|
On October 02 2015 23:15 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On October 02 2015 23:13 Rels wrote:On October 02 2015 23:12 raynpelikoneet wrote: Like i would like nothing more that call my scumbuddy (who will not get lynched by thread sentiment) mafia. Because it buys me town credit and well, we are still not lynching mafia (until later on, which everyone who is scum in this game knows -- that coolname is gonna get lynched at some point assumining he is scum). Of course but marv comment was BEFORE Damdred's cc well did you switch your vote before damdred's cc? starting to get lost ? (= Your addition was to this: "It in fact makes marv's comment invalid and gives an opportunity to mafia, if coolTLname is mafia, to defend him" so you cannot say marv's comment was invalid since it was not the thing that made people lynch scott
|
anyway I think coolTLname is scum because he's either a smurf or a lurker reader his two comments about GB proves it since he's not a newbie, his two questions at the beginning are dumbtells
the doubts I have is because we're starting to be in the same situation as yesterday: almost everybody is OK lynching him, so it is mislynch or a bus. I think only rsoultin (and maybe Trfel ?) are not OK lynching him.
|
Here is what i mean, here is what sicklucker means:
- your top scumread is coolname, let's call this 90 (bigger number is more scummy, numbers are arbitary) - yout top #2 scumread is scott, let's call this 70 - you are, logically, voting for coolname - scott claims, this would logically make his number go down to let's say 20 - marvellosity says coolname should not be 90, in fact he should be like 30. - Damdred cc's scott - this would make scott go back to 70.
Now what makes marv's claim on cooldude so important you throw your 90 into the trash (this number is btw FOR his actions, not what other people think of him)? Why is what marv says so important you don't believe your scumread anymore? And what makes you think, in this situation, that scott is the best lynch?
I understand sheeping, i do that a lot, but you claim yourself you are not sheeping. So explain it.
|
On October 02 2015 23:21 Rels wrote: since he's not a newbie, his two questions at the beginning are dumbtells
it is 99% proven he is newbie to TL mafia. i don't know why you want to claim otherwise.
|
On October 02 2015 23:23 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On October 02 2015 23:21 Rels wrote: since he's not a newbie, his two questions at the beginning are dumbtells
it is 99% proven he is newbie to TL mafia. i don't know why you want to claim otherwise. because he said something like "GB you are known for not reading the thread" yesterday
|
On October 02 2015 23:24 Rels wrote:Show nested quote +On October 02 2015 23:23 raynpelikoneet wrote:On October 02 2015 23:21 Rels wrote: since he's not a newbie, his two questions at the beginning are dumbtells
it is 99% proven he is newbie to TL mafia. i don't know why you want to claim otherwise. because he said something like "GB you are known for not reading the thread" yesterday who the fuck cares. he has played a game before. do you think he smurfed back then in a newbie game then now came back and smurfed again?
|
On October 02 2015 23:22 raynpelikoneet wrote: Here is what i mean, here is what sicklucker means:
- your top scumread is coolname, let's call this 90 (bigger number is more scummy, numbers are arbitary) - yout top #2 scumread is scott, let's call this 70 - you are, logically, voting for coolname - scott claims, this would logically make his number go down to let's say 20 - marvellosity says coolname should not be 90, in fact he should be like 30. - Damdred cc's scott - this would make scott go back to 70.
Now what makes marv's claim on cooldude so important you throw your 90 into the trash (this number is btw FOR his actions, not what other people think of him)? Why is what marv says so important you don't believe your scumread anymore? And what makes you think, in this situation, that scott is the best lynch?
I understand sheeping, i do that a lot, but you claim yourself you are not sheeping. So explain it. Where did I claim that ? I sheep all the time, I just fact check when I'm not sure
I don't know what to answer, your timeline is exactly right. About the intensity, marv's post did not put coolTLname at 30, but more like 60, hence why I didn't switch even though I had doubts, and would have probably ended up still on him at deadline
|
On October 02 2015 23:26 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On October 02 2015 23:24 Rels wrote:On October 02 2015 23:23 raynpelikoneet wrote:On October 02 2015 23:21 Rels wrote: since he's not a newbie, his two questions at the beginning are dumbtells
it is 99% proven he is newbie to TL mafia. i don't know why you want to claim otherwise. because he said something like "GB you are known for not reading the thread" yesterday who the fuck cares. he has played a game before. do you think he smurfed back then in a newbie game then now came back and smurfed again? no no no I think he's a lurker reader
|
On October 02 2015 23:27 Rels wrote:Show nested quote +On October 02 2015 23:26 raynpelikoneet wrote:On October 02 2015 23:24 Rels wrote:On October 02 2015 23:23 raynpelikoneet wrote:On October 02 2015 23:21 Rels wrote: since he's not a newbie, his two questions at the beginning are dumbtells
it is 99% proven he is newbie to TL mafia. i don't know why you want to claim otherwise. because he said something like "GB you are known for not reading the thread" yesterday who the fuck cares. he has played a game before. do you think he smurfed back then in a newbie game then now came back and smurfed again? no no no I think he's a lurker reader the why are you arguing he is a smurf?
