|
On June 02 2011 05:17 Palmar wrote: I'm calling you scum because you're scum.
Also because your pm from dec said so.
Good enough reasoning for me bro. Explain as much as you can. First who are you referring to?
|
Hurry Palmar...time's running out.
|
|
referring to chaos13
he's scum bro.
|
I'm leaving my vote on Tackster so as to not spread out the votes and make it a 1 vote lynch, but I'd like to bring up a suspicious player. I'd like to make it clear that I'm not advocating lynching this guy now, but pointing out what he's been up to for later reference.
+ Show Spoiler [analysis] +Kurumi has already brought him up, and upon looking through his posts, I found a lot of scummy content. That person is prplhzhe's either absolute noobtown or scum being coached to act noob, like sinani last game. The thing is, if you look through his posts in SNMM II, he's capable of forming a logical, intelligent argument. in this game, however, he is doing quite the opposite. Some of his scummy gems: + Show Spoiler [regarding kita] + On May 31 2011 20:12 prplhz wrote:I'm gonna agree with the FoS on kitaman27. One of his first post is this: + Show Spoiler +On May 31 2011 05:06 kitaman27 wrote: Agreed.
I'm green with envy for your scum hunting skills. .. and I honestly do not know what to read into that. First time I read it I didn't even notice but I think it's a weird thing to say. The following posts are all without content, telling people to stop talking about dog+list. Then he just made his biggest contribution yet, in defense of himself. I consider this scummy. + Show Spoiler [regarding sandroba] +On June 01 2011 08:43 prplhz wrote: I think I'm gonna vote for sandroba.
He came up with a crazy plan that got shot down like a lot of plans do. Then he claimed "LAL" and left and now he's back and defending his plan again. I am voting for him solely because I think that this is odd behavior and I don't think that I would ever act like that.
Other than that I think he is spammy. (though not as terrible as Kurumi who I think is actively trying to disrupt constructive townie discussion, but I don't think that he is scum so I'm not voting for him).
##Vote sandroba On June 01 2011 09:04 prplhz wrote: @sandroba
Care to explain why you aren't scum?????????????????????????????????????????????
You reek of scum because of your behavior. I'm pretty sure I already stated this. You go batshit crazy every time anybody talks about you and this just not fits with townie behavior in my book. It might be double reverse WIFOM from my side retaining your point of view but I really think that you're not town.
Do you feel the heat sandroba? Yea it's not pleasant now is it? This especially is a terrible post. Mentions "double reverse WifoM" and attacks sandroba for defending himself, albeit aggressively. On June 01 2011 09:38 prplhz wrote: @sandroba
If I were you'd I'd just accept my fate. You are going to get lynched because you act scummy. Now in the case that you are really just a bad townie acting aloof, you should really try to contribute before it is too late. Your analysis may become invaluable once that we know your alignment for sure. This one too. "don't even try to not get lynched, just contribute then when we lynch you we can look at your analysis." + Show Spoiler [regarding tackster] +Bring on the hardcore defense of a lurker who posts fluff. On June 01 2011 10:28 prplhz wrote: @Node
If you think that Tackster was really scum would he have ended his post with "KISSES xx". And you say that his post is easily not noticable, I just really think that it is. It is a very long post from a dude you haven't seen around a lot. I think if he were scum he would really have made that post a bit shorter, it might be the longest post I remember reading in this post so far. That said, yes it is full of fluff but I don't think we should judge people by their not being useful right now. This game is beyond complex and I don't think anybody has proved to be conclusively useful yet. I also think that in the likely case that Tackster flips green then we will have gained nothing except a wasted lynch.
WifoM(KISSES), could be a joke, then makes the terrible suggestion that we shouldn't judge people by how helpful they've been. On June 01 2011 10:56 prplhz wrote: @Node
Would you really not agree that if you don't want to draw too much attention to yourself and your post, you don't write something in it that will wholly differentiate you from everybody else in the game? Such as writing something as insane as "KISSES xx"? I am not saying that it is that easy, I am just saying that if he wanted to go unnoticed with his post then it would have been easy and he would probably not try to call unnecessary attention to it. Like you do by writing crazy stuff like that.
I think your argument for voting for Tackster is pretty bad and I also think that if Tackster flips green, something I consider very likely, then we will have gained absolutely nothing except maybe a clear scum read on sandroba. But I know another way to get a clear scum read on sandroba that will even give us more information if sandroba flips green than if Tackster does. We flip sandroba! So the Kisses thing is a serious defense? What? repeating defenses of Tackster and tunneling sandroba. And now we come to his voting pattern. Votes sandroba, is extremely confident of sandroba. Suddenly, when more people start posting in favor of sand being town, he backs down. On June 01 2011 22:52 prplhz wrote: Okay I agree that there's no point in spreading votes like this. sandroba has had his share of pressure put on him and if people don't think that he slipped then I guess I'll drop my case against him for now.
