|
On March 24 2018 16:58 rsoultin wrote: I'm interested in what the flips told you. How that potentially changed your view of the game. Yep, processing. Will come back to this.
|
Day 2 Vote Count
n00bking [7]: Palmar, Mocsta, Koshi, Conversion, rsoultin, disformation, darthfoley, Tictock Tictock [3]: MoosyDoosy, Fecalfeast, n00bking rsoultin[0]: Mocsta Mocsta [0]: Fecalfeast
Not Voting [5]: Alakaslam, raynpelikoneet, KelsierSC, ykl, Coagulation
n00bking is currently the lynch.
The deadline is Saturday, Mar 24 10:59pm GMT (GMT+00:00) which is in .
If there is an error in the vote count, let us know via PM.
|
On March 24 2018 18:13 n00bKing wrote:Other things I haven't cared for, from Palmar... This is him, at the end of one of his Town games: Show nested quote +On May 02 2016 19:31 Palmar wrote: If a person claims blue to save himself ALWAYS, ALWAYS lynch him. It is always the right play. Comparatively less sure of what to do, in this game, when disformation claimed a blue role under duress: Show nested quote +On March 22 2018 06:04 Palmar wrote: I hate day 1 claimers.
Because not every host is a bastard host like I am it's like 90% chance that disfo is actually just veteran. The problem is that it's a completely pointless claim. It ONLY helps mafia for him to make that claim, because they can avoid shooting him forever. It's the most selfish claim you can make as town.
Like the technically correct play here is to lynch disfo for being shit and dealing with it. Because he made the technically wrong play to claim in the first place.
idk
Given that Palmar's OWN vote was on disformation when he makes the claim (and given that he says this particular claim would be especially bad/selfish if it came from town *instead* of mafia), you might think he would be especially adamant about punching through the claim and lynching him anyway. Was obviously not the case here. Guessing at the mafia motivation for the change of heart might be sketchy. I don't know if there's something deeper than just "you don't want to be the guy who strongarms everyone into lynching a player you know would flip blue." And THIS role is one that is almost completely harmless for scum to go ahead and leave alive. Don't need to break your back getting a revealed Veteran lynched, when it can no longer hurt you at Night (and especially if the other leading wagons are town). Yeah, the more I consider this, the more the scum thought process crystallizes. The revealed Vet is a complete non-threat, so instead of pushing hard to lynch the blue claim (as he normally would) he can just half-ass the argument (as shown above in the second quote), and leave his vote there (for the sake of at least a *little* bit of consistency with the position he espoused in the first quote, should he get called out on this) but the half-assed argument won't actually move anyone to lynch the blue claim (as it didn't) and so you let someone else get pushed into the Noose instead, hope that maybe another blue role gets revealed, and all without any real risk that one of the mafia ends up in the Noose, because the other leading wagons from the day (like myself, Rels, mocsta, Conversion) had all been Town.
|
aight. awake. should have a bit of time. will catch up etc.
|
Conversion is town???
Interesting
|
Heh, I really like where your head's at regarding palmar's response to disformation.
|
On March 24 2018 20:38 Mocsta wrote: Conversion is town???
Interesting We'll know tonight, but probably -_- I'm not going to do him the same discourtesy others did me by assuming he has no emotions when he plays scum.
|
On March 24 2018 05:44 Coagulation wrote: yall played pubg mobile yet? That shit is fire! Think a co-worker plays pubg mobile. my phone is stone age, so no dice. though I am planning to get a new one.
On March 24 2018 05:50 rsoultin wrote: [...] Very Likely Town disformation - level of involvedness [...] *squints* maybe I need to be careful to not get buddied. maybe a good idea to look at the filter after all.
