• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 13:49
CEST 19:49
KST 02:49
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Rough Waters8[ASL22] Ro24 Preview: Siren's Call8[ASL22] Ro24 Preview: Summer's End9Serral wins HomeStory Cup 2915Serral wins Maestros of the Game 244
Community News
Official StarCraft website teases new content ahead of BlizzCon?96Stellar Fest TWO the Moon (Dec 16-20)9Weekly Cups (August 24-30): Patches' balance mod takes over3New 3v3 BGH Ladder (and more) on ShieldBattery!45Weekly Cups (August 17-23): Zerg dominate the week6
StarCraft 2
General
Balance hotfix patch 5.0.16b (July 16) SC4ALL: II Winner Will Earn a Spot at HSC 30! Nexon wins bid to develop StarCraft IP content, distribute Overwatch mobile game Weekly Cups (August 24-30): Patches' balance mod takes over September World Ranking: herO leads, Serral climbs
Tourneys
2026 GSTL Announcement Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Stellar Fest TWO the Moon (Dec 16-20) IntoTheTV X SOOP SC2 League : Weekly & Monthly SC2 INu's Battles#20 [BO.9]
Strategy
[G] Having the right mentality to improve
Custom Maps
Nexus Wars 2021 GUIDE [M] (2) Industrial Park
External Content
Mutation # 542 The Ascended Mutation # 541 Binary Choice The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 540 Dodge This
Brood War
General
Official StarCraft website teases new content ahead of BlizzCon? BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Pros React To: Calm's Big Brain Play Vs Mini New 3v3 BGH Ladder (and more) on ShieldBattery! [ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Rough Waters
Tourneys
[ASL22] Ro16 Group A [ASL22] Ro24 Group F [Megathread] Daily Proleagues Brood War in Budapest ! WORTEX 2026 BW Finals
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Odyssey Mineral Stack Saturation Replay Review Process - What do you do? Game Theory for Starcraft
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Diablo IV EVE Corporation [Maplestory Hardcore] Let's Play~!! General RTS Discussion Thread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish TSM pausing esports and CLG Dead
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Power Rank TL Mafia Community Thread NeO.D_StephenKing vs This Guy From 1 Million Dance
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine UK Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Artificial Intelligence Thread
Fan Clubs
MarineLorD Fan Club The Creator Fan Club The ShoWTimE Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 MLB/Baseball 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List Northern Ireland Global Starcraft
Blogs
F* the Children and Get Off …
TrAiDoS
Dreaming of BW patches (mod…
c3rberUs
Regacy Esports: The Bh…
regacyesports
LOCKPICKING NOOB
LUCKY_NOOB
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 6213 users

[D] New BW Server - Page 3

Forum Index > BW General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 68 69 70 Next
xboi209
Profile Blog Joined June 2011
United States1173 Posts
May 22 2013 06:49 GMT
#41
I like the idea of a TL branded server
http://www.reddit.com/r/broodwar/
Kiante
Profile Blog Joined December 2009
Australia7069 Posts
May 22 2013 06:51 GMT
#42
There's a lot of issues with an idea like this. Just for starters, it's not as simple as developing and implementing the technology required to do the stuff on your list, but it's about maintainence. How are you going to deal with hackers, deal with disputes. You'll need lots of staff, clear rule sets and stuff like that, which is a hard thing to find. Volunteers by their nature are very unreliable, so you'd need a really good system to streamline their work or incentivise it. I just honestly am not sure how well this would work, even with iccup being stupid. At the end of the day, it's just me, sayle and stratos blacklisted, not really a huge deal imo (fish is better anyway).

I agree that in an ideal world, a server not run by iccup would be a great thing, but there are significant roadblocks in getting there, and even then trying to get enough people playing to make matchmaking work would be tough. If you are set on trying to do this, make sure you go in with a really well developed plan
Writer
xboi209
Profile Blog Joined June 2011
United States1173 Posts
May 22 2013 06:54 GMT
#43
On May 22 2013 15:51 Kiante wrote:
There's a lot of issues with an idea like this. Just for starters, it's not as simple as developing and implementing the technology required to do the stuff on your list, but it's about maintainence. How are you going to deal with hackers, deal with disputes. You'll need lots of staff, clear rule sets and stuff like that, which is a hard thing to find. Volunteers by their nature are very unreliable, so you'd need a really good system to streamline their work or incentivise it. I just honestly am not sure how well this would work, even with iccup being stupid. At the end of the day, it's just me, sayle and stratos blacklisted, not really a huge deal imo (fish is better anyway).

