I remember back in 2005 and 2006 that gosugamers.net's news used to have interviews and articles about Testie. I remember him being my hero. I thought how cool it was that he could play random and still be one of the best players. Testie and Mondragon were close friends and Testie's skill was so high he was as good as like another Mondragon.
Anyone remember what Testie's best race of Zerg Terran Protoss was? I think Testie was a racepicker that played ZvP TvZ and PvT in important matches. He tried to play the matchups where one race is a little advantaged over the other.
I put this in the strategy forum because I figured we'd talk about how he played strategically.
I recently watched some game of Avernum (when he was in ToT) vs Testie TvP and I nearly got cancer from watching it. xD It's funny how these top performers of these days looked like current C- players.
It's hard to pick a best race. you can pick a best MU however. I think traditionally for foreigners PVT is the matchup where they are most comfortable therefore I would say PVT...
edit; but then I think I started following BW after his prime so dunno..
And if we're gonna talk about foreigner PvT I'd like to mention G5 and Nony.
Even though they came a bit after Testie, I think G5 may have had the best foreigner PvT at one point. And Nony was so good at one point he was complimented when he was in Korea as "the best foreigner they have seen (in recent times)". Unfortunately they added some comment afterwards that he still had a lot of flaws to fix. I'm really freebasing from memory here from years and years ago so the exact words may have been quite different but I'm positive it was something to that effect. It may have even been his team coach in Korea who said that.
But I agree PvT may have been the best foreigner match-up. And yeah, by the time I actually got into brood war and the pro scene (foreign and korean) I never saw Testie play much random. He mostly race picked P against important/strong opponents. If anyone wants to correct me on these details feel free cause it has been almost 10 years ago since this stuff and I'm not basing this off anything but the squiggly entrails in my head. But don't correct me on G5 having the best PvT at one point cause I don't need to be corrected on that.
On January 30 2017 22:52 SCC-Faust wrote: And if we're gonna talk about foreigner PvT I'd like to mention G5 and Nony.
Even though they came a bit after Testie, I think G5 may have had the best foreigner PvT at one point. And Nony was so good at one point he was complimented when he was in Korea as "the best foreigner they have seen (in recent times)". Unfortunately they added some comment afterwards that he still had a lot of flaws to fix. I'm really freebasing from memory here from years and years ago so the exact words may have been quite different but I'm positive it was something to that effect. It may have even been his team coach in Korea who said that.
But I agree PvT may have been the best foreigner match-up. And yeah, by the time I actually got into brood war and the pro scene (foreign and korean) I never saw Testie play much random. He mostly race picked P against important/strong opponents. If anyone wants to correct me on these details feel free cause it has been almost 10 years ago since this stuff and I'm not basing this off anything but the squiggly entrails in my head. But don't correct me on G5 having the best PvT at one point cause I don't need to be corrected on that.
True that, always loved and followed G5 for some reason.
On January 31 2017 04:06 MuNi wrote: Yeah man. Nony almost won the courage tournament back in the day. I think he got second place which is inssaaaaannnnee.
Draco was pretty good too, i remember watching his practise replay pack from his progaming days.
I recently watched some game of Avernum (when he was in ToT) vs Testie TvP and I nearly got cancer from watching it. xD It's funny how these top performers of these days looked like current C- players.
I had trouble understanding if you meant the 2017 players look C- nowadays or if the 2006 players looked C- in the replays?
I'd like to second the sentiment on how good G5 was at PvT.
His bulldog was so strong that he even beat Sea[Shield] once during some friendly matches during... 2008/2009 I want to say. Sea was throwing all the EG guys around easily but first game G5 just ended the game in less than 7 mintues with his bulldog.
Sea demanded a Bo3 and didn't drop another game but they were VERY epic. I was going to commentate them and put them on youtube but Sea said he was doing this as a courtesy and to not release the replays as it would hurt his image/trust in wanting to play with the EG guys more. Nony and Idra also played some good games against him too but I'll always remember that G5 bulldog game.
Good times.
