Meant for Cora
II Titanic Mini Mafia - Page 39
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Spaghetticus
Australia451 Posts
Meant for Cora | ||
Spaghetticus
Australia451 Posts
On December 11 2013 02:04 JarJarDrinks wrote: Did you read what I wrote? My whole point was that you could either stick w/ your stance or change it and both would look fine for you. I made you commit ahead of time so you couldn't base your decision on who the main wagons were gonna be @ the deadline. Silly question. Obviously I don't think my play is scummy. I think you look better now that you admitted that you're not gonna keep your vote locked. I've posted reads. Is there someone specific you'd like me to comment on? Really? You don't think a 10post filter scummy at this point? You don't think zeroing in on one relevant but minor detail for half of these isn't worth talking about? You've made other reads? Would you mind copy-pasting them in their entirety for dramatic effect? (it shouldn't take long) | ||
Artanis[Xp]
Netherlands12968 Posts
On December 11 2013 01:58 bumatlarge wrote: Spaghetti man is pretty mafia. I'd lynch him if pandain was here. Kushmasta seems super silly. If you have to (/green) things this early that aren't questions to the host, you are playing badly. ##Vote Pandain What makes Spaghetti mafia to you? | ||
Spaghetticus
Australia451 Posts
I second Artanis' need for clarification. I'm not a fan of people leaving their reads entirely unjustified, it allows too much fluidity for scum to read the ebb and flow and tailor the lynch. If you think me scum say why, so that you can' just backflip consequence free okty | ||
Xatalos
Finland9673 Posts
On December 11 2013 02:14 Artanis[Xp] wrote: I'm gonna step back from posting on Xata since no one seems to be reading it anyway and everything's already been said. What makes Spaghetti mafia to you? Do you really think I'm a lynch candidate for today? Who else would you vote for if it's fruitless to vote for me? I think you mentioned purple. What do you think of this purple wagon? | ||
JarJarDrinks
United States1302 Posts
On December 11 2013 02:14 Spaghetticus wrote: No, a 10 post filter isn't scummy at this point. People can post @ different times of the day. when I'm @ work (right now) is when I'm most available. Furthermore I think my posts all have pretty good content. It's not like I'm posting spammy one-liners.Really? You don't think a 10post filter scummy at this point? You don't think zeroing in on one relevant but minor detail for half of these isn't worth talking about? You've made other reads? Would you mind copy-pasting them in their entirety for dramatic effect? (it shouldn't take long) Yes, I think zeroing in a minor detail is scummy. I don't think what I was zeroing in on was minor. You obviously disagree. And if you gave me your simple answer when I asked for it, I wouldn't have mentioned it again. You can click my filter if want the reads I've already made. | ||
Spaghetticus
Australia451 Posts
On December 11 2013 02:21 Xatalos wrote: Do you really think I'm a lynch candidate for today? Who else would you vote for if it's fruitless to vote for me? I think you mentioned purple. What do you think of this purple wagon? Isn't the post you quote specifically answering your question? | ||
Xatalos
Finland9673 Posts
By the way, this post made me think you're more likely town: On December 10 2013 22:59 Spaghetticus wrote: @Kush Could you give insight into why you think the following people are green: - Spaghetticus - Xatalos - Corazon - Purpletrator I'm on the list because while I know my alignment, it seems fairly unanimous that I've done little to demonstrate it. It just seems counter-intuitive to bring pressure on yourself like that for no real reason. | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
On December 11 2013 01:58 bumatlarge wrote: Spaghetti man is pretty mafia. I'd lynch him if pandain was here. Kushmasta seems super silly. If you have to (/green) things this early that aren't questions to the host, you are playing badly. ##Vote Pandain i greened your mom. But seriously this is the worst post in the game! Some real oatsmaster level shit going on here. Why is speghetti mafia? Why are you already voting for a lurker? | ||
Xatalos
Finland9673 Posts
On December 11 2013 02:23 Spaghetticus wrote: Isn't the post you quote specifically answering your question? Not really. He only said that he'd stop posting about me, yet his vote remains and I'm apparently still his top scumread (for some reason). | ||
Spaghetticus
Australia451 Posts
On December 11 2013 02:23 JarJarDrinks wrote: No, a 10 post filter isn't scummy at this point. People can post @ different times of the day. when I'm @ work (right now) is when I'm most available. Furthermore I think my posts all have pretty good content. It's not like I'm posting spammy one-liners. Yes, I think zeroing in a minor detail is scummy. I don't think what I was zeroing in on was minor. You obviously disagree. And if you gave me your simple answer when I asked for it, I wouldn't have mentioned it again. You can click my filter if want the reads I've already made. I... I had reasons for not giving you a simple answer, which by this point I think you should be able to appreciate. If we leave this debacle in the past where is belongs, and pretend it never happened, this basically leave you with five posts worth of content. Some of those posts are +1's. Are you really backing yourself as a contributor? Do you refuse to quote your reads because you fear it will take too long, or because your lack of content is deniable when it isn't left in the open for all to see? | ||
