• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 14:57
CET 20:57
KST 04:57
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 3 - Playoffs Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups C & D Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups A & B Preview2TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners12Intel X Team Liquid Seoul event: Showmatches and Meet the Pros10
Community News
BGE Stara Zagora 2026 announced6[BSL21] Ro.16 Group Stage (C->B->A->D)4Weekly Cups (Nov 17-23): Solar, MaxPax, Clem win3RSL Season 3: RO16 results & RO8 bracket13Weekly Cups (Nov 10-16): Reynor, Solar lead Zerg surge2
StarCraft 2
General
BGE Stara Zagora 2026 announced SC: Evo Complete - Ranked Ladder OPEN ALPHA When will we find out if there are more tournament Weekly Cups (Nov 17-23): Solar, MaxPax, Clem win Weekly Cups (Nov 10-16): Reynor, Solar lead Zerg surge
Tourneys
Constellation Cup - Main Event - Stellar Fest Tenacious Turtle Tussle [Alpha Pro Series] Nice vs Cure RSL Revival: Season 3 $5,000+ WardiTV 2025 Championship
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 501 Price of Progress Mutation # 500 Fright night Mutation # 499 Chilling Adaptation Mutation # 498 Wheel of Misfortune|Cradle of Death
Brood War
General
Which season is the best in ASL? A cwal.gg Extension - Easily keep track of anyone BW General Discussion soO on: FanTaSy's Potential Return to StarCraft BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues Small VOD Thread 2.0 [BSL21] RO16 Tie Breaker - Group B - Sun 21:00 CET [BSL21] GosuLeague T1 Ro16 - Tue & Thu 22:00 CET
Strategy
Game Theory for Starcraft How to stay on top of macro? Current Meta PvZ map balance
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread The Perfect Game Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Beyond All Reason Should offensive tower rushing be viable in RTS games?
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Artificial Intelligence Thread YouTube Thread
Fan Clubs
White-Ra Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion! Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NBA General Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023 TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Where to ask questions and add stream? The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Esports Earnings: Bigger Pri…
TrAiDoS
Thanks for the RSL
Hildegard
Saturation point
Uldridge
DnB/metal remix FFO Mick Go…
ImbaTosS
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1206 users

[D] New BW Server - Page 3

Forum Index > BW General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 68 69 70 Next
xboi209
Profile Blog Joined June 2011
United States1173 Posts
May 22 2013 06:49 GMT
#41
I like the idea of a TL branded server
http://www.reddit.com/r/broodwar/
Kiante
Profile Blog Joined December 2009
Australia7069 Posts
May 22 2013 06:51 GMT
#42
There's a lot of issues with an idea like this. Just for starters, it's not as simple as developing and implementing the technology required to do the stuff on your list, but it's about maintainence. How are you going to deal with hackers, deal with disputes. You'll need lots of staff, clear rule sets and stuff like that, which is a hard thing to find. Volunteers by their nature are very unreliable, so you'd need a really good system to streamline their work or incentivise it. I just honestly am not sure how well this would work, even with iccup being stupid. At the end of the day, it's just me, sayle and stratos blacklisted, not really a huge deal imo (fish is better anyway).

I agree that in an ideal world, a server not run by iccup would be a great thing, but there are significant roadblocks in getting there, and even then trying to get enough people playing to make matchmaking work would be tough. If you are set on trying to do this, make sure you go in with a really well developed plan
Writer
xboi209
Profile Blog Joined June 2011
United States1173 Posts
May 22 2013 06:54 GMT
#43
On May 22 2013 15:51 Kiante wrote:
There's a lot of issues with an idea like this. Just for starters, it's not as simple as developing and implementing the technology required to do the stuff on your list, but it's about maintainence. How are you going to deal with hackers, deal with disputes. You'll need lots of staff, clear rule sets and stuff like that, which is a hard thing to find. Volunteers by their nature are very unreliable, so you'd need a really good system to streamline their work or incentivise it. I just honestly am not sure how well this would work, even with iccup being stupid. At the end of the day, it's just me, sayle and stratos blacklisted, not really a huge deal imo (fish is better anyway).