I agree that in an ideal world, a server not run by iccup would be a great thing, but there are significant roadblocks in getting there, and even then trying to get enough people playing to make matchmaking work would be tough. If you are set on trying to do this, make sure you go in with a really well developed plan

Assuming that hoards of people(500+) doesn't come in, not a lot of staff is actually needed to maintain the server
http://www.reddit.com/r/broodwar/
Mewka
Profile Joined February 2011
Poland1458 Posts
May 22 2013 06:55 GMT
#44
iCCup -.- ...
Mewka, Mewka[AoV], Fox.Mewka, Mewman
Falling
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Canada11605 Posts
May 22 2013 06:59 GMT
#45
On May 22 2013 15:54 xboi209 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 22 2013 15:51 Kiante wrote:
There's a lot of issues with an idea like this. Just for starters, it's not as simple as developing and implementing the technology required to do the stuff on your list, but it's about maintainence. How are you going to deal with hackers, deal with disputes. You'll need lots of staff, clear rule sets and stuff like that, which is a hard thing to find. Volunteers by their nature are very unreliable, so you'd need a really good system to streamline their work or incentivise it. I just honestly am not sure how well this would work, even with iccup being stupid. At the end of the day, it's just me, sayle and stratos blacklisted, not really a huge deal imo (fish is better anyway).

I agree that in an ideal world, a server not run by iccup would be a great thing, but there are significant roadblocks in getting there, and even then trying to get enough people playing to make matchmaking work would be tough. If you are set on trying to do this, make sure you go in with a really well developed plan

Assuming that hoards of people(500+) doesn't come in, not a lot of staff is actually needed to maintain the server

But if hordes don't come, then automatchmaking and the longterm viability of the server comes into question. You do need a critical mass for the server to work long term else it will be yet another empty private server.
Moderator5000 of our finest Taliban warriors have been released! Rise up my brothers. Mashalla! al-Donald ibn-Frederick al-Masih allows it.
xboi209
Profile Blog Joined June 2011
United States1173 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-05-22 07:06:04
May 22 2013 07:04 GMT
#46
On May 22 2013 15:59 Falling wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 22 2013 15:54 xboi209 wrote:
On May 22 2013 15:51 Kiante wrote:
There's a lot of issues with an idea like this. Just for starters, it's not as simple as developing and implementing the technology required to do the stuff on your list, but it's about maintainence. How are you going to deal with hackers, deal with disputes. You'll need lots of staff, clear rule sets and stuff like that, which is a hard thing to find. Volunteers by their nature are very unreliable, so you'd need a really good system to streamline their work or incentivise it. I just honestly am not sure how well this would work, even with iccup being stupid. At the end of the day, it's just me, sayle and stratos blacklisted, not really a huge deal imo (fish is better anyway).

I agree that in an ideal world, a server not run by iccup would be a great thing, but there are significant roadblocks in getting there, and even then trying to get enough people playing to make matchmaking work would be tough. If you are set on trying to do this, make sure you go in with a really well developed plan

Assuming that hoards of people(500+) doesn't come in, not a lot of staff is actually needed to maintain the server

But if hordes don't come, then automatchmaking and the longterm viability of the server comes into question. You do need a critical mass for the server to work long term else it will be yet another empty private server.

Honestly, I don't expect this server to get 500+ players at all because of the dead population starcraft has. I'm not throwing away the idea that it can't eventually build up its playerbase but it's just unlikely
The best bet however is the antihack, auto matchmaker, and international friendliness(translations in multiple languages)
http://www.reddit.com/r/broodwar/
Lorch
Profile Joined June 2011
Germany3710 Posts
May 22 2013 07:37 GMT
#47
- Automatic port forwarding to allow almost anyone to host games


Oh god that took me like forever to set up, so I think that'd be amazing.

