|
NOTE: When providing a source, please provide a very brief summary on what it's about and what purpose it adds to the discussion. The supporting statement should clearly explain why the subject is relevant and needs to be discussed. Please follow this rule especially for tweets.
Your supporting statement should always come BEFORE you provide the source. |
"Let's start with this one as it's quite easy. If you're in Afghanistan and you want the US gone, you become a farmer. Or you become a construction worker or a businessman or just about any fucking job that a normal human being would have. Despite moronic claims on the internet, the US is not imperialistic. The US doesn't take land. 1) It removes the bad leadership, 2) it installs new leadership picked by the local people from local people, and 3) then it tries to build a mutually prosperous alliance."
This is 1:1 Putin's reasoning.
I also find it fascinating how you also claim that Israel did nothing wrong in Gaza until October 7 despite all the evidence to the contrary that has been posted in this very thread (years earlier, and again several times after Oct 7). This level of ignorance and misinformation has to be deliberate.
|
|
Northern Ireland22954 Posts
On February 05 2024 21:55 Magic Powers wrote: "Let's start with this one as it's quite easy. If you're in Afghanistan and you want the US gone, you become a farmer. Or you become a construction worker or a businessman or just about any fucking job that a normal human being would have. Despite moronic claims on the internet, the US is not imperialistic. The US doesn't take land. 1) It removes the bad leadership, 2) it installs new leadership picked by the local people from local people, and 3) then it tries to build a mutually prosperous alliance."
This is 1:1 Putin's reasoning.
I also find it fascinating how you also claim that Israel did nothing wrong in Gaza until October 7 despite all the evidence to the contrary that has been posted in this very thread (years earlier, and again several times after Oct 7). This level of ignorance and misinformation has to be deliberate. I mean the US isn’t colonialist for the most part. But I think many view colonialism and imperialism as directly synonymous when they really aren’t in today’s world.
So I’d assume it’s just that conflation of terms coming to bear here.
|
On February 05 2024 21:52 JimmiC wrote:Show nested quote +On February 05 2024 20:33 Acrofales wrote:On February 05 2024 17:22 RenSC2 wrote:Sorry for late reply. On February 02 2024 20:14 Nebuchad wrote:On February 02 2024 19:56 Magic Powers wrote:On February 02 2024 19:20 Nebuchad wrote: So Ren, I'm a 19-year-old Palestinian in Gaza, I really want Palestinians to be free from Israel and I'm willing to use violence to reach this goal. What organization should I join? You can only be a freedom fighter if you fight for what foreigners - not your own people - consider freedom. If your own people see and treat you as a freedom fighter, but people of foreign nations see you as an oppressor, then you are an oppressor and not a freedom fighter. It doesn't matter what your own people think, they're infants who can't think and choose for themselves. It only matters what foreigners think. Also, if a foreigner agrees with those people that the fighters are fighting for, then they're supporting oppression and generally Satan. So, I wouldn't associate with this exact language. Hamas is still a far right organization, if it achieves all of its goals Palestinians would still be oppressed, just not by Israel. The parallel is (I've written this before but it was in a post to JimmiC, it makes sense that absolutely no one read it) with the talibans. Are the talibans fighting for freedom? Well no, we can see that once the US is gone, they've implemented a rigid hierarchical system, because of course they have. But that doesn't change the fact that in the context of the US vs Afghanistan war, if you're a young kid living in a valley and you want the US out of that valley, what you do is you join the taliban. There isn't going to be another force that's only fighting for freedom and doesn't have the baggage. Let's start with this one as it's quite easy. If you're in Afghanistan and you want the US gone, you become a farmer. Or you become a construction worker or a businessman or just about any fucking job that a normal human being would have. Despite moronic claims on the internet, the US is not imperialistic. The US doesn't take land. 1) It removes the bad leadership, 2) it installs new leadership picked by the local people from local people, and 3) then it tries to build a mutually prosperous alliance. On the first point of removing leadership, the US didn't even care about the damn Taliban initially. They just wanted to go after Al Qaeda for hopefully obvious reasons and the Taliban got in their way. So the US threw them out of power. The US then handed the country over to the Afghani people. It trained their military (seemingly poorly, but that's for another discussion). It provided supplies to help get them off the ground and improve quality of life. It tried (and failed) to turn Afghanistan