EPTTitanic Mini Mafia! - Page 14
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
exarezee
United States423 Posts
| ||
|
hzflank
United Kingdom2991 Posts
On July 27 2013 23:53 exarezee wrote: You're exactly right. Scum would ideally want two town wagons Day 1. That's why we wagon paper and tofu......you really think they are town/town with their interactions with me day 1? I think that Paper is scum. However, that read may possibly change (If I am given reason to change it), and if it does change then there is every possibility that they are both town. Their interactions with you in no way preclude them from both being town. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16627 Posts
Look at his first post. On July 27 2013 20:13 justanothertownie wrote: I don't like Paperscraps. First he joins the lurker discussion without adding any content, then he starts to jump on exarezee without any good reason (I'm not really convinced that it was just a joke) and when he gets a little heat for it he totally backs off. I really hate this: justanothertownie thinks its not a joke. But he doesnt explain why scum would do it, summerizes Paperscraps actions and just says its scummy. Scum take jokes seriously cause they play the game seriously. extreme nitpicking here, clearly paperscraps was using generalization and notice that justanothertownie just throws shit on him without explain how or why its scummy. Like pointing out supposed bad posts without explain why. scumtell. Also I'm annoyed by CJS. Going through his filter I can't find anything valuable - he just didn't say anything until this point (apart from fluff). Ok look at his thoughts on CJS, I assume he is leaning null scummy. In his very next post commenting on CJS post, his view drastically changes. On July 27 2013 23:19 justanothertownie wrote: ##Captain: Captain Jack Sparrow You earned it with your last post. I have to agree with you - Oats and Vayne both did not post useful things as of now. looks like he wants to sheep CJS, off this horrific On July 27 2013 23:08 IMCaptainJackSparrow wrote: My vote still stands, and I believe that it is the correct one for this situation. Oatsmaster is acting like scum. He is refusing to give us any decent information whatsoever, just mucking up the thread with sarcastic one-liners and not giving us any insight on his opinions or anything. He is the perfect example of scum trying to blend in and be in the conversation, yet his words hold no meaning and are merely just filler. If you take them out, his filter is left with: And that, my friends, is not someone I want to give rum to. accusations without anything to back them up with. contradictions and shit, way over generalization. And it makes justanormaltownie want to sheep him? I dont buy it, justanormaltownie wants to support this set of lynches/lynch and see if I could possibly be mislynched. ##vote: justanormaltownie | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16627 Posts
On July 28 2013 00:00 exarezee wrote: I understand it's probably going to look pretty bad for me and potentially cost the town the game if both paper and tofu turn up town...but it's just crying that one of those two attempted a really poor attack at me in the hopes of garnering a following. What the the reasons for FT and paper being scum outside the votes which I dont think are alignment indicative? | ||
|
exarezee
United States423 Posts
Tofu attacks me about the lurker talk. I give a scum lean on papers. Tofu votes me because I did not provide a reason for my scum lean on papers. Papers comes back to thread and drops a vote on me. No reason is given. I provide my reason on papers. Tofu unvotes me and casts suspicion on papers now. Papers unvotes me. Papers plays off his posts as jokes. | ||
|
VayneAuthority
United States8983 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16627 Posts
Papersvote isnt serious. By serious vote, I mean intent to lynch. Other than that exarzee? | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16627 Posts
what do you think of justanothertownie? | ||
|
exarezee
United States423 Posts
On July 28 2013 00:14 Oatsmaster wrote: Tofu's vote isnt serious. Papersvote isnt serious. By serious vote, I mean intent to lynch. Other than that exarzee? What's the intent then? | ||
|
hzflank
United Kingdom2991 Posts
