EPT[D] New BW Server - Page 4
| Forum Index > BW General |
|
zoNin
Canada57 Posts
| ||
|
soujiro_
Uruguay5195 Posts
 | ||
|
skate_metaly
Romania38 Posts
Without a valid anti hacker , or some stats system, it's a lost cause unfortunately. But creating games is really easy, i didn't thought that on icc is that hard without port forwarding . | ||
|
Iplaythings
Denmark9110 Posts
On May 22 2013 16:53 Cele wrote: now they are even corrupt? i bid you to show proof. Well, technically i dont care, but i wont be playing on a new server until it is more frequently used then ICC. Which isnt gonna happen. TL is a rather small community BW wise. And many people worldwide still play ICC. Corrupt may or may not be stretching it, but they are unprofessional (like they IP banned a whole city) | ||
Manifesto7
Osaka27149 Posts
I think I know the answer... | ||
|
xboi209
United States1173 Posts
On May 22 2013 22:20 Manifesto7 wrote: So which is easier? Sitting down with iccup people amd working things out, or setting up a new server and maintaining it for years to come? I think I know the answer... Starting a new server, if you didn't think that then you obviously havent joined the iccup team yet. | ||
|
sabas123
Netherlands3122 Posts
also being able to have a pre portforwarded sever would be a 1000 times better for the community and being able to let new people stick with the game instead of leaving it becouse they can't find games | ||
Jaevlaterran
Sweden578 Posts
On May 22 2013 15:20 TehRei wrote: That would certainly help, but... I think this would go a long way towards populating the server. A BW-server managed by TL would be the dream, but a BW-server endorsed by TL would be almost as good (and more realistic). I also believe this would make BW a lot more approachable to new players. Currently, if someone new to the BW scene comes to TL and asks how to get started, they get an answer similar to this;
If it's possible to remove a few items from that list, or to have them available in the same place, that would go a long way towards making BW easier to pick up. For example: imagine if you could log in with your (already created) teamliquid account? Or if you don't have to port forward? Note that I'm not saying that teamliquid has to be in charge of running the proposed server, but if there's gonna be a new server, communication and cooperation with big BW communities such as TL and Defiler will be key. The closer fan communities and tournament organizers cooperate with the server admins, the better. I agree with all this. If there was one file to dowload and double click that did all those things on the list, I'd switch immediatly. | ||
|
sabas123
Netherlands3122 Posts
On May 22 2013 23:13 Jaevlaterran wrote: I agree with all this. If there was one file to dowload and double click that did all those things on the list, I'd switch immediatly. would there be a way that the swbi would be able to help set this up?? | ||
|
remag
Germany354 Posts
| ||
|
Dirtyharry
Germany171 Posts
| ||
|
iFU.pauline
France1574 Posts
| ||
|
sabas123
Netherlands3122 Posts
On May 23 2013 01:58 iFU.pauline wrote: Useless shit, it will just divide more and more the community. if there would be a port forward it would mean that newer people exetly would stick and thus make it bigger in the end, besides i doubt there would be a huge split if this stuff will be done correctly. | ||
|
dRaW
Canada5744 Posts
On May 22 2013 15:51 Kiante wrote: There's a lot of issues with an idea like this. Just for starters, it's not as simple as developing and implementing the technology required to do the stuff on your list, but it's about maintainence. How are you going to deal with hackers, deal with disputes. You'll need lots of staff, clear rule sets and stuff like that, which is a hard thing to find. Volunteers by their nature are very unreliable, so you'd need a really good system to streamline their work or incentivise it. I just honestly am not sure how well this would work, even with iccup being stupid. At the end of the day, it's just me, sayle and stratos blacklisted, not really a huge deal imo (fish is better anyway). I agree that in an ideal world, a server not run by iccup would be a great thing, but there are significant roadblocks in getting there, and even then trying to get enough people playing to make matchmaking work would be tough. If you are set on trying to do this, make sure you go in with a really well developed plan I agree, people are too unreliable and lazy. The best thing would have been just to fix iccup like 2 years ago. | ||
|
xboi209
United States1173 Posts
There is a possibility of having a host bot for ladder games though | ||
|
LRM)TechnicS
Bulgaria1565 Posts
On May 22 2013 15:51 Kiante wrote: At the end of the day, it's just me, sayle and stratos blacklisted, wait... wut? since when and what for? | ||
|
sabas123
Netherlands3122 Posts
well, actualy it are 6 people who got banned, kiante forgot to putslugger pie and me on the list^^ and we basicly got banned for insulting pucca saying giving him examples on why hes statement that he would have good knowlage about each mu was false. | ||
|
Glioburd
France1911 Posts
On May 23 2013 01:58 iFU.pauline wrote: Useless shit, it will just divide more and more the community. This | ||
|
Corrupt
Bulgaria1312 Posts
On May 22 2013 22:00 Iplaythings wrote: Corrupt may or may not be stretching it, but they are unprofessional (like they IP banned a whole city) Word. | ||
|
NeThZOR
South Africa7387 Posts
| ||
| ||
