|
On July 28 2013 00:58 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On July 28 2013 00:28 Clarity_nl wrote:
Oats your case makes no sense to me, why do you think JAtownie is scum? Cause he nitpicks peoples post. He suddenly 180s on a read convinced by a really bad post. He never explains how papers is scum cause of that, just points out 'bad' posts without offering any analysis.
Oatsmaster, I think you are being very hasty in calling out JAT because he was simply saying that he agreed with my post (and you even quoted the wrong post, well done). He wasn't sheeping off of me, he was simply stating that he agreed with me. There's nothing truly scummy in that.
The real reason you called him scum was because he said he agreed with me when I said I thought you were scum. You called him out because you are scared, Oatsmaster, and for no other reason. Why are you so scared to get lynched?
|
CJS is totally town.
On July 28 2013 00:43 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On July 28 2013 00:09 Oatsmaster wrote:yup justanothertownie dude is scum. Look at his first post. On July 27 2013 20:13 justanothertownie wrote:
I don't like Paperscraps. First he joins the lurker discussion without adding any content, then he starts to jump on exarezee without any good reason (I'm not really convinced that it was just a joke) and when he gets a little heat for it he totally backs off. I really hate this:
justanothertownie thinks its not a joke. But he doesnt explain why scum would do it, summerizes Paperscraps actions and just says its scummy. Scum take jokes seriously cause they play the game seriously. So town doesn't play the game seriously? That's a weird stance to take. I think Paperscraps just saw an opportunity to park his vote without having to give a reason. Conveniently FirmTofu had just voted for exarezee shortly before. Show nested quote +On July 28 2013 00:09 Oatsmaster wrote:TLDR; Besides the first question on my first post, I haven't been serious at all. So this is not serious at all?
Lurkers are liabilities later in the game. I don't have a problem with taking them out sooner, rather than later. If you are stuck in a potential mylo/lylo situation with a lurker, it is no fun. Of course, if some one is overly scummy we should lynch them first.
extreme nitpicking here, clearly paperscraps was using generalization and notice that justanothertownie just throws shit on him without explain how or why its scummy. Like pointing out supposed bad posts without explain why. scumtell. Yes, he is generalising. He isn't saying anything new and doesn't take a stance on the subject at hand which is scummy in itself but even if it wasn't it is definitely not meant as a joke. He contradicts himself. Concerning CJS i was leaning null/scummy that's correct. The reason for this was his filter which showed nothing but fluff. He then went on and posted an accurate statement about Vayne and you (you both didn't contribute anything useful up to this point in time) which i quite liked and which therefore slightly changed my opinion of him. Why exactly is this a scumtell for you? And no, i don't want to sheep CJS in the slightest. I won't do anything like that and your point about this is just garbage. Just because I agree with one of his posts doesn't mean I want to sheep him - you are just pulling that out of your ass. So you think Paper is town? What about CJS?
Town dont care how they look so they play around right. Scum care how they look so they dont. And therefore because they dont play around, they tend to pick out joking posts as scummy, one part because without context, its scummy so any easy reason, and another part is that they just dont see the joke.
So why would scum vote so carelessly early game? He knows that exarezee is reletively active at that point and probably wont get lynched so why put yourself in the spotlight that way.
Random votes like that are strong towntells and you not seeing it and insisting you are right is scummy.
Papers is in no way contradicting himself, he says lynch lurkers sure, but if he has a strong scum read on a non lurker, lynch that dude first. HOW IN THE FUCKING WORLD IS THAT A CONTRADICTION? pulling shit out of your ass to make your point here.
About your 180 on CJS.
On July 27 2013 23:19 justanothertownie wrote:
##Captain: Captain Jack Sparrow
You earned it with your last post. I have to agree with you - Oats and Vayne both did not post useful things as of now.
"i have to agree with you"
Is that not sheeping? You havent provided any of your own reasons why me or Vayne are scum, but you have scumreads on us because of that one LOUSY FUCKING POST that CJS posted. What made you so convinced that CJS was not scum from that post justanothertownie?
|
On July 28 2013 01:01 Clarity_nl wrote:Show nested quote +On July 28 2013 00:58 Oatsmaster wrote:On July 28 2013 00:28 Clarity_nl wrote:
Oats your case makes no sense to me, why do you think JAtownie is scum? Cause he nitpicks peoples post. He suddenly 180s on a read convinced by a really bad post. He never explains how papers is scum cause of that, just points out 'bad' posts without offering any analysis. I happen to agree that vayne has done nothing and that before you made that case you had done nothing. So what is left, he nitpicks stuff during the first 12 hours of the game? Please explain why that is scummy.
because he takes it and calls 1 part scummy. Like he is trying so desperately to call paper's scum. If you read a filter and you dont think a dude is scum, you dont make a case right? Well justanothertownie decided that he had to call papers scum and capitalize on the current thread view towards him and went through his filter thinking that. So he nitpicked. Nitpicking is bad and scummy because it shows you dont have actual reasons to believe someone is scum.
