Is Protoss too strong in SC2?
Forum Index > Polls & Liquibet |
TL.net Bot
TL.net125 Posts
| ||
Mahanaim
Korea (South)1002 Posts
| ||
Jj_82
Swaziland419 Posts
This, aaaand generally, I'd love Blizzard to double down on reducing armies melting within seconds! | ||
NinjaNight
428 Posts
| ||
sugarmuffinpuff
Canada38 Posts
| ||
Geo.Rion
7377 Posts
On May 26 2019 01:46 sugarmuffinpuff wrote: I suck at starcraft, but I liked Artosis and NoRegret's recent episodes of "In Depth" where they talked about protoss all-ins, and specifically immortal/warp prism play. They stay fairly objective about it, and aren't overly "balance-whiney". Definitely a good thing to watch if you care about this sort of stuff. More than balance, the main problem with immortal is that it absolutely shaped the PvZ meta. There are so many small variations the P could do, and the Zerg is mostly just guessing when to stop droning. Many times the viewers cant catch it either, which variation of the immortal push is being done, and they just see a push that either rolls through the zerg or gets swarmed down. I think Serral said in an interview, that the meta has really shifted, now in PvZ the P is trying to end it with immortals, and in TvZ the terrans are pushing it to late-late game (6-10 months ago it was the opposite) | ||
Dedraterllaerau
113 Posts
With TL's news headlines like "Protoss dominate Super Tournament, RO8 bracket set" or "PartinG advances, Protoss lock in half of Code S RO16 spots" Should not the focus be on all the players that advanced instead of what race they play? As the biggest portal for foreign SC content you are a big part of shaping our community, and your best idea of contributing to this is putting more gasoline on the fire for all those toxic "PROTOSSED" balance spamming whiners you see everywhere from twitch chat to in-game SC2? How about giving the Protoss players who have in fact played brilliantly recently some credit, instead of making them feel like they are carried by imbalance. Start showing some professional behavior instead of taking these passive aggressive pokes at professional players choice of in game race, it is after all how they make a living. | ||
[F_]aths
Germany3947 Posts
| ||
StarcraftSquall
United States196 Posts
On May 26 2019 04:31 Dedraterllaerau wrote: What exactly do you think you are going to accomplish with these kinds of polls? With TL's news headlines like "Protoss dominate Super Tournament, RO8 bracket set" or "PartinG advances, Protoss lock in half of Code S RO16 spots" Should not the focus be on all the players that advanced instead of what race they play? As the biggest portal for foreign SC content you are a big part of shaping our community, and your best idea of contributing to this is putting more gasoline on the fire for all those toxic "PROTOSSED" balance spamming whiners you see everywhere from twitch chat to in-game SC2? How about giving the Protoss players who have in fact played brilliantly recently some credit, instead of making them feel like they are carried by imbalance. Start showing some professional behavior instead of taking these passive aggressive pokes at professional players choice of in game race, it is after all how they make a living. I approve of this message. I also think we need to nerf Terran and Zerg every time someone whines about Protoss imbalance. Then maybe everyone would just SHUT UP AND PLAY. 😏 | ||
Samba
Germany452 Posts
Not the standard i´m used from TL | ||
noise.harvester
9 Posts
| ||
blind429
36 Posts
On May 26 2019 04:31 Dedraterllaerau wrote: What exactly do you think you are going to accomplish with these kinds of polls? With TL's news headlines like "Protoss dominate Super Tournament, RO8 bracket set" or "PartinG advances, Protoss lock in half of Code S RO16 spots" Should not the focus be on all the players that advanced instead of what race they play? As the biggest portal for foreign SC content you are a big part of shaping our community, and your best idea of contributing to this is putting more gasoline on the fire for all those toxic "PROTOSSED" balance spamming whiners you see everywhere from twitch chat to in-game SC2? How about giving the Protoss players who have in fact played brilliantly recently some credit, instead of making them feel like they are carried by imbalance. Start showing some professional behavior instead of taking these passive aggressive pokes at professional players choice of in game race, it is after all how they make a living. lol | ||
ZigguratOfUr
Iraq16955 Posts
| ||
sertman
United States540 Posts
