• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 09:52
CEST 15:52
KST 22:52
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Finals Preview: Sweet Victory!9[ASL22] Ro4 Preview: Mirror Mirror6[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: Within Reach5[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: In A Tizzy11[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Holy Diver5
Community News
Evil Geniuses - shutting down12ISSL (IntoTheTV x SOOP SC2 League): Premier5Weekly Cups (October 12-18): 5.0.17 era begins1[$1250] International ShieldBattery League55Weekly Cups (October 5-11): Farewell to 5.0.167
StarCraft 2
General
REPORT: StarCraft 2: Remastered In Development No more SC2 streamers on team liquid? Daily SC2 Player Grid - feedback wanted Evil Geniuses - shutting down Weekly Cups (October 5-11): Farewell to 5.0.16
Tourneys
ScienceCraft (October 24-25) - Live Event RSL goes to London! 2026 Offline Finals Nov 21-22 ISSL (IntoTheTV x SOOP SC2 League): Premier Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament WORTEX Challenger Series — Open SC2 LAN in Budapes
Strategy
[H] ZvP Mid-Late Game: Stalkers Collossi HT
Custom Maps
[G] How to playtest arcade maps [A] Nemrods 1/4 players [M] (2) Sweltering Sands [M] (2) Frigid Storage
External Content
Mutation # 548 Shining Bright The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 547 Temple Of Terror Mutation # 546 Catch the Train
Brood War
General
Young Players Tournament Announced by SOOP BW General Discussion Bot on ladder Do we even care about balance? Mineral gathering rate (boosted) for each patch
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [$1250] International ShieldBattery League [ASL22] Grand Finals [BSL23] RO24 Group Stage
Strategy
50,000-Word Terran Builds Memo 2026-10-22 Cliff Jump Revisited (1 in a 1000 strategy) Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread General RTS Discussion Thread Armies of Exigo - YesYes? Dawn of War IV
Dota 2
Dota 2 Champions League Season 3 Begins April 25!
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
Canadian Politics Mega-thread US Politics Mega-thread Artificial Intelligence Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread
Fan Clubs
Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion!
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
How Much Genes Contribute to…
TrAiDoS
ShieldBattery on Mac
Kraekkling
[ASL22] Ro4 Day1 Ticket Giv…
bITt.mAN
38 yo Retired SWE loo…
PurE)Rabbit-SF
Can Bots Beat Pros?? Starcr…
namkraft
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 8595 users

[D] New BW Server - Page 3

Forum Index > BW General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 68 69 70 Next
xboi209
Profile Blog Joined June 2011
United States1173 Posts
May 22 2013 06:49 GMT
#41
I like the idea of a TL branded server
http://www.reddit.com/r/broodwar/
Kiante
Profile Blog Joined December 2009
Australia7069 Posts
May 22 2013 06:51 GMT
#42
There's a lot of issues with an idea like this. Just for starters, it's not as simple as developing and implementing the technology required to do the stuff on your list, but it's about maintainence. How are you going to deal with hackers, deal with disputes. You'll need lots of staff, clear rule sets and stuff like that, which is a hard thing to find. Volunteers by their nature are very unreliable, so you'd need a really good system to streamline their work or incentivise it. I just honestly am not sure how well this would work, even with iccup being stupid. At the end of the day, it's just me, sayle and stratos blacklisted, not really a huge deal imo (fish is better anyway).

I agree that in an ideal world, a server not run by iccup would be a great thing, but there are significant roadblocks in getting there, and even then trying to get enough people playing to make matchmaking work would be tough. If you are set on trying to do this, make sure you go in with a really well developed plan
Writer
xboi209
Profile Blog Joined June 2011
United States1173 Posts
May 22 2013 06:54 GMT
#43
On May 22 2013 15:51 Kiante wrote:
There's a lot of issues with an idea like this. Just for starters, it's not as simple as developing and implementing the technology required to do the stuff on your list, but it's about maintainence. How are you going to deal with hackers, deal with disputes. You'll need lots of staff, clear rule sets and stuff like that, which is a hard thing to find. Volunteers by their nature are very unreliable, so you'd need a really good system to streamline their work or incentivise it. I just honestly am not sure how well this would work, even with iccup being stupid. At the end of the day, it's just me, sayle and stratos blacklisted, not really a huge deal imo (fish is better anyway).

