• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 06:00
CET 12:00
KST 20:00
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Finals Preview: Sweet Victory!12[ASL22] Ro4 Preview: Mirror Mirror6[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: Within Reach5[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: In A Tizzy11[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Holy Diver5
Community News
[BSL23] RO16 Group Stage14Weekly Cups (Nov 2-8): herO back on top?2Weekly Cups (Oct 26 - Nov 1): MaxPax, herO, Solar win0Weekly Cups (October 19-25): Clem triples first in 5.0.175Evil Geniuses - shutting down23
StarCraft 2
General
Serral's getting trashed by New Catsle's Mind Weekly Cups (Nov 2-8): herO back on top? Liquibets sc2 season 30 No more SC2 streamers on team liquid? StarCraft open world shooter announced at BlizzCon
Tourneys
soO & FanTaSy return! SC2 Kevin Scrim 4v4 (Nov 16) RSL goes to London! 2026 Offline Finals Nov 21-22 Tasteless Time Warp: SC Evo Showmatch (May 25) Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament iNu's Battles #22
Strategy
[H] ZvP Mid-Late Game: Stalkers Collossi HT
Custom Maps
Starcraft 2 Advance [G] How to playtest arcade maps [D] the control group Simple Questions/Answers
External Content
The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 551 Robotic Revival Mutation # 550 Graveyard Shift Mutation # 549 Endless Sparkles
Brood War
General
List of top players active on ShieldBattery BW General Discussion [BSL23] RO16 Group Stage screpdb: new Starcraft reporting tool [BW] Looking for Clan Thread!
Tourneys
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 4 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL23] Ro16 Group C - Sunday 21:00 CET [BSL23] Ro16 Group A - Saturday 21:00 CET
Strategy
Infested Terran strategies in 2026 Nuke strategy worked in K-League 2026-11-09 50,000-Word Terran Builds Memo 2026-10-22 Cliff Jump Revisited (1 in a 1000 strategy)
Other Games
General Games
List of Game Threads The PlayStation 5 Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile
Dota 2
Dota 2 Champions League Season 3 Begins April 25!
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Trading/Investing Thread Dating: How's your luck? US Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
Fan Club Resource Thread Reynor Fan Club The Flash Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
The time I organised my…
AssyrianKing
Why I built Repalyzer (1.1.…
BlueStar
Innovate or Game Over?
TrAiDoS
ShieldBattery on Mac
Kraekkling
[ASL22] Ro4 Day1 Ticket Giv…
bITt.mAN
Can Bots Beat Pros?? Starcr…
namkraft
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 14750 users

Scans need separate energy - Page 2

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next All
AsianEcksDragon
Profile Joined March 2008
United States1036 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-03-12 22:01:12
March 12 2010 21:59 GMT
#21
I don't see a problem with it. Just scan when you need to. Intel is much more important than a few seconds of boosted economy. It's not like you'll mine any gas with mules so you'll either be making a lot of marines or just end up bottle necking yourself. Besides, you are not losing anything in the long run. Unless you use those extra minerals mined by mule to do a timing push and expand, you'll just mine out faster.
神は乗り越えられる試練しか与えない
0neder
Profile Joined July 2009
United States3733 Posts
March 12 2010 22:05 GMT
#22
Maybe, just maybe, you don't need mules as much as you've been brainwashed to think only of econ.
Eiii
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
United States2566 Posts
March 12 2010 22:06 GMT
#23
First people complain that every race is too similar, then they complain when some races can do things that others can't... :/
:3
TheYango
Profile Joined September 2008
United States47024 Posts
March 12 2010 22:09 GMT
#24
On March 13 2010 07:05 0neder wrote:
Maybe, just maybe, you don't need mules as much as you've been brainwashed to think only of econ.

Do you have another proposal as to how to counter the fact that Protoss and Zerg inherently produce more workers by means of their macro mechanics? Or some proof that Terran units are more cost-effective?
Moderator
Icx
Profile Blog Joined November 2009
Belgium853 Posts
March 12 2010 22:10 GMT
#25
People just like to compare it to Protoss.

Let's say you scan almost everytime to get scouting information etc.
What did you gain from the macro-mechanic? nothing, because the ability already was in sc1.

