|
On August 18 2013 08:02 OmniEulogy wrote: I'm fairly certain I just got that last part wrong, would a mod be kind enough to tell me/us what the correct format is to vote for a no-lynch? Thanks!
##Vote: No-lynch
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On August 18 2013 08:08 DeusXmachina wrote:Show nested quote +On August 18 2013 08:07 Holyflare wrote:On August 18 2013 08:02 OmniEulogy wrote:On August 18 2013 07:49 Holyflare wrote:On August 18 2013 07:39 OmniEulogy wrote:On August 18 2013 07:02 Koshi wrote:On August 18 2013 07:02 OmniEulogy wrote: what's up guys. I'm almost completely caught up Yeah it took me 5 minutes as well. Hahahaha yeah, unfortunately what I'm really going over right now is the massive clusterfuck at the end of D1. I agree with you completely when you say that nobody should vote for a guy with literally 0 posts. Town should NEVER lynch the "easiest" target which it seems like they did... that's complete scum mentality. Town lynch the scummiest players not the easiest ones -.- ... I'm also really upset that three people didn't even vote which makes it even harder to sort it out. so far I think I'm pretty happy with my reads right now though I think Slam really sticks out to me as scummy for jumping around on his votes so much, even to the point of voting for Xzavier on two seperate occasions, however he has been one of the most consistant contributors in the game albeit very spammy. I'm getting a newbie town feeling from him and with the amount he's posting if he is scum it wont take long for him to slip. For that reason I'm ok with him currently. I've never played with Deus but people say he's an aggressive townie. I'm not seeing any of that from this game. He's been asking really bad fluff questions which would be easy for scum to imitate to pretend to be contributing, his vote on Xzavier and his reason behind it were terrible or rather his lack of a reason. Then after the lynch on Xzavier he goes after Holy for something he was fine before and even said he thought Holy was town for. I'd say out of all the players he's my top scum read right now. And then Holy votes for Xzavier as a "place holder" never to take his vote off him. Very scummy behavior considering he goes for the easy lynch, and a way to avoid needing to actually come up with a reason to vote for somebody. As far as town reads go I had a newbie town read on Reps and so in turn I believe Koshi is town. JAT is my strongest town read in the game at the moment slight town read on iVLosK! and the rest are all neutral as I still have to go through the filters again. I'd really like to know why Slam jumped his vote around so much asap and why the hell all three of you (Holy, Deus, Slam) thought it was a good idea to lynch Xzavier. I like how you ignore everything I've said the entirety of the game just to focus on the person I put my vote on. It was my girlfriends birthday today (went out yesterday for it/party today) so I left my vote on the safest person so far. If he posted once and voted he'd be still in the game and I would NOT be alright with that, I would 100% not be alright with wasting 2 days just so we could fucking waste another day talking about him and wasting the day on him. That's a pretty massive issue.... the objective isn't to find the safest person to vote for and then do it as town..... Your reason of not wanting to get rid of somebody who might contribute doesn't work in this case. Xzavier had literally not made a single post, was very likely to be modkilled and you had stronger feelings against another player but you kept your vote on him because it was safer? Am I reading that right? Safer for what? Town on D1 doesn't need to worry about what the safe vote is. if you wanted to be safe why didn't you just ##Vote:No-Lynch instead of putting it on somebody who wouldn't defend himself. I'm fairly certain I just got that last part wrong, would a mod be kind enough to tell me/us what the correct format is to vote for a no-lynch? Thanks! I am confused why Xzavier WAS voted off though when the 2 votes were placed after the deadline........ We didn't even have enough votes against him. It wasn't a vote off. He was modkilled. They just said he got lynched in the end of day post.
No, it's a plurality lynch system, whoever has the most votes at the end of the day is voted off not majority, I've even stated that before and so did somebody else earlier when you said we needed more people.
|
On August 18 2013 08:03 Koshi wrote:Show nested quote +On August 18 2013 08:00 DeusXmachina wrote: I voted on xzavier because it was basically the same thing as voting no-lynch. Call me crazy but I am not going to vote on 2 people that I am not 100 percent sold on being scum. You will never be 100% sold on somebody being scum. Voting on a 0 poster means that you vote on somebody that is 2/9 going to be scum. (there are 2 scums right?)