On March 24 2018 07:48 n00bKing wrote:Show nested quote +On March 23 2018 21:22 disformation wrote: ykl at least seems new to forum mafia and overwhelmed. can he be both as scum? sure. is there a lot of content to go on: no. would I like to be in lylo with him as things stand: no. so dunno. is there a super good reason to lynch with fire rn: not rly. hope we have a cop or something. Not really what a cop is for. We'd find out whether or not there was a "super good reason to lynch with fire" if he was nailed to the wall and forced to participate, as he would be in games at other sites. Instead we have 7 players who aren't even voting, and of the players who are posting things, some still do not respond to direct questions. Moosy is a great example of this. Makes a bunch of disjointed "If X, then Y" posts (each one different than the last) that all appear to have no basis. And if you ask him for the basis...no answer. Yet some people somehow find the nerve to count him as someone "trying to solve the game." I can't even. Show nested quote +On March 23 2018 21:22 disformation wrote: slam: dunno not even voting is imo always a bit risky/weird for scum imo. gut feeling also says he is slightly more likely to be town. think ill trust rs on that. she said he is prolly town earlier. What makes not voting riskier for scum than for anyone else? [...] @cop: dunno I think cop checks into unreadable question marks are decent? but don't listen to me I'm obv not the best blue player. @not voting: usually you get (or can get) modkilled for not voting twice in a row, so in my mind scum at least wants to put down a random vote, since risking the danger of actually getting modkilled later in the game would be super shit for/towards their teammates. yeah it is not 100% especially with more erratic players (think moosy forgot to submit nightactions once e.g.). but imo it is more usually likely to come from super pissed off town. you seem to have made different experiences, so I guess I can understand your pov on this.
On March 24 2018 09:22 raynpelikoneet wrote: Regarding this i actually have one thing to say.
darthfoley, since i have completely forgotten what i think your alignment is do you remember who was the guy who said one or both of us have to be mafia? Basically he called the argument between us "forced" but couldn't tell if we are both mafia (which is always the case if an argument is forced). But then he added the "if not both at least one" which is completely bs since if a townie and mafia are arguing and you cannot tell which one of those is mafia then it is equally likely the argument is TvS than that it is TvT. 2nd person to say something like this about df. df is creepy. like he can erase himself from ppls memory. might be a funny idea for some themed game.
|
On March 24 2018 16:54 n00bKing wrote:Show nested quote +On March 24 2018 16:49 rsoultin wrote:On March 24 2018 16:42 n00bKing wrote:On March 24 2018 16:40 rsoultin wrote:On March 24 2018 16:28 rsoultin wrote:On March 23 2018 08:11 Tictock wrote: Just checking flips before I finish reading (note I still have not read pgs 40-70 or w/e)
Guess I can let that HF stuff go.
Exo seems like the weirdest kill to me, unless he was vigged?
Assuming for a moment that that was all mafia KP then I think 5 mafia is a safe bet (6 just seems like too much for 20 players).
Noting for myself to look into who Vivax was scum reading. Just for clarification, this is the post that people say they don't understand how it can come from town? I mean, I know it's the one rayn is talking about. I'm just making sure that it's also the one you're talking about nk? Yes. Tt's explanation for it lines up for me? I'm terms of teaching differently to the hf/viva kills. I guess it's a bit purposeless in the sense that he's just speculating about kp and saying he needs to check things, I'm just not sure what's supposed to be so scummy about it? ...as rayn and I have said, there is no reason for a town player to make that post. As I've said, I can, however, imagine a reason for a scum player to make that post. And again, his defense of the post has been even worse than the post was. Check my "Yikes" post.
Geez, we are still on this.
I think I slightly misunderstood why you guys found this scummy but my response is the same. I responded to the flips they same way that I do do to any post I feel like responding too.
If you are so sure this makes me scum you should prob be casing me.
This cannot possibly be the most alignment indicative thing you can find on me though.
|
On March 24 2018 12:19 Tictock wrote:Yea just glancing through a bit of KSC's filter. Show nested quote +On March 22 2018 07:28 KelsierSC wrote: why are we acting like fucking retards all of a sudden and going oprah on our votes.
df, moosy , dis if you dont believe the claim are the only real choices.
I don't understand the mocsta voting at all.
Show nested quote +On March 22 2018 07:38 KelsierSC wrote: voting is pretty interesting here, Im tempted to vote mocsta because if he flips scum then like most of the scum are on this conversion vote.
Moosy jumping on it at the end is really fucking dumpster.