I agree that in an ideal world, a server not run by iccup would be a great thing, but there are significant roadblocks in getting there, and even then trying to get enough people playing to make matchmaking work would be tough. If you are set on trying to do this, make sure you go in with a really well developed plan

Assuming that hoards of people(500+) doesn't come in, not a lot of staff is actually needed to maintain the server
http://www.reddit.com/r/broodwar/
Mewka
Profile Joined February 2011
Poland1458 Posts
May 22 2013 06:55 GMT
#44
iCCup -.- ...
Mewka, Mewka[AoV], Fox.Mewka, Mewman
Falling
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Canada11607 Posts
May 22 2013 06:59 GMT
#45
On May 22 2013 15:54 xboi209 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 22 2013 15:51 Kiante wrote:
There's a lot of issues with an idea like this. Just for starters, it's not as simple as developing and implementing the technology required to do the stuff on your list, but it's about maintainence. How are you going to deal with hackers, deal with disputes. You'll need lots of staff, clear rule sets and stuff like that, which is a hard thing to find. Volunteers by their nature are very unreliable, so you'd need a really good system to streamline their work or incentivise it. I just honestly am not sure how well this would work, even with iccup being stupid. At the end of the day, it's just me, sayle and stratos blacklisted, not really a huge deal imo (fish is better anyway).

I agree that in an ideal world, a server not run by iccup would be a great thing, but there are significant roadblocks in getting there, and even then trying to get enough people playing to make matchmaking work would be tough. If you are set on trying to do this, make sure you go in with a really well developed plan

Assuming that hoards of people(500+) doesn't come in, not a lot of staff is actually needed to maintain the server

But if hordes don't come, then automatchmaking and the longterm viability of the server comes into question. You do need a critical mass for the server to work long term else it will be yet another empty private server.
ModeratorWake me up when Trump's term is finished. Slava Ukraini.
xboi209
Profile Blog Joined June 2011
United States1173 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-05-22 07:06:04
May 22 2013 07:04 GMT
#46
On May 22 2013 15:59 Falling wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 22 2013 15:54 xboi209 wrote:
On May 22 2013 15:51 Kiante wrote:
There's a lot of issues with an idea like this. Just for starters, it's not as simple as developing and implementing the technology required to do the stuff on your list, but it's about maintainence. How are you going to deal with hackers, deal with disputes. You'll need lots of staff, clear rule sets and stuff like that, which is a hard thing to find. Volunteers by their nature are very unreliable, so you'd need a really good system to streamline their work or incentivise it. I just honestly am not sure how well this would work, even with iccup being stupid. At the end of the day, it's just me, sayle and stratos blacklisted, not really a huge deal imo (fish is better anyway).

I agree that in an ideal world, a server not run by iccup would be a great thing, but there are significant roadblocks in getting there, and even then trying to get enough people playing to make matchmaking work would be tough. If you are set on trying to do this, make sure you go in with a really well developed plan

Assuming that hoards of people(500+) doesn't come in, not a lot of staff is actually needed to maintain the server

But if hordes don't come, then automatchmaking and the longterm viability of the server comes into question. You do need a critical mass for the server to work long term else it will be yet another empty private server.

Honestly, I don't expect this server to get 500+ players at all because of the dead population starcraft has. I'm not throwing away the idea that it can't eventually build up its playerbase but it's just unlikely
The best bet however is the antihack, auto matchmaker, and international friendliness(translations in multiple languages)
http://www.reddit.com/r/broodwar/
Lorch
Profile Joined June 2011
Germany3711 Posts
May 22 2013 07:37 GMT
#47
- Automatic port forwarding to allow almost anyone to host games


Oh god that took me like forever to set up, so I think that'd be amazing.