Xatalos
Finland9673 Posts
On December 11 2013 02:29 kushm4sta wrote: i greened your mom. But seriously this is the worst post in the game! Some real oatsmaster level shit going on here. Why is speghetti mafia? Why are you already voting for a lurker? At least I can agree with kush sometimes. | ||
Spaghetticus
Australia451 Posts
On December 11 2013 02:29 Xatalos wrote: Not really. He only said that he'd stop posting about me, yet his vote remains and I'm apparently still his top scumread (for some reason). He(?) said he'd back off because he no longer thinks you a viable lynch, even though his convictions remain unchanged. Seems reasonable. | ||
Xatalos
Finland9673 Posts
On December 11 2013 02:33 Spaghetticus wrote: He(?) said he'd back off because he no longer thinks you a viable lynch, even though his convictions remain unchanged. Seems reasonable. Actually he said: "I'm gonna step back from posting on Xata since no one seems to be reading it anyway and everything's already been said." Which means that he's going to focus elsewhere - but he didn't say that I wouldn't be his favored lynch. | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
On December 10 2013 13:57 bumatlarge wrote: Facts>Analysis>information. Information is subjectively valued. In standard setups, information is massively overshadowed by conclusions drawn from all information. Information is a too insubstantial this early. I'd be more then happy to keep filling up the thread with this gentleman talk if you'll oblige. Multiple posts like this! like anyone wants to learn how to play mafia from bumatlarge... ##unvote ##vote bumatlarge Also if he were town, I would definitely expect scum to have jumped on him by now, since he is so obviously scummy (enjoy that kush logic) | ||
bumatlarge
United States4567 Posts
You sure do ask a lot of questions. That's great but it's an easy way for scum to post. Think of how easy it is to poke around new threads and post question marks. Super minor though. Your last few posts seem a little too vicious for what you are calling out. Activity is looking great this game, so let's not discuss how big our filters are, when your filter is not hard for you to generate as scum. There are much worse offenders then you, I'll try to find them. You should vote pandain though. | ||
Spaghetticus
Australia451 Posts
On December 11 2013 02:28 Xatalos wrote: Spag, have you catched up with the thread? What about those slight scumreads that you mentioned? By the way, this post made me think you're more likely town: It just seems counter-intuitive to bring pressure on yourself like that for no real reason. They're just single digit contenders on my spreadsheet (on a scale from -100 being mafia, and 100 being town). I adjust scores accordingly after each incident I find interesting. It's more to keep track of my perspective over time, as I often forget the small stuff. It's really not worth talking about, and I don't want scum knowing my reads unless I'm acting on them. I appreciate the town read, though think it's something I'd do as scum too. No I haven't caught up with the thread. I'm still stuck on the same page. I think it's more important to attend to the here and now, and I'm losing focus again (tis 5am). | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
On December 11 2013 02:40 bumatlarge wrote: Reading your fitler, I'm probably wrong. I didn't remember you posting alot early, but you did and it was better. You seem aggravated, I'd actually suggest stepping away from mafia for an hour or two and come back with a fresh mind. You sure do ask a lot of questions. That's great but it's an easy way for scum to post. Think of how easy it is to poke around new threads and post question marks. Super minor though. Your last few posts seem a little too vicious for what you are calling out. Activity is looking great this game, so let's not discuss how big our filters are, when your filter is not hard for you to generate as scum. There are much worse offenders then you, I'll try to find them. You should vote pandain though. another post from bum with 0 town indicative content. Why is speghetti scum? | ||
bumatlarge
United States4567 Posts
| ||
Spaghetticus
Australia451 Posts
On December 11 2013 02:40 bumatlarge wrote: Reading your fitler, I'm probably wrong. I didn't remember you posting alot early, but you did and it was better. You seem aggravated, I'd actually suggest stepping away from mafia for an hour or two and come back with a fresh mind. You sure do ask a lot of questions. That's great but it's an easy way for scum to post. Think of how easy it is to poke around new threads and post question marks. Super minor though. Your last few posts seem a little too vicious for what you are calling out. Activity is looking great this game, so let's not discuss how big our filters are, when your filter is not hard for you to generate as scum. There are much worse offenders then you, I'll try to find them. You should vote pandain though. Are you talking to me? It seems like it. Yeah I'm getting my vicious streak out this game, I'm not usually this pissed off at everything, I swear! I've been lynched as town for being too nice! I'm not voting Pandain. He's gonna opt out or get modkilled IMO. I think talking about filters is legitimate when they are this small. It's why you're hitting Pandain right? | ||
| ||