What do you think about Oats and Thrawn
[M][N] "SMB" Mini Mafia - Page 15
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
What do you think about Oats and Thrawn | ||
Koshi
Belgium38797 Posts
Why are you not trolling with Grack Skanjab1s? | ||
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
On January 16 2014 18:07 thrawn2112 wrote: What do you think about Oats and Thrawn I think you're almost certainly town, and I'm leaning slightly town on Oats, too. Your interactions feel like town-on-town. What do you think of Sn0? | ||
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
On January 16 2014 18:09 Koshi wrote: Mr. Evil Snowman so scummy. Why are you not trolling with Grack Skanjab1s? I'm too busy finding scum. | ||
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
On January 16 2014 18:12 Skanjab1s wrote: I think you're almost certainly town, and I'm leaning slightly town on Oats, too. Your interactions feel like town-on-town. What do you think of Sn0? I think what you said here: "- His "let's lynch the host" thing, while being a joke, shows a deep lack of desire for actually wanting to find scum. " is quite possibly the scummiest thing in the thread. A "deep lack of desire," are you serious? That reeks of exaggeration and propaganda based writing. | ||
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
On January 16 2014 18:20 thrawn2112 wrote: ##unvote I think what you said here: "- His "let's lynch the host" thing, while being a joke, shows a deep lack of desire for actually wanting to find scum. " is quite possibly the scummiest thing in the thread. A "deep lack of desire," are you serious? That reeks of exaggeration and propaganda based writing. It felt scummy to me, so I put it in the case. And yes, a lack of desire to find scum is, believe it or not, present in scum. | ||
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
On January 16 2014 18:33 Skanjab1s wrote: It felt scummy to me, so I put it in the case. And yes, a lack of desire to find scum is, believe it or not, present in scum. Apart from what I pointed out, what irks me the most about skan's case is that it looks exactly like a scum's "I'm going to read this filter and point out every single 'scumtell' I can" type of case. I don't see any thought process behind the case, it all looks very robotic. (scum going through the motions of writing a case) Nowhere in the case does he stop to consider reasons why sn0man might be town, which is something that townies generally do even if they are experiencing confirmation bias. He obviously read sn0's filter knowing that he wanted to scum-read sn0_man, and wrote a bunch of exxaggerated propaganda to prove his point. | ||
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
Our friend Oats has drove me to drink. Is skanjabs scum? Or has my beverage made me dumb? | ||
Koshi
Belgium38797 Posts
More interested in Oats atm. Not going to let him live because he is in people their face. It is proven he can do it as scum. | ||
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
On January 16 2014 18:44 thrawn2112 wrote: Apart from what I pointed out, what irks me the most about skan's case is that it looks exactly like a scum's "I'm going to read this filter and point out every single 'scumtell' I can" type of case. I don't see any thought process behind the case, it all looks very robotic. (scum going through the motions of writing a case) Nowhere in the case does he stop to consider reasons why sn0man might be town, which is something that townies generally do even if they are experiencing confirmation bias. He obviously read sn0's filter knowing that he wanted to scum-read sn0_man, and wrote a bunch of exxaggerated propaganda to prove his point. That's the way I write cases, I filter people and point out all the scummy things I think they've done. Obviously I don't stop to consider reasons in my case of why snoman might be town. That's not what a case is. A case on why someone is scum is a compilation of their scumminess. Also, I got scum feels from sno's posts, so I filtered him and made the case. It's not that I wanted to scumread him, it's that I already have scumread him. If you believe that the points in my case are "exaggerated propaganda" then please explain how. | ||
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
On January 16 2014 19:02 Koshi wrote: Feels like Skanjab is doing the same as in Hogwarts only more tryhard. But I like the case. So meh. More interested in Oats atm. Not going to let him live because he is in people their face. It is proven he can do it as scum. Hm. I'll have to research the hogwarts crap when I'm sober. When you say he is "doing the same" what are you referring to? What I found scummiest about the case is the lack of townie "is this guy town or scum" thought process behind any of it, and the exxaggeration I mentioned. I think it's different than confirmation bias cases because there you usually have some kind of "now he might be town for doing this because of X but most likely not." lol someone other than myself is going to have read Oats because I cba to read one more of his posts + Show Spoiler + <3<3<3 Oats. but you being tha dumb right now | ||
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
On January 16 2014 19:02 Skanjab1s wrote: Obviously I don't stop to consider reasons in my case of why snoman might be town. yes, but have you done this? | ||
Oatsmaster
United States16627 Posts
On January 16 2014 19:02 Koshi wrote: Feels like Skanjab is doing the same as in Hogwarts only more tryhard. But I like the case. So meh. More interested in Oats atm. Not going to let him live because he is in people their face. It is proven he can do it as scum. Dude then ask me questions or something instead of commenting on how Im not town. Thats not useful. | ||
Koshi
Belgium38797 Posts
On January 16 2014 19:15 thrawn2112 wrote: Hm. I'll have to research the hogwarts crap when I'm sober. When you say he is "doing the same" what are you referring to? What I found scummiest about the case is the lack of townie "is this guy town or scum" thought process behind any of it, and the exxaggeration I mentioned. I think it's different than confirmation bias cases because there you usually have some kind of "now he might be town for doing this because of X but most likely not." lol someone other than myself is going to have read Oats because I cba to read one more of his posts + Show Spoiler + <3<3<3 Oats. but you being tha dumb right now I had Skanjab as scum in Hogwarts till he started making cases, early game Skan posted strange fluff just like Snow is doing now. Like 3-5 really double meaning posts. | ||
Koshi
Belgium38797 Posts
On January 16 2014 19:19 Oatsmaster wrote: yeah skanjab's case is pretty scummy. sn0 feels kinda like the dude I jumped on in white flag mafia. And I was scum there. Dude then ask me questions or something instead of commenting on how Im not town. Thats not useful. I am simply stating that "Oats in the face" is not a towntell. At all. But here is a question: VA posted a gif in his first post, confirmed town? | ||
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
Yes, and I still find the things he has done to be quite scummy. Could you please stop ignoring my questions thrawn? | ||
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
| ||
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
Even though you're halfway across the world and asleep, I hope you feel it, thrawn. I hope you feeeeeeel it. | ||
raynpelikoneet
Finland43188 Posts
On January 16 2014 19:02 Koshi wrote: Feels like Skanjab is doing the same as in Hogwarts only more tryhard. But I like the case. So meh. More interested in Oats atm. Not going to let him live because he is in people their face. It is proven he can do it as scum. Koshi why do you like the case? And in what game has Oats does what he did here as scum? Having a shitfest with me does not count. | ||
Koshi
Belgium38797 Posts
On January 16 2014 20:16 raynpelikoneet wrote: Koshi why do you like the case? And in what game has Oats does what he did here as scum? Having a shitfest with me does not count. Everything. It's all true. PYP? That's why he was alive till D7. | ||
| ||