EPTWhite Flag Mafia - Page 6
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Tehpoofter
United States2911 Posts
| ||
|
Asinine
Qatar66 Posts
Another thought elicits it's familiars Crowding their weight into the chamber Of my weary, doleful mind What right does he possess To exhaust my idle time By way of his enslaving image. | ||
|
Grackaroni
United States9832 Posts
On October 31 2013 12:10 Asinine wrote: Another thought elicits it's familiars Crowding their weight into the chamber Of my weary, doleful mind What right does he possess To exhaust my idle time By way of his enslaving image. I have come to the conclusion that this man is Palmar. There will be no further questions! | ||
|
Grackaroni
United States9832 Posts
On October 31 2013 12:07 Tehpoofter wrote: I like the plan but one suggestion Pandain day 1 Oak day 2 I really would prefer to stick to my master plan. Not that I'm defending Pandain or anything. He's also a total scummer. We'll kill him day2 unless something pertinent comes up. How much could change between now and then? | ||
|
Bereft
United States1007 Posts
On October 31 2013 12:13 Grackaroni wrote: I have come to the conclusion that this man is Palmar. There will be no further questions! no, i want to ask a question -- why does pandain only get to ask one. asinine, what's your reason for smurfing? i can think of only 2 reasons. which one is yours: [a] you have a reputation known throughout the land of being an excellent scum hunter, and you don't want to die night 1. [b] you believe your meta is so obvious people would be able to read your play day 1. [c] other (please expand) | ||
|
Asinine
Qatar66 Posts
On October 31 2013 12:24 Bereft wrote: no, i want to ask a question -- why does pandain only get to ask one. asinine, what's your reason for smurfing? i can think of only 2 reasons. which one is yours: [a] you have a reputation known throughout the land of being an excellent scum hunter, and you don't want to die night 1. [b] you believe your meta is so obvious people would be able to read your play day 1. [c] other (please expand) Meta is the only reason why anyone smurfs. I hope that answer is sufficient. | ||
|
Grackaroni
United States9832 Posts
On October 31 2013 12:24 Bereft wrote: grack, if you really wanted to throw weight behind that vote, why not at least RNG it? instead of picking your favorite singaporean, that is. which has tons of favoritism bias. since we have extra mafia this game, RNG gives us a 31% chance of hitting scum, instead of the typical ~25%. we're all reasonable and rational people here, logic appeals to us [i'd hope]. no, i want to ask a question -- why does pandain only get to ask one. asinine, what's your reason for smurfing? i can think of only 2 reasons. which one is yours: [a] you have a reputation known throughout the land of being an excellent scum hunter, and you don't want to die night 1. [b] you believe your meta is so obvious people would be able to read your play day 1. [c] other (please expand) Those are some pretty good odds. I'm not against RNG if people are up for it. | ||
|
hzflank
United Kingdom2991 Posts
On October 31 2013 12:37 Grackaroni wrote: Those are some pretty good odds. I'm not against RNG if people are up for it. I would think my chances of actually identifying scum on day one are less than 31%, therefore RNG would yield better results for me. Ofcourse, We would need to decide on who rolls the dice. How should we do that? I suggest we vote on it. | ||
|
hzflank
United Kingdom2991 Posts
On October 31 2013 12:05 Asinine wrote: Why label Stutters as town As a conversation starter. Up until that point only little blue men were being discussed and I am unable to partake in that discussion to to my unfamiliarity with big green or red men. Obviously I did not think that Stutters' post gave a clue to his alignment, but I may not of conveyed the tone correctly. On October 31 2013 12:05 Asinine wrote: and leave the thread? Due to Stutters reply. As you begin to read his post he appears to care about what I said, then when you get to the end I realised that he does not care. There was no reason to continue that line of conversation with him and I had nothing that I wanted to post, so I decided to spare the poor tl.net servers the effort of adding another one of my posts for a short while. On October 31 2013 12:05 Asinine wrote: Your post serves no greater purpose other than to gain Stutters' support. But my post gave you something to post about and in turn gave me something to post about. Now I can wonder why you commented on my post twice even though that you thought my post had no purpose. You might be mafia looking for something to post about, but obviously this early in the game there is no real need for that. You may be town attempting to move a conversation forward. Or perhaps you genuinely thought I had a clue as to Stutter's alignment two hours into the game when only five people had posted, and felt the need to call me out on that. Either of those possibilities fit in with your second post. On October 31 2013 12:07 Asinine wrote: Looks like he didn't even gain Stutters support... Regardless, hzflank does not look good right now. The (rhetorical) question is: did you post that for the sake of posting something? Or did you post that hoping that I would reply directly to you? Or did you post that because when you were reading the thread for the first time you were already looking for scum, and my post was the only thing so far that looked like it might be scum? I have no flipping idea, but less than five hours into the game and when I am tired, that's the best that I can do at the moment. On October 31 2013 10:17 Stutters695 wrote: Why so srs? Oh, you wanted me to be less serious? Oops  | ||
|
Bereft
United States1007 Posts