In fact. This video I made back in May of 2009 when I introduce G5 is a small nod toward that game he played.
G5 would play amazing online games but I think he would get a little nervous at LANs. One time he beat Machine PvZ on... Python I think laying down in a hammock playing 1 handed (so he claimed but G5 was never the type to boast or brag or lie). Machine got SO angry he logged off for a few hours.
I recently watched some game of Avernum (when he was in ToT) vs Testie TvP and I nearly got cancer from watching it. xD It's funny how these top performers of these days looked like current C- players.
I had trouble understanding if you meant the 2017 players look C- nowadays or if the 2006 players looked C- in the replays?
He meant the 2006 players look like current C- players
Couple games vs. Tasteless, TT1 etc on iCCup. Judging that he's tuning in for first time since ten years he knows what to do and plays overall good, he managed to take down some games. He's playing Dota/LoL nowadays. Let's tune for his next stream and shoutout on his chat that we want him play BW again.
pvt is the easiast mu no wonder it was best for alot of foriegnners. it was my best and i didnt even play protoss really. as in easiest to master not the easiest matchup
The idea that any match up is easiest to master is absurd. The best and most perfect elements of BW are that in which it is a game that is impossible to master. Also, everyone has their strengths. One could say Bisu "mastered" pvz and that his pvt leaves something to be desired compared to that of Stork or Reach. Every person has the ability to play their best under a myriad of circumstances, but to master a match up or BW in general is another story.
On February 12 2017 15:09 MuNi wrote: The idea that any match up is easiest to master is absurd. The best and most perfect elements of BW are that in which it is a game that is impossible to master. Also, everyone has their strengths. One could say Bisu "mastered" pvz and that his pvt leaves something to be desired compared to that of Stork or Reach. Every person has the ability to play their best under a myriad of circumstances, but to master a match up or BW in general is another story.
Anyone saying "Bisu's PvT leaves something to be desired compared to that of Stork or Reach" should do a reality check :D
On February 12 2017 15:09 MuNi wrote: The idea that any match up is easiest to master is absurd. The best and most perfect elements of BW are that in which it is a game that is impossible to master. Also, everyone has their strengths. One could say Bisu "mastered" pvz and that his pvt leaves something to be desired compared to that of Stork or Reach. Every person has the ability to play their best under a myriad of circumstances, but to master a match up or BW in general is another story.
Anyone saying "Bisu's PvT leaves something to be desired compared to that of Stork or Reach" should do a reality check :D
I am a huge Bisu fan, and there is no doubt his PvT during his golden years was a lot worse than Storks. Bisu did absolutely demolish PvT in the last few years of proleague, but I remember vividly the frustration of watching him give away games/series in PvT during the 06-10 era. Thinking back its actually really weird that he wasnt better, his early/mid game PvT was phenomenal, but his late game was always "bad". So many games he was well ahead, before he did one of his classic suicide his entire army into a Terran wall into a loss. He was also always bad at playing carriers for some reason (something Stork excelled at). If Bisu had Storks lategame decision making and large army control he would have a lot more Starleagues to his name I believe.
On February 12 2017 15:09 MuNi wrote: The idea that any match up is easiest to master is absurd. The best and most perfect elements of BW are that in which it is a game that is impossible to master. Also, everyone has their strengths. One could say Bisu "mastered" pvz and that his pvt leaves something to be desired compared to that of Stork or Reach. Every person has the ability to play their best under a myriad of circumstances, but to master a match up or BW in general is another story.
Anyone saying "Bisu's PvT leaves something to be desired compared to that of Stork or Reach" should do a reality check :D
I am a huge Bisu fan, and there is no doubt his PvT during his golden years was a lot worse than Storks. Bisu did absolutely demolish PvT in the last few years of proleague, but I remember vividly the frustration of watching him give away games/series in PvT during the 06-10 era. Thinking back its actually really weird that he wasnt better, his early/mid game PvT was phenomenal, but his late game was always "bad". So many games he was well ahead, before he did one of his classic suicide his entire army into a Terran wall into a loss. He was also always bad at playing carriers for some reason (something Stork excelled at). If Bisu had Storks lategame decision making and large army control he would have a lot more Starleagues to his name I believe.
