EPTII Titanic Mini Mafia - Page 49
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Grackaroni
United States9846 Posts
| ||
|
Plutarch
Greece515 Posts
| ||
|
Pandain
United States12989 Posts
On December 11 2013 13:40 Grackaroni wrote: Policy lynches aside Pandain, I get a different vibe from slam this game. In time to die he actually tried to make sense at the start of the game and started caring less over time. This game he wanted to make it abundantly clear from the start that he didn't give a shit about the game. It really seems quite similar to my play from last game. This is better. Can we agree holys reasoning was extremely poor? A policy lynch won't happen anyway but that's something useful that came from this | ||
|
VayneAuthority
United States8983 Posts
What is there to be gained by not lynching him pandain btw? I am approaching it from your side now. Why is alakaslam a bad lynch? | ||
|
Grackaroni
United States9846 Posts
On December 11 2013 13:38 Pandain wrote: I've never seen a policy lynch. Policy lynches are actually bad ideas. Scum dont actually outright defend someone, often. That argument is null because maybe we are resisting a poor idea. And Vayne the reason you don't get policy lynched is because people like me realize that policy lynches, no matter how rewarding to the individual, hurt town Yeah I agree with the last 2 reasons that is basically what I was saying. It's really silly of Plutarch to expect somebody to flip scum just for getting resistance. | ||
|
VayneAuthority
United States8983 Posts
| ||
|
Pandain
United States12989 Posts
I read him as town from early on. Because of how abrasive he is and how that is really hard to do whem you have team members. Furthermore i believe i can get a stronger read, since it isnt that strong now and he could just be super risky, later on. Therefore, he's a bad lynch today even if a dick. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On December 10 2013 08:20 Holyflare wrote: @Slam. What to you suggests that Xatalos is scum? (judging by your vote) What specifically outlined his motives as scummy rather than towny. If you reply in cryptics I will policy you! | ||
|
Grackaroni
United States9846 Posts
| ||
|
Plutarch
Greece515 Posts
| ||
|
Pandain
United States12989 Posts
No that happened AGES ago and he responded in cryptics. Then you apparently, according to others, argued against a slam lynch. | ||
|
VayneAuthority
United States8983 Posts
| ||
|
Pandain
United States12989 Posts
| ||
|
Grackaroni
United States9846 Posts
| ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
On December 11 2013 13:36 Pandain wrote: This is super fake reasoning to me. If we're that confused, slam can explain. And he's not that unintelligible Note that I have offered this. Has anyone asked. . . Decently, for such an explanation? Based on things I have said? Has anyone tried to work with me, versus around me? Or, has anyone even read what I have said in it's entirety, or even a skim? Think about it, Vayne, plutarch, others. I martyred last game. Here, I try to aid town as I can. So, when I martyred, you don't lynch me and tell me it is poor play. Now, when I am not martyring, you decide to lynch me- day one- based on the same reasoning I used to martyr. Which side of the double standard will you maintain? If you decide to hold to the double standard, perhaps I can peacefully assert what Rayne asserted last game: that you all should be lynched as equally anti-town. Note my disregard of his behavior and frustration was shared... By scum, and townies who lead mislynch after mislynch until scum victory. I was party to that. Who failed to learn last game, VA? There is meaning behind everything I have said. Ask, and I will answer, but you must be specific, and must not ask that I hamstring myself. That is all I have received thus far, and some insults. If I am wrong, I apologize for my lack of notice. Bring instructions or a copy to my attention and I will address it. Note that bringing "stop posting the way you have been" in any such or more hostile manner may cause me to revert to my former resentment and possibly, to irrational action. I have been very irrational in the past, note a 90 day TL martyr. This was for offsite reasons, but no insults were involved. I do not intend to do so again, but I don't know what I will do if I am swayed by emotional stress. I do not trust it. Now, continue. I finished a good one and am starting another. I feel the cool headedness, it is good. | ||
|
Plutarch
Greece515 Posts
| ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
On December 11 2013 14:05 Plutarch wrote: Keep posting like that and tell me who you think is scum and maybe we won't lynch you. You have a day to make yourself useful. This is hamstringing. I bluntly refuse, however on the basis that I stand by my former usefulness. What does 109 have to do with 35? | ||
|
Plutarch
Greece515 Posts
| ||
|
VayneAuthority
United States8983 Posts
| ||
| ||
