|
On January 17 2014 06:07 raynpelikoneet wrote: Okay that's weird. Why?
i stared into kush's soul and found it to my liking
my toad read only accounts for what he'd posted since before I slept, but he seemed more interested than others in finding scum
|
On January 17 2014 06:11 Koshi wrote:O rly. Tell me more.
I have said everything I have to say about why I find your play suspicious. I guess we just wait and see what you do next!
|
On January 17 2014 06:16 thrawn2112 wrote:i stared into kush's soul and found it to my liking my toad read only accounts for what he'd posted since before I slept, but he seemed more interested than others in finding scum Could you show me these ultimate contributions to scumhunting from Toad?
|
On January 16 2014 17:00 thrawn2112 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 16 2014 16:53 Oatsmaster wrote: Like Koshi is also able to be productive, but he hasnt been yet. Why dont you vote for him? from what I remember koshi is a slow starter. I also remember that he stayed up late to see the game start and was likely very tired. both of those reasons make everything he posted non alignment indicative Why is Koshi scummy again?
|
actually nevermind about toad, I have no idea about him after rereading. rayn, can you explain your toad read?
|
He is better than this, that's my case. Why is Koshi scummy in your opinion? All you say is "Koshi is a slow starter" and the next post you reference him you say "Koshi is scum i think". Why?
|
On January 17 2014 06:26 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On January 16 2014 17:00 thrawn2112 wrote:On January 16 2014 16:53 Oatsmaster wrote: Like Koshi is also able to be productive, but he hasnt been yet. Why dont you vote for him? from what I remember koshi is a slow starter. I also remember that he stayed up late to see the game start and was likely very tired. both of those reasons make everything he posted non alignment indicative Why is Koshi scummy again?
the conversation he had with you about Oats, which took place after what you quoted
He mentioned Oats as the person he was interested in... but he didn't have a read on or ask questions to Oats. All he had to say about Oats is that we shouldn't count him as town for what he posted.
|
For real though, I don't get the kush read.
He starts out out-of-character, produces 2 scum candidates practically out of thin air in like the first 3 pages of gameplay, then is reminded that he's not playing to "meta" and instantly reverts to useless troll without even bothering to try to develop or justify his reads. Which, by the way, he feels the need to keep calling scum without adding to any body of evidence.
If he started out as usual then he'd get a free pass as "just kush" but that start is bothering me combined with how rapidly he tailored himself to thread expectations.
|
that's not what happened sno
|
On January 17 2014 06:30 Sn0_Man wrote: For real though, I don't get the kush read.
He starts out out-of-character, produces 2 scum candidates practically out of thin air in like the first 3 pages of gameplay, then is reminded that he's not playing to "meta" and instantly reverts to useless troll without even bothering to try to develop or justify his reads. Which, by the way, he feels the need to keep calling scum without adding to any body of evidence.
If he started out as usual then he'd get a free pass as "just kush" but that start is bothering me combined with how rapidly he tailored himself to thread expectations.
If it becomes important then I'll explain all of my kush/town reasoning.
But I would like to point out that I specifically asked kush for a read which prompted his comment about you.
|
(changed because only adressing that part):
On January 17 2014 06:28 raynpelikoneet wrote: He is better than this, that's my case. [...] which is soley based on your sn0 read that apparently clashes with mine?
|
Kush, you go from this:
On January 16 2014 10:07 kushm4sta wrote:Im not calling you anything. You are calling yourself VT which im just informing you is bad for town. So you shoulnd't do it ever again please. To this:
On January 17 2014 02:14 kushm4sta wrote: i dont mind getting lynched because I think it would be funny One is pretty "serious" and not at all in line with what I'd expect of you, and one is trolly, amusing, and very much in line with the public perception others have of you.
What happened in the middle was that people were claiming that when you are serious like that you are scum.
If you'd like to explain i'm all ears.
|
I am too tired to do anything. I will bring magic tomorrow.
|
On January 17 2014 06:35 Toadesstern wrote:(changed because only adressing that part): Show nested quote +On January 17 2014 06:28 raynpelikoneet wrote: He is better than this, that's my case. [...] which is soley based on your sn0 read that apparently clashes with mine?
lol yeah that is why i'm reading rayn as town atm. one of his favorite scumtells is when people disagree with him
|
On January 17 2014 06:36 Sn0_Man wrote:Kush, you go from this: Show nested quote +On January 16 2014 10:07 kushm4sta wrote:On January 16 2014 10:06 Hopeless1der wrote: so you calling me scum kush? Im not calling you anything. You are calling yourself VT which im just informing you is bad for town. So you shoulnd't do it ever again please. To this: Show nested quote +On January 17 2014 02:14 kushm4sta wrote: i dont mind getting lynched because I think it would be funny One is pretty "serious" and not at all in line with what I'd expect of you, and one is trolly, amusing, and very much in line with the public perception others have of you. What happened in the middle was that people were claiming that when you are serious like that you are scum. If you'd like to explain i'm all ears.
scum
|
Erm thrawn...
As nice as it is that you are handing out town-reads like they are going out of style, the entire thread cannot be town (I checked, Caller isn't the host). Whats the master plan here? The goal of the game is to find and lynch scum...
|
On January 17 2014 06:36 thrawn2112 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 17 2014 06:35 Toadesstern wrote:(changed because only adressing that part): On January 17 2014 06:28 raynpelikoneet wrote: He is better than this, that's my case. [...] which is soley based on your sn0 read that apparently clashes with mine? lol yeah that is why i'm reading rayn as town atm. one of his favorite scumtells is when people disagree with him could be, I only remember playing with him one game and he was town that game and I always confused him with vayne (who was in that game as well) because their names, shortned, are just so damn alike so I'm not really having a good memory of his playstyle (no I don't consider the failgame a game). I'm not really going to reread older games for that though.
If this is true it's odd though. Yeah "random" my ass, there's no way Mig, rayn and I are all town. That means I'm either pulling a GM here or rayn's mafia. He did say he likes establishing reads on big players first. That contraticts with his reasoning above... he's basing a read on me on a read on someone else, who I might add, hasn't flipped yet...
|
On January 17 2014 06:35 Toadesstern wrote:(changed because only adressing that part): Show nested quote +On January 17 2014 06:28 raynpelikoneet wrote: He is better than this, that's my case. [...] which is soley based on your sn0 read that apparently clashes with mine? No it's based on you agreeing with Skanjabs' case which i can't see a townie your caliber doing.
|
On January 17 2014 06:41 Sn0_Man wrote: Erm thrawn...
As nice as it is that you are handing out town-reads like they are going out of style, the entire thread cannot be town (I checked, Caller isn't the host). Whats the master plan here? The goal of the game is to find and lynch scum...
lol I have no say in whether or not I read people as town/scum, you gotta ask my brain that question
I do have some reads that are more interesting than what I'm currently talking about. But I'm waiting on certain posts from certain people to come to a conclusion.
|
On January 17 2014 06:44 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On January 17 2014 06:35 Toadesstern wrote:(changed because only adressing that part): On January 17 2014 06:28 raynpelikoneet wrote: He is better than this, that's my case. [...] which is soley based on your sn0 read that apparently clashes with mine? No it's based on you agreeing with Skanjabs' case which i can't see a townie your caliber doing. we've been over this 5 times already. I said the case is bad but there was one phrase I liked. Please stop calling that agreeing with the case when I agreed that it's mostly bad at least 5 times up to this point.
|
|
|
|