While at the same time protoss is just chronoboosting away for no drawback.

Imagine that as protoss chronoboost would say this "everytime chronoboost is active your observers don't give sight and have no detection".

Ofcourse it's a bit wrong to compare it like that, but in general, that's a bit how the terran macromechanic feels like.
love1another
Profile Blog Joined December 2009
United States1844 Posts
March 12 2010 22:10 GMT
#26
It seems like a scan shouldn't cost more than an observer, and the way it is now, the opportunity cost in foregone mules is just too high.
"I'm learning more and more that TL isn't the place to go for advice outside of anything you need in college. It's like you guys just make up your own fantasy world shit and post it as if you've done it." - Chill
Juicyfruit
Profile Joined May 2008
Canada5484 Posts
March 12 2010 22:14 GMT
#27
The problem is, right now scans cost you one MULE and thus 270minerals no matter what because by the time one MULE is done, you only have the energy to call in another one. Imo, if the energy regen of the terran`s CC were boosted by a little bit, such that it regens... say 70 energy every 90 seconds instead of the 55 or so that it does now, then things would work out. That way, after every 3 or so MULE calls, you`ll have the energy left to perform a free scan. Or, if you need additional scans before that, only then do you sacrifice econ.
Jonoman92
Profile Blog Joined September 2006
United States9111 Posts
March 12 2010 22:14 GMT
#28
It might be nice to have the orbital command the option of building a 50min/50gas scanner similiar to how it was in sc1.
Simple
Profile Blog Joined February 2009
United States801 Posts
March 12 2010 22:15 GMT
#29
or give scan to sensor towers. i dont see them used often anyway
Scorch
Profile Blog Joined March 2008
Austria3371 Posts
March 12 2010 22:17 GMT
#30
I think the problem is that the macro mechanics are too powerful in comparison with scan. If a scan costs 270 minerals, something isn't quite right. Having to make a choice is great, but deciding against MULE puts you back too much.

Make scan cost only ~35 energy? Move scan to the sensor tower?
Comeh
Profile Blog Joined July 2008
United States18919 Posts
March 12 2010 22:23 GMT
#31
On March 13 2010 07:17 Scorch wrote:
I think the problem is that the macro mechanics are too powerful in comparison with scan. If a scan costs 270 minerals, something isn't quite right. Having to make a choice is great, but deciding against MULE puts you back too much.

Make scan cost only ~35 energy? Move scan to the sensor tower?

Perhaps movign the scan to the sensor tower might do something - but you also need to make sure its still balanced/costs a decent amount - after all, scanning anywhere on the map at any time IS a very powerful ability. Starcraft limited this by making it expensive in the original - you need to have a CC to get scan. Maybe make individual sensor towers upgradeable to a scanning tower for a certain (somewhat high) amount of minerals, and once you do that it just acts as a scanner in sc1 would.
ヽ(⌐■_■)ノヽ(⌐■_■)ノヽ(⌐■_■)ノヽ(⌐■_■)ノヽ(⌐■_■)ノヽ(⌐■_■)ノDELETE ICEFROGヽ(⌐■_■)ノヽ(⌐■_■)ノヽ(⌐■_■)ノヽ(⌐■_■)ノヽ(⌐■_■)ノヽ(⌐■_■)ノヽ(
Ryhn
Profile Joined February 2010
United States509 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-03-12 22:40:06
March 12 2010 22:33 GMT
#32
On March 13 2010 07:14 Juicyfruit wrote:
The problem is, right now scans cost you one MULE and thus 270minerals no matter what because by the time one MULE is done, you only have the energy to call in another one. Imo, if the energy regen of the terran`s CC were boosted by a little bit, such that it regens... say 70 energy every 90 seconds instead of the 55 or so that it does now, then things would work out. That way, after every 3 or so MULE calls, you`ll have the energy left to perform a free scan. Or, if you need additional scans before that, only then do you sacrifice econ.


While you have your heart in the right place, this solution just leads us straight back to the original problem.

With the extra energy everyone would just get one extra MULE to boost their economy instead of taking their "free scan" -- because it wouldn't actually be free.