into a prosperous country. The only reason for the US to remain in Afghanistan was the presence of the Taliban threatening to tear down everything they built. If the Taliban was gone sooner, the US would have left sooner. So that kid in the valley who wants the US gone should have simply told the Taliban to fuck off and gone to school or into a trade. Unfortunately, the US eventually got bored and left without finishing the job, so the country goes right back to being a shit hole. On February 02 2024 19:20 Nebuchad wrote: So Ren, I'm a 19-year-old Palestinian in Gaza, I really want Palestinians to be free from Israel and I'm willing to use violence to reach this goal. What organization should I join? This one is a bit more complicated because Israel is right on Gaza's doorstep and there is some signs that it is willing to take land. Except, up until Oct 7th, the issue had been about settlers taking land in the west bank and Israel turning a blind eye to it. Gaza itself hadn't been touched. So if you're a 19 year old in Gaza until Oct 7th, congrats, your land hasn't been touched. It's ruled by Hamas, which sucks, but you get to live a pretty normal middle eastern life. You even have the US pouring in billions of dollars in aid to your area. If you want to improve your situation, you should probably go to school. Biggest impact would be to become a lawyer while also learning public speaking and English. Understanding the law and the ability to communicate with the English speaking world (which includes Israel) is a great way to help humanize Gazans and help put more international pressure on Israel to grant Gaza more freedom. Instead, a bunch of those 19 year old Palestinians joined Hamas and went on a murder spree. What we've seen in Gaza since then is a direct result of that murder spree. I don't need a wall full of yarn connecting some vast conspiracy. It's a very straight line. Hamas attacked, Israel attacked back and will keep it up until Hamas can no longer hold power. Those 19 year old assholes created this mess. If they wanted freedom for Gaza from Israel, they did the exact wrong thing. If a kid wants freedom, the worst thing he could do now is join Hamas. Unlike in Afghanistan, Israel is much less likely than the US to get bored. For an Israeli, what happens with Hamas is a matter of life and death. His best bet right now is to keep his head down, try to avoid the conflict and avoid getting forcibly recruited. If he really wants to make a difference, he should be an informant for the IDF against Hamas, but that's extremely risky and I wouldn't recommend it. The faster Hamas goes away, the faster Gaza goes into rebuilding mode. At that point, there should be plenty of opportunities working in construction. While I absolutely agree with you, because at heart I am also a pacifist, I think it's fair to say there are situations where pacifism just gets stomped on. For instance, you might say that the best way to get Russia out of Ukraine is to just roll over and let them roll their tanks up to Kyiv, depose Zelensky and install their puppet. If Ukrainians had done that 2 years ago, then the Russian army would be back home again! Why wouldn't you pick that option if you want Russians out of your country, rather than pick up arms to battle them every step of the way and throw them out forcefully? Surely the former would have been faster and have led to less bloodshed? In this case it's fairly clear: Russia installs a puppet government, ensures they get all the economic benefits of Ukraine and self-determination is out the window. I am guessing Afghani resistance against US occupation was somewhat similar: they saw the US as an oppressive force that had removed the kind of government they wanted (regardless of how backward and repressive that kind of government is... it seems to have a reasonable amount of popular support all over the region). So rather than learning how to be a plumber and waiting patiently for the US army to leave, they picked up an AK47 and a home-built IED to fight the US army, even if the overall effect was prolongation of the US' mission in Afghanistan. The same obviously goes for 14-year-old Palestinians in Gaza. I find it quite remarkable that you think Israel wasn't an oppressor in Gaza before October 7. Sure, Hamas was the government, but Israel blockaded the port and airport, and any land traffic in/out of the strip. Gaza had no self-determination whatsoever in international trade/diplomacy. You can't call it self-determination if you can't determine what ships enter or exit the country. So the status quo from 2009ish until now was one of Israeli repression of Gaza, even if they let Hamas "decide" within Gaza. It's similar to how Bantustans in South Africa were "autonomous". While I fully agree with you that if more Gazans focused on building diplomatic routes to a two-state solution and real autonomy by working with Israel, that would probably be a better and more viable route to changing the status quo. But I also understand that after Netanyahu utter disdain for any kind of rapprochement in in 2017, some people decided that the only real way to change the