|
On November 27 2014 06:04 Faruko wrote: Alexis Sanchez is BY FAR the best signing in years
As a Barcelona fan I'm glad to see him doing great. Most of Barcelona supporters never respected o cheered him, even his last year that very good.
|
Sanchez was just a bad decision to let him go, although suarez is better so np. Fabregas was rly bad for barca in all 3 years though, he was just not good enough.
|
On November 27 2014 06:12 Steveling wrote: Sanchez was just a bad decision to let him go, although suarez is better so np. Fabregas was rly bad for barca in all 3 years though, he was just not good enough. Sanchez, Suarez, Messi and Neymar... Would have been Godlike
4-2-3-1 and win UCL
Syarez forward, Messi middle a little behind him and Sanchez and Neymar wingers
|
On November 27 2014 06:12 Steveling wrote: Sanchez was just a bad decision to let him go, although suarez is better so np. Fabregas was rly bad for barca in all 3 years though, he was just not good enough. Suarez as a winger is just a criminal waste of his skills.
They've been using Fabregas as a buttplug for their team, pushing him into all possible positions, false 9, left wing, attacking midfielder... Anything to avoid admitting the fact that he should've been simply Xavi's successor, fair and square. But at that point, they weren't ready to give up on Xavi so it had to fail badly and waste Cesc's time.
He still collected a shitton of assists, though.
|
On November 27 2014 06:22 wingpawn wrote:Show nested quote +On November 27 2014 06:12 Steveling wrote: Sanchez was just a bad decision to let him go, although suarez is better so np. Fabregas was rly bad for barca in all 3 years though, he was just not good enough. Suarez as a winger is just a criminal waste of his skills. They've been using Fabregas as a buttplug for their team, pushing him into all possible positions, false 9, left wing, attacking midfielder... Anything to avoid admitting the fact that he should've been simply Xavi's successor, fair and square. But at that point, they weren't ready to give up on Xavi so it had to fail badly and waste Cesc's time. He still collected a shitton of assists, though. You cant make these comments if you havent seen barca with fabregas in the team. And no, he could not have been the successor to xavi, xavi in a big game player, fabregas made assists to the mallorcas of spain, not the teams with quality.
|
Liverpool parked the bus... Versus Ludogorets. That is just pathetic.
edit: Aaand they didn't even survive... Even more pathetic.
|
Gala down to 10 men, gg ez
|
|
Weeks ago: PL is shit, Bundesliga is awesome. This week: All PL teams win, all Bundesliga teams lose.
Viva La Liga!
|
So Rodgers spent+100 million pounds and he cant even beat Ludogerets?
|
On November 27 2014 06:26 themartinez wrote:Show nested quote +On November 27 2014 06:22 wingpawn wrote:On November 27 2014 06:12 Steveling wrote: Sanchez was just a bad decision to let him go, although suarez is better so np. Fabregas was rly bad for barca in all 3 years though, he was just not good enough. Suarez as a winger is just a criminal waste of his skills. They've been using Fabregas as a buttplug for their team, pushing him into all possible positions, false 9, left wing, attacking midfielder... Anything to avoid admitting the fact that he should've been simply Xavi's successor, fair and square. But at that point, they weren't ready to give up on Xavi so it had to fail badly and waste Cesc's time. He still collected a shitton of assists, though. You cant make these comments if you havent seen barca with fabregas in the team. And no, he could not have been the successor to xavi, xavi in a big game player, fabregas made assists to the mallorcas of spain, not the teams with quality. How is it that he couldn't be a successor to Xavi if now, five months after Chelsea transfer, he's the assist machine? Did he have a leg transplant in London?
|
On November 27 2014 06:32 Mensol wrote: So Rodgers spent+100 million pounds and he cant even beat Ludogerets? well to be fair, real also had tons of trouble beating ludogorets and basel even lost there... still pathetic.
nonetheless, a victory over basel at home is all pool needs for the ro16.
|
Lol, now Dortmund is not only extremely shit in the Bundesliga, but they also finally lost in the CL...
|
On November 27 2014 06:26 themartinez wrote:Show nested quote +On November 27 2014 06:22 wingpawn wrote:On November 27 2014 06:12 Steveling wrote: Sanchez was just a bad decision to let him go, although suarez is better so np. Fabregas was rly bad for barca in all 3 years though, he was just not good enough. Suarez as a winger is just a criminal waste of his skills. They've been using Fabregas as a buttplug for their team, pushing him into all possible positions, false 9, left wing, attacking midfielder... Anything to avoid admitting the fact that he should've been simply Xavi's successor, fair and square. But at that point, they weren't ready to give up on Xavi so it had to fail badly and waste Cesc's time. He still collected a shitton of assists, though. You cant make these comments if you havent seen barca with fabregas in the team. And no, he could not have been the successor to xavi, xavi in a big game player, fabregas made assists to the mallorcas of spain, not the teams with quality.
