|
On July 07 2015 00:36 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On July 07 2015 00:34 geript wrote:On July 07 2015 00:31 marvellosity wrote:On July 07 2015 00:30 geript wrote:
I'm seeing how dumb I have to make my arguments for people to sheep me. you've not made any arguments You're not reading very closely. i'll rephrase: whatever you're doing is making me want to lynch oats less and less, whatever his alignment is.
ok bbcakes. It's not my fault that you're not all up on specific player's trolling meta, or how they annoy people. Or the fact that they don't get into shit fights with people where they make fucking retarted statements without calling them scum. You know, like it wasn't obvious already.
Ok here's my argument. I'm Dumbledore and I have a red check on Oats.
|
On July 07 2015 00:38 geript wrote:Show nested quote +On July 07 2015 00:35 Oatsmaster wrote:On July 07 2015 00:30 ruXxar wrote:On July 07 2015 00:29 Oatsmaster wrote:On July 07 2015 00:22 geript wrote:
I think he's trying to say he scumslipped and was just following what HF did early not realizing there are two investigators. scumslip x2 Bullshit. Scum are the least likely to slip anything zzz. Look, just cause geript spouted some shit last game, doesnt mean he didnt slip this game. Regardless, he is scum outside of that Awe.... That's cute. You still believe in scumslips. This is what you're second or third game. Don't worry. You'll grow up at some point.
Im sure you have never ever slipped as mafia.
I do it like once a game but no one ever notices.
|
On July 07 2015 00:40 geript wrote:Show nested quote +On July 07 2015 00:36 marvellosity wrote:On July 07 2015 00:34 geript wrote:On July 07 2015 00:31 marvellosity wrote:On July 07 2015 00:30 geript wrote:
I'm seeing how dumb I have to make my arguments for people to sheep me. you've not made any arguments You're not reading very closely. i'll rephrase: whatever you're doing is making me want to lynch oats less and less, whatever his alignment is. ok bbcakes. It's not my fault that you're not all up on specific player's trolling meta, or how they annoy people. Or the fact that they don't get into shit fights with people where they make fucking retarted statements without calling them scum. You know, like it wasn't obvious already. Ok here's my argument. I'm Dumbledore and I have a red check on Oats.
no red text in that statement.
Am i getting wooshed here or does geript really believe that claiming cop will convince people.
|
On July 07 2015 00:42 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On July 07 2015 00:40 geript wrote:On July 07 2015 00:36 marvellosity wrote:On July 07 2015 00:34 geript wrote:On July 07 2015 00:31 marvellosity wrote:On July 07 2015 00:30 geript wrote:
I'm seeing how dumb I have to make my arguments for people to sheep me. you've not made any arguments You're not reading very closely. i'll rephrase: whatever you're doing is making me want to lynch oats less and less, whatever his alignment is. ok bbcakes. It's not my fault that you're not all up on specific player's trolling meta, or how they annoy people. Or the fact that they don't get into shit fights with people where they make fucking retarted statements without calling them scum. You know, like it wasn't obvious already. Ok here's my argument. I'm Dumbledore and I have a red check on Oats. no red text in that statement. Am i getting wooshed here or does geript really believe that claiming cop will convince people.
No idea what he is doing to be honest even if he was dumbledore (probably isn't) he would not have a check yet.
|
On July 07 2015 00:44 Harkon wrote:Show nested quote +On July 07 2015 00:42 Oatsmaster wrote:On July 07 2015 00:40 geript wrote:On July 07 2015 00:36 marvellosity wrote:On July 07 2015 00:34 geript wrote:On July 07 2015 00:31 marvellosity wrote:On July 07 2015 00:30 geript wrote:
I'm seeing how dumb I have to make my arguments for people to sheep me. you've not made any arguments You're not reading very closely. i'll rephrase: whatever you're doing is making me want to lynch oats less and less, whatever his alignment is. ok bbcakes. It's not my fault that you're not all up on specific player's trolling meta, or how they annoy people. Or the fact that they don't get into shit fights with people where they make fucking retarted statements without calling them scum. You know, like it wasn't obvious already. Ok here's my argument. I'm Dumbledore and I have a red check on Oats. no red text in that statement. Am i getting wooshed here or does geript really believe that claiming cop will convince people. No idea what he is doing to be honest even if he was dumbledore (probably isn't) he would not have a check yet.
ok so you arent a vet.
Hm.
|
On July 07 2015 00:46 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On July 07 2015 00:44 Harkon wrote:On July 07 2015 00:42 Oatsmaster wrote:On July 07 2015 00:40 geript wrote:On July 07 2015 00:36 marvellosity wrote:On July 07 2015 00:34 geript wrote:On July 07 2015 00:31 marvellosity wrote:On July 07 2015 00:30 geript wrote:
I'm seeing how dumb I have to make my arguments for people to sheep me. you've not made any arguments You're not reading very closely. i'll rephrase: whatever you're doing is making me want to lynch oats less and less, whatever his alignment is. ok bbcakes. It's not my fault that you're not all up on specific player's trolling meta, or how they annoy people. Or the fact that they don't get into shit fights with people where they make fucking retarted statements without calling them scum. You know, like it wasn't obvious already. Ok here's my argument. I'm Dumbledore and I have a red check on Oats. no red text in that statement. Am i getting wooshed here or does geript really believe that claiming cop will convince people. No idea what he is doing to be honest even if he was dumbledore (probably isn't) he would not have a check yet. ok so you arent a vet. Hm.
