|
On August 18 2013 03:37 DeusXmachina wrote:Show nested quote +On August 18 2013 03:33 iVLosK! wrote:On August 18 2013 01:28 justanothertownie wrote:On August 18 2013 01:17 Alakaslam wrote: Good morning everyone. I agree with Holyflare's stance first of all ##Vote: Xzavier As a placeholder.
However the squibbles voting is intriguing. It is a policy lynch based on what may be IRL circumstances. Is there actually something wrong with his posting, other than the lack of it?
If not, may want to reconsider... ... As according to his own deadlines, he will likely be modkilled. It is 9:15 on the west coast.
Any better reasons though? As the same goes for Xzavier... So if squib is preferable guess what I'm definetly willing to switch if Squibbles posts something useful or a better target appears. It mostly is his lack of posting but the 2 posts he made also added nothing to the thread. Yeah, I guess iVlosk should explain himself - doesn't look to good. *too Sadly it's shit like this that makes me think he is town. Being a dick is probably not want you want to do as scum. I wouldn't bet to much on this.
|
On August 18 2013 03:40 iVLosK! wrote:Show nested quote +On August 18 2013 03:36 justanothertownie wrote:On August 18 2013 03:33 iVLosK! wrote:On August 18 2013 01:28 justanothertownie wrote:On August 18 2013 01:17 Alakaslam wrote: Good morning everyone. I agree with Holyflare's stance first of all ##Vote: Xzavier As a placeholder.
However the squibbles voting is intriguing. It is a policy lynch based on what may be IRL circumstances. Is there actually something wrong with his posting, other than the lack of it?
If not, may want to reconsider... ... As according to his own deadlines, he will likely be modkilled. It is 9:15 on the west coast.
Any better reasons though? As the same goes for Xzavier... So if squib is preferable guess what I'm definetly willing to switch if Squibbles posts something useful or a better target appears. It mostly is his lack of posting but the 2 posts he made also added nothing to the thread. Yeah, I guess iVlosk should explain himself - doesn't look to good. *too So, now you are here? At least you have valuable things to say. /s I'm at work. Cute wagon attempt though.
iV do you think JAT is scum because he wagoned? What are you trying to say?
|
Whatever - I will be gone for a few hours. Would like to hear what's about to happen to the people who didn't vote.
|
On August 18 2013 03:46 DeusXmachina wrote:Show nested quote +On August 18 2013 03:40 iVLosK! wrote:On August 18 2013 03:36 justanothertownie wrote:On August 18 2013 03:33 iVLosK! wrote:On August 18 2013 01:28 justanothertownie wrote:On August 18 2013 01:17 Alakaslam wrote: Good morning everyone. I agree with Holyflare's stance first of all ##Vote: Xzavier As a placeholder.
However the squibbles voting is intriguing. It is a policy lynch based on what may be IRL circumstances. Is there actually something wrong with his posting, other than the lack of it?
If not, may want to reconsider... ... As according to his own deadlines, he will likely be modkilled. It is 9:15 on the west coast.
Any better reasons though? As the same goes for Xzavier... So if squib is preferable guess what I'm definetly willing to switch if Squibbles posts something useful or a better target appears. It mostly is his lack of posting but the 2 posts he made also added nothing to the thread. Yeah, I guess iVlosk should explain himself - doesn't look to good. *too So, now you are here? At least you have valuable things to say. /s I'm at work. Cute wagon attempt though. iV do you think JAT is scum because he wagoned? What are you trying to say? I don't even think JAT is the one who manufactured the wagon. The "Cute wagon" comment was directed at the game as a whole.
|
I am back. I will be reviewing the two filters of the non-voters and making a decision on modkill or not.
Update: Both reps)squishy and Squibbles will be modkilled. reps)squishy has broken 2 rules now and that is not acceptable. Squibbles has not lived up to activity requirements. Remember that you are not allowed to discuss modkills during the game. Replacements will be here by the end of the night.
|
|
On August 18 2013 02:59 justanothertownie wrote: I thought he wasn't as antagonistic as I would expect according to the description of others about his play. He also didn't defend himself at all... It's important to note that JAT's read on me is based on the fact that he's HEARD (though, he hasn't gone and read) that I am a bigger dick than this and the fact that I was offline while you guys put together that little 1 hour wagon on me.
|
Koshi is replacing reps)squishy, effective immediately. Say hi
|
|
Only 23 pages. Got to spam guis.
|
...
This game is made of fail. (Not aimed at the hosts; more about the general level of lurkiness, afking and such.)
Also, nice last minute switcharoo to a completely useless lynch that ended up being town.
|
Just got to lynch one of the 3 people on that wagon. ezpz
|
On August 18 2013 04:49 iVLosK! wrote:Show nested quote +On August 18 2013 02:59 justanothertownie wrote: I thought he wasn't as antagonistic as I would expect according to the description of others about his play. He also didn't defend himself at all... It's important to note that JAT's read on me is based on the fact that he's HEARD (though, he hasn't gone and read) that I am a bigger dick than this and the fact that I was offline while you guys put together that little 1 hour wagon on me.
Not just that but his overall play has been pretty much to follow the thread sentiment and bandwagon, he's either very new to the game or scum (or both). Hasn't given any reads either, not even when directly asked to, so he's on the list of scummy people.
|
Why were you guys voting iVlosk?
|
Ok, so seriously. Those 3 people on Xzavier. Why the fuck would you vote on a 0-poster?
|
Imo next lynch kill one of those.
|
On August 18 2013 05:59 Koshi wrote: Imo next lynch kill one of those.
I could very much agree that there was at least one scum on that wagon.
|
On August 18 2013 06:04 LoneMeow wrote:I could very much agree that there was at least one scum on that wagon. It doesn't matter. People should know you never vote for a 0 poster. Especially alaksalam.
|
On August 18 2013 05:59 Koshi wrote: Ok, so seriously. Those 3 people on Xzavier. Why the fuck would you vote on a 0-poster? He did flip scum. Umadbro?
|
On August 18 2013 06:17 iVLosK! wrote:Show nested quote +On August 18 2013 05:59 Koshi wrote: Ok, so seriously. Those 3 people on Xzavier. Why the fuck would you vote on a 0-poster? He did flip scum. Umadbro? Say w0ts?
|
|
|
|