From the 6 dragons Bisus PvT is one of the worst. Best is one of the best vs terran, but he is rather appalling vs zerg. If you would combine Bisus PvZ with Bests PvT and Storks buildorders then we would get a perfect toss.
On February 18 2017 17:26 LastWish wrote: From the 6 dragons Bisus PvT is one of the worst. Best is one of the best vs terran, but he is rather appalling vs zerg. If you would combine Bisus PvZ with Bests PvT and Storks buildorders then we would get a perfect toss.
If you combine Flash's TvZ with Flash's TvP and Flash's build orders we would get a perfect Terran
On February 18 2017 17:26 LastWish wrote: From the 6 dragons Bisus PvT is one of the worst. Best is one of the best vs terran, but he is rather appalling vs zerg. If you would combine Bisus PvZ with Bests PvT and Storks buildorders then we would get a perfect toss.
If you combine Flash's TvZ with Flash's TvP and Flash's build orders we would get a perfect Terran
On February 18 2017 17:26 LastWish wrote: From the 6 dragons Bisus PvT is one of the worst. Best is one of the best vs terran, but he is rather appalling vs zerg. If you would combine Bisus PvZ with Bests PvT and Storks buildorders then we would get a perfect toss.
If you combine Flash's TvZ with Flash's TvP and Flash's build orders we would get a perfect Terran
is always funny to me how overrated american players are, except for Nony, Frozen and Idra at some point, all the others were crappy compared to Testie/Mondi/Draco
Nony and Idra both had higher peak levels (both in terms of absolute and relative skill) than Froz. Froz might well have been one of the most naturally gifted players (of anyone), but he never dedicated his life to brood war in the way the aforementioned two players did.
Froz was something special though. Managed to trick lots of people, including top nonkoreans, into believing that he was actually Nada smurfing.
On February 26 2017 01:48 Liquid`Drone wrote: Froz was something special though. Managed to trick lots of people, including top nonkoreans, into believing that he was actually Nada smurfing.
I think it was me, froz, veg and Raszi, maybe someone else, who smurfed as a korean proteam during the WGTour period where a lot of top koreans actaully did play WGTour. I dunno if me, veg or raszi really tricked anyone, and we picked lesser known names anyway, but Froz pretended to be Nada, and he was like 33-0 with 350 apm in every game, and I remember reading posts from top foreigners at the time thinking he was the real one. I don't even know if it was ever debunked.
This was like 13-14 years ago so I don't remember everything, but from quick googling we must have pretended to be Toona SG. Froz pretended to be Nada and I pretended to be Salmosa, our collective team stats were something like 100-3 (we all stopped playing before reaching higher ranks where it became more difficult).
On March 09 2017 22:00 Liquid`Drone wrote: I think it was me, froz, veg and Raszi, maybe someone else, who smurfed as a korean proteam during the WGTour period where a lot of top koreans actaully did play WGTour. I dunno if me, veg or raszi really tricked anyone, and we picked lesser known names anyway, but Froz pretended to be Nada, and he was like 33-0 with 350 apm in every game, and I remember reading posts from top foreigners at the time thinking he was the real one. I don't even know if it was ever debunked.
This was like 13-14 years ago so I don't remember everything, but from quick googling we must have pretended to be Toona SG. Froz pretended to be Nada and I pretended to be Salmosa, our collective team stats were something like 100-3 (we all stopped playing before reaching higher ranks where it became more difficult).
On March 11 2017 06:29 Ty2 wrote: He hasn't touched the game since the new season. I guess when his twitch channel got banned things slowed down. The highest he got I think was C- or C.
His ban is expected and justified but don't call anyone a racist just for using the "n-word" even if it's used in an insulting manner. It trivializes real racism that consists of something more than just using COMMON cuss-words at someone that is clearly annoying you.
