|
On October 12 2015 01:26 Onegu wrote:Show nested quote +On October 12 2015 01:18 MoosyDoosy wrote: Onegu, I hope you realize that you can just ask me for my thought process. Or you could just give it but you just vote someone when you don't even mention them in your filter. oh my. you did entertain me! my bad~ x3
|
I mean his reads list he hardly mentions any of his scum reads at all in his filter.
Like he says _stoicism gives him a twitch and could be a alt(not sure what that means) but other than that nothing.
Seems like he is pulling his reads out of nowhere for no reasons. And the 2 people he votes are after people already voted them.
|
bb, my thought process is all here in my filter. Don't lie and say I didn't mention him. It just shows that you're not reading carefully. + Show Spoiler +On October 11 2015 00:20 MoosyDoosy wrote: Hi people.
I actually kind of agree with sentiment that we need a lot less spam so I'll work on it. I know I've been a problem in the past so hopefully I won't be terrible this game. It's quite a problem though as I've promised to post Part 2 of my analysis of Crime & Punishment but now I feel like I can't post it in this game. ):
Also, as a note, I realized that no emoji will show up if you do the reverse like I did above. It was actually pretty mind blowing when I found out as it works on a bunch of other sites and gets rid of the annoying little faces. Just a bit of a pet peeve.
Also, while I'm at it, I may as well state that I currently don't like either of ObviousOne or Stoicism_. ObviousOne for obvious reasons that he's giving excuses for not posting much and Stoicism_ for taking Obvious's sarcastic post a bit too personally. On October 11 2015 04:57 MoosyDoosy wrote: Kels do you know how to read this ObviousOne dude? On October 11 2015 05:00 MoosyDoosy wrote:Show nested quote +On October 11 2015 04:58 KelsierSC wrote:On October 11 2015 04:57 MoosyDoosy wrote: Kels do you know how to read this ObviousOne dude? no he just made some posts that felt off. is there a magic formula that I should not care about? No, he just said he was an older player so I was wondering if you knew him since I'm relatively new myself hm... On October 11 2015 10:15 MoosyDoosy wrote: ObviousOne, why are you so focused on people talking about you or at you. On October 11 2015 10:57 MoosyDoosy wrote: Before I leave here's a list on where I'm at right now:
Town: Eversince kSC -Celestial- Onegu Fecalfeast
Null: Vivax marvellosity sicklucker
Scum: Gumdrop ObviousOne Stoicism_
Inactive: Shining
|
I'm somewhere along Moosy's line of reads except that gumdrop is null for me and FecalFeast scummish.
|
I said hardly mentions. And you hardly mention him. And you gave no reasons why you would be scum reading him.
|
Ack, I don't like it. I have had reservations for a while, but I am pretty sure I'm over emphasizing.
|
On October 11 2015 17:21 Onegu wrote:Show nested quote +On October 11 2015 10:33 Fecalfeast wrote:On October 11 2015 10:31 -Celestial- wrote:On October 11 2015 10:08 ObviousOne wrote:Celestial: voting the AWOL guy. Has a big paragraph by my name that could have just said NAI. [association based on unflipped players ahead has KSC, the other guy I find scummy, in his leaning town list. Potential lynch candidate. Er...you might want to check again. I've not actually voted for anyone yet. I got scumfeel on Gumdrop, Vivax and marvellosity but no vote. Please don't lie. Good eye, I didn't fact check any of the list as it felt very half-assed. ##unvote ##vote ObviousOne Why does scum OO lie about that though. Unless your point is being he is just making shit up, but from the rest of his post I don't get that sense. Celestial is looking townie for that huge post but why it has KSC as more town than myself I will never know. I don't like moosy right now, his jump on gumdrop felt really opportunistic to me. I still don't like gumdrops entrance at all, and KSC follow up vote was fine for pressure but when mossy jumped on it it just felt wrong to me. Marv has until 24 hours to impress me before my vote goes on him for being lazy which is something town marv wouldn't do in a newbie game. Also @celestial didn't we just play in a game and I claimed VT and we went through the same thing. Scum OO tries very hard to be accurate as possible so there's no blowback early. I was in a rush to get around to watching a backlog of TV episodes so one "mistake" which relates to looking at things outside the context of the thread is the opposite of a scum tell for me.
In any case, Stoic is off my list for possible candidates for today.
I don't like excuses like "I was drunk" like if you can't just play when you're sober then you're mafia covering for your inactivity. KSC vote stays.
