| Blogs > affinity |
|
Dakk
Sweden572 Posts
 I go to a school here in sweden, and my profile is "game-production". We read a mandatory "all-around" profile the 1st year, then we get to choose from programming or design..  When i get back from my vacation, i will post 2-3 games here and hope for some responses, this was a good game actually. Liked it alot.. I still only did one year in school, so my games are gonna be fairly simple as a starter, but i will improve I promiss :D | ||
|
sLiniss
United States849 Posts
| ||
|
Southlight
United States11768 Posts
1) The help page needs some work, most notably with regards to the Class List. It would really help if you could organize them based on trees, and have a brief explanation with regards to the concept of the tree. For instance, you would have one tree go Sword -> Knight -> Slayer -> Spear -> Lancer -> Master Lancer (or w/e it was called) and describe it as something like a melee damage dealer that hits multiple rows. The reason why I say this is because for a newbie it's really hard to organize all the promotion trees in your head, and even into the level 30s I'm not really sure what's going on. 2) It would be nice if you could output a big text file (or something) of the combat log, as opposed to having to keep clicking fast forward. 3) Power seems bizarre in that I've seen multiple teams with one level 70 and a bunch of 30s sitting around my power level despite me having a bunch of lower 30s as well. Needless to say that one level 70 character bashes my face in. | ||
|
YPang
United States4024 Posts
| ||
|
affinity
United States266 Posts
Thanks, we'll fix that~ I also think the promotion tree needs work; we need to show information about the class on mouseovers or something. @Southlight: Thanks for the feedback! 1. I'm thinking about doing two things to make understanding what classes you want better: 1. Put class descriptions on the promotion page, so people have an idea what each class does + can turn into, and 2. improve the class trees 2. How about the autoplay button? 3. Yea, the matchmaking needs work =/ We're trying to think up of a better algorithm atm. | ||
|
ShadowDrgn
United States2497 Posts
I'd like to see: 1. Further increased xp/money rewards for having higher rep and defeating formations with higher power. Scale the xp to level accordingly. If you suck at the game and don't take the time to make a good formation, imbue items, etc. you should level slowly. If you're good, you should be rewarded. 2. Remove the queue dodging. Not really an issue now, but if there are better rewards for higher rep, don't let people artificially inflate their formations by only fighting ones they can beat. 3. Rescale the way battles are accumulated. Right now, it's way too easy to write a script to battle every 90 seconds. If you leave that running for 8 hours overnight, that's 320 battles. If you don't, you'll wake up with like 35-40 battles. Most games of this sort hand out actions linearly so there's no incentive to sit on the site refreshing all day (or bot). I'm curious why you decided to go the exponential route. Browser games typically appeal to people that only want to play once or twice a day, but yours rewards being logged in as much as possible. | ||
|
Ian Ian Ian
915 Posts
Also, is it just me, or am I unable to find a class that is pushed towards pure attack? Yesterday I spent awhile refreshing for new trainees and got a few sexy tankers with 7+ vit, a guy with 7.9 strength, and then some random stuff with like 7 luk and 7 str. I then spent time researching classes and none of them seemed really geared towards pure attack. The game seems to get really boring around mid-level.. leveling starts tot ake really long around level 25 and other then changing classes/levels theres not muc way to buff your characters since the equipment system is so limited.. i maxed all my equips like right away. | ||
|
Djin)ftw(
Germany3357 Posts
![[image loading]](http://img251.imageshack.us/img251/4642/bugopera1051.jpg) ![[image loading]](http://img46.imageshack.us/img46/5499/bugopera10512.jpg) ![[image loading]](http://img824.imageshack.us/img824/5497/bugopera10513.jpg) | ||
|
Ian Ian Ian
915 Posts
So I try to get my account info by entering my email and apparently it's case sensitive, also kind of stupid -.- Also, you sohuld be able to get your account info e-mialed to you with just your e-mail or account, not both, because somtimes I forget one or the other, lol. | ||
|
ShadowDrgn
United States2497 Posts
On July 09 2010 21:25 Ian Ian Ian wrote: Also, is it just me, or am I unable to find a class that is pushed towards pure attack? Yesterday I spent awhile refreshing for new trainees and got a few sexy tankers with 7+ vit, a guy with 7.9 strength, and then some random stuff with like 7 luk and 7 str. I then spent time researching classes and none of them seemed really geared towards pure attack. Tyrant, Conqueror, Deadeye are probably your best bets for pure attack. | ||
|
Djin)ftw(
Germany3357 Posts
If you recruit someone new there it says "Basic Rating: Awful Average Okay Good" Where can I see that for my first 7 fighters? | ||
|
Ian Ian Ian
915 Posts
On July 09 2010 22:48 ShadowDrgn wrote: Tyrant, Conqueror, Deadeye are probably your best bets for pure attack. What about a pure tank? Thanks for the advice :D | ||
|
Garrl
Scotland1982 Posts
![[image loading]](http://img5.imageshack.us/img5/9899/drawzg.png)  Surely that should've ended as a draw?Edit: also, I laughed - #376 KOREAN AIR OSL (banana) 981 61 - 62 | ||
|
Ian Ian Ian
915 Posts
| ||
|
DarthThienAn
United States2734 Posts
@whoever asked: I just recruited someone and named them Flash, Jaedong, etc. | ||
|
affinity
United States266 Posts
@Shadowdrgn: Your point about things not being competitive at a lower level + being a filler REALLY gave me perspective on things, thanks. 1. Definitely makes sense; if you beat a formation with reputation much higher than yours, you should get some kind of big bonus. The exp system which is currently based on opponent power is flawed. I think changing it to reflect on reputation would be a good idea. 2. With the new system that we're going to implement (see 3-5 formations and choose 1 to attack; you can see a little bit of info on the formation such as bounty + some characters), I think players should be rewarded for knowing what kind of formations they can beat and which ones they should stay away from. 3. I think people should be rewarded if they log in more than once a day. If they want to spend more time with us, then we should make things better for them. As for bots, i think that's a separate issue. | ||
|
kefif
Poland264 Posts
| ||
|
Djin)ftw(
Germany3357 Posts
dont know how it is on higher levels, but 10 rounds he needs to survive seems to be too long. Maybe it's viable if you have 2 or 3 hp%/regen boosts, but I don't know if the group would still be strong then €: nice game though i have to say, impressive. Refining/Imbuing alone are funny as hell. btw savant cant carry a weapon until lvl 24, is that supposed to be? OO now i promoted him and canT give him a weapon lol | ||
|
Ian Ian Ian
915 Posts
Djin: I think at higherlevels battles take way longer or something. Which I think is kind of dumb.. like when you're trying to develope you're formation to be the best it can be, and all of a sudden the way battles get carried out changes drastically, it becomes hard to plan ahead.. Also, hw about a way to tell if you won a battle or not without clicking on the button to see the end? Like a "You werevictorious" at thetop of the screen.. not the bottom, lol. | ||
|
Ian Ian Ian
915 Posts
| ||
| ||
|
|
The PondCast
WardiTV Qualifier
OSC
Online Event
Korean StarCraft League
Afreeca Starleague
Rush vs Soulkey
CranKy Ducklings
AI Arena Tournament
BSL Open Qualifier
Sparkling Tuna Cup
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
