|
Hey everybody.
So anyways. I'll just start this off with a few things:
1. I'm a girl, please refer to me as she, her etc.
In regards to Koshi's starter:
2. Let's be nice. I don't mind saying things are stupid or retarded or whatever, but let's lay off the personal attacks.
3. Koshi you're advocating policy lynching people who don't hit 40 posts a day? That's nice, however I don't policy lynch unless there's no better option for lynching scum.
|
I just played with ala smurfing in normal mini and he had 3 pages of filter over five days of the game.
I hope for better.
|
|
When lurking's allowed it's the easiest option for scummers. You can end up lynching a townie who you read as scum while scummers laugh in the background.
|
|
Heh, it's funny cause I much prefer the Slam that showed up in NMM1 compared to Slam that shows up to other games. Even with his small filter/lurkiness from NMM1.
|
On February 04 2014 07:16 Koshi wrote:Show nested quote +On February 04 2014 07:13 JonnyLaw wrote: Half the game won't meet those requirements. Being nice is too hard. People are lazy.
Lynching lurkers is fine but your 40 posts are ambitious. Who isn't going to meet those requirements?
You've played with me before...
|
Koshi are we going to get the super pro-town, active and helpful version of you or the super lurky, one-liner trolly Koshi?
|
What kind of question is that? Is the next one "koshi are you scum?"
Also. Mr. Stray Kitten. Just say what you think whenever you think it.
|
On February 04 2014 07:38 Koshi wrote: Also. Mr. Stray Kitten. Just say what you think whenever you think it.
Well, for starters I don't quite agree with your "minimum post count" thing. I'll support a lurker lynch if it's necessary, but based on amount of content, not number of posts.
|
No not at all, I just want you to commit.
On February 04 2014 07:33 LoneMeow wrote:Show nested quote +On February 04 2014 07:16 Koshi wrote:On February 04 2014 07:13 JonnyLaw wrote: Half the game won't meet those requirements. Being nice is too hard. People are lazy.
Lynching lurkers is fine but your 40 posts are ambitious. Who isn't going to meet those requirements? You've played with me before...
What are you trying to say? You don't want the requirement cause you know you can't meet it? Or Koshi is supposed to know you already will disagree with his plan?
##vote LoneMeow
|
On February 04 2014 07:43 Balla24 wrote:No not at all, I just want you to commit. Show nested quote +On February 04 2014 07:33 LoneMeow wrote:On February 04 2014 07:16 Koshi wrote:On February 04 2014 07:13 JonnyLaw wrote: Half the game won't meet those requirements. Being nice is too hard. People are lazy.
Lynching lurkers is fine but your 40 posts are ambitious. Who isn't going to meet those requirements? You've played with me before... What are you trying to say? You don't want the requirement cause you know you can't meet it? Or Koshi is supposed to know you already will disagree with his plan? ##vote LoneMeow
Trying to say he should already know how likely it is that I'll reach that requirement. (In case you haven't followed any games I've been in: Extremely unlikely.)
And that has very little to do with whether I agree or disagree with his plan.
|
40 posts is an arbitrary number that doesn't mean anything.
It worked okay as a conversation starter but on Wednesday are you going to be sitting around counting people's posts since the game started?
I'm not. I assume people are going to play the game. If they don't we'll fucking lynch them. It's that simple. I want help catching scum. I don't want people shitting up the thread with nonsense.
And what the fuck is that vote? Lonemeow's said the most sensible thing since this game started.
On February 04 2014 07:40 LoneMeow wrote:Show nested quote +On February 04 2014 07:38 Koshi wrote: Also. Mr. Stray Kitten. Just say what you think whenever you think it. Well, for starters I don't quite agree with your "minimum post count" thing. I'll support a lurker lynch if it's necessary, but based on amount of content, not number of posts.
|
It is a good post to quote in 40 hours ;D
|
hai guys. does this mean i have to abandon my be-a-dick meta ?
|
Apparently. also you have to take on a 'spam 40 posts a cycle' meta.
How does this make you feel?
|
On February 04 2014 08:45 suki wrote: Apparently. also you have to take on a 'spam 40 posts a cycle' meta.
How does this make you feel? motivated. And its not like there is anything from stopping me from literally posting
1
2
3
4 ... ... ... etc
40 if I were actually scared koshi (or anyone else) would follow through with it.
Is there anyone who is legitimately advocating for letting people lurk? I understand that its largely inevitable (hell, im one of the poster children) but we should still be making a reasonable effort to pressure people and get thoughts when they are around.
|
Wassup guys. Koshi's baseline is post often. That simple. I prefer we don't get spammy and post mass one liners (As I tend to do sometime giving my current thoughts) But try to know what you are saying when you post as well. Have a clear intention.
We DO need to have pressure to make people who usually lurk (whether they be town or scum) post more often. So I like the guideline in general. So lets try to aim for 40 as a benchmark why not.
Balla is this your first mafia game? I was browsing some of this towns old games and didn't see you.
|
On February 04 2014 08:55 Hopeless1der wrote:Show nested quote +On February 04 2014 08:45 suki wrote: Apparently. also you have to take on a 'spam 40 posts a cycle' meta.
How does this make you feel? motivated. And its not like there is anything from stopping me from literally posting ... ... ... etc if I were actually scared koshi (or anyone else) would follow through with it. Is there anyone who is legitimately advocating for letting people lurk? I understand that its largely inevitable (hell, im one of the poster children) but we should still be making a reasonable effort to pressure people and get thoughts when they are around. What are you trying to accomplish with this post? I disagree that its inevitable. If we as a town are all posting well and making concise thoughts then we could just find lurking scum on the wayside. It almost seems like your advocating to let people lurk. I don't even know why your bringing up you making numbered post. Of course that isn't acceptable do you even have to ask it?
|
Jay, let me slippery slope this argument.
Suppose I invoke a policy that "I will vote the player with the smallest filter at 30 minutes to deadline".
How do you avoid drawing my vote? By spamming as much as possible.
How do you conclude that I'm "almost advocating to let people lurk"? I literally ask that question as a rhetorical because its implied that lurking is bad. Is this real life right now?
|
|
|
|