Maybe if Terran had an arbitrary limit to how many MULEs they could call in a time frame your solution would work. But even then they might just wait for their timer to cooldown and call in multiple MULEs at once.

At this point the timer becomes the current problem spawned by my solution, so we could try making the calculation dynamic. Instead of [X] MULEs every [Y] Seconds, Blizzard could figure out a function that calculates how much additional income from MULEs you've gathered at any given point, and cap -that- number by denying a MULE drop when it's econ boost would push you over your income limit.

Unfortunately, from this solution we have yet another problem. The design is becoming too implicitly complicated. The solution is quickly spiraling into obscure hidden rules. This isn't very intuitive and would constitute poor game design.

It does not seem to be an easy problem to fix.
Famous Books Written by Progamers - "Clam: Mastering your other self"
imperator-xy
Profile Blog Joined March 2009
Germany1377 Posts
March 12 2010 22:33 GMT
#33
i think what should be changed is the mule. putting the scan into another building or making a seperated countdown wouldnt be good as mule and scan would just become no-think-mechanics then.
you should not always be able to use it but rather think about when or where to use it.
iounas
Profile Joined July 2008
409 Posts
March 12 2010 22:38 GMT
#34
Make mule give 100 min.. Cant complain about expensive scan then..
IdrA: stalkers actually do negative damage. when you shoot a marine with a stalker it gains health.
Irrelevant
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
United States2364 Posts
March 12 2010 22:42 GMT
#35
I like how it is, it's a tactical choice of either getting the eco boost from mule or saving it for a scan, having both would just remove another level of tactics.
Slunk
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Germany768 Posts
March 12 2010 22:46 GMT
#36
Why should terran get free minerals AND free maphack?
404.Delirium
Profile Joined May 2008
United States1190 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-03-12 22:47:52
March 12 2010 22:47 GMT
#37
The only reason there's complaints with scanning being so expensive is because MULE's are SO valuable. 50 energy for, what was it, 260ish minerals? Two Chrono's will give use an extra 2 probes in the same time as 4, but still cost the same.

Just learn to balance your MULE's and scans as far as I'm concerned. I felt it kind of silly to be this big of an issue.

Edit: What I'm getting at is after a few mules you've more than surpassed the Protoss in economy gains via 'spell' so you can invest in a scan if you so need to.
seriously next disrespectful comment in this blog is ip ban. Be happy or get the hell out. // SC2 is like playing with neutral-colored Play-Doh while BW is like colorful Legos.
Juicyfruit
Profile Joined May 2008
Canada5484 Posts
March 12 2010 22:47 GMT
#38
On March 13 2010 07:33 Ryhn wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 13 2010 07:14 Juicyfruit wrote:
The problem is, right now scans cost you one MULE and thus 270minerals no matter what because by the time one MULE is done, you only have the energy to call in another one. Imo, if the energy regen of the terran`s CC were boosted by a little bit, such that it regens... say 70 energy every 90 seconds instead of the 55 or so that it does now, then things would work out. That way, after every 3 or so MULE calls, you`ll have the energy left to perform a free scan. Or, if you need additional scans before that, only then do you sacrifice econ.


While you have your heart in the right place, this solution just leads us straight back to the original problem.

With the extra energy everyone would just get one extra MULE to boost their economy instead of taking their "free scan" -- because it wouldn't actually be free.

Maybe if Terran had an arbitrary limit to how many MULEs they could call in a time frame your solution would work. But even then they might just wait for their timer to cooldown and call in multiple MULEs at once.

At this point the timer becomes the current problem spawned by my solution, so we could try making the calculation dynamic. Instead of [X] MULEs every [Y] Seconds, Blizzard could figure out a function that calculates how much additional income from MULEs you've gathered at any given point, and cap -that- number by denying a MULE drop when it's econ boost would push you over your income limit.

Unfortunately, from this solution we have yet another problem. The design is becoming too implicitly complicated. The solution is quickly spiraling into obscure hidden rules. This isn't very intuitive and would constitute poor game design.

It does not seem to be an easy problem to fix.


Hmm, I thought you were limited to 1 mule per CC anyways, but maybe it's just because right now, you only have the energy to call in a new mule once your old one expires.