Disagree completely, and I've consistently argued, for some years now, that 'racist' is a term that is thrown around (far) too frequently, and that the term has largely lost its poignancy and usefulness for that reason. But Testie telling a guy to 'stop being such a nigger' because he was listening to rap and speaking ebonics, I have no problems defining that as being racist. Either way, I've had quite lengthy discussions with Testie about this, and he literally argues that black people are more criminal because they have worse genes than white people and asians. He's a self-admitted racist by any definition.
I actually got Testie a pro tryout once. I sent a bunch of his replays to a coach I was acquainted with. The coach was very concerned about Testie playing multiple races, but he liked what he saw. He said if Testie could play just one race, he'd give him a tryout.
Testie ended up playing 3-4 games PvT vs Silent_Control, which the coach and I obs'd and just talked generally about Testie as a player. I made the best case for him that I could, but he got dusted REALLY bad by Silent_Control. He was very nervous while playing.
But most of all, I'll always remember the day I convinced Testie to shave his soul patch. "I'll do it but if there's a zit under there I'll kill you", he said.
On January 30 2017 20:30 kogeT wrote: I recently watched some game of Avernum (when he was in ToT) vs Testie TvP and I nearly got cancer from watching it. xD It's funny how these top performers of these days looked like current C- players.
This is one of the silliest claim ever made on SC-BW history. Go back and play Mondragon, Draco, Ret or any of those and then we see who looks like a C- ... these guys were good, they were very good, they were good back in the day, and they would be good now. Most of them might easily get to A nowadays when properly trained ... don't want to be rude, but saying top performers of that days look like C- is total bullshit. Maybe the playstyle was slightly different, this might be ... but that's it.
They were good, but Broodwar has evolved a lot since back then and that is why they look like current C- players. The game was played differently back then. It's the same in football, any great team from the 70s would probably lose to a current football team just because football evolved so much. They were good back in their time and if they started today, they would be great as well.
On February 12 2017 12:42 sicklucker wrote: pvt is the easiast mu no wonder it was best for alot of foriegnners. it was my best and i didnt even play protoss really. as in easiest to master not the easiest matchup
Easiest to master? What? It's basically impossible to master any match up. You can get really really good at it (which no foreigner has ever done by the way...compared to top korean pros) Put any P player against Flash and look how "easy it is to master".
On February 12 2017 12:42 sicklucker wrote: pvt is the easiast mu no wonder it was best for alot of foriegnners. it was my best and i didnt even play protoss really. as in easiest to master not the easiest matchup
Easiest to master? What? It's basically impossible to master any match up. You can get really really good at it (which no foreigner has ever done by the way...compared to top korean pros) Put any P player against Flash and look how "easy it is to master".
If you define "master" as "dominate Flash" than of course no matchup can be mastered.
It was a hyperbolic statement, but contains some truth. PvT is the easiest matchup, up to a pretty high level of skill. I'd guess up to iCCup B level, maybe even more. That's pretty damn high.
Once you get past a certain point, the matchup gets pretty even. But being B level iCCup makes you a top 1000 player outside of Korea (might also need to exclude China). So I think by some reasonable choice of standard, you could call that "mastery".
On February 12 2017 12:42 sicklucker wrote: pvt is the easiast mu no wonder it was best for alot of foriegnners. it was my best and i didnt even play protoss really. as in easiest to master not the easiest matchup
Easiest to master? What? It's basically impossible to master any match up. You can get really really good at it (which no foreigner has ever done by the way...compared to top korean pros) Put any P player against Flash and look how "easy it is to master".
If you define "master" as "dominate Flash" than of course no matchup can be mastered.
It was a hyperbolic statement, but contains some truth. PvT is the easiest matchup, up to a pretty high level of skill. I'd guess up to iCCup B level, maybe even more. That's pretty damn high.
Once you get past a certain point, the matchup gets pretty even. But being B level iCCup makes you a top 1000 player outside of Korea (might also need to exclude China). So I think by some reasonable choice of standard, you could call that "mastery".