##Unvote sandroba "I've pressured him enough, not going to spread my vote" sandroba is (was?) up there on the vote count. Taking a vote off him is not helping focus the lynch targets. Then Kurumi starts to put on some pressure, and instead of refuting his points, prplhz does this: On June 02 2011 00:43 prplhz wrote: @Kurumi
As do I with your vote on me. If you of all people want to apply pressure then maybe it's not me you should be voting for. You are not helping anybody in any way right now. On June 02 2011 04:06 prplhz wrote: I am going to vote for Kurumi because I find his behavior disruptive. I think he has about 60-70 posts in this game so far and I bet almost all of them are one/two liners. I also have another reason that makes him scummy, he has done something that we all agreed townies should not do, but I cannot tell you about that until day2.
##Vote: Kurumi OMGUS, and not recognizing that Kurumi has been as helpful as I've ever seen him. his style is short posts, and this game he's had a lot of long ones too. Look through XXXIX, he plays very similarly, and gets lynched for it as town. I don't want to make that mistake again.
|
VisceraEyes
On June 02 2011 02:48 VisceraEyes wrote: @Everyone else I don't care if ANYONE answers my survey. I thought I made that clear. If people answer my survey, it will help town as people will have more information to compare against in the future when scum-hunting. But the point wasn't for people to answer, the point was for people to THINK about the questions, which obviously people have.
Ok,I said that his survey and such was a newbie move,but he justifies it and talks as it was a plan. It makes me think that he wanted to get town cred with that,act cool and stuff. What's the point of posting something which You don't care about being discussed? Ah yes,derailing the thread.
On June 01 2011 15:24 VisceraEyes wrote:Show nested quote +On June 01 2011 15:19 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On June 01 2011 15:15 VisceraEyes wrote: @BC
Not usually.
You don't really have to be a dick, guy. I don't know what you're angry about SPECIFICALLY, but I know it doesn't have anything to do with me. I'm not angry duder. Don't take my posting to be angry unless you see mass caps and me calling you a retarded backwoods faggot or the like. I find being aggressive as I am a much better way to force people to step up than being nice about it. It also forces players into arguing. That in turn gives information that is used to analyze people. I know I come off as a dick, but if you sit back and look at what I'm doing the reason is pretty clear. It gives town information to work from, as well as helping you learn areas you need improvement in your game. We all have areas to improve, no shame in it. No, but there's a difference between being aggressive in your posting and just being insulting and rude. But whatever. Teach me how awful I am, if you think you can. And if you're alive that long. If You're alive that long? Sure You want to kill one of the most pro-town guys around there,Viscera.. It's all shady for me though,he's the scummiest among the four candidates: tnkted needs alignment check and we're home sandroba is desperate townie,if he is indeed scum it will flow out next day. Trackster is inactive,though he posted now. I think we should tell him NOT TO use his power or he is shot/policy lynched. I'd go for prplhz,but You're not willing too,like with every suspect of mine.. Well,Bum is spewing some green happiness now.
|
yeah whatever, let's kill VisEyes tonight.
Varpulis, tnkted and chaos13 can be taken care of by vigis
|
On June 02 2011 05:25 Palmar wrote: referring to chaos13
he's scum bro. Did you receive a PM from Decon regarding this due to your role, or is this your opinion?
|
Oh also about Viscera,after BC pressured him Viscera began attacking back and voting him.
|
Kurumi stfu for 10 minutes.
|
Well, Tackster is pretty much worthless if his role is real. Stupid role, imo. Viscera is the only other person on that list that I might consider voting for, let me look through his posts before making a decision.
|
On June 02 2011 05:29 Jackal58 wrote: Kurumi stfu for 10 minutes.
|
If my fistpound of Palmar before didn't get counted: #Fistpound: Palmar
|
On June 02 2011 05:32 redFF wrote: I was hoping we could get an answer from Palmar with out it being lost in 300 posts of no you.
|
It's nothing I can confirm Jackal58, so I'm not gonna try to bullshit the town into voting him dead.
I dunno bro, he's just giving me maf vibes all around.
|
Thank you Palmar. Carry on Kurumi. No offense intended.
|
On June 02 2011 05:38 Jackal58 wrote: Thank you Palmar. Carry on Kurumi. No offense intended. Jackal what do you think of Mataza? What do you think of me? Is Tackster the correct lynch?
|
Damn,the more I think about the lynch the more I am focused on Sandroba.. I don't know.. I just feel this.. ITCH,an itch to change vote not on Viscera but Sandroba. Unless Sandroba takes vote off Trackster ##Vote Sandroba
|
I stand by my vote on BloodyC0bbler. If anyone is waiting to see if I'll scum-switch, not even to save my life.
If I die, make damn sure you guys are confident of the motives of who you follow.
|
I'm on the fence about VisceraEyes. Either he's scum and doing a poor job of it or town and doing a terrible job of it. I'm not going to go post by post because I don't have time to make a well organized post (20 min till lynch, want to give people time to respond), but in bullet point form: - He states the obvious
- claims not to see scumtells because of meta discussion
- his scummy as all hell survey
- the vet claim after, which is just about the stupidest thing you could do as vet
- wants to lynch BC (scumtell,scumtell,scumtell,scumtell)
- claims noob to avoid confrontation
- defends his scummy survey by saying it was supposed to be scummy
There may be more, but I'm in a hurry. Thoughts? At this point, he seems more scummy to me than Tackster, if Tackster agrees to step it up if we don't lynch him.
|
|
|
|