II Titanic Mini Mafia - Page 48
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
VayneAuthority
United States8983 Posts
| ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
##Unvote ##Vote Alakaslam | ||
Plutarch
Greece515 Posts
| ||
Plutarch
Greece515 Posts
| ||
Grackaroni
United States9832 Posts
##Unvote: Raynepelikoneet. ##Vote: Alakaslam | ||
Grackaroni
United States9832 Posts
| ||
Pandain
United States12979 Posts
On December 11 2013 13:11 Holyflare wrote: K fine, not enough policy lynches happen on TL anyway. For the sanity of the members! ##Unvote ##Vote Alakaslam So you actually have scum reads and decide to ignore them for a policy lynch Nice holy | ||
VayneAuthority
United States8983 Posts
| ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On December 11 2013 13:24 Pandain wrote: So you actually have scum reads and decide to ignore them for a policy lynch Nice holy yes | ||
Pandain
United States12979 Posts
On December 11 2013 13:27 VayneAuthority wrote: I was waiting for the jabs at people going on the slam lynch. it's not scummy at all. Don't make it out to be something it isn't It's scummy as shit if you aren't clearly aggravated and have reads, actual reads, like holy has. We are 46 pages in, one guy out of 18 isn't a big deal and he's probably town Coming from someone who is often the target of policy lynches I'm surprised at your approach | ||
Plutarch
Greece515 Posts
On December 11 2013 13:24 Pandain wrote: So you actually have scum reads and decide to ignore them for a policy lynch Nice holy This is a scummy post. Why single out holy? and not Grack and I? Why try and paint a policy lynch as anything more than it is? This post is off. | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
VayneAuthority
United States8983 Posts
On December 11 2013 13:29 Pandain wrote: It's scummy as shit if you aren't clearly aggravated and have reads, actual reads, like holy has. We are 46 pages in, one guy out of 18 isn't a big deal and he's probably town Coming from someone who is often the target of policy lynches I'm surprised at your approach how many times have I been lynched? Point made Scum isn't going to kill slam for us. he will never go away and always linger as we get closer to lylo. | ||
Plutarch
Greece515 Posts
| ||
Pandain
United States12979 Posts
On December 11 2013 13:30 Plutarch wrote: This is a scummy post. Why single out holy? and not Grack and I? Why try and paint a policy lynch as anything more than it is? This post is off. I think grack is scummier for it. You were the one who advocated for it, indicating you we're more distraught. Same for spag early on. Holy jumped on, and at least grack seemed sort of lost though he's still suspicious for it | ||
VayneAuthority
United States8983 Posts
can anyone explain to me why alakaslam will not flip scum besides probability? that's one thing he has going for him. | ||
Grackaroni
United States9832 Posts
| ||
Pandain
United States12979 Posts
On December 11 2013 13:31 Holyflare wrote: I'm playing so that town can have a victory at the end game, if I die (being the only person that can seemingly translate slams posts) then he is a wildcard and is a hinderence to the town win con. This is super fake reasoning to me. If we're that confused, slam can explain. And he's not that unintelligible | ||
Pandain
United States12979 Posts
On December 11 2013 13:35 Grackaroni wrote: Name one time that town successfully policy lynched somebody without there being much resistance. I've never seen a policy lynch. Policy lynches are actually bad ideas. Scum dont actually outright defend someone, often. That argument is null because maybe we are resisting a poor idea. And Vayne the reason you don't get policy lynched is because people like me realize that policy lynches, no matter how rewarding to the individual, hurt town | ||
Plutarch
Greece515 Posts
On December 11 2013 13:36 Pandain wrote: This is super fake reasoning to me. If we're that confused, slam can explain. And he's not that unintelligible I disagree. And he won't stop and just post like a human being. Even when asked repeatedly. | ||
| ||