I think the idea is great, and even though I don't play much bw having a new server would certainly motivate me to play more!
Glioburd
Profile Joined April 2008
France1911 Posts
May 22 2013 07:41 GMT
#48
On May 22 2013 10:33 1a2a3a[MB] wrote:
and the corrupt admins

lol.
"You should hate loosing, but you should never fear defeat." NaDa.
Severedevil
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
United States4839 Posts
May 22 2013 07:44 GMT
#49
Would this work better than getting everyone on Fish?
My strategy is to fork people.
SnowFantasy
Profile Blog Joined September 2006
4173 Posts
May 22 2013 07:51 GMT
#50
On May 22 2013 16:44 Severedevil wrote:
Would this work better than getting everyone on Fish?


not really.
Cele
Profile Blog Joined December 2008
Germany4016 Posts
May 22 2013 07:53 GMT
#51
On May 22 2013 16:41 Glioburd wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 22 2013 10:33 1a2a3a[MB] wrote:
and the corrupt admins

lol.


now they are even corrupt? i bid you to show proof.

Well, technically i dont care, but i wont be playing on a new server until it is more frequently used then ICC. Which isnt gonna happen. TL is a rather small community BW wise. And many people worldwide still play ICC.
Broodwar for life!
Mewka
Profile Joined February 2011
Poland1458 Posts
May 22 2013 07:58 GMT
#52
On May 22 2013 16:44 Severedevil wrote:
Would this work better than getting everyone on Fish?

its more like, bw needs foreign server too
Mewka, Mewka[AoV], Fox.Mewka, Mewman
TehRei
Profile Joined April 2012
Sweden261 Posts
May 22 2013 08:08 GMT
#53
On May 22 2013 15:59 Falling wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 22 2013 15:54 xboi209 wrote:
On May 22 2013 15:51 Kiante wrote:
There's a lot of issues with an idea like this. Just for starters, it's not as simple as developing and implementing the technology required to do the stuff on your list, but it's about maintainence. How are you going to deal with hackers, deal with disputes. You'll need lots of staff, clear rule sets and stuff like that, which is a hard thing to find. Volunteers by their nature are very unreliable, so you'd need a really good system to streamline their work or incentivise it. I just honestly am not sure how well this would work, even with iccup being stupid. At the end of the day, it's just me, sayle and stratos blacklisted, not really a huge deal imo (fish is better anyway).

I agree that in an ideal world, a server not run by iccup would be a great thing, but there are significant roadblocks in getting there, and even then trying to get enough people playing to make matchmaking work would be tough. If you are set on trying to do this, make sure you go in with a really well developed plan

Assuming that hoards of people(500+) doesn't come in, not a lot of staff is actually needed to maintain the server

But if hordes don't come, then automatchmaking and the longterm viability of the server comes into question. You do need a critical mass for the server to work long term else it will be yet another empty private server.

Well, this thread has only been up for a couple of hours, but as of writing this there 79 "Yes" votes for moving to a new server, along with 20 "if enough people switch". If the new server would get a shout-out in tournaments like TLS, and perhaps even be the server that the tournament is played on, I don't think that getting players there would necessarily be a problem.

What likely would be problem though is what Kiante mentioned, getting volunteers to work on this. If you're running server, it needs to be up 24/7, and have people working on it roughly 24/7 as well. Getting reliable and competent people to regularly invest a lot of their spare time for no monetary compensation is not as simple as it sounds. I'm sure there are people that fits that description, the question is if there's enough of them.
But, as Kiante also pointed out, with a really easy and streamlined system, it might be possible to do this. But it will take time, and it will not be an easy thing to accomplish.
XenOsky
Profile Blog Joined March 2008
Chile2358 Posts
May 22 2013 08:28 GMT
#54
i would play anywhere where my stats don't get deleted after every season, that why i used to love b.net...

having 500-300 stats was cool...
ἡ τῆς Νεμέσεως τάξις
SnowFantasy
Profile Blog Joined September 2006
4173 Posts
May 22 2013 08:48 GMT
#55
On May 22 2013 17:08 TehRei wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 22 2013 15:59 Falling wrote:
On May 22 2013 15:54 xboi209 wrote:
On May 22 2013 15:51 Kiante wrote:
There's a lot of issues with an idea like this. Just for starters, it's not as simple as developing and implementing the technology required to do the stuff on your list, but it's about maintainence. How are you going to deal with hackers, deal with disputes. You'll need lots of staff, clear rule sets and stuff like that, which is a hard thing to find. Volunteers by their nature are very unreliable, so you'd need a really good system to streamline their work or incentivise it. I just honestly am not sure how well this would work, even with iccup being stupid. At the end of the day, it's just me, sayle and stratos blacklisted, not really a huge deal imo (fish is better anyway).