Clarity, who is scum? And dont say vayne, hes town.
|
On July 28 2013 01:01 IMCaptainJackSparrow wrote:Show nested quote +On July 28 2013 00:58 Oatsmaster wrote:On July 28 2013 00:28 Clarity_nl wrote:
Oats your case makes no sense to me, why do you think JAtownie is scum? Cause he nitpicks peoples post. He suddenly 180s on a read convinced by a really bad post. He never explains how papers is scum cause of that, just points out 'bad' posts without offering any analysis. Oatsmaster, I think you are being very hasty in calling out JAT because he was simply saying that he agreed with my post (and you even quoted the wrong post, well done). He wasn't sheeping off of me, he was simply stating that he agreed with me. There's nothing truly scummy in that. The real reason you called him scum was because he said he agreed with me when I said I thought you were scum. You called him out because you are scared, Oatsmaster, and for no other reason. Why are you so scared to get lynched?
Jumping to conclusion here.
|
Also CJS, whos scum then?
|
On July 28 2013 01:08 Oatsmaster wrote:
Also CJS, whos scum then?
Right now, I'm leaning towards you being scum. I'm trying to figure out whether Vayne is stupid or scum, and I'm leaning towards stupid.
I'd also like to point out that a lot of people have not posted to a satisfactory level, and any one of them could be scum lurking in the shadows. We have quite a ways to go before anyone dies, so a lot of things can change.
|
Sorry, but agreeing with someone on one particular subject is not the same as sheeping him. Or do we have a very different understanding of this term?
Regarding Papers: The contradiction I meant ist still the point that he claims everything he said was a joke and the part I quoted is surely not.
Why would scum not vote so carelessly if it makes them look townie to people like you?
|
Townreads
Paperscraps
FirmTofu
Oatsmaster
People I don't want to lynch day 1 reads
exarezee
Vivax
Clarity_nl
hzflank
|
On July 28 2013 01:11 IMCaptainJackSparrow wrote:Right now, I'm leaning towards you being scum. I'm trying to figure out whether Vayne is stupid or scum, and I'm leaning towards stupid. I'd also like to point out that a lot of people have not posted to a satisfactory level, and any one of them could be scum lurking in the shadows. We have quite a ways to go before anyone dies, so a lot of things can change.
Why me?
|
Oats, they have already posted that. Clarity thinks that Tofu is scum and CJS thinks that Oats is scum.
|
On July 28 2013 01:12 Koshi wrote:
Townreads
Paperscraps
FirmTofu
Oatsmaster
People I don't want to lynch day 1 reads
exarezee
Vivax
Clarity_nl
hzflank
So who do you want to lynch?
|
On July 28 2013 01:12 justanothertownie wrote:
Sorry, but agreeing with someone on one particular subject is not the same as sheeping him. Or do we have a very different understanding of this term?
Regarding Papers: The contradiction I meant ist still the point that he claims everything he said was a joke and the part I quoted is surely not
How the fuck is it a contradiction if his post is slightly inaccurate?
Also, so he posted that everything was a joke when there was a post that clearly was not, how does that make him scum?
.
Why would scum not vote so carelessly if it makes them look townie to people like you?
Because scum dont think that way.
|
On July 28 2013 01:13 hzflank wrote:
Oats, they have already posted that. Clarity thinks that Tofu is scum and CJS thinks that Oats is scum.
my bad.
So clarity, ignoring the vote post, what else makes tofu scum?
|
On July 28 2013 01:14 hzflank wrote:Show nested quote +On July 28 2013 01:12 Koshi wrote:
Townreads
Paperscraps
FirmTofu
Oatsmaster
People I don't want to lynch day 1 reads
exarezee
Vivax
Clarity_nl
hzflank So who do you want to lynch?