On May 26 2019 04:31 Dedraterllaerau wrote: What exactly do you think you are going to accomplish with these kinds of polls? With TL's news headlines like "Protoss dominate Super Tournament, RO8 bracket set" or "PartinG advances, Protoss lock in half of Code S RO16 spots" Should not the focus be on all the players that advanced instead of what race they play? As the biggest portal for foreign SC content you are a big part of shaping our community, and your best idea of contributing to this is putting more gasoline on the fire for all those toxic "PROTOSSED" balance spamming whiners you see everywhere from twitch chat to in-game SC2? How about giving the Protoss players who have in fact played brilliantly recently some credit, instead of making them feel like they are carried by imbalance. Start showing some professional behavior instead of taking these passive aggressive pokes at professional players choice of in game race, it is after all how they make a living. You said it yourself - this is how they make a living. If a race is too strong, it takes money out of the pockets of players who are practicing hard with other races. You can see by the poll results that there is a significant amount of the TL community believes Protoss is too strong. It's not the job of this website to protect the feelings of players who are playing a race that is seeing a different kind of widespread success than we are used to seeing at the professional level. It is the job of a news organization to report the facts. The facts are, Protoss dominated Super Tournament with 7 Protosses in the Ro8. The facts are, in the current season of GSL there were 8 protosses in the Ro16 with at the time of this posting, 3 of the 4 have advanced to the Ro8. And now the facts are that there is a significant perception in every single space for SC2 discussion - whether it's reddit, here, or twitch chat - that Protoss is too strong. Here's a newsflash - you're advocating for unprofessional, biased journalism if you are seriously arguing that TL should ignore the elephant in the room by not addressing the current massive success of Protosses in top Korean tournaments. Yes, Maru won 4 GSLs in a row - but it's not like those four GSLs were open season for Terrans the same way it currently is for Protosses. You seem more upset that TL's news and polls fuel toxic behavior than it is being factually accurate. I think you should just suck it up and realize that all those people screaming P R O T O S S E D in the current meta have a point, even if they haven't had a good point in other metas. The only way this can get worse is if Blizzard does nothing - not if TL and other places enforce what is by now a delusional balance ideal where nobody can acknowledge or talk about certain races having far more success than others in the top leagues in the world. | ||
Dedraterllaerau
113 Posts
On May 27 2019 16:28 sertman wrote: You said it yourself - this is how they make a living. If a race is too strong, it takes money out of the pockets of players who are practicing hard with other races. You can see by the poll results that there is a significant amount of the TL community believes Protoss is too strong. It's not the job of this website to protect the feelings of players who are playing a race that is seeing a different kind of widespread success than we are used to seeing at the professional level. It is the job of a news organization to report the facts. The facts are, Protoss dominated Super Tournament with 7 Protosses in the Ro8. The facts are, in the current season of GSL there were 8 protosses in the Ro16 with at the time of this posting, 3 of the 4 have advanced to the Ro8. And now the facts are that there is a significant perception in every single space for SC2 discussion - whether it's reddit, here, or twitch chat - that Protoss is too strong. Here's a newsflash - you're advocating for unprofessional, biased journalism if you are seriously arguing that TL should ignore the elephant in the room by not addressing the current massive success of Protosses in top Korean tournaments. Yes, Maru won 4 GSLs in a row - but it's not like those four GSLs were open season for Terrans the same way it currently is for Protosses. You seem more upset that TL's news and polls fuel toxic behavior than it is being factually accurate. I think you should just suck it up and realize that all those people screaming P R O T O S S E D in the current meta have a point, even if they haven't had a good point in other metas. The only way this can get worse is if Blizzard does nothing - not if TL and other places enforce what is by now a delusional balance ideal where nobody can acknowledge or talk about certain races having far more success than others in the top leagues in the world. The fact that you think this poll is relevant and that the people spamming PROTOSSED has any clue about the current state of the game pretty much sums up what limited understanding you have of the game. I'll do you a favor and help you learn how to asses possible balance issues, and also make you understand the difference between "fun gameplay" and "balance". 