Agree that Marv's working his way to candidacy today.
|
So, that being said, sell me on it. Or try your bestest.
|
You mention him 5 times in a 4 page filter. 2 of those times to say you see him scummy for no reason except the first post where you say "obvious reasons". Sorry buddy that isn't a real reason.
|
On October 12 2015 01:47 Onegu wrote: I said hardly mentions. And you hardly mention him. And you gave no reasons why you would be scum reading him. ? I did share some reasons. Did you read my post in the last page?
|
I'm talking about prior to that post. I'm talking about everything prior to you voting him.
|
my point is you voted for a scum read of yours that you gave no reason to be voting for him until after you vote him.
|
On October 12 2015 01:52 Onegu wrote: I'm talking about prior to that post. I'm talking about everything prior to you voting him. And I'm saying that that was my thought process which I didn't splurge all over the thread as I was developing it. But there's enough in my posts for you to have been able to deduce where my line of thinking was going. So yes, I did have a thought process and yes, you're wrong when you say my posts don't say I'm scumreading ObviousOne, because they're obvious to see if you're reading between the lines.
|
I'm listing to the bengals game then sleeping I check in when free and then will sleep.
|
On October 12 2015 01:54 Onegu wrote: my point is you voted for a scum read of yours that you gave no reason to be voting for him until after you vote him. -facepalm- Onegu, that's called fishing for a reaction. Have you heard of it? At worst I would have Eversince all over me asking me what's up. At best I would have caught something good.
|
On October 12 2015 01:48 ObviousOne wrote:Show nested quote +On October 11 2015 17:21 Onegu wrote:On October 11 2015 10:33 Fecalfeast wrote:On October 11 2015 10:31 -Celestial- wrote:On October 11 2015 10:08 ObviousOne wrote:Celestial: voting the AWOL guy. Has a big paragraph by my name that could have just said NAI. [association based on unflipped players ahead has KSC, the other guy I find scummy, in his leaning town list. Potential lynch candidate. Er...you might want to check again. I've not actually voted for anyone yet. I got scumfeel on Gumdrop, Vivax and marvellosity but no vote. Please don't lie. Good eye, I didn't fact check any of the list as it felt very half-assed. ##unvote ##vote ObviousOne Why does scum OO lie about that though. Unless your point is being he is just making shit up, but from the rest of his post I don't get that sense. Celestial is looking townie for that huge post but why it has KSC as more town than myself I will never know. I don't like moosy right now, his jump on gumdrop felt really opportunistic to me. I still don't like gumdrops entrance at all, and KSC follow up vote was fine for pressure but when mossy jumped on it it just felt wrong to me. Marv has until 24 hours to impress me before my vote goes on him for being lazy which is something town marv wouldn't do in a newbie game. Also @celestial didn't we just play in a game and I claimed VT and we went through the same thing. Scum OO tries very hard to be accurate as possible so there's no blowback early. I was in a rush to get around to watching a backlog of TV episodes so one "mistake" which relates to looking at things outside the context of the thread is the opposite of a scum tell for me. In any case, Stoic is off my list for possible candidates for today. I don't like excuses like "I was drunk" like if you can't just play when you're sober then you're mafia covering for your inactivity. KSC vote stays. Agree that Marv's working his way to candidacy today. Yes, and scum ObviousOne just spewed me town by thinking I was participating in the thread when I really wasn't.
Also, this post is really off kilter especially when I'm just noting that you seem to be focusing on people that were scum reading you.
On October 11 2015 10:21 ObviousOne wrote:Show nested quote +On October 11 2015 10:15 MoosyDoosy wrote: ObviousOne, why are you so focused on people talking about you or at you. In what way do you mean. If youre talking about my comment regarding stoic it's that he was pretty up in my face about me being accessible to him, which of course stemmed from him not being to read my post properly in the first place, and ended up not being here all day anyway. Why focus exclusively on Stoicism_?
Combined with your abrupt change now to take him off of the potential lynch candidate list I do think you're trying to be as correct as possible.
|
Hmmm, give me a bit but I'll post up my thoughts on Obvious after I get out of class. I reallllly don't like that exit. In any way, shape, form, or fashion. Will divulge. Gimme an hour or so.
|
Oops, wait. I have people confused again. Re- previous statement. I'll post up thoughts on Obvious but that was meant for Onegu. But props'! Now I'll be forced to do a write up on both!
Ok. Gots to run!
|
Bleh.
Still not a fan of you Mossy.
##Unvote
Im fairly null on OO, just do see him that bad.
Let's do this for now.
##Vote: Marv
Touchdown Bengals.
I am still around just not going to f5 every 5 mins.
|
On October 12 2015 02:16 Onegu wrote: Bleh.
Still not a fan of you Mossy.
##Unvote
Im fairly null on OO, just do see him that bad.
Let's do this for now.
##Vote: Marv
Touchdown Bengals.
I am still around just not going to f5 every 5 mins. Of course you wouldn’t be a fan of me. My read on Gumdrop was actually opportunistic, although that was because I just skimmed over his post the first time and didn’t catch the undertone to it and was angry that I didn’t spot it the first time.
|
|
|
|