Oats what the fuck are you doing man
|
On July 07 2015 00:46 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On July 07 2015 00:44 Harkon wrote:On July 07 2015 00:42 Oatsmaster wrote:On July 07 2015 00:40 geript wrote:On July 07 2015 00:36 marvellosity wrote:On July 07 2015 00:34 geript wrote:On July 07 2015 00:31 marvellosity wrote:On July 07 2015 00:30 geript wrote:
I'm seeing how dumb I have to make my arguments for people to sheep me. you've not made any arguments You're not reading very closely. i'll rephrase: whatever you're doing is making me want to lynch oats less and less, whatever his alignment is. ok bbcakes. It's not my fault that you're not all up on specific player's trolling meta, or how they annoy people. Or the fact that they don't get into shit fights with people where they make fucking retarted statements without calling them scum. You know, like it wasn't obvious already. Ok here's my argument. I'm Dumbledore and I have a red check on Oats. no red text in that statement. Am i getting wooshed here or does geript really believe that claiming cop will convince people. No idea what he is doing to be honest even if he was dumbledore (probably isn't) he would not have a check yet. ok so you arent a vet. Hm.
Quite an ironic statement.
|
On July 07 2015 00:46 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On July 07 2015 00:44 Harkon wrote:On July 07 2015 00:42 Oatsmaster wrote:On July 07 2015 00:40 geript wrote:On July 07 2015 00:36 marvellosity wrote:On July 07 2015 00:34 geript wrote:On July 07 2015 00:31 marvellosity wrote:On July 07 2015 00:30 geript wrote:
I'm seeing how dumb I have to make my arguments for people to sheep me. you've not made any arguments You're not reading very closely. i'll rephrase: whatever you're doing is making me want to lynch oats less and less, whatever his alignment is. ok bbcakes. It's not my fault that you're not all up on specific player's trolling meta, or how they annoy people. Or the fact that they don't get into shit fights with people where they make fucking retarted statements without calling them scum. You know, like it wasn't obvious already. Ok here's my argument. I'm Dumbledore and I have a red check on Oats. no red text in that statement. Am i getting wooshed here or does geript really believe that claiming cop will convince people. No idea what he is doing to be honest even if he was dumbledore (probably isn't) he would not have a check yet. ok so you arent a vet. Hm.
Oats, you better start making sense soon, cause this is stupid.
|
On July 06 2015 12:35 geript wrote:
lynch the fuck out of oats. he's definitely not town.
If you think this...
On July 07 2015 00:38 geript wrote:Show nested quote +On July 07 2015 00:35 Oatsmaster wrote:On July 07 2015 00:30 ruXxar wrote:On July 07 2015 00:29 Oatsmaster wrote:On July 07 2015 00:22 geript wrote:
I think he's trying to say he scumslipped and was just following what HF did early not realizing there are two investigators. scumslip x2 Bullshit. Scum are the least likely to slip anything zzz. Look, just cause geript spouted some shit last game, doesnt mean he didnt slip this game. Regardless, he is scum outside of that Awe.... That's cute. You still believe in scumslips. This is what you're second or third game. Don't worry. You'll grow up at some point.
This makes little sense.
The reason being that if he is indeed mafia, he doesn't have to believe in scumslips to use them against you. You worrying about whether or not he believes in scumslips only makes sense if you think he's town, because if he's mafia he's clearly just making shit up to throw on you.
|
On July 07 2015 00:52 ruXxar wrote:Show nested quote +On July 07 2015 00:46 Oatsmaster wrote:On July 07 2015 00:44 Harkon wrote:On July 07 2015 00:42 Oatsmaster wrote:On July 07 2015 00:40 geript wrote:On July 07 2015 00:36 marvellosity wrote:On July 07 2015 00:34 geript wrote:On July 07 2015 00:31 marvellosity wrote:On July 07 2015 00:30 geript wrote:
I'm seeing how dumb I have to make my arguments for people to sheep me. you've not made any arguments You're not reading very closely. i'll rephrase: whatever you're doing is making me want to lynch oats less and less, whatever his alignment is. ok bbcakes. It's not my fault that you're not all up on specific player's trolling meta, or how they annoy people. Or the fact that they don't get into shit fights with people where they make fucking retarted statements without calling them scum. You know, like it wasn't obvious already. Ok here's my argument. I'm Dumbledore and I have a red check on Oats. no red text in that statement. Am i getting wooshed here or does geript really believe that claiming cop will convince people. No idea what he is doing to be honest even if he was dumbledore (probably isn't) he would not have a check yet. ok so you arent a vet. Hm. Oats, you better start making sense soon, cause this is stupid.
hakon is not a vet.
What is your problem man.
|
OH LOL.
no i didnt mean the role.
Why would I be talking about the role.
|
I'm mostly caught up.