Pretty big change in stance on Mocsta, with not many posts happening between. And Conversion too? Show nested quote +On March 22 2018 07:39 KelsierSC wrote: or they were worried about df being lynched...
this conversion wagon is really fucking bad lol Show nested quote +On March 22 2018 07:43 KelsierSC wrote: i dont want like 3 wagons competing with conversions wagon
keep it clean
vote df or conversion of give a real fucking good reason why you are wasting your vote. Honestly all I read here was pg 5 of KSC's filter and I feel like the dude never gave a shit about how EoD went. Only consistent scumread is DF, but mostly what he was doing was just shouting at everyone and calling them bad, while flip slopping his own reads all over the place. Solid lynch right here. hmmm... at least in the moment it felt like he was caring to me. the 3 wagons competing thing, can very well be a consolidating thing. the mocsta kinda flip flop is strange indeed. though I guess that could be read as voting mocsta despite thinking town, cause that would mean conv is scum from a vca point? still not great though.
tbh not sure what to think of ksc atm, since he hasn't posted at all in 2 days. despite being fairly town d1. probably should drop him to like null territory.
|
oh missed that one.
On March 24 2018 08:21 Tictock wrote:Show nested quote +On March 24 2018 02:52 disformation wrote:On March 24 2018 02:48 Fecalfeast wrote:On March 24 2018 02:38 disformation wrote:On March 24 2018 02:37 Fecalfeast wrote: Deadline is tomorrow right?
I want to lynch rso yes. why? Seems mafia to me 10/10 answer. =D will leave work in a bit, but lemme take a look at her filter later. Why on earth would this make you want to filter Rsoul? dunno. multiple ppl have said that she is like meh or underwhelming so I want to check if I can see what they can see.
|
think I don't mind tt's stuff on ykl.
|
@nk: why do you say ticktock would be an excellent lynch, besides the nk post thingie? sry if I should have missed, feel free to quote the right post in that case
|
On March 24 2018 18:13 n00bKing wrote:Other things I haven't cared for, from Palmar... This is him, at the end of one of his Town games: Show nested quote +On May 02 2016 19:31 Palmar wrote: If a person claims blue to save himself ALWAYS, ALWAYS lynch him. It is always the right play. Comparatively less sure of what to do, in this game, when disformation claimed a blue role under duress: Show nested quote +On March 22 2018 06:04 Palmar wrote: I hate day 1 claimers.
Because not every host is a bastard host like I am it's like 90% chance that disfo is actually just veteran. The problem is that it's a completely pointless claim. It ONLY helps mafia for him to make that claim, because they can avoid shooting him forever. It's the most selfish claim you can make as town.
Like the technically correct play here is to lynch disfo for being shit and dealing with it. Because he made the technically wrong play to claim in the first place.
idk
Given that Palmar's OWN vote was on disformation when he makes the claim (and given that he says this particular claim would be especially bad/selfish if it came from town *instead* of mafia), you might think he would be especially adamant about punching through the claim and lynching him anyway. Was obviously not the case here. Guessing at the mafia motivation for the change of heart might be sketchy. I don't know if there's something deeper than just "you don't want to be the guy who strongarms everyone into lynching a player you know would flip blue." And THIS role is one that is almost completely harmless for scum to go ahead and leave alive. Don't need to break your back getting a revealed Veteran lynched, when it can no longer hurt you at Night (and especially if the other leading wagons are town).
Yeah you're just mafia.
Why didn't you quote my entire post:
On May 02 2016 19:31 Palmar wrote: I am sorry that I didn't kick and scream to lynch superbia day 1.
If a person claims blue to save himself ALWAYS, ALWAYS lynch him. It is always the right play.
Notice how I'm apologizing for doing exactly what you're accusing me of doing this game. I wasn't adamant about killing the blue claim that game, and I wasn't this game either. In fact, that game I eventually changed my vote away from Superbia I think.
But I'm not here to argue with you, just pointing out to the rest of everyone that you intentionally cut out half of my post and the context of that game, the very stuff that completely negates your accusation.
This isn't a mistake, because you dug up some random game from two years ago. You don't randomly find a very specific post by me talking about this stuff, and then accidentally forget to quote half of the post.
I need to run, have a wedding.
Don't change this guys, noobking is mafia every time.
|
for context, the post noobking quoted is me bitching in the postgame that I ended up doing what I did here.
I do have a better feeling about it this game though. I don't really think disfo is mafia.
|
lol i was jsut about to start writing about Palmar. Maybe i will still do that.
|
I guess that is why I am not a fan of meta I cant easily verify.
|
I think it's fair to say that your response to Superbia's claim was stronger than it was to disinfo's. Nor do I think it negates NK's point? The context of that game...(I think it's the one where JAT and I called for no CC, rayn, but I haven't checked that cause it's irrelevant) It's http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/506344-a-normal-game-just-for-jat-3
Anyway, the context of that game had Superbia claiming 'blue' right before EoD.