|
Like you literally fucking say "since he's not a newbie, his two questions at the beginning are dumbtells"
|
On October 02 2015 23:27 Rels wrote:Show nested quote +On October 02 2015 23:26 raynpelikoneet wrote:On October 02 2015 23:24 Rels wrote:On October 02 2015 23:23 raynpelikoneet wrote:On October 02 2015 23:21 Rels wrote: since he's not a newbie, his two questions at the beginning are dumbtells
it is 99% proven he is newbie to TL mafia. i don't know why you want to claim otherwise. because he said something like "GB you are known for not reading the thread" yesterday who the fuck cares. he has played a game before. do you think he smurfed back then in a newbie game then now came back and smurfed again? no no no I think he's a lurker reader actually you made me see the first comment, and I was the one being like "well he has joined another newbie game" now that he had made a second comment of the same type, it cannot be a coincidence he knew GB and I are not the best players in the game he knew GB usually doesn't read properly the thread. Even I didn't know that, but he said it
|
read
On October 02 2015 23:21 Rels wrote: anyway I think coolTLname is scum because he's either a smurf or a lurker reader his two comments about GB proves it since he's not a newbie, his two questions at the beginning are dumbtells
the doubts I have is because we're starting to be in the same situation as yesterday: almost everybody is OK lynching him, so it is mislynch or a bus. I think only rsoultin (and maybe Trfel ?) are not OK lynching him.
|
what the fuck is a lurker reader?
|
On October 02 2015 23:32 raynpelikoneet wrote: what the fuck is a lurker reader? someone reading games but not posting or playing
|
On October 02 2015 23:33 Rels wrote:Show nested quote +On October 02 2015 23:32 raynpelikoneet wrote: what the fuck is a lurker reader? someone reading games but not posting or playing mmm and you think this is possible given how he approached the game early on?
|
This is the second slip:
On October 02 2015 05:06 Rels wrote:Show nested quote +On October 02 2015 04:04 coolTLname wrote:On October 02 2015 04:01 GlowingBear wrote:On October 02 2015 03:56 coolTLname wrote:On October 01 2015 18:41 raynpelikoneet wrote: ... furthermore if he read the voting thread, he is jsut blantantly lying. There was NEVER ever time when coolname/scott/rsoultin were "main lynch targets". this is just a lie, rayn isn't reading thread, im sure u all remember when rsoultin and trfel had 4 votes a piece. On October 01 2015 18:57 raynpelikoneet wrote: Like i know LS is not the most logical guy, but he gets his stuff somewhere, everyone does. What he says doesn't make any sense. The conclusion definitely did not come from reading the voting thread, that is 100% obvious. If he had skimmed the thread he would know that (1) GB is actually one of the main lynch targets, (2) rsoultin is not, (3) coolTLname is being voted BECAUSE scott claimed. Somehow he conveniently misses those KEY things that lead to the situation we were at the time. I can't see this being possible unless you are like the most unfortunate person on the planet when you skim through the thread. i was not voted because scott claimed, he claimed at the last minute after i had already a lot of votes - 7. GB never had more votes than rsoultin, by the way. On October 01 2015 19:39 raynpelikoneet wrote:mmm like here is why this coolnamedude is scum; 1) says he wants to be lynched over scott -> tries to vote for scott 2) says i am mafia for things that do not make me mafia, calls me a liar -> either just straight out lying or didn't read the thread.. but -> says people who do not read the thread are mafia.. 3) calls me/you mafia because we are "cluttering the thread for posting so much" -> says rsoultin is town because she has the biggest filter in the game (yes that is literally his only reason he has managed to ACTUALLY provide). My votes did not even count because i posted them too late, and i've posted much more reasons for why rsoultin is town, the biggest being that she did not vote up Trfel when the votes were tied, stating him as town and just accepting her own lynch. On October 01 2015 12:47 coolTLname wrote:On October 01 2015 12:42 Trfel wrote: I could also probably lynch coolTLname for voting at End of Day and then not posting until 39 minutes later. And then saying that he wanted to get lynched after voting for survival. Like i said earlier, i was busy. To be elaborate i had a therapy session with my dad during the last hour of the game. I actually checked during the session and it seemed clear i would be lynched , until scott revealed at the last minute. I didn't really know what the votes or anything that was going on , but scott seemed suspicious enough to me so i tried to mobile vote him. Unfortunately i was lagging and i cant text for shit, which made my votes not even count, because i missed the deadline, btw. I've caught rayn not really knowing what happening in the thread multiple times now. Not reading the thread doesn't make him mafia Glowing bear u should know better of all people, why would u even say this ? It is quite ridiculous, we all know mafia does not read the thread. Why would a townie not read the thread? OK rayn you were right he is a fucking smurf. We lynch him
|
On October 02 2015 23:34 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On October 02 2015 23:33 Rels wrote:On October 02 2015 23:32 raynpelikoneet wrote: what the fuck is a lurker reader? someone reading games but not posting or playing mmm and you think this is possible given how he approached the game early on? not as town no I think he played dumb with his questions and his reads
|
|
That's what I want to check when I filter dive him though But I distincly remember his second post to be super useless questions That could be explained by newbieness, but if he is, how does he know GB is not a thread reader, and that GB and I are not the more experiences players ? Tonight I will confirm that
|
rayn when did rsoultin said she would be back with reread ?
|
|
|
|