[M][N] "SMB" Mini Mafia - Page 13

On January 16 2014 16:01 Oatsmaster wrote:
lol rayn hasnt done jack shit, how does that make him somehow scummier than like Grack or Hopeless?

On January 16 2014 16:03 thrawn2112 wrote:
And no, I don't have much confidence in either of them (grack+hopeless) flipping scum.

On January 16 2014 10:23 thrawn2112 wrote:
I wrote this a million times when I bussed grack in some normal.

He deflects suspicion by trolling/joking so don't let him get away with it.

On January 16 2014 10:21 thrawn2112 wrote:


yep you're scum

On January 16 2014 16:11 thrawn2112 wrote:
Oats, what are you driving at with this line of questioning? I can't tell if you think I'm scum, if you're mad that I'm not voting grack, or....?

On January 16 2014 16:00 Skanjab1s wrote:
Hiii. I'd be delighted if you kittens could indulge me in a brief questionnaire, it'll only take a little of your time.

(1) Do you prefer to play as town or scum?
(2) What will you be remembered for this game?
(3) How do you react to pressure?
(4) Is your play usually emotional, or reserved?

Joke answers = Totally scum, by the way.

On January 16 2014 15:43 thrawn2112 wrote:
By "go off" did you mean vote for or unvote Grack?

If it's the first then I don't understand the question. If you mean unvote, I didn't like how hopeless was treating Grack and wanted to give Grack some room to breathe if he's town. Having the entire thread pile votes on and yelling at someone isn't a very good way to figure out their alignment. See WoS from LXIV.

On January 16 2014 16:23 Oatsmaster wrote:

Thrawn, here you seem to think that hopeless is scummy and earlier you thought Grack was scummy. Whats with all these contradictions in your reads? Why bother saying this if you think hopeless and Grack are both town?

On January 16 2014 16:27 thrawn2112 wrote:
My initial vote on grack was because he was present for the trolling, and suddenly absent once people started playing the real game. Playing hearthstone is a perfectly good reason for him not to have posted during the time he was away, so my initial accusation doesn't stand up. My meta accusation was based on a single response from this game, and 1 scum game I played with him. That is not how you do meta. I realized all of the above, plus the other explanation I gave you, so I unvoted.

On January 16 2014 16:27 thrawn2112 wrote:


" I didn't like how hopeless was treating Grack"

that does NOT mean I was scumreading hopeless.

Oats please just fucking read.

On January 16 2014 16:27 thrawn2112 wrote:
My initial vote on grack was because he was present for the trolling, and suddenly absent once people started playing the real game. Playing hearthstone is a perfectly good reason for him not to have posted during the time he was away, so my initial accusation doesn't stand up. My meta accusation was based on a single response from this game, and 1 scum game I played with him. That is not how you do meta. I realized all of the above, plus the other explanation I gave you, so I unvoted.

On January 16 2014 16:34 thrawn2112 wrote:
Oats you have misread almost every single thing I've posted. If you put that quote in context..... you know..... a READING skill.... then you would understand. It wasn't about being nice. It was about not suffocating someone with so much pressure that if they're town, they will become more and more unlikely to cooperate. Also I realized my initial reason for voting was completely stupid.

What's frustrating about this is that only townies are capable of the stupidity you're displaying.

On January 16 2014 16:38 thrawn2112 wrote:
Oats the reason you dont understand how people can reread the thread and reevaluate their reads is because you never do either.

On January 16 2014 16:21 Oatsmaster wrote:

whos scum?