status quo was by killing Israelis until they also reject that status quo. The Taliban had support initially with the rural people who farmed the poppy’s and were more religious. By 2019 just the support of the zealots and war lords. The local power and money. The people with their feet on the throats of the people wanted to keep it there. This myth that people in Gaza and Afghanistan like to be brutally oppressed needs to stop. Clearly a shitty job has been done giving them the kind of lives even our lower middle class and poor have, but it is wholly false to believe they do not want what we have. Show nested quote +But in 2019, a response to the same survey found that only 13.4 percent of Afghans had sympathy for the Taliban. As intra-Afghan peace talks stalled in early 2021, an overwhelming majority surveyed said it was important to protect [PDF] women’s rights, freedom of speech, and the constitution. Also some stuff about the economy and quality of life Ren was speaking on. Show nested quote + The Taliban’s takeover has also wiped out gains in Afghans’ standards of living that were made over the two decades after the U.S. invasion, according to the UNDP. In an October 2022 report, the agency said that almost all Afghans were living in poverty. The economy has shrunk by up to 30 percent since the takeover, and an estimated seven hundred thousand jobs have been lost. More than 90 percent [PDF] of the population has been suffering from some form of food insecurity. Exacerbating the crisis is a pause in aid by some countries and international organizations, which had been the lifeline of the economy and public health sector.
Bunch more info in the source including pdf of reports if you want more granular. https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/taliban-afghanistan
Unsurprisingly, if a country's economy depends almost entirely on foreign aid and development funds, the economy is going to tank when that money stops coming. I have a hard time believing support for Taliban was so low, yet they had enough power to absolutely steamroll the Afghani army when the west was pulling out. Yes, clearly the Afghan army was awful, but if 87% of the country supports the government and the army, vs 13% the guerrillas of the Taliban, the latter do not win a fight for power even if they are battle-hardened and good at war. The numbers just don't work. If I had to guess, there's some interesting finnagling with statistics happening there, where the Taliban do enjoy only 13% of popular support, but everybody else enjoys even less, and a vast majority don't give a crap who governs them or what freedoms they have as long as there is food to eat, and they are not educated enough to know that the food they could eat in 2019 was in a large part due to international support of their liberal government, which would instantly dry up under Taliban rule.
Anyway, this thread is about Israel and Palestina, not the Taliban, and I think you are one of the people who likes to reiterate over and over how many polls show Hamas has vast popular support, despite their repressive rule in Gaza for 15+ years. One of their main things is Sharia rule, and Palestinians seem to want that, if your own polls can be believed. If not, then why do they support Hamas over Al-aqsa Brigade or a variety of other militant groups with less religious undertones?
|
Northern Ireland22954 Posts
On February 05 2024 21:59 JimmiC wrote:Show nested quote +On February 05 2024 21:41 WombaT wrote:On February 05 2024 21:37 JimmiC wrote:On February 05 2024 18:45 WombaT wrote:On February 05 2024 18:29 Nebuchad wrote:On February 05 2024 17:22 RenSC2 wrote: [way too many words] I agree with you that there are no untainted options for Palestinian resistance. This is a very human thing to be happening, when a group is threatened internal differences between the members of the group tend to take second stage, and as such the people who have the most forceful ideology will dominate. This has happened and will continue to happen. This is also what's happening with Israel, of course, and is the reason why they willingly vote fascists in. I assume the bit about them becoming lawyers and farmers was sarcastical? Uncalled for in my opinion, but I don't think I'll bite today Said post seems to presuppose that Israel is solely secured with security, with no elements of expansion. I think you should read more carefully. there is some signs that it is willing to take land Jimmy I’m not going to be lectured by you of all people when it comes to the topic of accurately reading posts. Oh sorry were you not wrong? You are such a whiner How about “oops I missed it” but keep trying hard to be cool and insulting me. Stop being so entitled. It’s not like you are alone, just one of the many that doesn’t read, misreads, assumes the worst and treats it as fact, then gets all mad when it’s pointed out and instead of taking responsibility starts the low quality posts of insults. Not that the ones you put effort into are much better. Perhaps if you didn’t continually misread and misrepresenting the posts of others, and many of mine I wouldn’t have responded so?
