EPTSandlot - Draft Results - Page 8
| Forum Index > BW General |
|
pdk001
Korea (South)922 Posts
| ||
CTStalker
Canada9720 Posts
| ||
jkillashark
United States5262 Posts
| ||
|
FirstProbe
1206 Posts
we should've picked the better players earlier... it seemed like we tried to pick the good cheap players earlier on, so that we could have lots of minerals left for later - but that just left us with the overpriced better known people, because all the others were taken T_T | ||
|
bioboyAT
Austria1763 Posts
| ||
|
NeVeRDiEDrOnE
Korea (South)227 Posts
On September 16 2006 09:21 yosh wrote: he's lying nope. "by picking Plto you can see PvP 2gate lot ---> speedlot rush f.i." was that post. @FA didn't know you could read Korean^^  That drafting was really interesting~~ (if the bankrupt teams wouldn't have got gifts it would have been perfect  ) I'm really thrilled to see the matches^^PS: imo the team with the most remaining minerals should have been rewarded with the extra player | ||
|
jkillashark
United States5262 Posts
But if TL wins that would be so sick. | ||
|
Liquid`Nazgul
22427 Posts
On September 16 2006 09:39 FirstProbe wrote: I think we did the selection wrong we should've picked the better players earlier... it seemed like we tried to pick the good cheap players earlier on, so that we could have lots of minerals left for later - but that just left us with the overpriced better known people, because all the others were taken T_T Yea I think we made a mistake in picking theo so fast (no offense yo) but we were thinking others would spend their minerals wisely and not put all their minerals on 1 player while leaving them with 0 for the players in round 7-8 (meaning they got the worst players). If we had forseen this we had gone for 200-250 players all the way after picking FA. | ||
|
ToT)Testie(
Canada723 Posts
Sure wish there was some 2on2 action in this. | ||
|
Night[Mare
Mexico4793 Posts
| ||
|
Liquid`Nazgul
22427 Posts
| ||
|
NeVeRDiEDrOnE
Korea (South)227 Posts
 | ||
|
Spike
United States1392 Posts
lol, so the teams that got left with bad players can avoid putting them in the line-up or choose them to go up against favorable teams. | ||
|
FirstProbe
1206 Posts
On September 16 2006 09:41 bioboyAT wrote: so u say the first 3 picks were prettey bad ? they wouldn't have been my picks personally I might have taken Lx at some point, but I would've gone with Tempest)is( first round. Then I would've gone for one of the other zergs (I personally don't know too much about kosiro) - probably Mondragon because he seems to get the job done... polaris would've been better than siz)fantasy imo I dunno if I would've picked plto 4th either (even though I like him), cos I think we could've scored one more high level player. This means he could've gone to another team, but there are other players equally as good as him, even if a little pricier. see the thing is, while I think fisheye is great, he hasn't been playing for some time. We ended up saving all that money by choosing the better of the cheaper players (with some loyalty choices methinks), only to buy someone who was probably overpriced. Even if he was cheap, I don't think he would've been a good choice anyway, so we missed out on getting a more active and better player, and ending up spending extra minerals (sure we had enough) that could've been spent earlier and better. | ||
|
FirstProbe
1206 Posts
On September 16 2006 09:49 Liquid`Nazgul wrote: Yea I think we made a mistake in picking theo so fast (no offense yo) but we were thinking others would spend their minerals wisely and not put all their minerals on 1 player while leaving them with 0 for the players in round 7-8 (meaning they got the worst players). If we had forseen this we had gone for 200-250 players all the way after picking FA. fair enough, I was sitting in the channel pulling my hair out (no offense), and praying that they'd at least leave the most expensive player alone (who is, quite good really) and we could snap him up - but he was taken at the end of round 5 T_T | ||
|
ToT)Testie(
Canada723 Posts
| ||
|
Liquid`Nazgul
22427 Posts
On September 16 2006 10:05 Spike wrote: just read that there will be 5 1v1's. the captains will choose the 5 players and they will play each other according to rank. lol, so the teams that got left with bad players can avoid putting them in the line-up or choose them to go up against favorable teams. Everyone has to play atleast once though I think. edit: lol Testie jokes up please. | ||
|
Spike
United States1392 Posts
fair enough, I was sitting in the channel pulling my hair out (no offense), and praying that they'd at least leave the most expensive player alone (who is, quite good really) and we could snap him up - but he was taken at the end of round 5 T_T yea, after FA I thought we were going to snap up draco considering we had been pretty cheap so far and we actually had the chance to get him. | ||
|
Agone
American Samoa231 Posts
| ||
|
Liquid`Nazgul
22427 Posts
On September 16 2006 10:15 Spike wrote: yea, after FA I thought we were going to snap up draco considering we had been pretty cheap so far and we actually had the chance to get him. We were fully intending to buy Draco at one moment until Mani told us this was in his player profile: Can Play: M-F 2:30PM - 5:00PM CET Cannot Play: M-F 12AM - 2:30PM & 5PM - 12AM CET Which is quite ridiculous. If he actually holds himself to this schedule I doubt he is much use to any team. Out of all those guys who have school and work, his life is based around StarCraft but he can't find more than 2 and a half hours to play? Anyway I think by the time it was our turn again Draco was gone already. And if he wasn't it was because we didn't want to pick him anymore. | ||
| ||
