|
On October 17 2013 20:55 raynpelikonoshi wrote: Hmm. People look quite good.
Worst filter is probably Zaragon.
Knowing it's Koshi writing, the rapid change of subjects and reads fits your town playstyle reasonably well. But you do seem less curious and more suprious than I've seen you before. Don't know what to make of that, so null right now.
What is "worst filter" about? If you're just comparing me to my Newbie XVIII play, fair enough, I'm not in shape to play that way at the moment. I still don't see "worst", and are you talking about my play level or calling me scummy?
On Mocsta, so far I'm getting the same vibe I had early Noir, towny by personality read with some suspicious hints. I'll put a light town lean on him. Honestly, maybe more than light, considering how that game turned out.
On skanjab1s, it wouldn't be an obvious choice to make a case on yamato if he's scum. The quality of the case is decent, but I'm still expecting a yamato wall of text coming soon whether he's town or scum and I'll only be able to put a read on yamato together when I compare his early probing with his analysis.
I did a meta dive on skanjab1s, he's playing similarly to his town game except slightly less content per post until his yamato case. I'd say he falls into the newer player range; it makes slightly more sense to know he's played a couple of games under different names and thus is not quite a smurf and not quite a new player.
Out of game note: + Show Spoiler +Will need a replace if I can't fix something with meds in the next ~2 hours. Sorry guys
|
For those wondering, I've been playing forum mafia for roughly 2 years now, I'm not really new, just new to this site.
|
@Mocsta: Why did you claim the self-aware miller? What's the point? What did you hope to achieve?
|
On October 17 2013 23:21 LastArgument wrote:Show nested quote +On October 17 2013 23:18 Hopeless1der wrote:On October 17 2013 23:10 LastArgument wrote: Just to be completely clear, Hopeless - you don't have any specific scumreads at the moment? Nothing that I'd be confident in any case I tried to make, no. skanj is still my strongest read, but thats a relative term. I'd rather lynch VA with his jokes to see yamato squirm at this point. Here's my issue with this. And there are two. Firstly, you've said this as town before: Show nested quote +On January 03 2013 07:12 Hopeless1der wrote:On January 03 2013 07:04 Lazermonkey wrote: So, anyone feel like policy lynching grush just for the lulz? He is going to troll the game 24/7 no matter what alignment he gets... I will have nothing to do with a policy lynch on any specific player. If a player warrants such treatment, they shouldn't be allowed to play in the first place. You may not like grush's playstyle, but I don't find it entirely devoid of reason or thinking. I am willing to go after lurkers, but that's about as far as I am concerned with policy. @wbg voters: dafuq? You've also said this as town: Show nested quote +On April 23 2013 01:42 Hopeless1der wrote: so...its a pressure vote on someone you think is less scum than other players....are you sure you know how to play this game? Your attitude doesn't seem to tally with how you view the game when you play town. ##Vote: Hopeless1der quotes that are literally MONTHS ago, and I've taken a rather long break from mafia. My stance on policy votes can't have changed? Not only that, but the first quote was in regards to a specific player, simply for existing (grush). For the 2nd quote, pressure =\= policy.
|
11589 Posts
On October 17 2013 23:22 Skanjab1s wrote:Show nested quote +On October 17 2013 23:17 yamato77 wrote: I don't follow up on my suspicions?
Hahahahahahahahahahaha. Laughing at it doesn't make it not true, you have yet to follow up on any of the people you have pointed fingers at, instead choosing to target VA because you're "sick of him". So because I don't vote for everyone that I've said could be mafia, it makes me mafia?
Please. I've followed up on my suspicions by asking other people what they think on many occasions. Conversation about reads is more useful than slapping a vote down every time I think someone looks off.
|
On October 17 2013 23:24 Zaragon wrote:Show nested quote +On October 17 2013 20:55 raynpelikonoshi wrote: Hmm. People look quite good.
Worst filter is probably Zaragon. Knowing it's Koshi writing, the rapid change of subjects and reads fits your town playstyle reasonably well. But you do seem less curious and more suprious than I've seen you before. Don't know what to make of that, so null right now. What is "worst filter" about? If you're just comparing me to my Newbie XVIII play, fair enough, I'm not in shape to play that way at the moment. I still don't see "worst", and are you talking about my play level or calling me scummy? On Mocsta, so far I'm getting the same vibe I had early Noir, towny by personality read with some suspicious hints. I'll put a light town lean on him. Honestly, maybe more than light, considering how that game turned out. On skanjab1s, it wouldn't be an obvious choice to make a case on yamato if he's scum. The quality of the case is decent, but I'm still expecting a yamato wall of text coming soon whether he's town or scum and I'll only be able to put a read on yamato together when I compare his early probing with his analysis. I did a meta dive on skanjab1s, he's playing similarly to his town game except slightly less content per post until his yamato case. I'd say he falls into the newer player range; it makes slightly more sense to know he's played a couple of games under different names and thus is not quite a smurf and not quite a new player. Out of game note: + Show Spoiler +Will need a replace if I can't fix something with meds in the next ~2 hours. Sorry guys It's that you made 2 posts and they were solely about skanjab & me. And the part about me was: "I wont be able to read rayn/koshi this game" and after that "oh ok, maybe I can read rayn/Koshi after all". But there was no effort into trying to read me. But it is good that you followed up on that now.