If I dunno, Drone had made that observation I wouldn’t have responded thus as he’s studiously fair to a fault.
^_^
|
|
|
On February 05 2024 22:02 WombaT wrote:Show nested quote +On February 05 2024 21:55 Magic Powers wrote: "Let's start with this one as it's quite easy. If you're in Afghanistan and you want the US gone, you become a farmer. Or you become a construction worker or a businessman or just about any fucking job that a normal human being would have. Despite moronic claims on the internet, the US is not imperialistic. The US doesn't take land. 1) It removes the bad leadership, 2) it installs new leadership picked by the local people from local people, and 3) then it tries to build a mutually prosperous alliance."
This is 1:1 Putin's reasoning.
I also find it fascinating how you also claim that Israel did nothing wrong in Gaza until October 7 despite all the evidence to the contrary that has been posted in this very thread (years earlier, and again several times after Oct 7). This level of ignorance and misinformation has to be deliberate. I mean the US isn’t colonialist for the most part. But I think many view colonialism and imperialism as directly synonymous when they really aren’t in today’s world. So I’d assume it’s just that conflation of terms coming to bear here.
I understand that the US, unlike Russia, isn't strictly colonialist. But Ren's reasoning for why they aren't colonialist is really poor, and that's why I compared it to Putin's propaganda so it becomes obvious that the true reasoning has to be a different one, whereas Ren's reasoning, if anything, makes the US look colonialist.
|
|
I'm coming around to the idea that Biden is in complete war hawk mode. On a surface level I see absolutely nothing wrong with Hamas' truce offer as proposed in this article. It sounds fantastic to me (if accepted and it actually works). Meanwhile Biden calls it "over the top". What's wrong with the old man?
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-68225663
|
Northern Ireland22954 Posts
On February 07 2024 21:02 Magic Powers wrote:I'm coming around to the idea that Biden is in complete war hawk mode. On a surface level I see absolutely nothing wrong with Hamas' truce offer as proposed in this article. It sounds fantastic to me (if accepted and it actually works). Meanwhile Biden calls it "over the top". What's wrong with the old man? https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-68225663 Seems reasonable on skimming to me too
|
Again. No deal.
When both political sides are religious fanatics then the innocent bystanders won't win.
|
On February 07 2024 21:52 WombaT wrote:Show nested quote +On February 07 2024 21:02 Magic Powers wrote:I'm coming around to the idea that Biden is in complete war hawk mode. On a surface level I see absolutely nothing wrong with Hamas' truce offer as proposed in this article. It sounds fantastic to me (if accepted and it actually works). Meanwhile Biden calls it "over the top". What's wrong with the old man? https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-68225663 Seems reasonable on skimming to me too That offer means Hamas takes over the Gaza Strip again. I don't see why Israel would accept that.
|
On February 08 2024 00:08 RvB wrote:Show nested quote +On February 07 2024 21:52 WombaT wrote:On February 07 2024 21:02 Magic Powers wrote:I'm coming around to the idea that Biden is in complete war hawk mode. On a surface level I see absolutely nothing wrong with Hamas' truce offer as proposed in this article. It sounds fantastic to me (if accepted and it actually works). Meanwhile Biden calls it "over the top". What's wrong with the old man? https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-68225663 Seems reasonable on skimming to me too That offer means Hamas takes over the Gaza Strip again. I don't see why Israel would accept that.