I agree that in an ideal world, a server not run by iccup would be a great thing, but there are significant roadblocks in getting there, and even then trying to get enough people playing to make matchmaking work would be tough. If you are set on trying to do this, make sure you go in with a really well developed plan

Assuming that hoards of people(500+) doesn't come in, not a lot of staff is actually needed to maintain the server
http://www.reddit.com/r/broodwar/
Mewka
Profile Joined February 2011
Poland1458 Posts
May 22 2013 06:55 GMT
#44
iCCup -.- ...
Mewka, Mewka[AoV], Fox.Mewka, Mewman
Falling
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Canada11378 Posts
May 22 2013 06:59 GMT
#45
On May 22 2013 15:54 xboi209 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 22 2013 15:51 Kiante wrote:
There's a lot of issues with an idea like this. Just for starters, it's not as simple as developing and implementing the technology required to do the stuff on your list, but it's about maintainence. How are you going to deal with hackers, deal with disputes. You'll need lots of staff, clear rule sets and stuff like that, which is a hard thing to find. Volunteers by their nature are very unreliable, so you'd need a really good system to streamline their work or incentivise it. I just honestly am not sure how well this would work, even with iccup being stupid. At the end of the day, it's just me, sayle and stratos blacklisted, not really a huge deal imo (fish is better anyway).

I agree that in an ideal world, a server not run by iccup would be a great thing, but there are significant roadblocks in getting there, and even then trying to get enough people playing to make matchmaking work would be tough. If you are set on trying to do this, make sure you go in with a really well developed plan

Assuming that hoards of people(500+) doesn't come in, not a lot of staff is actually needed to maintain the server

But if hordes don't come, then automatchmaking and the longterm viability of the server comes into question. You do need a critical mass for the server to work long term else it will be yet another empty private server.
Moderator"In Trump We Trust," says the Golden Goat of Mars Lago. Have faith and believe! Trump moves in mysterious ways. Like the wind he blows where he pleases...
xboi209
Profile Blog Joined June 2011
United States1173 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-05-22 07:06:04
May 22 2013 07:04 GMT
#46
On May 22 2013 15:59 Falling wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 22 2013 15:54 xboi209 wrote:
On May 22 2013 15:51 Kiante wrote:
There's a lot of issues with an idea like this. Just for starters, it's not as simple as developing and implementing the technology required to do the stuff on your list, but it's about maintainence. How are you going to deal with hackers, deal with disputes. You'll need lots of staff, clear rule sets and stuff like that, which is a hard thing to find. Volunteers by their nature are very unreliable, so you'd need a really good system to streamline their work or incentivise it. I just honestly am not sure how well this would work, even with iccup being stupid. At the end of the day, it's just me, sayle and stratos blacklisted, not really a huge deal imo (fish is better anyway).

I agree that in an ideal world, a server not run by iccup would be a great thing, but there are significant roadblocks in getting there, and even then trying to get enough people playing to make matchmaking work would be tough. If you are set on trying to do this, make sure you go in with a really well developed plan

Assuming that hoards of people(500+) doesn't come in, not a lot of staff is actually needed to maintain the server

But if hordes don't come, then automatchmaking and the longterm viability of the server comes into question. You do need a critical mass for the server to work long term else it will be yet another empty private server.

Honestly, I don't expect this server to get 500+ players at all because of the dead population starcraft has. I'm not throwing away the idea that it can't eventually build up its playerbase but it's just unlikely
The best bet however is the antihack, auto matchmaker, and international friendliness(translations in multiple languages)
http://www.reddit.com/r/broodwar/
Lorch
Profile Joined June 2011
Germany3688 Posts
May 22 2013 07:37 GMT
#47
- Automatic port forwarding to allow almost anyone to host games


Oh god that took me like forever to set up, so I think that'd be amazing.