Nobody yet.
|
On July 28 2013 01:07 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On July 28 2013 01:01 Clarity_nl wrote:On July 28 2013 00:58 Oatsmaster wrote:On July 28 2013 00:28 Clarity_nl wrote:
Oats your case makes no sense to me, why do you think JAtownie is scum? Cause he nitpicks peoples post. He suddenly 180s on a read convinced by a really bad post. He never explains how papers is scum cause of that, just points out 'bad' posts without offering any analysis. I happen to agree that vayne has done nothing and that before you made that case you had done nothing. So what is left, he nitpicks stuff during the first 12 hours of the game? Please explain why that is scummy. because he takes it and calls 1 part scummy. Like he is trying so desperately to call paper's scum. If you read a filter and you dont think a dude is scum, you dont make a case right? Well justanothertownie decided that he had to call papers scum and capitalize on the current thread view towards him and went through his filter thinking that. So he nitpicked. Nitpicking is bad and scummy because it shows you dont have actual reasons to believe someone is scum. Clarity, who is scum? And dont say vayne, hes town.
I'm not buying it, I understand that argument when you cherrypick a 10 page filter but it was like 12 hours into the game or something.
Anyway, other than Tofu? I dunno, there's a lot of people who have contributed nothing or the minimum and I'm kinda getting worried this is just gonna be a town on town shitfest.
What makes you say vayne is town?
|
[quote]On July 28 2013 01:12 justanothertownie wrote:
Sorry, but agreeing with someone on one particular subject is not the same as sheeping him. Or do we have a very different understanding of this term?
So you currently think me and vayne are scum right?
Wanna give better reasons that CJS?
|
On July 28 2013 01:12 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On July 28 2013 01:11 IMCaptainJackSparrow wrote:On July 28 2013 01:08 Oatsmaster wrote:
Also CJS, whos scum then? Right now, I'm leaning towards you being scum. I'm trying to figure out whether Vayne is stupid or scum, and I'm leaning towards stupid. I'd also like to point out that a lot of people have not posted to a satisfactory level, and any one of them could be scum lurking in the shadows. We have quite a ways to go before anyone dies, so a lot of things can change. Why me?
Because your filter is filled with a bunch of nonsense posts. It looks like activity but there's no substance in it. You are also really quick to call JAT scum based off of simply agreeing with my post.
Are you blind, by the way? These are things I've already said. The fact that I have to tell you again proves to me that you are not reading the thread, which makes you even scummier.
|
On July 28 2013 01:15 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On July 28 2013 01:13 hzflank wrote:
Oats, they have already posted that. Clarity thinks that Tofu is scum and CJS thinks that Oats is scum. my bad. So clarity, ignoring the vote post, what else makes tofu scum?
What? Nothing else makes him scum he hasn't done anything else.
You're asking silly questions.
|
On July 28 2013 01:15 Clarity_nl wrote:Show nested quote +On July 28 2013 01:07 Oatsmaster wrote:On July 28 2013 01:01 Clarity_nl wrote:On July 28 2013 00:58 Oatsmaster wrote:On July 28 2013 00:28 Clarity_nl wrote:
Oats your case makes no sense to me, why do you think JAtownie is scum? Cause he nitpicks peoples post. He suddenly 180s on a read convinced by a really bad post. He never explains how papers is scum cause of that, just points out 'bad' posts without offering any analysis. I happen to agree that vayne has done nothing and that before you made that case you had done nothing. So what is left, he nitpicks stuff during the first 12 hours of the game? Please explain why that is scummy. because he takes it and calls 1 part scummy. Like he is trying so desperately to call paper's scum. If you read a filter and you dont think a dude is scum, you dont make a case right? Well justanothertownie decided that he had to call papers scum and capitalize on the current thread view towards him and went through his filter thinking that. So he nitpicked. Nitpicking is bad and scummy because it shows you dont have actual reasons to believe someone is scum. Clarity, who is scum? And dont say vayne, hes town. I'm not buying it, I understand that argument when you cherrypick a 10 page filter but it was like 12 hours into the game or something. Anyway, other than Tofu? I dunno, there's a lot of people who have contributed nothing or the minimum and I'm kinda getting worried this is just gonna be a town on town shitfest. What makes you say vayne is town?
Explain the tofu read.
Vayne is town for not giving a fuck how he looks.
|
On July 28 2013 01:04 Oatsmaster wrote:
Town dont care how they look so they play around right. Scum care how they look so they dont. And therefore because they dont play around, they tend to pick out joking posts as scummy, one part because without context, its scummy so any easy reason, and another part is that they just dont see the joke.
I do not agree with this at all. Playing around is not an alignment tell. It is just as easy to make jokes or think things are jokes as either alignment. It might be a personality tell, but that is all.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