I think the idea is great, and even though I don't play much bw having a new server would certainly motivate me to play more!
Glioburd
Profile Joined April 2008
France1911 Posts
May 22 2013 07:41 GMT
#48
On May 22 2013 10:33 1a2a3a[MB] wrote:
and the corrupt admins

lol.
"You should hate loosing, but you should never fear defeat." NaDa.
Severedevil
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
United States4839 Posts
May 22 2013 07:44 GMT
#49
Would this work better than getting everyone on Fish?
My strategy is to fork people.
SnowFantasy
Profile Blog Joined September 2006
4173 Posts
May 22 2013 07:51 GMT
#50
On May 22 2013 16:44 Severedevil wrote:
Would this work better than getting everyone on Fish?


not really.
Cele
Profile Blog Joined December 2008
Germany4016 Posts
May 22 2013 07:53 GMT
#51
On May 22 2013 16:41 Glioburd wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 22 2013 10:33 1a2a3a[MB] wrote:
and the corrupt admins

lol.


now they are even corrupt? i bid you to show proof.

Well, technically i dont care, but i wont be playing on a new server until it is more frequently used then ICC. Which isnt gonna happen. TL is a rather small community BW wise. And many people worldwide still play ICC.
Broodwar for life!
Mewka
Profile Joined February 2011
Poland1458 Posts
May 22 2013 07:58 GMT
#52
On May 22 2013 16:44 Severedevil wrote:
Would this work better than getting everyone on Fish?

its more like, bw needs foreign server too
Mewka, Mewka[AoV], Fox.Mewka, Mewman
TehRei
Profile Joined April 2012
Sweden261 Posts
May 22 2013 08:08 GMT
#53
On May 22 2013 15:59 Falling wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 22 2013 15:54 xboi209 wrote:
On May 22 2013 15:51 Kiante wrote:
There's a lot of issues with an idea like this. Just for starters, it's not as simple as developing and implementing the technology required to do the stuff on your list, but it's about maintainence. How are you going to deal with hackers, deal with disputes. You'll need lots of staff, clear rule sets and stuff like that, which is a hard thing to find. Volunteers by their nature are very unreliable, so you'd need a really good system to streamline their work or incentivise it. I just honestly am not sure how well this would work, even with iccup being stupid. At the end of the day, it's just me, sayle and stratos blacklisted, not really a huge deal imo (fish is better anyway).

I agree that in an ideal world, a server not run by iccup would be a great thing, but there are significant roadblocks in getting there, and even then trying to get enough people playing to make matchmaking work would be tough. If you are set on trying to do this, make sure you go in with a really well developed plan

Assuming that hoards of people(500+) doesn't come in, not a lot of staff is actually needed to maintain the server

But if hordes don't come, then automatchmaking and the longterm viability of the server comes into question. You do need a critical mass for the server to work long term else it will be yet another empty private server.

Well, this thread has only been up for a couple of hours, but as of writing this there 79 "Yes" votes for moving to a new server, along with 20 "if enough people switch". If the new server would get a shout-out in tournaments like TLS, and perhaps even be the server that the tournament is played on, I don't think that getting players there would necessarily be a problem.

What likely would be problem though is what Kiante mentioned, getting volunteers to work on this. If you're running server, it needs to be up 24/7, and have people working on it roughly 24/7 as well. Getting reliable and competent people to regularly invest a lot of their spare time for no monetary compensation is not as simple as it sounds. I'm sure there are people that fits that description, the question is if there's enough of them.
But, as Kiante also pointed out, with a really easy and streamlined system, it might be possible to do this. But it will take time, and it will not be an easy thing to accomplish.
XenOsky
Profile Blog Joined March 2008
Chile2358 Posts
May 22 2013 08:28 GMT
#54
i would play anywhere where my stats don't get deleted after every season, that why i used to love b.net...

having 500-300 stats was cool...
ἡ τῆς Νεμέσεως τάξις
SnowFantasy
Profile Blog Joined September 2006
4173 Posts
May 22 2013 08:48 GMT
#55
On May 22 2013 17:08 TehRei wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 22 2013 15:59 Falling wrote:
On May 22 2013 15:54 xboi209 wrote:
On May 22 2013 15:51 Kiante wrote:
There's a lot of issues with an idea like this. Just for starters, it's not as simple as developing and implementing the technology required to do the stuff on your list, but it's about maintainence. How are you going to deal with hackers, deal with disputes. You'll need lots of staff, clear rule sets and stuff like that, which is a hard thing to find. Volunteers by their nature are very unreliable, so you'd need a really good system to streamline their work or incentivise it. I just honestly am not sure how well this would work, even with iccup being stupid. At the end of the day, it's just me, sayle and stratos blacklisted, not really a huge deal imo (fish is better anyway).

