|
On April 30 2013 03:32 TheRavensName wrote:Show nested quote +On April 30 2013 03:25 Sharrant wrote:On April 30 2013 03:16 Stutters695 wrote: As I've said, I'm in the midst of finals and replacing in was really a mistake. Yet despite that, in my minute filter I've already said more than Shiao. Haven't really looked at giggles. I'm not sure how I feel about this quote. Stutters calling GiygaS "giggles" reads to me as someone who has more familiarity with the thread than Stutters would. It seems more likely a habit that would be picked up from quickly chatting with people in the scum QT to try and figure out what his best move would be. Does anyone else get that vibe, or am I reaching on this? . I called him giggleS recently, and I believe that post was in response to something I said.
Ah, that makes sense. Very well, then.
On April 30 2013 03:34 Hopeless1der wrote:Show nested quote +On April 30 2013 03:31 Sharrant wrote:On April 30 2013 03:29 Hopeless1der wrote:On April 30 2013 03:26 Sharrant wrote:On April 30 2013 03:21 Hopeless1der wrote:On April 29 2013 21:49 Mr. Cheesecake wrote: Sanity doesnt flip on death.
That sucks, lynch shaiopi tomorrow, d2 looks like it was between 2 scum after all. Where did we learn sanity doesn't flip? I don't see it anywhere. Do you think it's scummy he's saying that, when you don't know? I don't know if he A) got a PM from a mod, B) got it from a QT somewhere, C) its actually in the thread and I'm blind or D)he's talking out of his ass. Its kind of important to know if the information is in fact available in case we decide to for whatever reason lynch a cop before his claim. That wasn't an answer. That was a summary of options. Do you think it is scummy that he is claiming knowledge not readily available in the thread? Uhhhhh yes?
And what is it that makes that scummy to you? I see it much more likely being a town tell. There's the possibility a mafia could make that post, but it seems much more likely to come from town in my opinion.
|
11589 Posts
Does a cop's sanity flip upon death?
|
I like how there's now a discussion about my nickname being suspicious or not.
|
On April 30 2013 03:37 Sharrant wrote:Show nested quote +On April 30 2013 03:32 TheRavensName wrote:On April 30 2013 03:25 Sharrant wrote:On April 30 2013 03:16 Stutters695 wrote: As I've said, I'm in the midst of finals and replacing in was really a mistake. Yet despite that, in my minute filter I've already said more than Shiao. Haven't really looked at giggles. I'm not sure how I feel about this quote. Stutters calling GiygaS "giggles" reads to me as someone who has more familiarity with the thread than Stutters would. It seems more likely a habit that would be picked up from quickly chatting with people in the scum QT to try and figure out what his best move would be. Does anyone else get that vibe, or am I reaching on this? . I called him giggleS recently, and I believe that post was in response to something I said. Ah, that makes sense. Very well, then. Show nested quote +On April 30 2013 03:34 Hopeless1der wrote:On April 30 2013 03:31 Sharrant wrote:On April 30 2013 03:29 Hopeless1der wrote:On April 30 2013 03:26 Sharrant wrote:On April 30 2013 03:21 Hopeless1der wrote:On April 29 2013 21:49 Mr. Cheesecake wrote: Sanity doesnt flip on death.
That sucks, lynch shaiopi tomorrow, d2 looks like it was between 2 scum after all. Where did we learn sanity doesn't flip? I don't see it anywhere. Do you think it's scummy he's saying that, when you don't know? I don't know if he A) got a PM from a mod, B) got it from a QT somewhere, C) its actually in the thread and I'm blind or D)he's talking out of his ass. Its kind of important to know if the information is in fact available in case we decide to for whatever reason lynch a cop before his claim. That wasn't an answer. That was a summary of options. Do you think it is scummy that he is claiming knowledge not readily available in the thread? Uhhhhh yes? And what is it that makes that scummy to you? I see it much more likely being a town tell. There's the possibility a mafia could make that post, but it seems much more likely to come from town in my opinion. I don't have the information. He seems to have it and I want to know how he has it. It helps to decide how I want to follow the cop claim chains or if I just want to say fuck it and scumhunt like a normal person. If you think its a towntell, enlighten me. I cannot tell what the fuck you want from me here.
|
On April 30 2013 03:07 ShiaoPi wrote:Show nested quote +On April 30 2013 02:23 Stutters695 wrote: Well since the thread has died down, let's try this:
ShiaoPi: You have yet to adress any points against you ever, much less give a reason a single reason why we should lynch a claimed cop over you (except that he's wrong).