I win a lot of green ranked zergs and protosses, but terrans are giving me really hard time. Last season I had both PvZ and PvP >70% winrate while vs T my winrate was slightly less than 50%... :/
On February 12 2017 12:42 sicklucker wrote: pvt is the easiast mu no wonder it was best for alot of foriegnners. it was my best and i didnt even play protoss really. as in easiest to master not the easiest matchup
Easiest to master? What? It's basically impossible to master any match up. You can get really really good at it (which no foreigner has ever done by the way...compared to top korean pros) Put any P player against Flash and look how "easy it is to master".
If you define "master" as "dominate Flash" than of course no matchup can be mastered.
It was a hyperbolic statement, but contains some truth. PvT is the easiest matchup, up to a pretty high level of skill. I'd guess up to iCCup B level, maybe even more. That's pretty damn high.
Once you get past a certain point, the matchup gets pretty even. But being B level iCCup makes you a top 1000 player outside of Korea (might also need to exclude China). So I think by some reasonable choice of standard, you could call that "mastery".
I win a lot of green ranked zergs and protosses, but terrans are giving me really hard time. Last season I had both PvZ and PvP >70% winrate while vs T my winrate was slightly less than 50%... :/
same for me, red and yellow ranks terrans are easy to beat as protoss, B/B+ level terrans are a pain in the ass to kill, most of them are super defensive or super aggro, theres no easy way to beat them other than straight up macro game and even then i find it really hard to win vs good terran players.
On January 30 2017 20:30 kogeT wrote: I recently watched some game of Avernum (when he was in ToT) vs Testie TvP and I nearly got cancer from watching it. xD It's funny how these top performers of these days looked like current C- players.
pfff.. Testie could give you trouble, players back in the day were skilled but the metagame was different. just look at his iccup account he's curently A-, or look a Dinot who recently came back, he's A+ and 7th place on the ladder. Both after many years of not playing the game have been defeating players left and rigth in just one season and getting A- or better
I actually checked Testie's stats a little more. Looking at his match list since he became b-, he is 7-15 against players that were b- or higher when he played them. I'm sure he's improving fast though, but based on the game list he looks way worse than the average a- player.
On May 26 2017 12:22 Liquid`Drone wrote: Dinot is a different story though. Really glad to see him back, he was one of my favorite players to watch before he quit.
Yeah Dinot was one of the best foreigner zergs between 2008-2010 he was very agressive, loved hydras, his lategame was sometimes a bit sloppy, but when he was able to put himself together at this stage he was brilliant. i still remenber his games during TSL against Rondo, and Jianfei, he defeated idra during group stages of TSL, and the liquibition games he had against Jianfei were amazing. also i remenber him playing against Idra(when idra was training in korea) during the Highlander tournament and Dinot defeated hiim 3-0, i believe idra cryied in rage xD
yeah I remember him as a really aggressive but really and creative player. Not really impressed by people cheesing with 3 hatch ling or hydra semi-allins, but he'd pull off really crisp builds with slow overlord drops and stuff. That stuff I love.
On March 12 2017 01:08 Liquid`Drone wrote: Disagree completely, and I've consistently argued, for some years now, that 'racist' is a term that is thrown around (far) too frequently, and that the term has largely lost its poignancy and usefulness for that reason. But Testie telling a guy to 'stop being such a nigger' because he was listening to rap and speaking ebonics, I have no problems defining that as being racist. Either way, I've had quite lengthy discussions with Testie about this, and he literally argues that black people are more criminal because they have worse genes than white people and asians. He's a self-admitted racist by any definition.
I know Testie and he isn't a hateful guy at all.
Not that I agree with him, but in his defense, it's a well-established fact that there's more criminality among black people in almost every nation, whether they're a minority or majority population (it's just a matter of statistics). To deem someone a racist just for wanting to explore the role genetics might play in criminality, is very regressive and anti-science.
If you don't think there's any genetic component to criminality, then what is your competing theory/explanation?
You've skipped past refuting his argument and gone straight to attacking him and calling him a racist, so surely you must have an explanation that isn't in any way racist. I'd love to hear it.
I haven't checked the literature, but I am sure racists are more likely to be criminal.