I agree that in an ideal world, a server not run by iccup would be a great thing, but there are significant roadblocks in getting there, and even then trying to get enough people playing to make matchmaking work would be tough. If you are set on trying to do this, make sure you go in with a really well developed plan

Assuming that hoards of people(500+) doesn't come in, not a lot of staff is actually needed to maintain the server

But if hordes don't come, then automatchmaking and the longterm viability of the server comes into question. You do need a critical mass for the server to work long term else it will be yet another empty private server.

Well, this thread has only been up for a couple of hours, but as of writing this there 79 "Yes" votes for moving to a new server, along with 20 "if enough people switch". If the new server would get a shout-out in tournaments like TLS, and perhaps even be the server that the tournament is played on, I don't think that getting players there would necessarily be a problem.

What likely would be problem though is what Kiante mentioned, getting volunteers to work on this. If you're running server, it needs to be up 24/7, and have people working on it roughly 24/7 as well. Getting reliable and competent people to regularly invest a lot of their spare time for no monetary compensation is not as simple as it sounds. I'm sure there are people that fits that description, the question is if there's enough of them.
But, as Kiante also pointed out, with a really easy and streamlined system, it might be possible to do this. But it will take time, and it will not be an easy thing to accomplish.


It will be popular for the first couple days but maybe 15 of those 79 will actually switch.

4-5 of those 15 will switch back to iccup once they realized the other 64 did too.

You're left with 10 people. Four of them will be AFK in op teamliquid and 3 will be chatting.

At least you'll get to play 3 man KOTH games.
Nazza
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
Australia1654 Posts
May 22 2013 09:13 GMT
#56
On May 22 2013 17:48 SnowFantasy wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 22 2013 17:08 TehRei wrote:
On May 22 2013 15:59 Falling wrote:
On May 22 2013 15:54 xboi209 wrote:
On May 22 2013 15:51 Kiante wrote:
There's a lot of issues with an idea like this. Just for starters, it's not as simple as developing and implementing the technology required to do the stuff on your list, but it's about maintainence. How are you going to deal with hackers, deal with disputes. You'll need lots of staff, clear rule sets and stuff like that, which is a hard thing to find. Volunteers by their nature are very unreliable, so you'd need a really good system to streamline their work or incentivise it. I just honestly am not sure how well this would work, even with iccup being stupid. At the end of the day, it's just me, sayle and stratos blacklisted, not really a huge deal imo (fish is better anyway).

I agree that in an ideal world, a server not run by iccup would be a great thing, but there are significant roadblocks in getting there, and even then trying to get enough people playing to make matchmaking work would be tough. If you are set on trying to do this, make sure you go in with a really well developed plan

Assuming that hoards of people(500+) doesn't come in, not a lot of staff is actually needed to maintain the server

But if hordes don't come, then automatchmaking and the longterm viability of the server comes into question. You do need a critical mass for the server to work long term else it will be yet another empty private server.

Well, this thread has only been up for a couple of hours, but as of writing this there 79 "Yes" votes for moving to a new server, along with 20 "if enough people switch". If the new server would get a shout-out in tournaments like TLS, and perhaps even be the server that the tournament is played on, I don't think that getting players there would necessarily be a problem.

What likely would be problem though is what Kiante mentioned, getting volunteers to work on this. If you're running server, it needs to be up 24/7, and have people working on it roughly 24/7 as well. Getting reliable and competent people to regularly invest a lot of their spare time for no monetary compensation is not as simple as it sounds. I'm sure there are people that fits that description, the question is if there's enough of them.
But, as Kiante also pointed out, with a really easy and streamlined system, it might be possible to do this. But it will take time, and it will not be an easy thing to accomplish.


It will be popular for the first couple days but maybe 15 of those 79 will actually switch.

4-5 of those 15 will switch back to iccup once they realized the other 64 did too.