I agree that in an ideal world, a server not run by iccup would be a great thing, but there are significant roadblocks in getting there, and even then trying to get enough people playing to make matchmaking work would be tough. If you are set on trying to do this, make sure you go in with a really well developed plan

Assuming that hoards of people(500+) doesn't come in, not a lot of staff is actually needed to maintain the server

But if hordes don't come, then automatchmaking and the longterm viability of the server comes into question. You do need a critical mass for the server to work long term else it will be yet another empty private server.

Well, this thread has only been up for a couple of hours, but as of writing this there 79 "Yes" votes for moving to a new server, along with 20 "if enough people switch". If the new server would get a shout-out in tournaments like TLS, and perhaps even be the server that the tournament is played on, I don't think that getting players there would necessarily be a problem.

What likely would be problem though is what Kiante mentioned, getting volunteers to work on this. If you're running server, it needs to be up 24/7, and have people working on it roughly 24/7 as well. Getting reliable and competent people to regularly invest a lot of their spare time for no monetary compensation is not as simple as it sounds. I'm sure there are people that fits that description, the question is if there's enough of them.
But, as Kiante also pointed out, with a really easy and streamlined system, it might be possible to do this. But it will take time, and it will not be an easy thing to accomplish.


It will be popular for the first couple days but maybe 15 of those 79 will actually switch.

4-5 of those 15 will switch back to iccup once they realized the other 64 did too.

You're left with 10 people. Four of them will be AFK in op teamliquid and 3 will be chatting.

At least you'll get to play 3 man KOTH games.
Nazza
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
Australia1654 Posts
May 22 2013 09:13 GMT
#56
On May 22 2013 17:48 SnowFantasy wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 22 2013 17:08 TehRei wrote:
On May 22 2013 15:59 Falling wrote:
On May 22 2013 15:54 xboi209 wrote:
On May 22 2013 15:51 Kiante wrote:
There's a lot of issues with an idea like this. Just for starters, it's not as simple as developing and implementing the technology required to do the stuff on your list, but it's about maintainence. How are you going to deal with hackers, deal with disputes. You'll need lots of staff, clear rule sets and stuff like that, which is a hard thing to find. Volunteers by their nature are very unreliable, so you'd need a really good system to streamline their work or incentivise it. I just honestly am not sure how well this would work, even with iccup being stupid. At the end of the day, it's just me, sayle and stratos blacklisted, not really a huge deal imo (fish is better anyway).

I agree that in an ideal world, a server not run by iccup would be a great thing, but there are significant roadblocks in getting there, and even then trying to get enough people playing to make matchmaking work would be tough. If you are set on trying to do this, make sure you go in with a really well developed plan

Assuming that hoards of people(500+) doesn't come in, not a lot of staff is actually needed to maintain the server

But if hordes don't come, then automatchmaking and the longterm viability of the server comes into question. You do need a critical mass for the server to work long term else it will be yet another empty private server.

Well, this thread has only been up for a couple of hours, but as of writing this there 79 "Yes" votes for moving to a new server, along with 20 "if enough people switch". If the new server would get a shout-out in tournaments like TLS, and perhaps even be the server that the tournament is played on, I don't think that getting players there would necessarily be a problem.

What likely would be problem though is what Kiante mentioned, getting volunteers to work on this. If you're running server, it needs to be up 24/7, and have people working on it roughly 24/7 as well. Getting reliable and competent people to regularly invest a lot of their spare time for no monetary compensation is not as simple as it sounds. I'm sure there are people that fits that description, the question is if there's enough of them.
But, as Kiante also pointed out, with a really easy and streamlined system, it might be possible to do this. But it will take time, and it will not be an easy thing to accomplish.


It will be popular for the first couple days but maybe 15 of those 79 will actually switch.

