EPTDate of replay: 2021-10-30 12:27.
Time mark of teamkill: 19:10.
Player: XizTy (starts killing ally at top middle).
BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ - Page 36
| Forum Index > BW General |
|
kurrrak
Poland136 Posts
Date of replay: 2021-10-30 12:27. Time mark of teamkill: 19:10. Player: XizTy (starts killing ally at top middle). | ||
|
D3AD-R3TARD
Poland309 Posts
On October 30 2021 07:23 Wormer wrote: Game: 3x3 Big Game Hunters match played on 2021-10-29 23:53 What: ksl attacked his teammate TrickyHunt at approx 25 minute of the game. Thank you for your hard work supporting this bot! Banned. On October 30 2021 16:55 kurrrak wrote: I started to notice it 4-5 days ago, but it might have begun even earlier. I think it's the problem with all bots. I don't have a good way to measure lag, but I know that's a problem with bots. I'll try to figure a way to measure lag so that I can optimize the setup to minimize it. On October 30 2021 19:58 kurrrak wrote: Teamkill report: Date of replay: 2021-10-30 12:27. Time mark of teamkill: 19:10. Player: XizTy (starts killing ally at top middle). Banned | ||
|
vfsjhvfsjh
92 Posts
Date of replay: 2021-10-30 22:27 GMT. Player: ksl (started killing ally zerg). | ||
|
vfsjhvfsjh
92 Posts
Date of replay: 2021-10-31 14:17 GMT. Player: Foderpex (started killing ally terran because I didn't ally the enemies). | ||
|
beWaterMyFriend78
114 Posts
Date of Game : 2021-11-01 00:20 GMT. Player: xebek (start killing me , after i msg 2 him " dont mine my base, its lower income") | ||
|
MeSaber
Sweden1235 Posts
On October 31 2021 23:18 vfsjhvfsjh wrote: Teamkill report: Date of replay: 2021-10-31 14:17 GMT. Player: Foderpex (started killing ally terran because I didn't ally the enemies). Now why would you ally enemies? That itself is worth a ban xD | ||
|
vfsjhvfsjh
92 Posts
That's what I was trying to say. one of the enemies left the game a bit early, and then Foderpex was trying to force me to ally with them which I refused. Because I just wanted to follow the rule. However, he just betrayed and attacked me with the enemies. The other ally in my team noticed and left the game. Foderpex and the rest could've left the game early but they did not. | ||
|
D3AD-R3TARD
Poland309 Posts
On October 31 2021 06:29 vfsjhvfsjh wrote: Teamkill report: Date of replay: 2021-10-30 22:27 GMT. Player: ksl (started killing ally zerg). He was already banned. On October 31 2021 23:18 vfsjhvfsjh wrote: Teamkill report: Date of replay: 2021-10-31 14:17 GMT. Player: Foderpex (started killing ally terran because I didn't ally the enemies). Banned. On November 01 2021 08:51 beWaterMyFriend78 wrote: Teamkiller report: Date of Game : 2021-11-01 00:20 GMT. Player: xebek (start killing me , after i msg 2 him " dont mine my base, its lower income") Banned. | ||
|
beWaterMyFriend78
114 Posts
 | ||
|
martosss
2 Posts
| ||
|
D3AD-R3TARD
Poland309 Posts
On November 02 2021 02:23 martosss wrote: The bots seem to be experiencing lag. Some of them drop from the game(happened to me twice already with EU4 bot and once more before that) and sometimes they're shown with red ping when I join the lobby before the game starts. I tested some things today and sometimes I have to reset games. Sorry for that but as the system runs 24/7 I sometimes have to test things during matches. As for lag. I am aware that this is a problem. I try to establish whats going on and is there anything on my part to make it better. | ||
|
kogeT
Poland2041 Posts
| ||
|
D3AD-R3TARD
Poland309 Posts
On November 03 2021 21:13 kogeT wrote: How much effort would it take to make same for 2v2? Maybe two types of games: autobalance, and fixed (so you can take a team mate and game starts as soon as 4 players are in and MMR is calculated based on result) From a programming point of view it's not that much work, but I'm bound by the number of bots I can run. And with more bots I would rather expand 3v3 than do 2v2. There is little balancing to do in 2v2. Even in 3v3 some lobbies are impossible to balance if there is a particularly good player. So for now I don't plan to expand into 2v2. | ||
|
kogeT
Poland2041 Posts
| ||
|
pebble444
Italy2498 Posts
On November 03 2021 23:04 kogeT wrote: Then just lobbies with ladder without autobalancing. :-) What is needed to host more bots? probably more computers, more internet, more thingies | ||
|
xebek
1 Post
User was banned for this post. | ||
|
MeSaber
Sweden1235 Posts
Funny read. | ||
|
D3AD-R3TARD
Poland309 Posts
On November 05 2021 07:52 xebek wrote: yo D3AD-R3TARD I'm just wondering why retard but it is obvious. if you like to promote any fucking noobs and if you think that's fine in a team game to not support the team and is fine on BGH, you know BGH minerals to be on low income...then suck me and the newbies. if you have no idea what happens in that game and trust that sucker you are like him a sucker. Do you have the rep to see what was wrong there? or do you just ban me? it was fun to play on the bots games but thanks for banning me you can put your ban in your ass. fucking retard! if you want to be the judge listen to both sides not just a retard like you. but I get it you promote them cos they are retard like you GOOD JOB User was banned for this post. Wonder no more. The name dead retard comes from an angry CS player who called me that many years ago after I killed him a couple of times. I liked the name, so I use it sometimes. So now you know... And yes, I do have for all the replays and I watch them before banning someone. And you did attack your teammate, so this ban was correct. Having weak allies doesn't make it ok to attack them. On the side note. Many games with player's positions as in mentioned game - 11 and 1 for one team, 12 position for the other - end with unbalanced games even if players are correctly matched into teams. Also, positioning 12 and 1 vs 11 might be even worse. Does someone with good map making skills can tell me if there is a way to avoid certain position combinations without changing anything else in game play? | ||
|
wimpwimpwimp
171 Posts
On November 05 2021 22:27 D3AD-R3TARD wrote: (snip) On the side note. Many games with player's positions as in mentioned game - 11 and 1 for one team, 12 position for the other - end with unbalanced games even if players are correctly matched into teams. Also, positioning 12 and 1 vs 11 might be even worse. Does someone with good map making skills can tell me if there is a way to avoid certain position combinations without changing anything else in game play? I think having a very wide variety of starting set ups in terms of races and positioning is one of the best features of BGH, as it results in endlessly varied gameplay and rewards players and teams for "thinking on their feet" and being creative. So even if what you suggest might be possible in theory, it shouldn't be implemented in my opinion. | ||
2Pacalypse-
Croatia9517 Posts
On November 06 2021 00:07 wimpwimpwimp wrote: I think having a very wide variety of starting set ups in terms of races and positioning is one of the best features of BGH, as it results in endlessly varied gameplay and rewards players and teams for "thinking on their feet" and being creative. So even if what you suggest might be possible in theory, it shouldn't be implemented in my opinion. Agreed. | ||
| ||