Then just limit it to 1 mule per CC concurrently, and boost the energy regen.
TheHof
Profile Joined March 2010
United States92 Posts
March 12 2010 22:47 GMT
#39
Personally, I love the mechanics as they are. I love that I can forget about mules for too long and call down two at once. I find the tradeoff interesting strategically, and don't really feel like if I don't use constant mules I'm screwed over, and I don't feel free to spam comsat which means it's another interesting choice to make.
"It's so nerve wracking, I'm just crossing my fingers and sayin' c'mooon esports"-Day[9]
Icx
Profile Blog Joined November 2009
Belgium853 Posts
March 12 2010 22:50 GMT
#40
On March 13 2010 07:46 Slunk wrote:
Why should terran get free minerals AND free maphack?


Why should protoss get a free chronoboost with no drawbacks and permanent maphack obs all over the map?

(just showing how stupid your point is, since every race has his own way of gathering intell, but terran is the only race that can't use it if they use their macromechanic)
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
KCM Race Survival
19:00
Season 4 Week 5
Kim Chul Min (afreeca) 1206
LiquipediaDiscussion
The PondCast
19:00
Episode 117
CranKy Ducklings27
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Lowko314
OGKoka 189
ProTech180
StarCraft: Brood War
Rain 2131
Jaedong 494
Mini 392
Soulkey 233
EffOrt 215
Light 185
firebathero 171
Larva 149
Snow 149
ZerO 143
[ Show more ]
Rush 113
Last 109
Pusan 86
Stork 83
Hyun 76
Killer 60
Barracks 58
ToSsGirL 29
Shinee 22
soO 21
Shine 18
Hm[arnc] 17
sorry 17
Aegong 15
Noble 14
Movie 12
Terrorterran 11
Dota 2
monkeys_forever415
League of Legends
JimRising 334
Reynor95
Counter-Strike
fl0m3171
olofmeister824
shoxiejesuss420
allub270
kRYSTAL_12
Other Games
summit1g10164
XaKoH 215
crisheroes212
B2W.Neo147
Mew2King126
dupreeh109
syndereN84
ViBE59
Organizations
StarCraft 2
angryscii 13
StarCraft: Brood War
lovetv 7
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• CranKy Ducklings SOOP10
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• iopq 8
• ChaeLyn 5
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• WagamamaTV278
League of Legends
• Jankos1491
• Stunt652
Upcoming Events
WardiTV Invitational
1h
Lambo vs Shameless
Rogue vs uThermal
Percival vs YoungYakov
TBD vs GgMaChine
OSC
5h
OSC
12h
ArT vs MindelVK
MiniZergUA vs TBD
Shameless vs TBD
Ultimate Battle
1d 1h
OSC
1d 3h
OSC
1d 12h
ByuN vs MaxPax
herO vs Krystianer
Percival vs Shameless
LetaleX vs YoungYakov
Nicoract vs Gerald
GgMaChine vs ArT
CranKy Ducklings
1d 23h
WardiTV Invitational
2 days
IPSL
2 days
TerrOr vs IJ_Terran
rasowy vs Hazorath
BSL
2 days
TerrOr vs OyAji
UltrA vs Gosudark
[ Show More ]
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
WardiTV Invitational
3 days
IPSL
3 days
Art_Of_Turtle vs KameZerg
Radley vs George
BSL
3 days
Artosis vs Dewalt
Ret vs Tech
WardiTV Weekly
4 days
PiGosaur Cup
5 days
The PondCast
5 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-11-11
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
HCC Season 3

Ongoing

Acropolis #5
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 4
International ShieldBattery League
Individual League
BSL Season 23
IPSL Winter 2026-27
Calamity Cup Div. A Season 8
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
IEM Beijing 2026
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
1win Private Club #2
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026

Upcoming

YSL S4
Sector 591
SC4ALL II: Brood War
BSL 23: Non-Korean Championship
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
StarCraft2 Weekly Open Tournament 2026 Grand Finals
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
Underdog Cup 2026 Div 2-3
PGL Bucharest 2027
BLAST Bounty Winter 2027
PGL Major Singapore 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 6
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.