BTW, the definition of racism is pinning behavior and race together. And with our understanding of biology, that would ought to happen through genetics.
Also, you are a racist or not regardless of if it is true or not. I don't know how you can say that 'merely exploring the science of genetics and race' is not racist.
Furthermore, minorities are more likely to be criminal, regardless of their ethnicity. So clearly, what we do see now has all to do with social position (being poor and having no opportunities) primarily, and culture (only having bad role models, hearing about others that you cannot do certain things because of your ethnicity, your environment promoting the wrong values, etc), not genetics.
Competing theory? Even if genes decide who is criminal and who is not, that isn't about race. There is more genetic variety among individuals than among races. In the case we do find causation between crime and genetics (which we might), every ethnicity will have just as many 'crime genes' as any other one. That's the main argument against racism. Humans are such a young species, there is extremely little genetic variation and individual trumps ethnicity by a long shot. BTW, we humans always pinned negative traits on other ethnicities. It was never a fair exploration of the facts. Just a way to explain away our made up negative stereotypes.
Well, you basically proposed the racist position here, which we know is scientifically wrong. Furthermore, it led through extremely immoral acts in the past, and still damages our societies today. I shouldn't be arguing with you. I should be shaming you and ridiculing you.
One shouldn't argue with racists. They have lost that privilege.
On May 28 2017 19:52 Ernaine wrote: I haven't checked the literature, but I am sure racists are more likely to be criminal.
BTW, the definition of racism is pinning behavior and race together. And with our understanding of biology, that would ought to happen through genetics.
Also, you are a racist or not regardless of if it is true or not. I don't know how you can say that 'merely exploring the science of genetics and race' is not racist.
Furthermore, minorities are more likely to be criminal, regardless of their ethnicity. So clearly, what we do see now has all to do with social position (being poor and having no opportunities) primarily, and culture (only having bad role models, hearing about others that you cannot do certain things because of your ethnicity, your environment promoting the wrong values, etc), not genetics.
Competing theory? Even if genes decide who is criminal and who is not, that isn't about race. There is more genetic variety among individuals than among races. In the case we do find causation between crime and genetics (which we might), every ethnicity will have just as many 'crime genes' as any other one. That's the main argument against racism. Humans are such a young species, there is extremely little genetic variation and individual trumps ethnicity by a long shot. BTW, we humans always pinned negative traits on other ethnicities. It was never a fair exploration of the facts. Just a way to explain away our made up negative stereotypes.
Well, you basically proposed the racist position here, which we know is scientifically wrong. Furthermore, it led through extremely immoral acts in the past, and still damages our societies today. I shouldn't be arguing with you. I should be shaming you and ridiculing you.
One shouldn't argue with racists. They have lost that privilege.
If there was this much emotion and stigma attached to aeronautics, we'd still be trying to reach the moon.
On March 12 2017 01:08 Liquid`Drone wrote: Disagree completely, and I've consistently argued, for some years now, that 'racist' is a term that is thrown around (far) too frequently, and that the term has largely lost its poignancy and usefulness for that reason. But Testie telling a guy to 'stop being such a nigger' because he was listening to rap and speaking ebonics, I have no problems defining that as being racist. Either way, I've had quite lengthy discussions with Testie about this, and he literally argues that black people are more criminal because they have worse genes than white people and asians. He's a self-admitted racist by any definition.
I know Testie and he isn't a hateful guy at all.
Not that I agree with him, but in his defense, it's a well-established fact that there's more criminality among black people in almost every nation, whether they're a minority or majority population (it's just a matter of statistics). To deem someone a racist just for wanting to explore the role genetics might play in criminality, is very regressive and anti-science.
If you don't think there's any genetic component to criminality, then what is your competing theory/explanation?
You've skipped past refuting his argument and gone straight to attacking him and calling him a racist, so surely you must have an explanation that isn't in any way racist. I'd love to hear it.