4-5 of those 15 will switch back to iccup once they realized the other 64 did too.

You're left with 10 people. Four of them will be AFK in op teamliquid and 3 will be chatting.

At least you'll get to play 3 man KOTH games.


It's easy. Just get 200 skynet bots to use your matchmaking system. Then run an event where humans have to fight ai to the death in some gigantic scoreboard server wide event....

About as easy as implementing an automatchmaking system for BW....

No one ever remembers second place, eh? eh? GIVE ME COMMAND
Berceno
Profile Joined May 2012
Spain401 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-05-22 10:09:26
May 22 2013 10:07 GMT
#57
if it had matchmaking I would switch asap. I would love to see something like age of empires II hd with broodwar ( and not for the graphics)
protoss living in da ghetto
BLinD-RawR
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
ALLEYCAT BLUES51346 Posts
May 22 2013 10:49 GMT
#58
if it had auto port forwarding I'd start playing BW again.
Brood War EICWoo Jung Ho, never forget.| Twitter: @BLinDRawR
ikan
Profile Joined December 2012
United States34 Posts
May 22 2013 10:54 GMT
#59
You could have seasonal stats in the profile for the season and lifetime stats in the profile on the website.
here for a good time, not a long time
Sinedd
Profile Joined July 2008
Poland7052 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-05-22 11:16:30
May 22 2013 11:15 GMT
#60
"Automatic port forwarding to allow almost anyone to host games"

IM FUCKING IN !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! WOOO !

please do this, please please please.. it would bring so many players to BW.. seriously !
T H C makes ppl happy
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 68 69 70 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Monday Night Weeklies
16:00
#62
RotterdaM753
SteadfastSC649
TKL 258
IndyStarCraft 207
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
RotterdaM 753
SteadfastSC 649
ByuN 401
TKL 258
IndyStarCraft 207
BRAT_OK 51
Trap 34
MindelVK 16
StarCraft: Brood War
Calm 3404
Shuttle 1568
Soulkey 119
Zeus 98
Snow 76
Mong 51
ToSsGirL 40
Hyun 35
Sharp 34
PianO 24
[ Show more ]
Shine 14
Sacsri 10
ajuk12(nOOB) 8
Dota 2
qojqva4044
LuMiX1
Counter-Strike
fl0m1742
ScreaM1569
byalli1075
x6flipin536
olofmeister430
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu119
Other Games
Liquid`RaSZi2356
singsing1278
Grubby1173
Beastyqt796
ceh9667
Hui .220
ArmadaUGS188
C9.Mang0154
Trikslyr45
Organizations
Other Games
BasetradeTV72
[ Show 19 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• StrangeGG 51
• Adnapsc2 9
• Reevou 5
• intothetv
• IndyKCrew
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Migwel
• Kozan
StarCraft: Brood War
• HerbMon 25
• blackmanpl 19
• Michael_bg 1
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 2776
• WagamamaTV1089
• masondota274
Other Games
• imaqtpie784
• Shiphtur332
Upcoming Events
Afreeca Starleague
16h 11m
Leta vs ggaemo
Jaedong vs Queen
GSL
17h 11m
PiGosaur Cup
1d 6h
Kung Fu Cup
1d 17h
Replay Cast
2 days
The PondCast
2 days
KCM Race Survival
2 days
Escore
3 days
IntoTheTV X SOOP
3 days
CranKy Ducklings
4 days
[ Show More ]
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
Shopify Rebellion Sundays
5 days
Spirit vs Mixu
Clem vs TBD
RSL Revival
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Afreeca Starleague
6 days
WardiTV Weekly
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-09-02
PiG Sty Festival 8.0
Big Dog Cup 2026 Div 1

Ongoing

KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 3
K-JUNGMAN
ASL Season 22
Super Anchor Qualifying S3
CSL 2026 AUTUMN (S22)
Acropolis #5
Acropolis #5 - TRS
RSL Revival: Season 6
Calamity Invitational
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3
XSE Pro League 2026

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S3: King of Kings
Acropolis #5 - GSA
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Acropolis #5 - GSB
Acropolis #5 - GSC
SC4ALL II: Brood War
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
Stake Ranked Episode 6
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
IEM Beijing 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
1win Private Club #2
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #3
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.