EPT5/4/4 B-team anti-teams every season.
Fantasy Proleague 2015 Round 1 - Page 9
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
RiskyChris
125 Posts
5/4/4 B-team anti-teams every season. | ||
|
TT1
Canada9968 Posts
On December 23 2014 23:11 RiskyChris wrote: If you pick any powerhouse on your anti-team you're seriously a loser scrub. 5/4/4 B-team anti-teams every season. i actually dont like picking those type of antiteams because you only have 1 trade per week, i'd rather go for a high'ish point player pick (6-7) + midd-point player who isnt playing + a 1-2 point pick on a weak time (like prime). that way you're sure that 1 of your players won't play the following week and you can trade the player that has the easiest matchup (best case scenario is if 1 or your 2 higher point players dont play the following week, which isnt that uncommon). went with MKP(7)/Taeja(5)/Nette(1) this round but thats only because i was pretty confident that Dark was gonna beat MKP, would have gone with a safer antiteam if the matchups were different. | ||
The_Templar
your Country52796 Posts
On December 23 2014 23:11 RiskyChris wrote: If you pick any powerhouse on your anti-team you're seriously a loser scrub. 5/4/4 B-team anti-teams every season. Why would you have three players that all have a decent chance to be fielded and possibly win next week? | ||
|
RiskyChris
125 Posts
On December 23 2014 23:30 The_Templar wrote: Why would you have three players that all have a decent chance to be fielded and possibly win next week? I picked Dark/Seed/Stork. I don't think they have huge chances of being fielded, except Seed, and I think he'll get rolled enough by enough players. Every 7+ point player is going to win something, nearly guaranteed. Ed: I do worry about Stork coming out against some of the weaker teams, I might get burned here. On December 23 2014 23:28 TT1 wrote: i actually dont like picking those type of antiteams because you only have 1 trade per week, i'd rather go for a high'ish point player pick (6-7) + midd-point player who isnt playing + a 1-2 point pick on a weak time (like prime) went with MKP(7)/Taeja(5)/Nette(1) this round, but thats only because i was pretty confident that Dark was gonna beat MKP, would have gone with a safer antiteam if the matchups were different. I've never traded my anti-team players, but I've always chosen them extremely conservatively. I only got burned once by Creator going ham on week and netting me -9 -- other than that I've often ended in the top anti-team points for FPL. | ||
|
Ej_
47656 Posts
On December 23 2014 23:34 RiskyChris wrote: I picked Dark/Seed/Stork. I don't think they have huge chances of being fielded, except Seed, and I think he'll get rolled enough by enough players. Every 7+ point player is going to win something, nearly guaranteed. Ed: I do worry about Stork coming out against some of the weaker teams, I might get burned here. Well that's too bad because Dark won a game today, his team won as well and Seed was actually fielded. MarineKing/Creator best anti-team 2014 | ||
|
The_Templar
your Country52796 Posts
On December 23 2014 23:34 RiskyChris wrote: I picked Dark/Seed/Stork. I don't think they have huge chances of being fielded, except Seed, and I think he'll get rolled enough by enough players. Every 7+ point player is going to win something, nearly guaranteed. Ed: I do worry about Stork coming out against some of the weaker teams, I might get burned here. I've never traded my anti-team players, but I've always chosen them extremely conservatively. I only got burned once by Creator going ham on week and netting me -9 -- other than that I've often ended in the top anti-team points for FPL. Dark got fielded this week, and won pretty convincingly. Seed was also fielded this week and could have won against a weaker player. Stork is likely to come out. All of these players have a decent change of winning something (the percent chance that they'll win some number of games combined is higher that a single top player winning the same number of games). So it's perfectly reasonable to pick two players that will never play and one good player that you expect to lose several times. | ||
|
RiskyChris
125 Posts
| ||
|
TT1
Canada9968 Posts
On December 23 2014 23:54 RiskyChris wrote: These are high risk plays, I think picking someone who has a minimal chance of winning or being fielded is better than picking... fucking MKP or Zest. Those are guaranteed losses if you have them in your team at the wrong time. theres a world of difference between picking MKP and Zest  | ||
|
Scarecrow
Korea (South)9172 Posts
On December 23 2014 23:54 RiskyChris wrote: These are high risk plays, I think picking someone who has a minimal chance of winning or being fielded is better. You're really not living up to your ID | ||
|
RiskyChris
125 Posts
I'm a no-trader, if that helps =P | ||
|
TT1
Canada9968 Posts
whyyyyyyyy, thats the best part | ||
|
SetGuitarsToKill
Canada28396 Posts
I think this might get addictive. | ||
|
RiskyChris
125 Posts
I might this season, we'll see. This is the first season I really dug into 1st week picks to choose my team (BOMBER!!!!! WTF!) | ||
|
The_Templar
your Country52796 Posts
On December 24 2014 00:38 SetGuitarsToKill wrote: Come on.. update! I wanna see if I improved or not... I think this might get addictive. "might"? "get"?  | ||
|
Tufas
Austria2259 Posts
 Good luck to everyone | ||
|
SetGuitarsToKill
Canada28396 Posts
I didn't really do it last year, but I actually know a thing or two now. Also, I've been pretty successful so far (if Yoda had won the ace I'd have 26 points right now) | ||
|
Silvana
3713 Posts
On December 24 2014 00:38 SetGuitarsToKill wrote: Come on.. update! I wanna see if I improved or not... I think this might get addictive. oh yeah sounds like exactly what I needed... :/ | ||
|
padiseal2
Austria721 Posts
On December 24 2014 00:51 Tufas wrote: Oh god I have not been at my PC in 4 days seems like there is no FPL for me this year Good luck to everyone you will get your chance next round | ||
|
rotta
5560 Posts
| ||
|
R1CH
Netherlands10340 Posts
| ||
| ||