On October 31 2013 12:53 hzflank wrote: I would think my chances of actually identifying scum on day one are less than 31%, therefore RNG would yield better results for me. Ofcourse, We would need to decide on who rolls the dice. How should we do that? I suggest we vote on it. BH suggested a pretty good method in the recent heavyweights game. On October 02 2013 09:10 Blazinghand wrote: For RNG, this post will be used for generating a random lynch. The # in the upper left corner can be right-clicked and used to access the absolute TL post # for this post. That number mod 9 is the random lynch. 1 =Oats, 2 = rayn, etc, all the way up to 8 = holyflare and 0 = sloosh. The reason we use the absolute TL post number is that posts are constantly being made, so the number is truly random. We turn it into a number 1-9 by taking that number mod 9. What is mod? effectively, it's the remainder after division. For example. 10 mod 9 = 1. 11 mod 9 = 2. 18 mod 9 = 0. 19 mod 9 = 1. and so on. Basically, this generates a random number 1 through 9. I am in favor of the random lynch (though am somewhat interested in a policy lynch today as well-- TL does not do this enough. I will start off by voting for the random lynched based on THIS POST. On October 02 2013 09:11 Blazinghand wrote: 19886995 mod 9 = 1. That's Oatsmaster. ##vote Oatsmaster i suggest we use that very method and use THIS POST. i've got to get to bed though, someone who's around mind calculating it? | ||
|
hzflank
United Kingdom2991 Posts
I guess we can all stop posting for the next 45 hours. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16627 Posts
| ||
|
Asinine
Qatar66 Posts
On October 31 2013 12:53 hzflank wrote: As a conversation starter. Up until that point only little blue men were being discussed and I am unable to partake in that discussion to to my unfamiliarity with big green or red men. Obviously I did not think that Stutters' post gave a clue to his alignment, but I may not of conveyed the tone correctly. Your post: On October 31 2013 09:31 hzflank wrote: Stutters posting when he does not have to is a town Stutters. It is quite apparent that you were trying to bait Stutters into posting. This is not what I take issue with. My issue is that your first post is stated as a fact and an imperative. In other words, you are essentially saying that Stutters should post -- when he doesn't have to -- and you will automatically consider him town. Now this may not be what you wanted to say, but it is exactly what it sounds like you are saying to any third-party. "Come out to play, Stutters! If you post a lot, I won't think you're scum." I don't see much town motivation in this strategy. Yes, you may get Stutters to post a little more. This, in theory, should give you town cred. However, you are quite clearly choosing one of the most obvious lynchbait targets to talk about on Day 1. Additionally, after Stutters reply, you just disappear with no follow-up. When you return, you make a lengthy post that focuses on defending yourself. There is a wishy-washy accusation towards me, but it is weak and unsubstantiated. You are also strong-arming Stutters to play a particular way that could make his meta harder to read in the long run. All in all, I am still unimpressed with you. Convince me otherwise. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16627 Posts
If we hit scum, great, but then what do we do on day 2? If we hit town, fuck, but then what do we do on day 2? Yeah sure we have a 30% chance of hitting scum, but we also have a 70% chance of hitting town, Would you lynch someone who you think is 70% town? I dont think so. | ||
|
Asinine
Qatar66 Posts
On October 31 2013 13:40 Oatsmaster wrote: Random lynching is bad and lets not do it. If we hit scum, great, but then what do we do on day 2? If we hit town, fuck, but then what do we do on day 2? Yeah sure we have a 30% chance of hitting scum, but we also have a 70% chance of hitting town, Would you lynch someone who you think is 70% town? I dont think so. This man speaks the truth. Give this man an Oscar. | ||
|
Stutters695
2610 Posts
On October 31 2013 12:53 hzflank wrote: As a conversation starter. Up until that point only little blue men were being discussed and I am unable to partake in that discussion to to my unfamiliarity with big green or red men. Obviously I did not think that Stutters' post gave a clue to his alignment, but I may not of conveyed the tone correctly. Due to Stutters reply. As you begin to read his post he appears to care about what I said, then when you get to the end I realised that he does not care. There was no reason to continue that line of conversation with him and I had nothing that I wanted to post, so I decided to spare the poor tl.net servers the effort of adding another one of my posts for a short while. But my post gave you something to post about and in turn gave me something to post about. Now I can wonder why you commented on my post twice even though that you thought my post had no purpose. You might be mafia looking for something to post about, but obviously this early in the game there is no real need for that. You may be town attempting to move a conversation forward. Or perhaps you genuinely thought I had a clue as to Stutter's alignment two hours into the game when only five people had posted, and felt the need to call me out on that. Either of those possibilities fit in with your second post. The (rhetorical) question is: did you post that for the sake of posting something? Or did you post that hoping that I would reply directly to you? Or did you post that because when you were reading the thread for the first time you were already looking for scum, and my post was the only thing so far that looked like it might be scum? I have no flipping idea, but less than five hours into the game and when I am tired, that's the best that I can do at the moment. Oh, you wanted me to be less serious? Oops I really want to lynch you when I wake up... This is the most over-explanatory and unnecessary defense I've ever seen. Feeling defensive cause you're scum? | ||
|
Grackaroni
United States9832 Posts
On October 31 2013 13:51 Stutters695 wrote: I really want to lynch you when I wake up... This is the most over-explanatory and unnecessary defense I've ever seen. Feeling defensive cause you're scum? I liked it. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16627 Posts
| ||
|
Grackaroni
United States9832 Posts
| ||
|
Laughing Jack
Finland50 Posts
Thepoof why do you want to lynch Pandain & Oak and Pandain first? | ||
| ||