1. Koreans have always had a lot of talented Protoss players for many years, and you consistently see the same names. Just like Europe has had many talented Zerg players over the years. This is one thing you have to take into consideration. 2. The amount of full-time PRO players is not that high for SC2 so you have a small sample size. 3. SC2 is sadly an extremely volatile game so at a high level with players executing simple builds very efficiently, "build order wins" sometimes see the lesser player beat the better player especially in shorter series ( just look at Neeb vs Volt WCS good example). This also adds to the randomness of how a tournament could shape up. 4. There has been only one, now most likely 2 heavily protoss represented tournaments in Korea. You add to this how the META has been shifting and these things need to stabilize before you start even considering balance changes. Again small sample size, not enough time for players to adapt. 5. Winrates, not alarming whatsoever as of yet. 6. Is X race doing the same build over and over across the board with near 100% win rate (LOTV release Adepts good example) Or an unstoppable unit composition? Currently not the case. Now add all these factors into your calculation and ask yourself is it too soon? You tell me it's their job to report FACTS. Sure they reported facts. But it's also about what news writers put emphasis on, the way they write it and timing. And if it's called for. You have to understand the scary part here is if Blizzard starts listening to 1000s of unknowledgeable viewers/players whining screams of imbalance and just does anything to make the community happy, you won't get a near balanced game ever. Now from my perspective, TL is adding to this process which is not helpful at all for the game or the community in the long run. So like I said it is really unprofessional behavior of TL. | ||
sertman
United States540 Posts
On May 27 2019 21:41 Dedraterllaerau wrote: The fact that you think this poll is relevant and that the people spamming PROTOSSED has any clue about the current state of the game pretty much sums up what limited understanding you have of the game. I'll do you a favor and help you learn how to asses possible balance issues, and also make you understand the difference between "fun gameplay" and "balance". 1. Koreans have always had a lot of talented Protoss players for many years, and you consistently see the same names. Just like Europe has had many talented Zerg players over the years. This is one thing you have to take into consideration. 2. The amount of full-time PRO players is not that high for SC2 so you have a small sample size. 3. SC2 is sadly an extremely volatile game so at a high level with players executing simple builds very efficiently, "build order wins" sometimes see the lesser player beat the better player especially in shorter series ( just look at Neeb vs Volt WCS good example). This also adds to the randomness of how a tournament could shape up. 4. There has been only one, now most likely 2 heavily protoss represented tournaments in Korea. You add to this how the META has been shifting and these things need to stabilize before you start even considering balance changes. Again small sample size, not enough time for players to adapt. 5. Winrates, not alarming whatsoever as of yet. 6. Is X race doing the same build over and over across the board with near 100% win rate (LOTV release Adepts good example) Or an unstoppable unit composition? Currently not the case. Now add all these factors into your calculation and ask yourself is it too soon? You tell me it's their job to report FACTS. Sure they reported facts. But it's also about what news writers put emphasis on, the way they write it and timing. And if it's called for. You have to understand the scary part here is if Blizzard starts listening to 1000s of unknowledgeable viewers/players whining screams of imbalance and just does anything to make the community happy, you won't get a near balanced game ever. Now from my perspective, TL is adding to this process which is not helpful at all for the game or the community in the long run. So like I said it is really unprofessional behavior of TL. You are incredibly patronizing when it's not warranted, and it makes me think that you're just projecting a lot of your emotions onto this conversation. Yes, this poll gives the P R O T O S S E D crowd in Twitch Chat some validity. You're going to have to get a grip and get over it. 1.) Since when dude? You said yourself that in 4.) that there have only been 2 recent tournaments (read: the last two) where we've seen this extremity of Protoss success, and it's not like a bunch of T/Z have left and a bunch of P returned. It's actually that basically every Protoss in Korea is succeeding right now - MC was literally the only notable Protoss to not qualify for GSL this season. 2.) The sample size thing is a cop-out. People were saying that during BL/Infestor too. 3.) The Super Tournament was a Bo5 for all rounds. 