You're left with 10 people. Four of them will be AFK in op teamliquid and 3 will be chatting.

At least you'll get to play 3 man KOTH games.


It's easy. Just get 200 skynet bots to use your matchmaking system. Then run an event where humans have to fight ai to the death in some gigantic scoreboard server wide event....

About as easy as implementing an automatchmaking system for BW....

No one ever remembers second place, eh? eh? GIVE ME COMMAND
Berceno
Profile Joined May 2012
Spain401 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-05-22 10:09:26
May 22 2013 10:07 GMT
#57
if it had matchmaking I would switch asap. I would love to see something like age of empires II hd with broodwar ( and not for the graphics)
protoss living in da ghetto
BLinD-RawR
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
ALLEYCAT BLUES51703 Posts
May 22 2013 10:49 GMT
#58
if it had auto port forwarding I'd start playing BW again.
Brood War EICWoo Jung Ho, never forget.| Twitter: @BLinDRawR
ikan
Profile Joined December 2012
United States34 Posts
May 22 2013 10:54 GMT
#59
You could have seasonal stats in the profile for the season and lifetime stats in the profile on the website.
here for a good time, not a long time
Sinedd
Profile Joined July 2008
Poland7052 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-05-22 11:16:30
May 22 2013 11:15 GMT
#60
"Automatic port forwarding to allow almost anyone to host games"

IM FUCKING IN !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! WOOO !

please do this, please please please.. it would bring so many players to BW.. seriously !
T H C makes ppl happy
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 68 69 70 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
WardiTV Summer Champion…
20:00
Not-Summer Champs Group B
GgMaChine vs Zoun
Lambo vs Zoun
IntoTheiNu 907
WardiTV856
TKL 240
Rex123
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
TKL 240
Rex 123
Classic 118
SHIN 11
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 49994
BeSt 1078
FanTaSy 953
Soulkey 628
Rush 574
Mini 545
Light 488
Soma 387
actioN 324
ggaemo 259
[ Show more ]
firebathero 237
Larva 234
Snow 186
ZerO 184
EffOrt 154
Hyuk 149
Stork 146
Sharp 117
Zeus 104
PianO 103
Killer 100
Dewaltoss 99
Mind 99
Hyun 90
Noble 58
soO 56
Trap 49
Movie 37
Mong 31
Hm[arnc] 31
sorry 26
zelot 24
Bale 22
Aegong 19
ToSsGirL 17
Terrorterran 15
Sacsri 13
HiyA 10
Rock 7
Dota 2
Gorgc15975
qojqva1271
XaKoH 302
syndereN298
XcaliburYe139
Counter-Strike
olofmeister1560
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor92
Other Games
singsing2173
B2W.Neo1242
hiko917
Beastyqt514
Lowko353
KnowMe130
ToD128
DeMusliM107
ZerO(Twitch)18
Organizations
StarCraft: Brood War
lovetv 10
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• StrangeGG 38
• maralekos10
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• HerbMon 35
• ChaeLyn 5
• iopq 1
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• WagamamaTV428
League of Legends
• Nemesis1968
Upcoming Events
OSC
8m
Big Brain Bouts
2h 8m
FEL
19h 8m
Patches Events
23h 8m
AI Arena Tournament
1d 3h
FEL
1d 20h
Sparkling Tuna Cup
1d 20h
Replay Cast
2 days
WardiTV Weekly
2 days
IntoTheTV X SOOP
3 days
ByuN vs Lambo
MaxPax vs Bunny
[ Show More ]
PiGosaur Cup
4 days
The PondCast
4 days
Kung Fu Cup
4 days
IntoTheTV X SOOP
5 days
SHIN vs GuMiho
Clem vs Classic
WardiTV Invitational
6 days
Epic.LAN
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-10-22
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
HCC Season 3

Ongoing

Acropolis #5
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 4
Acropolis #5 - GSC
1win Private Club #2
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026

Upcoming

BSL Season 23
IPSL Winter 2026-27
SC4ALL II: Brood War
BSL 23: Non-Korean Championship
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
eXTREMESLAND 2026
PGL Major Singapore 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 6
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
IEM Beijing 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.