Obviously. I was trying to make a point. I had a slight town read on iV as I stated in previous posts, and I was neutral on squibbs. Not even remotely confident that either one of them is scum.
|
On August 18 2013 08:10 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On August 18 2013 08:08 DeusXmachina wrote:On August 18 2013 08:07 Holyflare wrote:On August 18 2013 08:02 OmniEulogy wrote:On August 18 2013 07:49 Holyflare wrote:On August 18 2013 07:39 OmniEulogy wrote:On August 18 2013 07:02 Koshi wrote:On August 18 2013 07:02 OmniEulogy wrote: what's up guys. I'm almost completely caught up Yeah it took me 5 minutes as well. Hahahaha yeah, unfortunately what I'm really going over right now is the massive clusterfuck at the end of D1. I agree with you completely when you say that nobody should vote for a guy with literally 0 posts. Town should NEVER lynch the "easiest" target which it seems like they did... that's complete scum mentality. Town lynch the scummiest players not the easiest ones -.- ... I'm also really upset that three people didn't even vote which makes it even harder to sort it out. so far I think I'm pretty happy with my reads right now though I think Slam really sticks out to me as scummy for jumping around on his votes so much, even to the point of voting for Xzavier on two seperate occasions, however he has been one of the most consistant contributors in the game albeit very spammy. I'm getting a newbie town feeling from him and with the amount he's posting if he is scum it wont take long for him to slip. For that reason I'm ok with him currently. I've never played with Deus but people say he's an aggressive townie. I'm not seeing any of that from this game. He's been asking really bad fluff questions which would be easy for scum to imitate to pretend to be contributing, his vote on Xzavier and his reason behind it were terrible or rather his lack of a reason. Then after the lynch on Xzavier he goes after Holy for something he was fine before and even said he thought Holy was town for. I'd say out of all the players he's my top scum read right now. And then Holy votes for Xzavier as a "place holder" never to take his vote off him. Very scummy behavior considering he goes for the easy lynch, and a way to avoid needing to actually come up with a reason to vote for somebody. As far as town reads go I had a newbie town read on Reps and so in turn I believe Koshi is town. JAT is my strongest town read in the game at the moment slight town read on iVLosK! and the rest are all neutral as I still have to go through the filters again. I'd really like to know why Slam jumped his vote around so much asap and why the hell all three of you (Holy, Deus, Slam) thought it was a good idea to lynch Xzavier. I like how you ignore everything I've said the entirety of the game just to focus on the person I put my vote on. It was my girlfriends birthday today (went out yesterday for it/party today) so I left my vote on the safest person so far. If he posted once and voted he'd be still in the game and I would NOT be alright with that, I would 100% not be alright with wasting 2 days just so we could fucking waste another day talking about him and wasting the day on him. That's a pretty massive issue.... the objective isn't to find the safest person to vote for and then do it as town..... Your reason of not wanting to get rid of somebody who might contribute doesn't work in this case. Xzavier had literally not made a single post, was very likely to be modkilled and you had stronger feelings against another player but you kept your vote on him because it was safer? Am I reading that right? Safer for what? Town on D1 doesn't need to worry about what the safe vote is. if you wanted to be safe why didn't you just ##Vote:No-Lynch instead of putting it on somebody who wouldn't defend himself. I'm fairly certain I just got that last part wrong, would a mod be kind enough to tell me/us what the correct format is to vote for a no-lynch? Thanks! I am confused why Xzavier WAS voted off though when the 2 votes were placed after the deadline........ We didn't even have enough votes against him. It wasn't a vote off. He was modkilled. They just said he got lynched in the end of day post. No, it's a plurality lynch system, whoever has the most votes at the end of the day is voted off not majority, I've even stated that before and so did somebody else earlier when you said we needed more people.
Oh shit sorry
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On August 18 2013 08:05 OmniEulogy wrote:Show nested quote +On August 18 2013 07:54 Holyflare wrote: I also find it funny that you jump on everyone voting Xzavier when everyones alternative was squibbles who also would get modkilled, totally legit reasoning... not Squibbles said two things, I have the gift of knowing that he was town and therefore I can tell you he was either a very new, or bored townie. His two posts also indicate that and while I was reading the game before being subbed in for him my read on him was town. Why are you deflecting the subject? Squibbles didn't get voted on, if he had this wouldn't be as bad as it is. At least you could argue Squibbles had said he would contribute but never did.
I also thought he was town from what he has posted (if you actually read anything I posted, it seems you haven't). I am also not deflecting, the point you raised was that you shouldn't vote for a 0 poster, squibbles was a 2 poster with a no vote that also got modkilled, the REST of the town was on him right until the final minutes where they bandwagoned iVLosK! and then subsequently Xzavier. There was some suspicious shit there though and I'll leave it till the day before I discuss it. Not making the same mistake as my last game.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
Besides what I have just written, the fact that I couldn't change my vote because I was out has given me more information for this game than just voting anyone else could have.
|
guis guis guis. No worries.
Just remember. Need to kill Alaksalam,Holyflare, DeusXmachina or iVLosK. Just kill the one that is the most useless day 2.
Alaksalam knows better than to create such a shit environment and to do 0 scumhunting the entire game. And I am certain he knows that voting a 0 poster is horrible. His biggest contribution were giving out general advice. It is a newbie game but I don't like it.
On August 18 2013 01:26 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On August 18 2013 01:22 Alakaslam wrote: Indeed, iVLosK! Looks bad after reading up on HolyFlare, but are there enough reasons to voteswitch? Shall he defense hisself? I would rather get rid of the guy that says nothing than the person who can defend himself and (hopefully) contribute. You need to get rid of scum. Not of guys that can't defend themselves. Especially when they flip town most likely.