4.) Already addressed 5.) Winrates outside of top Koreans are generally meaningless, especially considering that one of the things that makes PvZ especially difficult right now are warp prism immortal micro, which only the top players can do with the kind of extreme efficiency that GSL Protosses are achieving. No matter how you cut it, watching two immortals in a prism hold off 20+ roaches *looks* ridiculous, unfair, and overpowered. 6.) Except the reason that people are really frustrated with Protoss, especially pro Zergs, is that they have a huge variety of really strong builds that make appropriately reacting to them basically impossible. Many Protoss losses come from egregious mistakes on their end like losing a warp prism during a 2 base push or something. I'm not arguing here in the essentialness of Protoss being too strong right now. What I'm saying is that watching Protoss right now *looks* and *feels* overpowered. Look at Parting's recent GSL games. Game 3 against Gumiho, Gumi makes the rather small mistake of mismanaging his orbital energy - it straight up loses him the game. Is there a similar mistake that Protoss can make that insta-loses them the game vs Terran? Is there a chrono that they can miss or something? That feels bad to watch - Gumi played really well up until that point, but he makes one mistake and the game ends, when Protoss does not have that same margin of error. Game 2 against soO - soO makes the rather small mistake of not having a drone in the way to block a single pylon in his natural against a gateway first opening. From that one tiny micro mistake, he insta loses - Parting gets down 4 pylons (which soO had no way of stopping the final three), a cannon + robo and an immortal down with a shield battery. One unit absolutely destroyed anything that soO could make from that point. That just feels bad to watch. It doesn't feel like Protoss is in a situation right now where one mistake and they outright lose the game the way that Terrans and Zergs are at present in that matchup. So no, it's not too soon. The community, as you can see by this poll, feels very strongly that something needs to change. If you want to talk about hurting the scene, think about how many people stop watching because they don't feel like they're watching a fair fight. Do you think I watched the Super Tournament past the round of 8? Do you think I'm really tuning into watching 8 Protosses in the GSL? I watched Group B and witnessed three of the most brutal Protossings I've seen recently in professional play - games that just straight up felt unfair to watch. I left feeling pretty upset for soO and Gumiho and I highly doubt I'll tune into future GSL games if that's going to be how I feel after watching them. It's journalistic malpractice to not put an emphasis on the recent total domination of Protoss in Korea. You are projecting toxicity onto TL when that's all coming from inside your own head. If you truly believe that all races are totally balanced and fair to play, "Protoss dominate GSL Super Tournament" shouldn't bother you. But because you associate any mention of racial success as toxic, you perceive it as toxic. There needs to be a place for there to be mature discussion of the strengths and weaknesses of each race in the meta. Shutting down discussion completely only pushes that discussion to places such as Reddit, which is just a circlejerk/counter-circlejerk mess of a place to discuss this, and Twitch Chat, which is not remotely constructive. You say that Blizzard shouldn't be listening to 1000s of bad players - except practically every single professional Terran and Zerg right now has said they feel Protoss is strong. soO was so tilted from his match against Parting he was talking about it after he beat Gumiho. Elazer straight up said that PvZ is imbalanced in an interview. "But they're just biased", you'll say. So are you dude. The reality of the Protoss Defense Squad is that you've constructed this talking point based bubble where every non-Protoss pro is biased, every fan is just upset about the games that THEY are losing, and the sample size is always too small and nothing should ever change. That's how we got BL/Infestor for way too long, and that's how people lose money even though they're working hard just because they couldn't play a perfect game against a race that doesn't need to. So no, I think that your advocation of sugarcoating and censorship does a lot more harm than good. It's not TL's responsibility how Twitch Chat responds to their articles as long as they are not straight up lying, just like it's not a sportswriter's responsibility how fans react to articles that are critical of a player or a coach. The reality is that it's Blizzard's responsibility to not just make a game that's balanced and fair, but to make a game that FEELS balanced and fair. Right now, we can disagree all day on whether they're doing the first thing, but it's clear they are failing at the second thing. | ||
