| Forum Index > Brood War Tournaments |
|
chrisolo
Germany2614 Posts
But I'd like to apply for D or at least D+ skill level. I have roughly played 60 or 70 1on1 in the past 3 years (including like 20 or 30 DRTL/CRTL games). Yes I have hit C-, but I am really noobish. Especially playing all 3 races and all 9 matchups. So please re-evaluate my ranking to D or D+. Thank you. | ||
|
DarkNetHunter
1224 Posts
On November 19 2014 17:49 chrisolo wrote: So I'd like to take what I can get (even if it is ridiculous to ban random in a fun tournament, you all take this WAAAAY to serious. Like really?). I wanna play "Random and tell" and I am fine with my matchup being annonymous, so I do not know my opponent race until just before the match, too. But I'd like to apply for D or at least D+ skill level. I have roughly played 60 or 70 1on1 in the past 3 years (including like 20 or 30 DRTL/CRTL games). Yes I have hit C-, but I am really noobish. Especially playing all 3 races and all 9 matchups. So please re-evaluate my ranking to D or D+. Thank you. Despite being on the same team, I disagree with this second proposal, first one is up to Lmaster, but no specific practice kind of defeats the purpose of prep leagues. You want to be both random and to have easier opponents (where playing random will be a greater advantage), for a fun league you care a lot about winning in that case. | ||
|
Qikz
United Kingdom12071 Posts
On October 22 2014 02:47 Dazed_Spy wrote: I dont like the idea of segregating competition any more than necessary. Why should worse players be coddled? As long as their isnt any overwhelming amount of c- players in pool as a whole, D players will primarily be meeting other D rank players. But that shouldnt mean they dont run the risk of getting curb stomped, or perhaps even rise to the occasion and beat someone whos 'better'. Finding myself on both sides of the fence it's both not fun being owned and not fun owning people so hard. It's much more entertaining to play somewhat close games which is hopefully what this will end up doing. | ||
|
chrisolo
Germany2614 Posts
On November 19 2014 21:32 DarkNetHunter wrote: Despite being on the same team, I disagree with this second proposal, first one is up to Lmaster, but no specific practice kind of defeats the purpose of prep leagues. You want to be both random and to have easier opponents (where playing random will be a greater advantage), for a fun league you care a lot about winning in that case. lol, if I would care about winning I would not choose to take the massive disadvantage of playing random. Really most of the people here complaining about random, never played random themselves. Its a massive addition of knowledge you need to understand 9 matchups instead of 3. If I would care about winning, I would play Protoss only (easy race). I am only asking to re-evaluate my ranking, as I just play some matches yesterday and saw that I suck hard. I do not mind playing in the C- class, as I will have my fun, but I just wanted to say that I am definitly not C- anymore and thus might lower the fun part for the C- players having literally zero competition. | ||
|
Dazed.
Canada3301 Posts
On November 19 2014 22:07 Qikz wrote: Replying to a really old post, bro. ^_^Finding myself on both sides of the fence it's both not fun being owned and not fun owning people so hard. It's much more entertaining to play somewhat close games which is hopefully what this will end up doing. | ||
|
SynC[gm]
United States3127 Posts
| ||
|
Sentenal
United States12398 Posts
Also, in light of: On November 19 2014 14:07 Snipinpanda wrote: So I've technically never hit C, though if you want to consider my rank as that, then whatever. I've also have not been active over the past two years. Panda never hit C, much less C+, and has been inactive for a long time, same as many people in this league. I think allowing Panda as a C- player should be fine, especially seeing as you are allowing other former C Rank players into the league. | ||
|
Artanis[Xp]
Netherlands12973 Posts
On November 19 2014 12:40 L_Master wrote: It's a little different than the way you read it. Each week uses one map for all seven games. I'd be strongly against one map per week. Not only does it reduce the strategy involved on picking the lineup, it'd also be incredibly boring to see the same map played out 4-7 times in a cast. If multiple clanwars are casted on the same day, you could see the same map up to 14 times. | ||
|
chrisolo
Germany2614 Posts
On November 20 2014 23:25 Artanis[Xp] wrote: I'd be strongly against one map per week. Not only does it reduce the strategy involved on picking the lineup, it'd also be incredibly boring to see the same map played out 4-7 times in a cast. If multiple clanwars are casted on the same day, you could see the same map up to 14 times. You know, it works massively in MOBAs! Maybe it would help BW to shine again! Who needs diversity anyways??? | ||
|
art_of_turtle
United States1210 Posts
| ||
|
Biolunar