+ Show Spoiler +On April 17 2016 06:56 Palmar wrote:Show nested quote +On April 17 2016 06:55 Superbia wrote: I can't make it any clearer than this right now. DO NOT LYNCH ME. nice, last minute "claim" On April 17 2016 06:56 Palmar wrote:hard claim, now. On April 17 2016 06:58 Palmar wrote:Show nested quote +On April 17 2016 06:57 Superbia wrote:On April 17 2016 06:56 Palmar wrote:On April 17 2016 06:55 Superbia wrote: I'm a PR you dipshits. hard claim, now. Nope. makes me want to stay on you. you're a doc or a vig, either way you will be fucking murdered tonight. On April 17 2016 06:58 Palmar wrote: ok whatever claim tomorrow.
I'm off for tonight and probably most if not all tomorrow
gl
These posts all happened within 1-2 minutes of each other. Not sure why NK choose to leave part of your post out, but I don't think it's misrepping anything regardless.
|
The thing with Palmar's approach to disformation during D1 and after is this. I actually thought about that too there since i think disformation is mafia and originally i figured it would be beneficial for Palmar to do what he did if he is mafia with disformation.
The problem i have with that line of thought is the following: We can probably agree Palmar isn't completely unaware of what happens in the game, especially close to the lynch D1. If Palmar is mafia there is actually zero benefit for him to downplay his accusation on disformation after the claim because: 1) thread sentiment suggest not lynching disformation anymore 2) he can use that as a cover up into eternity for not doing anything other than saying "lynch disformation" Therefore i came to conclusion that this:
My gut says that veteran is both a stupid and weird claim for mafia to make. It's also one of those types of claims that bad townies feel really comfortable revealing, because they don't understand the role of a veteran in the game. Thus if I was forced to bet, I'd bet town on disfo. ...line of thought has to be legit thought process and the only explanation for "breaking character" is this. There is literally zero reason for Palmar to break character here regardless of disformation's alignment since not doing so ONLY helps his mafia play because it's correct (1) metawise, (2) noone can blame him fro that, (3) it gives him an excuse to not do anything. If disformation is mafia, the seed of bussing would have been implemented already before the claim so it makes no sense for him to not continue that. If disformation is town, there is ABSOLUTELY no reason Palmar should "lay off" him like he did.
Here is an example of Palmar breaking character as mafia. One big game there was we had a similar type of situation where Vivax claimed a role D1 when being lynched. Palmar is known for his "lynch claimers" policy, although he is a bit of a hypocrite in that tbh, lots of words why it's the best play, always do the opposing thing.... I, in that game, kept my vote on Vivax and tried to get him lynched because i didn't think the claim means anything. Palmar comes in -> says he reads me town -> says he will sheep me -> votes for the counter-wagon Rels. That is how Palmar breaks character as mafia, doing something completely illogical that fucks him up immediately + Show Spoiler +(except that it doesn't since none of the plebs were able to lynch him in that game while me and Artanis shouted all N1 "Palmar is mafia" and got both killed N1) .
TLDR; There is zero reason for Palmar to break character he is very well aware of regardless of disformation's alignment.
Another thing is the coag townie seal that noobking talked about. I can't understand how he can come to a conclusion that "if Palmar is mafia he is lying" because i think that's a completely unnatural thought. There are more players in the game who know coag than Palmar, and the reason why noone is "contesting" the townie seal "case" is because well.. that's how it is. I can't figure out where the line of "if Palmar is mafia then he can be lying" comes from because that's not an option for him as mafia regardless of coag's alignment.
I am not sure why noobking throws all these things into trash and just follows one line of thought (which is definitely less likely than this). This is not even any sort of meta thing, this is just "why would town/mafia do this and how likely" which is what he loves all that much (like i do).
|
Also I've got a splitting headache that I don't want to take pain meds for because I can't take ibuprofen anymore without puking my guts out, and unless coincidence is just hammering me, that's started happening with acetaminophine as well @.@
So if I'm in and out a lot today, that's why.
|
|
|
|