I think the idea is great, and even though I don't play much bw having a new server would certainly motivate me to play more!
Glioburd
Profile Joined April 2008
France1911 Posts
May 22 2013 07:41 GMT
#48
On May 22 2013 10:33 1a2a3a[MB] wrote:
and the corrupt admins

lol.
"You should hate loosing, but you should never fear defeat." NaDa.
Severedevil
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
United States4839 Posts
May 22 2013 07:44 GMT
#49
Would this work better than getting everyone on Fish?
My strategy is to fork people.
SnowFantasy
Profile Blog Joined September 2006
4173 Posts
May 22 2013 07:51 GMT
#50
On May 22 2013 16:44 Severedevil wrote:
Would this work better than getting everyone on Fish?


not really.
Cele
Profile Blog Joined December 2008
Germany4016 Posts
May 22 2013 07:53 GMT
#51
On May 22 2013 16:41 Glioburd wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 22 2013 10:33 1a2a3a[MB] wrote:
and the corrupt admins

lol.


now they are even corrupt? i bid you to show proof.

Well, technically i dont care, but i wont be playing on a new server until it is more frequently used then ICC. Which isnt gonna happen. TL is a rather small community BW wise. And many people worldwide still play ICC.
Broodwar for life!
Mewka
Profile Joined February 2011
Poland1458 Posts
May 22 2013 07:58 GMT
#52
On May 22 2013 16:44 Severedevil wrote:
Would this work better than getting everyone on Fish?

its more like, bw needs foreign server too
Mewka, Mewka[AoV], Fox.Mewka, Mewman
TehRei
Profile Joined April 2012
Sweden261 Posts
May 22 2013 08:08 GMT
#53
On May 22 2013 15:59 Falling wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 22 2013 15:54 xboi209 wrote:
On May 22 2013 15:51 Kiante wrote:
There's a lot of issues with an idea like this. Just for starters, it's not as simple as developing and implementing the technology required to do the stuff on your list, but it's about maintainence. How are you going to deal with hackers, deal with disputes. You'll need lots of staff, clear rule sets and stuff like that, which is a hard thing to find. Volunteers by their nature are very unreliable, so you'd need a really good system to streamline their work or incentivise it. I just honestly am not sure how well this would work, even with iccup being stupid. At the end of the day, it's just me, sayle and stratos blacklisted, not really a huge deal imo (fish is better anyway).

I agree that in an ideal world, a server not run by iccup would be a great thing, but there are significant roadblocks in getting there, and even then trying to get enough people playing to make matchmaking work would be tough. If you are set on trying to do this, make sure you go in with a really well developed plan

Assuming that hoards of people(500+) doesn't come in, not a lot of staff is actually needed to maintain the server

But if hordes don't come, then automatchmaking and the longterm viability of the server comes into question. You do need a critical mass for the server to work long term else it will be yet another empty private server.

Well, this thread has only been up for a couple of hours, but as of writing this there 79 "Yes" votes for moving to a new server, along with 20 "if enough people switch". If the new server would get a shout-out in tournaments like TLS, and perhaps even be the server that the tournament is played on, I don't think that getting players there would necessarily be a problem.

What likely would be problem though is what Kiante mentioned, getting volunteers to work on this. If you're running server, it needs to be up 24/7, and have people working on it roughly 24/7 as well. Getting reliable and competent people to regularly invest a lot of their spare time for no monetary compensation is not as simple as it sounds. I'm sure there are people that fits that description, the question is if there's enough of them.
But, as Kiante also pointed out, with a really easy and streamlined system, it might be possible to do this. But it will take time, and it will not be an easy thing to accomplish.
XenOsky
Profile Blog Joined March 2008
Chile2295 Posts
May 22 2013 08:28 GMT
#54
i would play anywhere where my stats don't get deleted after every season, that why i used to love b.net...

having 500-300 stats was cool...
StarCraft & Audax Italiano.
SnowFantasy
Profile Blog Joined September 2006
4173 Posts
May 22 2013 08:48 GMT
#55
On May 22 2013 17:08 TehRei wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 22 2013 15:59 Falling wrote:
On May 22 2013 15:54 xboi209 wrote:
On May 22 2013 15:51 Kiante wrote:
There's a lot of issues with an idea like this. Just for starters, it's not as simple as developing and implementing the technology required to do the stuff on your list, but it's about maintainence. How are you going to deal with hackers, deal with disputes. You'll need lots of staff, clear rule sets and stuff like that, which is a hard thing to find. Volunteers by their nature are very unreliable, so you'd need a really good system to streamline their work or incentivise it. I just honestly am not sure how well this would work, even with iccup being stupid. At the end of the day, it's just me, sayle and stratos blacklisted, not really a huge deal imo (fish is better anyway).

