EPTStudent Mafia IV (New/Newish Players Welcome) - Page 23
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
batsnacks
United States4466 Posts
| ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
Dicksmash has got to go. His recent scumreads are really unconvincing and the reasoning he uses is generic and superficial. VOTE DICKSMASH PEOPLE. Batsnacks is way too active to lynch d1. The truth is that it's rare that someone is going to have strong reads d1, so you can't fault batsnacks for that. He has been promoting discussion and had a huge presence in the thread. You don't ever lynch someone like that d1. Oats, you should know that. And that's what makes me worry about you. | ||
|
Damdred
15669 Posts
| ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
What do I mean? I mean that he is going to be a big unknown all game due to his lack of activity and not giving a fuck. Unlike someone like bats or oats, who can prove themselves town later in the game. | ||
|
Damdred
15669 Posts
| ||
|
batsnacks
United States4466 Posts
| ||
|
batsnacks
United States4466 Posts
##unvote ##vote dicksmash | ||
|
Trfel
7015 Posts
On November 27 2014 01:33 kushm4sta wrote: Batsnacks is way too active to lynch d1. The truth is that it's rare that someone is going to have strong reads d1, so you can't fault batsnacks for that. He has been promoting discussion and had a huge presence in the thread. You don't ever lynch someone like that d1. Oats, you should know that. And that's what makes me worry about you. I'm not looking for a strong read from him, I'm looking for any kind of sensible read. His activity is why his lack of a reasonable read is even more of a red flag. I still feel like the Oatsmaster scumread is really weak, and I've stated this multiple times. Batsnacks even moved his vote off of Oatsmaster and then moved it back without explanation, which I feel gives even less support to his accusation. I don't feel that batsnacks has been promoting discussion, since he hasn't really been adding any discussion himself. | ||
|
batsnacks
United States4466 Posts
On November 27 2014 01:41 Trfel wrote: I'm not looking for a strong read from him, I'm looking for any kind of sensible read. His activity is why his lack of a reasonable read is even more of a red flag. I still feel like the Oatsmaster scumread is really weak, and I've stated this multiple times. Batsnacks even moved his vote off of Oatsmaster and then moved it back without explanation, which I feel gives even less support to his accusation. I don't feel that batsnacks has been promoting discussion, since he hasn't really been adding any discussion himself. I've given more reads than you.  | ||
|
Trfel
7015 Posts
By my count, you've given zero reads. I've explained why your Oatsmaster read is terrible, do I need to quote myself here? Meanwhile I've given one read. I also have several town leans, but I haven't felt the need to share those yet. I can do so if you would like, though. Anyway, batsnacks, I REALLY want to know why you keep changing your vote between Oatsmaster and Dicksmash without explanation. This seems extremely fishy to me. | ||
|
batsnacks
United States4466 Posts
On November 27 2014 01:48 Trfel wrote: By my count, you've given zero reads. I've explained why your Oatsmaster read is terrible, do I need to quote myself here? Meanwhile I've given one read. I also have several town leans, but I haven't felt the need to share those yet. I can do so if you would like, though. Anyway, batsnacks, I REALLY want to know why you keep changing your vote between Oatsmaster and Dicksmash without explanation. This seems extremely fishy to me. What's fishy about it? Why does changing my vote make me mafia? | ||
|
Half the Sky
Germany9029 Posts
On November 27 2014 01:33 kushm4sta wrote: I have no idea when EoD is. 10pm GMT/5pm EST, so just north of 5h. | ||
|
batsnacks
United States4466 Posts
##vote Trfel Look, I changed my vote again. It's really easy. | ||
|
Trfel
7015 Posts
| ||
|
Half the Sky
Germany9029 Posts
I'm looking at his post-page 18 activity and he has been putting out some substance though it could be supported better. He did have a bandwagon bats vote... ...but if you are looking to policy vote ANYONE at this point, you guys should be going after Alakaslam, not DSMI. After page 18, DSMI isn't a policy vote in my book. On November 27 2014 01:35 kushm4sta wrote: dicksmash lynch doubles as a plynch. so we will be in a good position even if he's town. What do I mean? I mean that he is going to be a big unknown all game due to his lack of activity and not giving a fuck. Unlike someone like bats or oats, who can prove themselves town later in the game. Fair point, but can you (or anyone) distinguish between him and Alakaslam? | ||
|
batsnacks
United States4466 Posts
| ||
|
batsnacks
United States4466 Posts
| ||
|
LightningStrike
United States14276 Posts
##vote Sleep | ||
|
batsnacks
United States4466 Posts
| ||
|
Half the Sky
Germany9029 Posts
On November 27 2014 01:33 kushm4sta wrote: Batsnacks is way too active to lynch d1. The truth is that it's rare that someone is going to have strong reads d1, so you can't fault batsnacks for that. He has been promoting discussion and had a huge presence in the thread. You don't ever lynch someone like that d1. I believe his issue is not the quantity of posts, it's the quality of them. In my case, I had a problem with the voting. Also, in your history of playing this game how often does a scum player try and be overly active so that focus is off of him later on? | ||
| ||