Israel surely wouldn't accept it. But people who have no pro-Israel bias could see how it makes more sense than continuing the war. Biden prefers war over peace due to his pro-Israel stance, not because Hamas' offer is unreasonable.
|
|
|
|
On February 07 2024 21:52 WombaT wrote:Show nested quote +On February 07 2024 21:02 Magic Powers wrote:I'm coming around to the idea that Biden is in complete war hawk mode. On a surface level I see absolutely nothing wrong with Hamas' truce offer as proposed in this article. It sounds fantastic to me (if accepted and it actually works). Meanwhile Biden calls it "over the top". What's wrong with the old man? https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-68225663 Seems reasonable on skimming to me too Here is a further breakdown of Hamas’ proposal:
What Hamas offers:
1. A return of the remaining hostages and Israeli bodies (Egypt estimates that about 50 of the hostages are dead now, so that’s about 80 live hostages assuming no more are murdered in the meantime). Hamas also says the releases are contingent on how well they feel Israel is holding up all it’s side of the bargain.
What Hamas demands:
1. 135 day ceasefire 2. Jews are to be banned from entering the Temple Mount (holiest site in Judaism. Currently Muslims can pray there and Jews can visit for non-prayer purposes like tourism) 3. Restoration of the Gaza strip to it’s pre-war condition 4. Complete withdrawal of all IDF forces from the Gaza Strip to the border 5. Complete stop of all IDF arial activity, including surveillance drones 6. The release of all the Palestinian prisoners imprisoned in Israel who are younger than 19 or older than 50, as well as the sick, in addition to 1,500 Palestinian prisoners named by Hamas (of which 500 are serving life sentences for mass murder) 7. Completing the necessary steps to ensure that the prisoners who were released for the offenses for which they were imprisoned are not re-arrested (even if they re-offend like those who were re-arrested since the last time) 8. The introduction of a minimum of 500 aid trucks per day into the Strip, including fuel trucks 9. The return of all the displaced people to their homes all over the Strip without movement restrictions (i.e. no checking to see if any returnees are Hamas militants) 10. The opening of all Gaza crossings for the movement of people and goods without restrictions, including the departure of men, women and children for treatment outside the Gaza Strip without any restrictions (i.e. no more bans on weapons entering the Strip) 11. Supply of heavy engineering equipment for clearing rubble, equipment for civil defense (i.e. Israel should donate guns for Hamas’ police force) and equipment for the Ministry of Health 12. The rehabilitation of the hospitals and bakeries in the entire strip 13. Bringing in of all the equipment needed to set up residential camps, including: 60 thousand temporary residential buildings (trailers and containers) at a rate of 15 thousand per week. The introduction of 200,000 tents at a rate of 50,000 per week 14. The beginning of infrastructure restoration all over the Strip, including water, electricity and communication infrastructures. 15. Approval of a comprehensive plan for the rehabilitation of all the residential buildings, commercial buildings and public buildings that were destroyed as a result of the fighting within a schedule of three years (funds will of course be managed by the local government [Hamas] to line pockets as desired) 16. Renewal of all the humanitarian aid provided to the residents of the Gaza Strip and especially the full functioning of UNRWA - as it was before October 7. 17. Supplying the diesel needed to operate the power plant in Gaza and needed for all sectors in the Gaza Strip. 18. Israel must be forced to meet the needs of the Gaza Strip in the area of electricity and water. 19. A mechanism for keeping Israel out of the Strip (i.e. this is actually a permanent ceasefire) 20. Also, additional prisoners (besides for the 1,500+teens+older+sick already released) will be demanded 45 days in, to guarantee the release of the second batch of Israeli hostages
TLDR: Hamas will give ~80 hostages (and some corpses) in exchange for ~2,000+ prisoners, Israel footing the bill for the reconstruction, and Hamas and it’s support networks restored to complete and permanent control of the Strip.
For comparison, Russia and Ukraine exchanged prisoners of war a week ago. 195 Russian prisoners were exchanged for 195-206 (depending on sources) Ukranian prisoners.
|
|
On February 08 2024 11:32 JimmiC wrote: It probably should also be noted that the taking of hostages is a war crime (like an actual one listed) not a legitimate negotiating tactic.
Many people, understandably so given the history, feel like paying the ransom will only make future kidnapping and hostages more likely in the future. Does holding people from a foreign land in administrative detention without trial or due process count as a war crime?
|
|
|
|