So I'll ask you:
What made you drop your suspicion on Sharrant (note: not why you voted Oats, why you never pushed Sharrant in D2)?
You say Gigyas should be lynched for being non-committal, no thread presence, and just going with the flow of the thread. That's awfully similar to your 3 reads throughout the game, none of which you have voted for.
Any explanations or are you just going to say more obvious stuff like "Kill stutters" to try and deflect from yourself again? LOL The points raised against me are mostly just inactivity and a fucking cop check which is just wrong. Besides hammering someone is kind of committal dont you think so? My read on sharrant changed as d1 progressed. Unfortunately I was unable to be active, so all you see is a seemingly total turnaround. Also I did adress points against me, so you are either dumb and unable of doing reading comprehension or just lying. Dunno why I answer to you anyway seeing that you are scum and should be dealt with fire. bed time now
You hammered Oats when he was sitting at L-1 for fifteen minutes. Of fucking course he didn't have time to contribute more. I was trying to give you the benefit of the doubt considering you hammered a townie WHO YOU NEVER HAD A SCUMREAD ON but if you're just going to dodge answering I'll await your flip.
|
On April 30 2013 03:32 TheRavensName wrote:Show nested quote +On April 30 2013 03:25 Sharrant wrote:On April 30 2013 03:16 Stutters695 wrote: As I've said, I'm in the midst of finals and replacing in was really a mistake. Yet despite that, in my minute filter I've already said more than Shiao. Haven't really looked at giggles. I'm not sure how I feel about this quote. Stutters calling GiygaS "giggles" reads to me as someone who has more familiarity with the thread than Stutters would. It seems more likely a habit that would be picked up from quickly chatting with people in the scum QT to try and figure out what his best move would be. Does anyone else get that vibe, or am I reaching on this? . I called him giggleS recently, and I believe that post was in response to something I said.
Correct, the post I called him giggles was a direct response to that post (plus its just fun to call people names).
|
ebwop: sorry for the language. I'm looking at Ace now since WoS brought him up. He has kinda slipped by lately.
|
On April 30 2013 03:40 Hopeless1der wrote:Show nested quote +On April 30 2013 03:37 Sharrant wrote:On April 30 2013 03:32 TheRavensName wrote:On April 30 2013 03:25 Sharrant wrote:On April 30 2013 03:16 Stutters695 wrote: As I've said, I'm in the midst of finals and replacing in was really a mistake. Yet despite that, in my minute filter I've already said more than Shiao. Haven't really looked at giggles. I'm not sure how I feel about this quote. Stutters calling GiygaS "giggles" reads to me as someone who has more familiarity with the thread than Stutters would. It seems more likely a habit that would be picked up from quickly chatting with people in the scum QT to try and figure out what his best move would be. Does anyone else get that vibe, or am I reaching on this? . I called him giggleS recently, and I believe that post was in response to something I said. Ah, that makes sense. Very well, then. On April 30 2013 03:34 Hopeless1der wrote:On April 30 2013 03:31 Sharrant wrote:On April 30 2013 03:29 Hopeless1der wrote:On April 30 2013 03:26 Sharrant wrote:On April 30 2013 03:21 Hopeless1der wrote:On April 29 2013 21:49 Mr. Cheesecake wrote: Sanity doesnt flip on death.
That sucks, lynch shaiopi tomorrow, d2 looks like it was between 2 scum after all. Where did we learn sanity doesn't flip? I don't see it anywhere. Do you think it's scummy he's saying that, when you don't know? I don't know if he A) got a PM from a mod, B) got it from a QT somewhere, C) its actually in the thread and I'm blind or D)he's talking out of his ass. Its kind of important to know if the information is in fact available in case we decide to for whatever reason lynch a cop before his claim. That wasn't an answer. That was a summary of options. Do you think it is scummy that he is claiming knowledge not readily available in the thread? Uhhhhh yes? And what is it that makes that scummy to you? I see it much more likely being a town tell. There's the possibility a mafia could make that post, but it seems much more likely to come from town in my opinion. I don't have the information. He seems to have it and I want to know how he has it. It helps to decide how I want to follow the cop claim chains or if I just want to say fuck it and scumhunt like a normal person. If you think its a towntell, enlighten me. I cannot tell what the fuck you want from me here.