WombaT
Northern Ireland23133 Posts
On May 28 2019 00:08 sertman wrote: You are incredibly patronizing when it's not warranted, and it makes me think that you're just projecting a lot of your emotions onto this conversation. Yes, this poll gives the P R O T O S S E D crowd in Twitch Chat some validity. You're going to have to get a grip and get over it. 1.) Since when dude? You said yourself that in 4.) that there have only been 2 recent tournaments (read: the last two) where we've seen this extremity of Protoss success, and it's not like a bunch of T/Z have left and a bunch of P returned. It's actually that basically every Protoss in Korea is succeeding right now - MC was literally the only notable Protoss to not qualify for GSL this season. 2.) The sample size thing is a cop-out. People were saying that during BL/Infestor too. 3.) The Super Tournament was a Bo5 for all rounds. 4.) Already addressed 5.) Winrates outside of top Koreans are generally meaningless, especially considering that one of the things that makes PvZ especially difficult right now are warp prism immortal micro, which only the top players can do with the kind of extreme efficiency that GSL Protosses are achieving. No matter how you cut it, watching two immortals in a prism hold off 20+ roaches *looks* ridiculous, unfair, and overpowered. 6.) Except the reason that people are really frustrated with Protoss, especially pro Zergs, is that they have a huge variety of really strong builds that make appropriately reacting to them basically impossible. Many Protoss losses come from egregious mistakes on their end like losing a warp prism during a 2 base push or something. I'm not arguing here in the essentialness of Protoss being too strong right now. What I'm saying is that watching Protoss right now *looks* and *feels* overpowered. Look at Parting's recent GSL games. Game 3 against Gumiho, Gumi makes the rather small mistake of mismanaging his orbital energy - it straight up loses him the game. Is there a similar mistake that Protoss can make that insta-loses them the game vs Terran? Is there a chrono that they can miss or something? That feels bad to watch - Gumi played really well up until that point, but he makes one mistake and the game ends, when Protoss does not have that same margin of error. Game 2 against soO - soO makes the rather small mistake of not having a drone in the way to block a single pylon in his natural against a gateway first opening. From that one tiny micro mistake, he insta loses - Parting gets down 4 pylons (which soO had no way of stopping the final three), a cannon + robo and an immortal down with a shield battery. One unit absolutely destroyed anything that soO could make from that point. That just feels bad to watch. It doesn't feel like Protoss is in a situation right now where one mistake and they outright lose the game the way that Terrans and Zergs are at present in that matchup. So no, it's not too soon. The community, as you can see by this poll, feels very strongly that something needs to change. If you want to talk about hurting the scene, think about how many people stop watching because they don't feel like they're watching a fair fight. Do you think I watched the Super Tournament past the round of 8? Do you think I'm really tuning into watching 8 Protosses in the GSL? I watched Group B and witnessed three of the most brutal Protossings I've seen recently in professional play - games that just straight up felt unfair to watch. I left feeling pretty upset for soO and Gumiho and I highly doubt I'll tune into future GSL games if that's going to be how I feel after watching them. It's journalistic malpractice to not put an emphasis on the recent total domination of Protoss in Korea. You are projecting toxicity onto TL when that's all coming from inside your own head. If you truly believe that all races are totally balanced and fair to play, "Protoss dominate GSL Super Tournament" shouldn't bother you. But because you associate any mention of racial success as toxic, you perceive it as toxic. There needs to be a place for there to be mature discussion of the strengths and weaknesses of each race in the meta. Shutting down discussion completely only pushes that discussion to places such as Reddit, which is just a circlejerk/counter-circlejerk mess of a place to discuss this, and Twitch Chat, which is not remotely constructive. You say that Blizzard shouldn't be listening to 1000s of bad players - except practically every single professional Terran and Zerg right now has said they feel Protoss is strong. soO was so tilted from his match against Parting he was talking about it after he beat Gumiho. Elazer straight up said that PvZ is imbalanced in an interview. "But they're