I agree that in an ideal world, a server not run by iccup would be a great thing, but there are significant roadblocks in getting there, and even then trying to get enough people playing to make matchmaking work would be tough. If you are set on trying to do this, make sure you go in with a really well developed plan

Assuming that hoards of people(500+) doesn't come in, not a lot of staff is actually needed to maintain the server

But if hordes don't come, then automatchmaking and the longterm viability of the server comes into question. You do need a critical mass for the server to work long term else it will be yet another empty private server.

Well, this thread has only been up for a couple of hours, but as of writing this there 79 "Yes" votes for moving to a new server, along with 20 "if enough people switch". If the new server would get a shout-out in tournaments like TLS, and perhaps even be the server that the tournament is played on, I don't think that getting players there would necessarily be a problem.

What likely would be problem though is what Kiante mentioned, getting volunteers to work on this. If you're running server, it needs to be up 24/7, and have people working on it roughly 24/7 as well. Getting reliable and competent people to regularly invest a lot of their spare time for no monetary compensation is not as simple as it sounds. I'm sure there are people that fits that description, the question is if there's enough of them.
But, as Kiante also pointed out, with a really easy and streamlined system, it might be possible to do this. But it will take time, and it will not be an easy thing to accomplish.


It will be popular for the first couple days but maybe 15 of those 79 will actually switch.

4-5 of those 15 will switch back to iccup once they realized the other 64 did too.

You're left with 10 people. Four of them will be AFK in op teamliquid and 3 will be chatting.

At least you'll get to play 3 man KOTH games.
Nazza
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
Australia1654 Posts
May 22 2013 09:13 GMT
#56
On May 22 2013 17:48 SnowFantasy wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 22 2013 17:08 TehRei wrote:
On May 22 2013 15:59 Falling wrote:
On May 22 2013 15:54 xboi209 wrote:
On May 22 2013 15:51 Kiante wrote:
There's a lot of issues with an idea like this. Just for starters, it's not as simple as developing and implementing the technology required to do the stuff on your list, but it's about maintainence. How are you going to deal with hackers, deal with disputes. You'll need lots of staff, clear rule sets and stuff like that, which is a hard thing to find. Volunteers by their nature are very unreliable, so you'd need a really good system to streamline their work or incentivise it. I just honestly am not sure how well this would work, even with iccup being stupid. At the end of the day, it's just me, sayle and stratos blacklisted, not really a huge deal imo (fish is better anyway).

I agree that in an ideal world, a server not run by iccup would be a great thing, but there are significant roadblocks in getting there, and even then trying to get enough people playing to make matchmaking work would be tough. If you are set on trying to do this, make sure you go in with a really well developed plan

Assuming that hoards of people(500+) doesn't come in, not a lot of staff is actually needed to maintain the server

But if hordes don't come, then automatchmaking and the longterm viability of the server comes into question. You do need a critical mass for the server to work long term else it will be yet another empty private server.

Well, this thread has only been up for a couple of hours, but as of writing this there 79 "Yes" votes for moving to a new server, along with 20 "if enough people switch". If the new server would get a shout-out in tournaments like TLS, and perhaps even be the server that the tournament is played on, I don't think that getting players there would necessarily be a problem.

What likely would be problem though is what Kiante mentioned, getting volunteers to work on this. If you're running server, it needs to be up 24/7, and have people working on it roughly 24/7 as well. Getting reliable and competent people to regularly invest a lot of their spare time for no monetary compensation is not as simple as it sounds. I'm sure there are people that fits that description, the question is if there's enough of them.
But, as Kiante also pointed out, with a really easy and streamlined system, it might be possible to do this. But it will take time, and it will not be an easy thing to accomplish.