I may need to re-read several filters again, I know I will need to read LS, Ras, WoS and Clarity.
Ras I got a "filler" impression from most of her posts, particularly at the beginning, but especially having been wrong on her as both alignments, I will re-read her filter to make sure I didn't misunderstand something. I know from NSM7 she definitely has filler reactions (or "lols") or what have you when people start to push her so that is definitely a red flag. Someone - I forget whom - brought up her being flustered and they are spot on with that.
Breshke is probably town - between what I knew of him before and his more recent games he does get more aggressive (not bm aggressive but because he has perfect information if a townie is playing poor) as scum. I'm not smelling an agenda from him.
Trfel's first post was NAI. He does that in a lot of his games, can do that as either alignment. I can see his subsequent posting as either alignment, on one hand he's deflecting questions, on the other, he doesn't care and will post when he's fully through. I'm going to wait until his analysis to judge him particularly since that's how he won NSM11.
ritoky, I feel the same way as 1-2 people who have said before, he has prided himself on D1 reads and the in and out passing is quite inconsistent with what he normally provides. The "1 of 3" comment also puzzles me because LS can be judged independently of milo, or what milo said about him (though I have a scumread on milo for other reasons) and ruxxar has said the same amount if not more than LS and so I don't know where this association is coming from unless it's based on the posting area where milo/oats were commenting on LS, etc. I'm giving him a slight scumread for now.
HF, I am bad reading HF D1. and I cannot tell whether his read on Trfel is bad (unfamiliarity) or mafia (taking advantage of the fact that Trfel is not posting reads quite yet, at least I know why). I will need to re-read this filter again.
Milo I have a a scumread. Milo if you are here, I want to see explanations for your INITIAL scumreads - when you say you agree with Oats, that's fine and dandy but based on your posts prior to that you could be a scummer taking advantage of
Oats isn't big on long wordy posts and cases, and I knew what he meant by his initial reads on people. I'm getting a town vibe from him particularly from the last 5 pages of the thread (up to page 53).
I also have townreads on Damdred (the thought processes are well out) and KSC (same).
Also willing to believe the wanderer claim out of BM.
|
On July 07 2015 00:57 Oatsmaster wrote:
OH LOL.
no i didnt mean the role.
Why would I be talking about the role.
I don't think anyone assumed you were?
|
On July 07 2015 00:58 Harkon wrote:Show nested quote +On July 07 2015 00:57 Oatsmaster wrote:
OH LOL.
no i didnt mean the role.
Why would I be talking about the role. I don't think anyone assumed you were?
clarity and rux thought I was.
LOL
Thanks Palmar for making a better case than I ever could
|
For emphasis, in case it's lost in the post:
Milo I want to see explanations for your initial reads:
On July 06 2015 11:07 milo109 wrote:
I'm mildly certain Kelsier is scum.
On July 06 2015 11:20 milo109 wrote:
Hmmm. I feel like I should post more but I don't have much more. Leaning town on Holyflare, and I want to call WaveofShadow also town. But I can't.
On July 06 2015 11:24 milo109 wrote:
It's harder to read Damdred when you aren't mafia. I'm gonna call him mafia here though.
My concern on your filter in general is this is pretty much how you played in Holy Guardians when you were mafia. I don't think you had explanations for pretty much any of your reads and several people have opposing opinions or have substantiated them.
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On July 07 2015 00:58 Half the Sky wrote:
HF, I am bad reading HF D1. and I cannot tell whether his read on Trfel is bad (unfamiliarity) or mafia (taking advantage of the fact that Trfel is not posting reads quite yet, at least I know why). I will need to re-read this filter again.
those are not the only 2 options, HtS
|
On July 07 2015 00:59 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On July 07 2015 00:58 Harkon wrote:On July 07 2015 00:57 Oatsmaster wrote:
OH LOL.
no i didnt mean the role.
Why would I be talking about the role. I don't think anyone assumed you were? clarity and rux thought I was. LOL Thanks Palmar for making a better case than I ever could
I don't necessarily think being inconsistent/bad makes geript scum. It wasn't really a case just pointing it out.
|
On July 07 2015 01:01 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On July 07 2015 00:58 Half the Sky wrote:
HF, I am bad reading HF D1. and I cannot tell whether his read on Trfel is bad (unfamiliarity) or mafia (taking advantage of the fact that Trfel is not posting reads quite yet, at least I know why). I will need to re-read this filter again.
those are not the only 2 options, HtS
I was about to point that out too. HTS says the jury is still out on Trfel but this statement seems like he has a firm townread in him.
|
yeah i really dont like that list from HTS.
|
EBWOP:
On July 07 2015 01:03 Harkon wrote:Show nested quote +On July 07 2015 01:01 marvellosity wrote:On July 07 2015 00:58 Half the Sky wrote:
HF, I am bad reading HF D1. and I cannot tell whether his read on Trfel is bad (unfamiliarity) or mafia (taking advantage of the fact that Trfel is not posting reads quite yet, at least I know why). I will need to re-read this filter again.
those are not the only 2 options, HtS I was about to point that out too. HTS says the jury is still out on Trfel but this statement seems like she has a firm townread on him.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