On July 28 2013 00:12 exarezee wrote: Let's look at their summarized sequence of interactions with me and assume they are both town. If you can explain to me their logic in this bizarre sequence, i will acquiesce. Tofu attacks me about the lurker talk. I give a scum lean on papers. Tofu votes me because I did not provide a reason for my scum lean on papers. Papers comes back to thread and drops a vote on me. No reason is given. I provide my reason on papers. Tofu unvotes me and casts suspicion on papers now. Papers unvotes me. Papers plays off his posts as jokes. They wanted to apply some pressure in an attempt to get a read? | ||
|
exarezee
United States423 Posts
On July 28 2013 00:17 hzflank wrote: They wanted to apply some pressure in an attempt to get a read? so why'd they unvote so quickly? | ||
|
hzflank
United Kingdom2991 Posts
On July 28 2013 00:14 VayneAuthority wrote: no way paper is mafia with how many people suspect him. Tofu is possible given his play in this game so far but gots to see more. Don't give a shit about day 1 usually anyway lalala How does multiple people suspecting someone make that person town? | ||
|
exarezee
United States423 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16627 Posts
Ok FT's vote was meant to push you into explaining your scumread on papers. His unvote is acknowledging that you did something, even if it wasnt very good. In no way does he say that Papers is scummy. FT isnt scum. So papers side. The vote seems consistent with the attitude shown in this post. On July 27 2013 09:32 Paperscraps wrote: ...LYNCH ALL LURKERS, MUAHAHAHAH. And it was possibly just a ploy to see what would happen. I dont see an intent to lynch you in his vote or surrounding actions. So therefore, neither of them are scummy for the votes on you exarzee | ||
|
VayneAuthority
United States8983 Posts
On July 28 2013 00:18 hzflank wrote: How does multiple people suspecting someone make that person town? Townie: Yo lets lynch this guy he's scum Scumbuddy - yea totally scum fuck him other scumbuddy - scummiest dude I've ever seen. lynch asap. THE ENTIRE FUCKING TEAM - GET HIM HURRY yea, no I don't see that happening this early. The only time town ever lynches scum day 1 is when a scum truly, truly fucks up. This doesn't seem like one of those times, it's too early in the cycle to be frank. Just seems like a convenient mislynch at at the moment for absolutely appalling reasons. But as I said, carry on my play usually starts later anyway. Not much of a morning person hahaha how do they say in french?? | ||
|
Vivax
21691 Posts
I Actually also want to lynch vayne for all the bollocks he has been posting early game.i'M not used to him posting bollocks in his town games. I already hate this ggame for all its small posts, and its joke posts. Jack sparrow is annoying and i would like him to get a more serious tone soon. All this bullshitting only helps scum.it was fine at the start but stop now please. That said, let's work towards a better atmosphere please. Also consider lookinespeciallyg at people who post only few.n | ||
|
exarezee
United States423 Posts
I don't believe one of the two to be scum because they voted for me. I'm looking at it through town eyes and their Complete Sequence of events doesn't make sense to me if BOTH are town...which leads to the next conclusion that one of them is scum. And I don't think they are both scum, because frankly it's too hard to pull this off. If I look at the sequence of events with one of them being town and one being scum, it makes more sense to me. | ||
|
VayneAuthority
United States8983 Posts
On July 28 2013 00:15 Oatsmaster wrote: Vayne, try a bit please. what do you think of justanothertownie? pretty useless I guess? Vig him if we have one. Don't waste a lynch on him. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16627 Posts
On July 28 2013 00:23 exarezee wrote: @Oatsmaster I don't believe one of the two to be scum because they voted for me. I'm looking at it through town eyes and their Complete Sequence of events doesn't make sense to me if BOTH are town...which leads to the next conclusion that one of them is scum. And I don't think they are both scum, because frankly it's too hard to pull this off. If I look at the sequence of events with one of them being town and one being scum, it makes more sense to me. What? So 1 town 1 scum means no communication right? so why cant it be 2 town?????????? I dont understand how you can say its 1 town and 1 scum without strongly leaning to one side. | ||
|
exarezee
United States423 Posts
I don't understand why tofu was debating lurkers with me. I don't understand why tofu put a placeholder vote on me. I don't understand why papers dropped in and put a vote on me. I don't understand why tofu unvoted me and soft accused papers when i soft accused papers earlier. I don't understand why papers unvoted me. | ||
| ||