Yeah, he clearly doesn't know what he's talking about. Fabregas got plenty of chances in xavi's position and he failed time after time. I wanted him to succeed too but he wasn't able to.
|
On November 27 2014 06:36 wingpawn wrote:Show nested quote +On November 27 2014 06:26 themartinez wrote:On November 27 2014 06:22 wingpawn wrote:On November 27 2014 06:12 Steveling wrote: Sanchez was just a bad decision to let him go, although suarez is better so np. Fabregas was rly bad for barca in all 3 years though, he was just not good enough. Suarez as a winger is just a criminal waste of his skills. They've been using Fabregas as a buttplug for their team, pushing him into all possible positions, false 9, left wing, attacking midfielder... Anything to avoid admitting the fact that he should've been simply Xavi's successor, fair and square. But at that point, they weren't ready to give up on Xavi so it had to fail badly and waste Cesc's time. He still collected a shitton of assists, though. You cant make these comments if you havent seen barca with fabregas in the team. And no, he could not have been the successor to xavi, xavi in a big game player, fabregas made assists to the mallorcas of spain, not the teams with quality. How is it that he couldn't be a successor to Xavi if now, five months after Chelsea transfer, he's the assist machine? Did he have a leg transplant in London? assists against which teams? omg, chelsea should win against those teams anyway. Come back when he faces real madrid or bayern and gets destroyed, like during the time he played at barca.
|
Gala with single point and -12 gd after 5 games...
|
L O L
On November 27 2014 06:36 Black Gun wrote:Show nested quote +On November 27 2014 06:32 Mensol wrote: So Rodgers spent+100 million pounds and he cant even beat Ludogerets? well to be fair, real also had tons of trouble beating ludogorets and basel even lost there... still pathetic. nonetheless, a victory over basel at home is all pool needs for the ro16. Basel is the killer of PL teams.
|
On November 27 2014 06:42 Mensol wrote:L O L This is the reason photoshop was made!
|
On November 27 2014 06:46 themartinez wrote:This is the reason photoshop was made!
You mean it was photoshop'd?!
|
So I really can't say that BVB is a good team at this point. People keep talking about a "poor run of form", but at some point, a "poor run" turns into "what the club actually is".
And honestly, what is BVB good at anymore? Both their offense and defense are horrible (counting among the worst in the Bundesliga), with some of the worst finishing and worst passing you can see. They don't have a lot of speed, they give up easy goals, and their possession is only good because they constantly hold the ball in their half/the middle 3rd. There really isn't a single thing BVB is good at this year (even though commentators love to talk about their counterattack, which is absolutely horrible due to unreliable finishing). Their only wins were against a struggling Arsenal and Gladbach, both at home, and the Gladbach one relied on an own goal that BVB had absolutely nothing to do with. Dortmund has failed against all quality competition, including Arsenal today and Bayern, Schalke, and Leverkusen in the Bundesliga.
The problem is that their signings have been a complete failure. They lost the likes of Lewandowski and Götze (transfer) and Reus, Gundogan, Kuba, Schmelzer, Subotic, Hummels, Pizsczek, and Sahin (injuries), and they have completely failed to replace them. Aubameyang, Mkhi, and Immobile are all busts that have failed to fill their potential with poor finishing and terrible passing, Sokratis is good but unreliable as he sometimes makes baffling positional decisions, Ginter is young and makes a lot of terrible decisions, Ramos and Jojic don't play enough to be a factor, and Dong Won Ji has completely disappeared since joining BVB. Worst of all they haven't made a single move to shore up the midfield. If Gündogan and Sahin were consistently healthy this wouldn't be as much of a problem, but the likes of Bender, Grosskreutz, Kehl, and Jojic don't make enough of a difference or just simply aren't good enough.
The glaring mistake is that BVB didn't make a single move for a proven, high-quality, high-talent player. They bought a whole lot of potential in Ramos, Dong Won Ji, Jojic, Ginter, Aubameyang, and Mkhi, but almost all of these were a complete bust. The closest thing to "proven talent" that they bought was Immobile, but even as Serie A's top scorer he still wasn't on the level of a signing for Van Persie, Lewandowski, Götze, Alonso, Neymar, Suarez, Khedira, Özil, Kroos, etc. etc. etc. Dortmund saw the mistake they made in the late '90's after their CL win (sink a shitload of money into high-cost players and sink into debt) and tried to go in the completely opposite direction by investing in all potential, but none of that potential has paid off at all.
|
|
|
|