could a chess champion get out of this scenario? - Page 3
Blogs > BlueRoyaL |
GreEny K
Germany7312 Posts
| ||
LetMeLiveABit
Malaysia20 Posts
On May 22 2010 05:31 mucker wrote: Two pages and no one has brought up the most important issue yet.... + Show Spoiler + is she hot? This is why they're good at chess. | ||
Divinek
Canada4045 Posts
On May 22 2010 04:55 liaf wrote: If she was good enough to get out of this position, she would have been good enough not to get in this position in the first place that's the big crux, in a million years she'd never win this position given how the skill sides look to have developed to this situation. oh but if based on the topic title, could magnus carlsen beat you in this game? yeah maybe he could | ||
Fenrax
United States5018 Posts
| ||
metaphoR
United States199 Posts
| ||
Elyvilon
United States13143 Posts
Past that, no, not really. | ||
hypercube
Hungary2735 Posts
| ||
NobleDog
United States65 Posts
#2--As has been said, unless you just start giving away pieces she has no chance to come back, and the same for a strong master. The key would be how well/poorly you play. A queen up in material is just huge at that point and in that position. | ||
lac29
United States1485 Posts
| ||
Chef
10810 Posts
In any case, it's called forfeiting when you leave the table, so she lost. Call her a faggot noob and enjoy the glory. If she would have stayed in that game, she's basically the equivalent of an eastern pubby terran that hides floating buildings in the corner of the map. | ||
avilo
United States4100 Posts
On May 22 2010 05:00 Ecrilon wrote: You need to ask? Looks, to put this is Starcraft terms, she has one mining base, 50 supply and no bank. You have a 200/200 3/3 ball of your choice and the rest of the map, mostly unsaturated because you have all your supply in military and 6000/4000 in the bank. Can you lose? Yeah I guess, if you never macro and just run your units back and forth across her ramp and lose all of them and do nothing while she seiges every expo. Will you lose? No. No you will not. this. | ||
calgar
United States1277 Posts
As to your question, is white a huge advantage, boils down to equilibrium. In chess an equilibrium is what results from a naturally symmetrical and even position. As white, with the move advantage, the ability to break the equilibrium results in about a 55% win at top level play. Initiative is a strong theme in chess that white is better able to take control of. A win as white or draw as black is considered a success, but at lower levels color is a minor advantage/disadvantage at best. Depending on peoples comfort with openings and positions some even prefer black because they feel at home in the positions they frequently find themselves in. | ||
lowbright
308 Posts
| ||
Kashll
United States1117 Posts
| ||
ssj114
Afghanistan461 Posts
| ||
Badjas
Netherlands2038 Posts
On May 22 2010 04:48 Bill Murray wrote: you are wrong theoretically he can fuck up, sure, but if he plays perfect he literally can't lose. nothing she can do. she has to hope he fucks up. Theoretically: concerned primarily with theories or hypotheses rather than practical considerations | ||
Snet
United States3573 Posts
| ||
anch
United States5457 Posts
edit: wow my suggestion really sucked before reading all the moves before me. shows how much I know. lol. also: goodjob saving the screenshot, even if she drives a caravan she cannot Dodge this. | ||
SleepSheep
Canada344 Posts
| ||
| ||