Dude, if you say 'black people are on average less intelligent and more likely to be criminal and this is determined by their inferior genetics and therefore we must stop immigration from africa because their inferior genes are bound to make our society worse', that is racist. There's no way around that. I agree that racist is a word with a highly contested definition, I agree that it is a word that has been thrown around too lightly, and if you want to argue that Testie's use of 'nigger' on his stream doesn't make him a racist, then whatever, be my guest. But he has presented the argument I put in quotation marks on several occasions, and every single working definition of racist will define that statement as racist.
Frankly, to me, it sounds like you're trying to say that you yourself is racist, but you don't want to be branded that way, so people shouldn't use this word to describe what the word actually means, but that just makes no sense to me.
And for the record, I consider Testie a friend. But he is a racist. Twitch banned him for expressing his racism because they don't tolerate it. It's not any more complicated than that.
On March 12 2017 01:08 Liquid`Drone wrote: Disagree completely, and I've consistently argued, for some years now, that 'racist' is a term that is thrown around (far) too frequently, and that the term has largely lost its poignancy and usefulness for that reason. But Testie telling a guy to 'stop being such a nigger' because he was listening to rap and speaking ebonics, I have no problems defining that as being racist. Either way, I've had quite lengthy discussions with Testie about this, and he literally argues that black people are more criminal because they have worse genes than white people and asians. He's a self-admitted racist by any definition.
I know Testie and he isn't a hateful guy at all.
Not that I agree with him, but in his defense, it's a well-established fact that there's more criminality among black people in almost every nation, whether they're a minority or majority population (it's just a matter of statistics). To deem someone a racist just for wanting to explore the role genetics might play in criminality, is very regressive and anti-science.
If you don't think there's any genetic component to criminality, then what is your competing theory/explanation?
You've skipped past refuting his argument and gone straight to attacking him and calling him a racist, so surely you must have an explanation that isn't in any way racist. I'd love to hear it.
Dude, if you say 'black people are on average less intelligent and more likely to be criminal and this is determined by their inferior genetics and therefore we must stop immigration from africa because their inferior genes are bound to make our society worse', that is racist. There's no way around that. I agree that racist is a word with a highly contested definition, I agree that it is a word that has been thrown around too lightly, and if you want to argue that Testie's use of 'nigger' on his stream doesn't make him a racist, then whatever, be my guest. But he has presented the argument I put in quotation marks on several occasions, and every single working definition of racist will define that statement as racist.
Frankly, to me, it sounds like you're trying to say that you yourself is racist, but you don't want to be branded that way, so people shouldn't use this word to describe what the word actually means, but that just makes no sense to me.
And for the record, I consider Testie a friend. But he is a racist. Twitch banned him for expressing his racism because they don't tolerate it. It's not any more complicated than that.
I see what you mean and I agree with you. The problem is that the definition of the term "racist" is overly broad to the point that it could reasonably be applied to almost every living person, therefor it's only going to be useful as a term if we find meaningful ways to distinguish between people who are or aren't racist, and there's a lot of room for interpretation here.
You draw the line at some combination of language (saying N), having an idea that's negative and only applies to a specific race (or subset of races), and/or wanting one's national foreign policy to reflect those negative ideas.
I draw the line at when there's hate behind these sentiments, or when they're just totally irrational. I know that isn't the case with Testie. He's not hateful, and his ideas are at least in part the result of incontrovertible statistical data. He's just trying to understand a problem and find the solution.
And where we draw that line is important, because if we're too loose with the term, it becomes nothing more than an ad hominem logical fallacy that shuts down discourse. Free exchange of ideas is required if we're ever going to make progress on this (in either direction), and the way people use that word has had the effect of making people unwilling to even enter the conversation in the first place.
So to your point, my great grandfather getting angry whenever he sees an Asian person taking pictures, because he thinks they're a spy, I'd say that makes him a racist. A person in the KKK, they're incredibly angry and antagonistic, we can safely say they're racists.
When my Chinese girlfriend says she won't walk home alone at night because there are a lot of black people in this city, I don't think that's racist. Anecdotally, if you've ever followed behind an attractive girl who's walking alone in this city, you'll see she gets harassed every block, almost exclusively by black males. If you look at the statistics, black males are vastly more likely to commit sexual assault and forcible rape than any other race.
