying more about it is that lone Zergs won the first two GSL. The first GSL was still an indication that Terran was overpowered (Terran domination in the brackets) while the second GSL was during the few weeks in October that represent the only time that Terran didn't dominate. The same can be said about the foreign scene:

http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/sc2-international/individual-leagues

This was after a balance patch that Terran players needed a few weeks to figure out.

The last few weeks represent a change as well as European Protoss players have been doing very well.


exactly what i wanted to say. the entire sc2 community was complaining about Terran being OP and then few patches come that doesn't change the inherent problems like mule, PF, marauder and T supporters over-exaggerate what the patch did so people actually started to believe everything was balanced...and then over time, people are still curious why T is still dominating?

imo, nothing drastic changed. I have been praying to blizzard to nerf marauders since beta and the only thing that they do is make concussive shells a 50/50 tech. I say this and I USE marauders in all three matchups very often so it shows how serious it is

On January 20 2011 20:05 Tyree wrote:
A slight nerf to early Terran aggression and a slight buff late game i feel would go a long way into making all the matchups better for everyone.


this is how i feel too. take away from T's early game and give a slight buff to T's late game



I rarely use marauders, almost only against a roach Z. Marauders arent the problem. Actually terran imbalance isnt the problem. If there even is a problem, it has to be the maps.


People have been asking for Marauder nerfs since the very start of the beta. Lots of other things have been nerfed since then, but the Marauder has gotten off pretty easily (50/50 conc shells; I'm trying to remember if this was the same patch Stim was made much cheaper.)

At this point, they've nerfed lots of other things, I almost feel like they're balancing around the Marauder.
jeeneeus
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
1168 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-01-20 11:25:26
January 20 2011 11:20 GMT
#59
On January 20 2011 20:10 teamsolid wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 20 2011 20:02 jeeneeus wrote:

I think the most important reason that terrans are doing so well is that there are just so many more great terran players. Here's a list of some of the greatest Korean players by race:

Zerg: Nestea, FruitDealer, IdrA

Protoss: MC, Genius, HongUn, Tester

Terran: BoxeR, Jinro, MarineKing, MVP, NaDa, Rainbow, Cliiiide

Obviously you could say that the reason there are so many good terran players is because terran is op, but I think these players would be really good regardless of race, as they all have really solid macro and micro.

You left out for Zerg: Zenio, Check, July and for Protoss: Sangho, InCa. Any of them would have a decent shot against any Terran on that list, except maybe MVP.


Those guys aren't the cream of the crop. If you're gonna include those players, then for terran you can add Top, Ensnare, Maka, Hyperdub, Rain (super iffy but he did get second in GSL 3), TheSTC (Although, he never got to play GSL because of the army thing, he's still one of my favorite players). Probably also add Leenock for zerg.

Edit: Choya for protoss I guess.
CryMeAReaper
Profile Joined November 2010
Denmark1135 Posts
January 20 2011 11:24 GMT
#60
this thread is incredibly stupid. it will only draw balance whiners, as seen, and u shouldve thought of that >.<

i might aswell give my 2 cents when im in here. i think its maps+ alot of terrans wins (most el oh el) are early/mid game wins, because of their easily massed and cost efficient bio. maybe z/p need to refine their expansion timings more, and figure out Ts timings to handle it, or nerf terran early/buff late, as our "cost efficient" units (aka only shit that works consistently) melts late game normally.
(>*-*)><( *-* )><(*-*<) DoDTimber on Bnet
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 23 24 25 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 13h 12m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
ZombieGrub316
Hui .190
UpATreeSC 153
Nathanias 130
JuggernautJason43
ForJumy 10
StarCraft: Brood War
Larva 956
ZZZero.O 140
scan(afreeca) 114
Aegong 79
Stormgate
NightEnD20
Dota 2
syndereN725
NeuroSwarm94
League of Legends
Grubby4947
Trikslyr63
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K768
flusha632
byalli342
oskar337
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu502
Other Games
FrodaN2780
tarik_tv2404
summit1g1789
Beastyqt641
B2W.Neo596
ToD317
C9.Mang0151
Skadoodle95
Sick43
PPMD39
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick2581
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 17 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• davetesta16
• LUISG 7
• Kozan
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Migwel
• intothetv
• IndyKCrew
StarCraft: Brood War
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota21760
• Ler52
League of Legends
• TFBlade953
Counter-Strike
• Shiphtur245
Other Games
• imaqtpie2256
Upcoming Events
CranKy Ducklings
13h 12m
Epic.LAN
15h 12m
CSO Contender
20h 12m
Sparkling Tuna Cup
1d 13h
Online Event
1d 19h
Esports World Cup
3 days
ByuN vs Astrea
Lambo vs HeRoMaRinE
Clem vs TBD
Solar vs Zoun
SHIN vs Reynor
Maru vs TriGGeR
herO vs Lancer
Cure vs ShoWTimE
Esports World Cup
4 days
Esports World Cup
5 days
Esports World Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

JPL Season 2
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

BSL 2v2 Season 3
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
CSL Xiamen Invitational
CSL Xiamen Invitational: ShowMatche
Championship of Russia 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
Underdog Cup #2
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.