It will be popular for the first couple days but maybe 15 of those 79 will actually switch.

4-5 of those 15 will switch back to iccup once they realized the other 64 did too.

You're left with 10 people. Four of them will be AFK in op teamliquid and 3 will be chatting.

At least you'll get to play 3 man KOTH games.


It's easy. Just get 200 skynet bots to use your matchmaking system. Then run an event where humans have to fight ai to the death in some gigantic scoreboard server wide event....

About as easy as implementing an automatchmaking system for BW....

No one ever remembers second place, eh? eh? GIVE ME COMMAND
Berceno
Profile Joined May 2012
Spain401 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-05-22 10:09:26
May 22 2013 10:07 GMT
#57
if it had matchmaking I would switch asap. I would love to see something like age of empires II hd with broodwar ( and not for the graphics)
protoss living in da ghetto
BLinD-RawR
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
ALLEYCAT BLUES50592 Posts
May 22 2013 10:49 GMT
#58
if it had auto port forwarding I'd start playing BW again.
Brood War EICWoo Jung Ho, never forget.| Twitter: @BLinDRawR
ikan
Profile Joined December 2012
United States34 Posts
May 22 2013 10:54 GMT
#59
You could have seasonal stats in the profile for the season and lifetime stats in the profile on the website.
here for a good time, not a long time
Sinedd
Profile Joined July 2008
Poland7052 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-05-22 11:16:30
May 22 2013 11:15 GMT
#60
"Automatic port forwarding to allow almost anyone to host games"

IM FUCKING IN !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! WOOO !

please do this, please please please.. it would bring so many players to BW.. seriously !
T H C makes ppl happy
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 68 69 70 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Replay Cast
19:10
RSL Winner's Finals
Maru vs herO
SteadfastSC132
Liquipedia
LAN Event
18:00
LANified! 37: Groundswell
Discussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
mouzHeroMarine 575
White-Ra 237
SteadfastSC 132
IndyStarCraft 122
UpATreeSC 84
Railgan 29
JuggernautJason25
StarCraft: Brood War
Calm 3657
Rain 2332
Dewaltoss 187
Hyun 148
IntoTheRainbow 10
NaDa 9
Dota 2
capcasts62
League of Legends
rGuardiaN63
Counter-Strike
byalli4843
fl0m1169
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu219
Other Games
FrodaN2705
Grubby2371
Beastyqt745
crisheroes343
Lowko297
XaKoH 291
RotterdaM253
DeMusliM218
Sick145
Hui .144
KnowMe143
ArmadaUGS142
C9.Mang0115
Mew2King74
Livibee55
Trikslyr41
nookyyy 20
MindelVK11
Organizations
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Main Stream136
Other Games
BasetradeTV96
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 18 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• HeavenSC 7
• IndyKCrew
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Migwel
• intothetv
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Kozan
StarCraft: Brood War
• blackmanpl 23
• FirePhoenix12
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• WagamamaTV365
• Ler49
League of Legends
• TFBlade1564
Other Games
• imaqtpie997
• Shiphtur358
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
3h 4m
Replay Cast
13h 4m
WardiTV Korean Royale
16h 4m
OSC
21h 4m
Sparkling Tuna Cup
1d 14h
WardiTV Korean Royale
1d 16h
Replay Cast
2 days
Wardi Open
2 days
Monday Night Weeklies
2 days
StarCraft2.fi
2 days
[ Show More ]
Replay Cast
3 days
Wardi Open
3 days
StarCraft2.fi
3 days
PiGosaur Monday
4 days
Wardi Open
4 days
StarCraft2.fi
4 days
Replay Cast
5 days
The PondCast
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

SOOP Univ League 2025
RSL Revival: Season 3
Eternal Conflict S1

Ongoing

C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 4
YSL S2
BSL Season 21
CSCL: Masked Kings S3
Slon Tour Season 2
META Madness #9
SL Budapest Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2

Upcoming

BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2026
HSC XXVIII
RSL Offline Finals
WardiTV 2025
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026: Closed Qualifier
eXTREMESLAND 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.