Germany224 Posts
| ||
|
Psyonic_Reaver
United States4343 Posts
On November 20 2014 13:41 Sentenal wrote: Lmaster, I want to add Caller (T) to our team. He hasn't played since before SC2 came out, and was "barely 3000" then. IMO he sucks and should be a D or D+. Is this he same caller that talked a lot of shit about how good he was at BW, got called out by Chill and had his ass handed to him? | ||
|
pebble444
Italy2503 Posts
On November 21 2014 02:00 Biolunar wrote: Question: Are the matches still played at 20:00 CEST (+02:00h)? Because we are now back in winter time (CET) which is +01:00h. We are playing in two days from this post Saturday, Nov 22 6:00pm GMT (GMT+00:00) | ||
|
Biolunar
Germany224 Posts
On November 21 2014 06:10 pebble444 wrote: We are playing in two days from this post Saturday, Nov 22 6:00pm GMT (GMT+00:00) OP should be updated if that is the case. | ||
|
Sentenal
United States12398 Posts
On November 21 2014 06:10 Psyonic_Reaver wrote: Is this he same caller that talked a lot of shit about how good he was at BW, got called out by Chill and had his ass handed to him? Uhhh, I don't recall that... Hes not Combat-ex if thats what you are thinking of | ||
|
Caller
Poland8075 Posts
On November 21 2014 06:10 Psyonic_Reaver wrote: Is this he same caller that talked a lot of shit about how good he was at BW, got called out by Chill and had his ass handed to him? no it was that fucking go*k ezreal | ||
|
Qikz
United Kingdom12071 Posts
On November 20 2014 04:40 Dazed_Spy wrote: Replying to a really old post, bro. ^_^ I have no idea how that happened. | ||
|
Psyonic_Reaver
United States4343 Posts
On November 21 2014 06:59 Sentenal wrote: Uhhh, I don't recall that... Hes not Combat-ex if thats what you are thinking of THAT'S who it was. On November 21 2014 07:05 Caller wrote: no it was that fucking go*k ezreal Aw yeah. #1 Ezreal. Pew pew. #1 Cho'gath too. Now I remember you. | ||
|
L_Master
United States8017 Posts
On November 19 2014 14:07 Snipinpanda wrote: So I've technically never hit C, though if you want to consider my rank as that, then whatever. I've also have not been active over the past two years. Come on man, don't give me the passive aggressive stuff. The explanation is good enough. I don't see any reason not to take you at your word, and you're a longstanding TL member so I'm okay with you playing. On November 19 2014 17:49 chrisolo wrote: So I'd like to take what I can get (even if it is ridiculous to ban random in a fun tournament, you all take this WAAAAY to serious. Like really?). I wanna play "Random and tell" and I am fine with my matchup being annonymous, so I do not know my opponent race until just before the match, too. But I'd like to apply for D or at least D+ skill level. I have roughly played 60 or 70 1on1 in the past 3 years (including like 20 or 30 DRTL/CRTL games). Yes I have hit C-, but I am really noobish. Especially playing all 3 races and all 9 matchups. So please re-evaluate my ranking to D or D+. Thank you. Sure, I'm okay with that. If you seem to strong, like any of the others, that may be adjusted. On November 20 2014 13:41 Sentenal wrote: Lmaster, I want to add Caller (T) to our team. He hasn't played since before SC2 came out, and was "barely 3000" then. IMO he sucks and should be a D or D+. Also, in light of: Panda never hit C, much less C+, and has been inactive for a long time, same as many people in this league. I think allowing Panda as a C- player should be fine, especially seeing as you are allowing other former C Rank players into the league. Caller confirmed at D+. Could be amended either direction depending on just how he looks. On November 20 2014 23:25 Artanis[Xp] wrote: I'd be strongly against one map per week. Not only does it reduce the strategy involved on picking the lineup, it'd also be incredibly boring to see the same map played out 4-7 times in a cast. If multiple clanwars are casted on the same day, you could see the same map up to 14 times. Agreed in principle, however this is a short "quasi-competitive" mini-pilot league. For ease of facilitation and practicing for newer players maps will remain as is. Rest assured if this goes reasonably well and a full length league is held one map for all matchups will not be the modus operandi for that league. On November 21 2014 01:39 art_of_turtle wrote: Are we starting this week or next? Also Saturday or Sunday Saturday. This week. | ||
|
Sentenal
United States12398 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + Prophecy_ (P) C- Sentenal (P) C- rlentless (T) C- Nagisama (T) D+ KazeHydra (P) D Sniper Terran (T) C- tonight (P) C- RedAxis (T) C- ilikestarcraft (Z) D+ ghrur (Z) C- Ryuhou (Z) D Caller (T) D+ Snipinpanda (T) C- | ||
| ||
|
|
Patches Events
PiGosaur Cup
Kung Fu Cup
Replay Cast
The PondCast
KCM Race Survival
OSC
IntoTheTV X SOOP
Reynor vs Solar
ByuN vs SHIN
Clem vs MaxPax
herO vs Rogue
WardiTV Invitational
IPSL
WorsT vs nOmaD
Dewalt vs andersOn
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