|
That's a pretty underwhelming entrance, Palmar. I can't even really imagine an answer that could possibly be useful one way or another.
|
On October 17 2013 23:18 Hopeless1der wrote:Show nested quote +On October 17 2013 23:10 LastArgument wrote: Just to be completely clear, Hopeless - you don't have any specific scumreads at the moment? Nothing that I'd be confident in any case I tried to make, no. skanj is still my strongest read, but thats a relative term. I'd rather lynch VA with his jokes to see yamato squirm at this point.
I am your strongest scumread?
You told me to cool off, because you thought I was getting overwhelmed and it seemed "too easy". This implies that you had a town read on me, obviously.
You then give me additional "points" for the case I made.
And now I am a scumread of yours? I'm sorry but I don't follow this faulty logic of yours, please explain.
|
Did you post on the QT last night Palmar?
|
11589 Posts
I'm probably not going to wall of text when I need to drive discussion. It's more important to poke and prod and ask questions for me this game because in general, few people are doing that. If a lot of useful discussion was being created, I could sit back, but this is not the case.
Anyway, I'm still watching the same people. I'd add an addendum that Hopeless being is active is unusual. Not sure what to make of it ATM.
|
Why are you still watching me? I am being a good boy atm.
|
how do you feel about VA disappearing after you voted him?
|
On October 17 2013 23:33 yamato77 wrote: I'm probably not going to wall of text when I need to drive discussion. It's more important to poke and prod and ask questions for me this game because in general, few people are doing that. If a lot of useful discussion was being created, I could sit back, but this is not the case.
Anyway, I'm still watching the same people. I'd add an addendum that Hopeless being is active is unusual. Not sure what to make of it ATM.
Could you not ignore the case I posted on you? I'm not just going to forget about it.
|
11589 Posts
On October 17 2013 23:34 raynpelikonoshi wrote: how do you feel about VA disappearing after you voted him? He's a policy lynch if there ever was one.
|
11589 Posts
On October 17 2013 23:35 Skanjab1s wrote:Show nested quote +On October 17 2013 23:33 yamato77 wrote: I'm probably not going to wall of text when I need to drive discussion. It's more important to poke and prod and ask questions for me this game because in general, few people are doing that. If a lot of useful discussion was being created, I could sit back, but this is not the case.
Anyway, I'm still watching the same people. I'd add an addendum that Hopeless being is active is unusual. Not sure what to make of it ATM. Could you not ignore the case I posted on you? I'm not just going to forget about it. I addresses it already. Your suspicion is weak because my reads are clear and consistent. Me not voting for everyone I find noteworthy does not make me mafia. Me voting for a policy lynch on the worst player in the thread does not make me mafia. It's not worth talking about because it's not even remotely correct.
|
Yeah, putting some votes on VA is never bad.
##unvote ##vote: Vayne
|
On October 17 2013 23:37 yamato77 wrote:Show nested quote +On October 17 2013 23:35 Skanjab1s wrote:On October 17 2013 23:33 yamato77 wrote: I'm probably not going to wall of text when I need to drive discussion. It's more important to poke and prod and ask questions for me this game because in general, few people are doing that. If a lot of useful discussion was being created, I could sit back, but this is not the case.
Anyway, I'm still watching the same people. I'd add an addendum that Hopeless being is active is unusual. Not sure what to make of it ATM. Could you not ignore the case I posted on you? I'm not just going to forget about it. I addresses it already. Your suspicion is weak because my reads are clear and consistent. Me not voting for everyone I find noteworthy does not make me mafia. Me voting for a policy lynch on the worst player in the thread does not make me mafia. It's not worth talking about because it's not even remotely correct.
You most certainly did not address it. I did not say you should vote for everyone you find. I did not say voting on a policy lynch makes you scum. I gave evidence that your reads are not clear and consistent. Do not attempt to strawman my points away, it will not work.
|
If a pm circle rises, it must be used with utmost caution.
People need to contribute to the thread.
|
11589 Posts
Well, at least this idiotic push if me gives me a read on you.
|
I don't see any particular reason to vote yamato right now.
It mostly seems like you're castigating him for what you view as bad play, rather than mafia play. If yamato continues to care about the game, it's a reasonably good indication that he's town. Finding various things somewhat scummy early on Day 1 doesn't strike me as a particularly convincing case for someone to be mafia.
|
|
|
|