Assuming the information is accurate (which I haven't verified), it reads as very townie to me because it's an important part of his role. His reaction to people wanting to lynch him to verify his claims, seems to first be to check if it would actually verify what he is saying. He's so casual about the fact that it wouldn't, and seems genuinely dissapointed and frustrated by the actions in and around his claim.
|
On April 30 2013 03:40 GiygaS wrote: I like how there's now a discussion about my nickname being suspicious or not. I have to admit this is too next level for me, GargoyleS.
|
Oo, oo I've got one! Gizmos and gadgetS? Too much?
|
TAIWAN NUMBAH WAN5955 Posts
On April 30 2013 03:41 Stutters695 wrote:Show nested quote +On April 30 2013 03:07 ShiaoPi wrote:On April 30 2013 02:23 Stutters695 wrote: Well since the thread has died down, let's try this:
ShiaoPi: You have yet to adress any points against you ever, much less give a reason a single reason why we should lynch a claimed cop over you (except that he's wrong).
So I'll ask you:
What made you drop your suspicion on Sharrant (note: not why you voted Oats, why you never pushed Sharrant in D2)?
You say Gigyas should be lynched for being non-committal, no thread presence, and just going with the flow of the thread. That's awfully similar to your 3 reads throughout the game, none of which you have voted for.
Any explanations or are you just going to say more obvious stuff like "Kill stutters" to try and deflect from yourself again? LOL The points raised against me are mostly just inactivity and a fucking cop check which is just wrong. Besides hammering someone is kind of committal dont you think so? My read on sharrant changed as d1 progressed. Unfortunately I was unable to be active, so all you see is a seemingly total turnaround. Also I did adress points against me, so you are either dumb and unable of doing reading comprehension or just lying. Dunno why I answer to you anyway seeing that you are scum and should be dealt with fire. bed time now You hammered Oats when he was sitting at L-1 for fifteen minutes. Of fucking course he didn't have time to contribute more. I was trying to give you the benefit of the doubt considering you hammered a townie WHO YOU NEVER HAD A SCUMREAD ON but if you're just going to dodge answering I'll await your flip.
On April 25 2013 16:15 ShiaoPi wrote: ugh, fuck my busy schedule for not being able to post earlier. So I am now on the chopping block for being the hammer vote on oats? Answering to the points of vivax now: -low activity: well ya, fuck my life for being busy. This also results in my "low involvement" as I obviously cant do much without much time....
Now onto why I hammered oats instead of following up on Sharrant: Look at the vote counts at the time when I "magically" returned. It's pretty much obvious that no one else besides Oats or yamato would get lynched that day. Waiting on oats to start to do something useful would be like waiting for a train that will never come anyway. Come on look at that shitfest in the pages before the lynch and tell me with a serious face that oats was getting productive.....Felt like a waste of time to keep waiting for him, so I thought fuck it, hammer him and we will know more.
If that explanation aint satisfying enough for you, can't help you.
yeah you claim to have read my oh so small filter. just stop lying
|
On April 30 2013 03:53 WaveofShadow wrote: Oo, oo I've got one! Gizmos and gadgetS? Too much? Too long, needs to be catchier. GrapeS?
|
Hey guys? How about GiygaS?
|
On April 30 2013 04:12 GiygaS wrote:Hey guys? How about GiygaS?
crazy talk.
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
On April 30 2013 03:39 yamato77 wrote: Does a cop's sanity flip upon death? no
|
On April 30 2013 04:12 GiygaS wrote:Hey guys? How about GiygaS? Dude, that's awful.
|
On April 30 2013 04:26 Artanis[Xp] wrote:Dude, that's awful. Yea. Thats not even really a word.
|
11589 Posts
Mr. CC confirmed telling truth.
No reason to be suspicious that he asked a question about his own role to the host.
hopeless=mafia
|
On April 30 2013 04:26 yamato77 wrote: Mr. CC confirmed telling truth.
No reason to be suspicious that he asked a question about his own role to the host.
hopeless=mafia coolstorybro
|
On April 30 2013 03:45 Stutters695 wrote: ebwop: sorry for the language. I'm looking at Ace now since WoS brought him up. He has kinda slipped by lately.
what? I've been around the entire game - where could I have slipped by?
VE -> Palmar Palmar->CC CC->VE
Town JK dont target any of them, let town docs take care of that. roleblocking any of them will screw us. let scum worry about who to rb.
|
|
|
|