If you accept that anecdotal evidence and the statistics, you can't deny that if she modifies her behavior to avoid walking alone in areas with higher black populations, she will experience less sexual harassment, and be less likely to be assaulted or raped.
Some say that's racism, some say it's pragmatism. You can call it what you want, but she'll be safer walking with me, and I really don't see the use in shaming her for it.
Testie said last night in his stream that his old best matchup was ZvT. It is pretty cool he started playing again. Nony Naugrim Oystein are examples of players that have come back.
On July 05 2017 22:25 Alpha-NP- wrote: Testie said last night in his stream that his old best matchup was ZvT. It is pretty cool he started playing again. Nony Naugrim Oystein are examples of players that have come back.
Wait, Nony is back too?!?! Where did you see this?
Watched him stream a couple games yesterday. I believe his apm averaged around 160-170 so obviously protoss is his best race. Only race you can play like that and get away with it (noob race. Easiest thing in the game to just make pylons and a few Zealots. Toss is the reason Shuttle can win games on the pro scene with 240 APM). He did beat a few E class Koreans though.
On July 08 2017 00:45 traxamillion wrote: Watched him stream a couple games yesterday. I believe his apm averaged around 160-170 so obviously protoss is his best race. Only race you can play like that and get away with it (noob race. Easiest thing in the game to just make pylons and a few Zealots. Toss is the reason Shuttle can win games on the pro scene with 240 APM). He did beat a few E class Koreans though.
interesting point of view, tell us more about it please
On March 12 2017 01:08 Liquid`Drone wrote: Disagree completely, and I've consistently argued, for some years now, that 'racist' is a term that is thrown around (far) too frequently, and that the term has largely lost its poignancy and usefulness for that reason. But Testie telling a guy to 'stop being such a nigger' because he was listening to rap and speaking ebonics, I have no problems defining that as being racist. Either way, I've had quite lengthy discussions with Testie about this, and he literally argues that black people are more criminal because they have worse genes than white people and asians. He's a self-admitted racist by any definition.
I know Testie and he isn't a hateful guy at all.
Not that I agree with him, but in his defense, it's a well-established fact that there's more criminality among black people in almost every nation, whether they're a minority or majority population (it's just a matter of statistics). To deem someone a racist just for wanting to explore the role genetics might play in criminality, is very regressive and anti-science.
If you don't think there's any genetic component to criminality, then what is your competing theory/explanation?
You've skipped past refuting his argument and gone straight to attacking him and calling him a racist, so surely you must have an explanation that isn't in any way racist. I'd love to hear it.
Dude, if you say 'black people are on average less intelligent and more likely to be criminal and this is determined by their inferior genetics and therefore we must stop immigration from africa because their inferior genes are bound to make our society worse', that is racist. There's no way around that. I agree that racist is a word with a highly contested definition, I agree that it is a word that has been thrown around too lightly, and if you want to argue that Testie's use of 'nigger' on his stream doesn't make him a racist, then whatever, be my guest. But he has presented the argument I put in quotation marks on several occasions, and every single working definition of racist will define that statement as racist.
Frankly, to me, it sounds like you're trying to say that you yourself is racist, but you don't want to be branded that way, so people shouldn't use this word to describe what the word actually means, but that just makes no sense to me.
And for the record, I consider Testie a friend. But he is a racist. Twitch banned him for expressing his racism because they don't tolerate it. It's not any more complicated than that.
On July 08 2017 00:45 traxamillion wrote: Watched him stream a couple games yesterday. I believe his apm averaged around 160-170 so obviously protoss is his best race. Only race you can play like that and get away with it (noob race. Easiest thing in the game to just make pylons and a few Zealots. Toss is the reason Shuttle can win games on the pro scene with 240 APM). He did beat a few E class Koreans though.
I hate when i watch Terrans(like Mind) destroy Larva/Jaedong with 250 apm. Which i did, yesterday i believe.