just biased", you'll say. So are you dude. The reality of the Protoss Defense Squad is that you've constructed this talking point based bubble where every non-Protoss pro is biased, every fan is just upset about the games that THEY are losing, and the sample size is always too small and nothing should ever change. That's how we got BL/Infestor for way too long, and that's how people lose money even though they're working hard just because they couldn't play a perfect game against a race that doesn't need to. So no, I think that your advocation of sugarcoating and censorship does a lot more harm than good. It's not TL's responsibility how Twitch Chat responds to their articles as long as they are not straight up lying, just like it's not a sportswriter's responsibility how fans react to articles that are critical of a player or a coach. The reality is that it's Blizzard's responsibility to not just make a game that's balanced and fair, but to make a game that FEELS balanced and fair. Right now, we can disagree all day on whether they're doing the first thing, but it's clear they are failing at the second thing. And it’s up to TL to be responsible in counterbalancing what ‘feels’ wrong to certain people with what actually is wrong and isn’t. Which generally it does with its writers and guides and various bits of content. I don’t really like the current state of PvZ at all myself, because it feels like it’s just players executing a pre-planned allin and winning or losing based upon their opponent scouting it and reading it well or badly. Problems are clear to see on both sides, I think Zergs are currently struggling because of the difficulty in ascertaining which allin is coming and preparing accordingly, the build skeletons are very similar and flexible. On the other hand Protoss are just ahead of the meta curve in PvZ. After their lategame comps were nerfed, they had to come up with solutions, which we’re seeing at the minute with all these timings. Now it’s Zerg’s turn to see if they can come up with stuff, which doesn’t mean they necessarily can reliably, but it’s at that point on the wheel. soO was going hyper aggressive in his games on Saturday, so perhaps some holes might be found. It’s easier to plan a timing when you’ve almost entirely discounted the possibility that it’s going to be your opponent doing anything aggressive first, so you can cut every corner to hit a tighter timing. I’m not sure really, Protoss gets a disproportionate amount of whine and always has, are they too strong right now? Maybe, but what is the benchmark for that? If so how are they too strong and is it something that needs player solutions or balance solutions? A large chunk of the playerbase and viewership are insanely biased people whose opinions really aren’t worth taking into account because of that. You’ll end up with a completely broken and terrible game. My Protoss bias is coming back just as a response to some of the recent whining, I do try to keep it in check though and I have some issues with Protoss currently (and forever as I feel basically all their issues come from warp gate). I don’t think their stuff is too outright strong, they are way too flexible in shifting gears. As a Terran you can scout diligently as hell, see tech, and you still can’t really rule out really aggressive blink play, vs really greedy blink into colossus with a few stalkers out on the map. Also the many pushes Zerg have to figure out that use the same buildings and tech. I’m not too sure how to alleviate this particular issue. The Warp Prism is what enables this, so I’d like to see it nerfed in some way in terms of its warpin capacity. Make them take longer to warp, warpin cooldown on your gates is longer if you’ve warped to a prism, or units warped to a prism cost more. Perhaps have parity warpins with pylons as a relatively cheap upgrade? You could still do certain pushes, you just might have to set them up more obviously, especially if you use an old-fashioned reinforcement pylon which would give your opponents more chance to scout it. On the negative side, Zergs are too good at spreading creep, so you basically need a prism to push quickly, so nerfing might just make Protoss outright suck versus Zerg. A gate cooldown increase might be OK though, your initial punch is still going to hit really hard, but your reinforcements will come slower which might give Zergs more of a chance. I’d like to see pickup range nerfed anyway, I think it’s too long and makes counterplay too difficult, and it wouldn’t penalise really skilful players anyway. | ||
Nakajin
Canada8987 Posts
| ||
Varanice
United States1514 Posts
On May 27 2019 09:53 ZigguratOfUr wrote: lmao. If a regular user opened a thread like this it would get closed, but I guess everything goes for the poll forum. agreed, i was really surprised to see this. | ||
Psychonian
United States2322 Posts
| ||
| ||