On August 18 2013 06:17 iVLosK! wrote:Show nested quote +On August 18 2013 05:59 Koshi wrote: Ok, so seriously. Those 3 people on Xzavier. Why the fuck would you vote on a 0-poster? He did flip scum. Umadbro? This guy is trying to WIFOM me and I don't like it.
On August 18 2013 03:00 DeusXmachina wrote: Yeah don't vote modkill I get it
On August 18 2013 03:03 DeusXmachina wrote: ##Unvote ##Vote Xzavier
On August 18 2013 03:01 DeusXmachina wrote: 4 votes and we need 5
5 spamposts in the same minute these are 3 of it. He knows he shouldn't vote for a modkill. He votes for the modkill. And then he says it is majority lynch when it is plurality. So bad it hurts my soul.
iV and Alaksalam should be lynched next time unless magic happens on day 2. The other 2 follow closely.
|
Also. I am town. OmniEulogy is also town because he got replaced after me. Because Cora isn't going to replace a townie first and then replace a scum in a 7 vs 2 game.
So we got 2 confirmed townies already. This game will be easy.
|
HIHIHI !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
so who am I replacing??!!
|
On August 18 2013 08:43 Malongo wrote: HIHIHI !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
so who am I replacing??!! Xzavier
|
Xzavier is dead. Nice to see at least the replacements start active. Thank god.
On August 18 2013 08:00 DeusXmachina wrote: I voted on xzavier because it was basically the same thing as voting no-lynch. Call me crazy but I am not going to vote on 2 people that I am not 100 percent sold on being scum. It was stated earlier but you will never ever be 100% sure about a player being scum Day1. What kind of reasoning is this? This switch to xzavier was horrible (and illegal to in my opinion but the hosts decide so that's not relevant).
On August 18 2013 07:54 Holyflare wrote: I also find it funny that you jump on everyone voting Xzavier when everyones alternative was squibbles who also would get modkilled, totally legit reasoning... not The alternative wasn't Squibbles it was iVLosk!. You know, the guy you made a big post on before.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On August 18 2013 08:45 Koshi wrote:Show nested quote +On August 18 2013 08:43 Malongo wrote: HIHIHI !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
so who am I replacing??!! Xzavier
Who is dead (but shouldn't be because of bad deadline shit..) and so you shouldn't be posting
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On August 18 2013 08:52 justanothertownie wrote:Xzavier is dead. Nice to see at least the replacements start active. Thank god. Show nested quote +On August 18 2013 08:00 DeusXmachina wrote: I voted on xzavier because it was basically the same thing as voting no-lynch. Call me crazy but I am not going to vote on 2 people that I am not 100 percent sold on being scum. It was stated earlier but you will never ever be 100% sure about a player being scum Day1. What kind of reasoning is this? This switch to xzavier was horrible (and illegal to in my opinion but the hosts decide so that's not relevant). Show nested quote +On August 18 2013 07:54 Holyflare wrote: I also find it funny that you jump on everyone voting Xzavier when everyones alternative was squibbles who also would get modkilled, totally legit reasoning... not The alternative wasn't Squibbles it was iVLosk!. You know, the guy you made a big post on before.
before I left EVERYONES votes were on squibbles
|
Ok, fair enough. But it doesn't take a genius to see that the votes on Squibbles were just pressure votes. At least mine was and I am fairly certain LoneMeows was too.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
No, but it takes a psychic to say what happened after.
|
|
On August 18 2013 08:43 Malongo wrote: HIHIHI !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
so who am I replacing??!! Dude what the hell. Get out of my game thread.
|
On August 18 2013 08:43 Malongo wrote: HIHIHI !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
so who am I replacing??!!
|
On August 18 2013 09:10 cakepie wrote:Show nested quote +On August 18 2013 08:43 Malongo wrote: HIHIHI !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
so who am I replacing??!! Cake pie FTW, rofl wow a lot while I've been gone.
TT koshi, thanks for the compliment. But when the juices get flowing I get emotional. I didn't feel good about the iVLosk wagon, and Chezinu was at work within me via IVLosk himself and Deus- I tunnel much FTL last game. Page 35 FTW. Offsite, iVLosK! Is bamcis epic bamcis awesomes, but yes it is dumb to let chezinuz swindle me.
That being said I really should know better... I should have stuck with the iVLosk vote even if I felt bad about it as it was the only lynch that made sense to me at the time.
Going to look at stuff, I don't recommend talk at night ( Indio jones)
Will answer queries though
|
On August 18 2013 05:59 Koshi wrote: Ok, so seriously. Those 3 people on Xzavier. Why the fuck would you vote on a 0-poster? HolyFlare had reasons, but they were invalid by the time I did. I was feeling like the iVLosk lynch was ominously bad when deus came in last minute. Well, I forgot that last minute voteswitches are inherently scummy... And therefore here is my light FoS on deus. Because I wanted to see why. And he didnt really tell me and then mods said no more.
Well... Take or leave...
|
|
|
|