|
What's the point of me writing up a case against my scum buddy Ace and then having him cop claim 5 minutes later. I'd know he was cop claiming ahead of time so I'd obviously want to set myself up to side with him like everyone else.
The point is exactly that it would give you massive cred.
On night one he wanted to lynch sent because he was convinced he scum slipped. After the cop check, he brought up that he wanted to lynch outside of Ace/himself and lynch prpl, before it was pointed out that we could reduce the mafia kp.
Can you link me to the post? I must have missed it <_<
|
|
|
The daypost might be delayed a bit I could be busy.
Also, send in actions to Artanis too because of this, I dunno if he'll even be here, but better make sure.
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
On June 09 2013 23:45 Vivax wrote:Show nested quote +
On night one he wanted to lynch sent because he was convinced he scum slipped. After the cop check, he brought up that he wanted to lynch outside of Ace/himself and lynch prpl, before it was pointed out that we could reduce the mafia kp.
Can you link me to the post? I must have missed it <_<
On June 06 2013 18:55 Oatsmaster wrote:
No.
Sent.
The point is, in both of your scenarios, rayn flips red.
There is no scenario where rayn flips green in your head.
Thats where you scumslipped.
On June 06 2013 21:38 Oatsmaster wrote:
We lynching Sent tmr.
On June 07 2013 10:34 Oatsmaster wrote:
Ok how about we dont lynch me or ace today.
WE LYNCH prp.
YES!
|
this is wrong in a lot of ways
|
Alright, didn't see that post.
Are you sure it was after the claim? You asked Oats yourself why he thinks that prplhz is town, now you quote him saying he's scum.
On June 07 2013 23:45 kitaman27 wrote:Show nested quote +On June 07 2013 23:31 Oatsmaster wrote:
I dont think prp is currently scum, sent scumslipped so there's that too. Ace/Sent wouldve probably been discussion topics, and now its Ace and me. Could you explain why prpl is town and why sent is scum (outside of a slip?). Also, a guess regarding the 4th suspect and a case would be helpful. Thoughts about layabout?
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
On June 09 2013 23:57 Vivax wrote:Alright, didn't see that post. Are you sure it was after the claim? You asked Oats yourself why he thinks that prplhz is town, now you quote him saying he's scum. Show nested quote +On June 07 2013 23:45 kitaman27 wrote:On June 07 2013 23:31 Oatsmaster wrote:
I dont think prp is currently scum, sent scumslipped so there's that too. Ace/Sent wouldve probably been discussion topics, and now its Ace and me. Could you explain why prpl is town and why sent is scum (outside of a slip?). Also, a guess regarding the 4th suspect and a case would be helpful. Thoughts about layabout?
Yep, he changed his mind.
|
Cool now I'm clueless.
Let's see what happens tonight.
|
Well this is some shit. I'm actually a bit stumped. We still need to deal with Ace since we don't know if Oats was a Miller or not. Doing some reading for this, was really expecting a scum flip there.
|
On June 09 2013 22:17 Vivax wrote:Show nested quote +On June 09 2013 21:16 layabout wrote:
+ Does anybody even want another red check? What does this even mean? It's DEMOCRACY TIME Poll: What do we do with this ace dudeLynch him (9) 60% Town (6) 40% Check him (0) 0% 15 total votes Your vote: What do we do with this ace dude (Vote): Lynch him
(Vote): Check him
(Vote): Town
Democracy doesn't lie.
We don't cop check him tonight.
As far as lynching him vs him being town goes, if you people want to fuck around with that tomorrow you're letting scum win.
I will not be advocating anyone but an Ace lynch tomorrow, although I REALLY don't want to have to waste my time on dealing with him because again, not hunting for the rest of the scum is exactly what they want.
|
So the poll is anonymous so I'm guessing the scummers could be honest with their intentions. They'd be fools not to since they can vote for the situation that favors them and nobody would know who voted for wat. Ergo, if he was scum they would label him town and if he was town they'd vote for the lynch.
Without shakalaka's vote (assuming he voted), we have 7-4 in favor of a lynch.
If Ace is town, the three scummers would vote to lynch him and buy an extra day. This would mean 4 towns voted for each scenario. Seems about probable, and scum could swing the wagon to their favored outcome.
If Ace is scum, the three scummers (including Ace) would vote against the lynch. This would mean 7 towns want Ace dead, and only one townie threw his lot in with the scum by some happenstance. This near-unanimous effort by town to lynch him would be less probable - but there is also the guy in IRC who asked Shakalaka to come in and vote for the town option. It would make sense that scum, seeing that despite all their efforts their man is going to get lynched, ask another guy to put some more weight on the town option.
Intredasting.
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
Please tell me you're not analyzing an anonymous poll -_-
|
On June 10 2013 04:34 kitaman27 wrote:
Please tell me you're not analyzing an anonymous poll -_-
gotta admit, I lolled
|
vivax i mean that if somebody comes in tomorrow with a red check on player x and that person isn't ace i do want to play this game anymore because it's all role bullshit.
kita ace's play is consistent and makes sense as town. In order for him to be scum you have to assume that he has taken silly risks (copcheck on Oats) that he didn't need to take. I would rather pick the scenario that makes more sense and that is with Ace being town.
If Ace is town the best thing to do is check him to stop a mislynch. If Ace is scum then checking him should confirm that. There is a risk associated with checking him but that cannot be helped. But i would rather we take it than mislynch and have only day1 where people had to justify their votes beyond it being the perceived optimal play because of a check.
+ Show Spoiler +have stolen a laptop i have access for 10 mins or so
|
is that a serious post? I hate having to decide on Dumbtelling
|
kita, Wos here is a simple question: assume I am Scum. Why would I be begging you to check me for 2 days ahead of time to prove my innocence?
|
On June 10 2013 04:45 VayneAuthority wrote:
is that a serious post? I hate having to decide on Dumbtelling
I voted for the "lynch him" option. Follow my lead.
|
On June 10 2013 04:47 Ace wrote:
kita, Wos here is a simple question: assume I am Scum. Why would I be begging you to check me for 2 days ahead of time to prove my innocence?
Because you are taking a risk that has a potentially huge payoff
|
On June 10 2013 04:50 layabout wrote:Show nested quote +On June 10 2013 04:47 Ace wrote:
kita, Wos here is a simple question: assume I am Scum. Why would I be begging you to check me for 2 days ahead of time to prove my innocence? Because you are taking a risk that has a potentially huge payoff
right, but I would have needed to get lucky 2 nights in a row and setup Oats ahead of time. Without checking me we mislynch and get up to 8 Town deaths and lylo. Which one seems like the smarter option here?
|
On June 10 2013 04:55 Ace wrote:Show nested quote +On June 10 2013 04:50 layabout wrote:On June 10 2013 04:47 Ace wrote:
kita, Wos here is a simple question: assume I am Scum. Why would I be begging you to check me for 2 days ahead of time to prove my innocence? Because you are taking a risk that has a potentially huge payoff right, but I would have needed to get lucky 2 nights in a row and setup Oats ahead of time. Without checking me we mislynch and get up to 8 Town deaths and lylo. Which one seems like the smarter option here?
You don't have to tell ME?
wait 8?
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
