EPTi don't see a day post so im assuming nobody got their roles
TL Mafia XXXV - Page 10
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
DoctorHelvetica
United States15034 Posts
i don't see a day post so im assuming nobody got their roles | ||
|
DoctorHelvetica
United States15034 Posts
On December 27 2010 12:05 seRapH wrote: I saw your /in post but you're not on the player list  oh that sucks ##Vote: Flamewheel | ||
|
LSB
United States5171 Posts
| ||
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26780 Posts
It's called signing up late, DoctorHelvetica. | ||
|
DoctorHelvetica
United States15034 Posts
| ||
|
Coagulation
United States9633 Posts
| ||
|
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26780 Posts
| ||
|
Mr. Wiggles
Canada5894 Posts
| ||
|
ShoCkeyy
7815 Posts
| ||
|
LunarDestiny
United States4177 Posts
On December 27 2010 11:50 Pandain wrote: WHAT TO DO FOR TODAY I say to do this ery day, I say to do this now. Town should lynch inactives. This is actually a somewhat complicated process. Right now in the beginning I will just begin voting people(pressuring) until they make enough of a meaningful post and then I’ll vote someone else. Now, the point is to lynch those who “contribute without really contributing” not those who are just going to get modkilled. That is why at the end it’ll end up being one of the “semi lurkers”, not the dead ones. SUMMARY 1.Contribute without spamming 2.Be active, make well thought out posts. 3.Lynch the semi inactives, inactives for now. On December 27 2010 11:51 Pandain wrote: ##Vote: Mr. Wiggles Contradiction? Pandain say we should lynch inactive for day1 then vote for Mr. Wiggles? Pandain, please explain. | ||
|
bumatlarge
United States4567 Posts
Instead of standard RNG, let's just start from the top and go 'eenymeenyminymoe' That way we all vote for the same person. Oh well sorry RoL. Or we could deduce things and throw RNG in a fire. I say we kill pandain. | ||
|
Node
United States2159 Posts
| ||
|
Mr. Wiggles
Canada5894 Posts
If he is of the belief I'm spamming, I've just been posting somewhat short responses because there hasn't really been anything worth discussing up to this point. He said we should post the semi-inactives to begin with, those who post without really contributing anything, which I guess is pretty much everyone here up until now. But then again, if he said he's going to pressure vote people into writing longer, more meaningful post instead of one-liners, I guess it's mission accomplished as far as I'm concerned. | ||
|
LSB
United States5171 Posts
On December 27 2010 12:35 Mr. Wiggles wrote: If he is of the belief I'm spamming, I've just been posting somewhat short responses because there hasn't really been anything worth discussing up to this point. What do you feel about lynching inactives / spammers? What do you feel that the blues should do? | ||
|
Incognito
United States2071 Posts
On December 27 2010 12:12 flamewheel wrote: Incognito is writing one. No I'm not  | ||
|
Mr.Zergling
United States141 Posts
| ||
|
LSB
United States5171 Posts
| ||
|
LSB
United States5171 Posts
| ||
|
Coagulation
United States9633 Posts
| ||
|
Mr. Wiggles
Canada5894 Posts
On December 27 2010 12:37 LSB wrote: What do you feel about lynching inactives / spammers? What do you feel that the blues should do? Like I've said, I don't have a ton of mafia experience so most of this is just my opinion: As far as what blues should do is concerned, there isn't really much they can do right now, besides try to blend in, and wait until it's easier to figure out who's who. Right now their actions are going to be more or less random, though they should try to base their actions a bit on what's been posted in the thread, though as I repeat, it's not going to be the most useful information when there isn't a ton of discussion going on. I feel inactives are either people who aren't very interested in the game, or people who are trying to lay low and hide, so they should be looked at, and possibly lynched because we really have no way to analyze them besides their lack of participation. Spammers are people who are trying hard to prove that they are active. So this could be someone trying to blend into the town or something and again, they should be looked at and considered as lynching candidates. However, if I recall correctly, this game has several new people who have not played mafia before, so some spamming from newer players may be either nervousness, or an irrational fear of being considered inactive. (Kind've of like what I did). So to summarize: 1. I have no idea what blues should do, besides try to make the best of the limited information they have this early into the game. 2. We should look at both inactives and spammers as candidates for lynching, because they may be either trying to hide or they are nervous and trying very hard to fit in. (Though we shouldn't exclude other suspicious people as candidates). At least, this is my unqualified opinion. :p | ||
| ||
