TL Mafia LX - Page 212
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
DoctorHelvetica
United States15034 Posts
| ||
DoctorHelvetica
United States15034 Posts
| ||
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
How in blue FUCK would you expect 5 nightkills to happen without an ignite from a bartender? Please. I will delight in this tale. | ||
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
| ||
DoctorHelvetica
United States15034 Posts
Explain how that is a scumtell though | ||
DoctorHelvetica
United States15034 Posts
tell me why not caring translates into scum in my case and why this means i am mafia instead of just bored | ||
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
The fact that you didn't care early doesn't make you less scummy either. If you are bartender it means you can let town and mafia kill each other all game. Your actual hard effort early game was enough to throw people off your trail because you can actually hunt scum like a towny and not sacrifice your win-con. If you ARE just bored, why should anyone believe what you have to say and believe that you're putting effort into anything? You're looking for an easy cop-out answer as to your inactivity lately and your frankly HUGE slip. Even IF bartender ignited people with Ignite in the thread, that means you'd have to be assuming mafia had 3 KP. Where are they going to get those KP considering we've nothing but 1 every night since the beginning of the game and we already figured out we don't have an SK? I refuse to believe that basic math and analysis is beyond your reach. | ||
DoctorHelvetica
United States15034 Posts
It's not beyond my reach but it's not something I ever do. Different people scumhunt in different ways. I limit myself to looking strictly between the lines because it's the thing I think I'm best at. It's why my Day 1 reads are so good and then my game takes a dive after that because I try to branch off with my analysis into things I'm not very good at doing. Some people like to catch scum by thinking really hard about the setup/night actions and laying traps or catching people in impossible logic/bad roleclaims. Those players fill that role pretty well and I don't because it's not the thing about mafia I find interesting, I just want to look at the behavior side of things. Some people like to ask lots of questions, some people like to rely on association reads, some people like to conspiracy theory, etc. I don't do any of those games. I swear to you I've gone 3-4 days into a game as town without even realizing there was a certain role in the game. Someone starts talking about the mad hatter and I didn't even know there was a mad hatter. I don't care because it's not really relevant to the way I analyze things. It's an aspect of my game I absolutely should improve on though, I'll give you that. If I was assuming mafia had 3 KP how would I make that assumption if I were scum? That's a point +100000 for how lazy I'm playing but has nothing to do with my alignment. I figured mafia killed MilkSuckler after learning his bombs weren't on any of them and the fourth KP I didn't really pay attention to but you're right, it must be the bartender. I would tell you this though, as scum I take things very seriously and if I stopped caring about the game I'd at least ask for a replacement out of respect for my teammates. I wouldn't just tank and stop caring like I am now because I figured town had won a long time ago. Do you watch sports? It's like when an elite team plays against some scrub team not even going to make the playoffs and gets owned because they underestimate their opponents and don't even try. That's what I've done in this game. I won't make any promises that I will care a lot later but if I'm the last scum in this game, I would throw in the towel the right way which is a PM to GreYMisT. What I have learned to trust is my Day 1/2 analysis when I was caring about this game and I'm trying to get back in touch with what I was thinking then and put the rest of events into perspective. Vivax had absolutely no response to my case and after some weak confusion about the night actions there wasn't much of a defense except for people who wanted jcarlsoniv dead instead. It's not just that you had soniv as a higher scumread than Vivax (I'm dubious about that because I think I nailed him pretty hard on Day 1 but just got sidetracked whereas Jcarls at least put surface effort into scumhunting and was more townie about the way he acted by far) but you seemed to be legitimately upset that Vivax would be lynched at all. Now MilkSuckler is gone. So far you've managed to demonstrate that I've lacked interest and effort in this game - as is true for every game I play in - but now can you demonstrate why that makes me scum and what my scum motivations are for not even reading what happens? So I can reference my disinterested town meta that you have no idea about since it's been almost a year since I've been active? So I can make a meta defense (which I hate doing) against people who don't know me? That's a conspiracy theory at best. | ||
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
You make a massive post talking about how much you don't care and you don't even care to read my accusations against you THAT YOU'RE MAKING THE POST TO DEFEND IN THE FIRST PLACE? Hah. Couple more interesting things I picked out of here. On March 11 2013 11:23 DoctorHelvetica wrote: My inactivity is 2/3rds the fact that I'm usually at work during the majority of the days discussion and filter diving has become really unattractive in a game that I would have conceded days ago if I were scum. It's not beyond my reach but it's not something I ever do. Different people scumhunt in different ways. I limit myself to looking strictly between the lines because it's the thing I think I'm best at. It's why my Day 1 reads are so good and then my game takes a dive after that because I try to branch off with my analysis into things I'm not very good at doing. Some people like to catch scum by thinking really hard about the setup/night actions and laying traps or catching people in impossible logic/bad roleclaims. Those players fill that role pretty well and I don't because it's not the thing about mafia I find interesting, I just want to look at the behavior side of things. Some people like to ask lots of questions, some people like to rely on association reads, some people like to conspiracy theory, etc. I don't do any of those games. I swear to you I've gone 3-4 days into a game as town without even realizing there was a certain role in the game. Someone starts talking about the mad hatter and I didn't even know there was a mad hatter. I don't care because it's not really relevant to the way I analyze things. It's an aspect of my game I absolutely should improve on though, I'll give you that. If I was assuming mafia had 3 KP how would I make that assumption if I were scum? That's a point +100000 for how lazy I'm playing but has nothing to do with my alignment. I figured mafia killed MilkSuckler after learning his bombs weren't on any of them and the fourth KP I didn't really pay attention to but you're right, it must be the bartender. And the 5th? Even during this conversation you're essentially telling me you don't care. That's not a towny way to play. At all. The only night it ever would have been possible for scum to have 3 KP was right at the start of the game. (Not including dayvig). You're really telling me that you don't ever read roles or flips or ANYTHING all throughout a game? It doesn't even make sense to me how you could play a game of mafia that way without blowing reads completely and sounding really stupid every single time you're proven wrong. I would tell you this though, as scum I take things very seriously and if I stopped caring about the game I'd at least ask for a replacement out of respect for my teammates. I wouldn't just tank and stop caring like I am now because I figured town had won a long time ago. Do you watch sports? It's like when an elite team plays against some scrub team not even going to make the playoffs and gets owned because they underestimate their opponents and don't even try. That's what I've done in this game. I won't make any promises that I will care a lot later but if I'm the last scum in this game, I would throw in the towel the right way which is a PM to GreYMisT. There's only one scum left right now and clearly he hasn't thrown in the towel yet. If this is some 'subtle' way of calling me scum and telling me to give in, even that makes no sense because scum has a real chance of winning this game right now. WHICH IS WHY I'M TRYING TO FIND HIM. What I have learned to trust is my Day 1/2 analysis when I was caring about this game and I'm trying to get back in touch with what I was thinking then and put the rest of events into perspective. Vivax had absolutely no response to my case and after some weak confusion about the night actions there wasn't much of a defense except for people who wanted jcarlsoniv dead instead. It's not just that you had soniv as a higher scumread than Vivax (I'm dubious about that because I think I nailed him pretty hard on Day 1 but just got sidetracked whereas Jcarls at least put surface effort into scumhunting and was more townie about the way he acted by far) but you seemed to be legitimately upset that Vivax would be lynched at all. Now MilkSuckler is gone. Show me where Soniv put effort into scumhunting besides a few measly questions and maybe one case throughout his whole tenure in this thread. He was useless. What contributions did he make to help out the town? I defy you to tell me how he helped. I stood by the mislynch on Geript and I stand by my reads on Soniv. So far you've managed to demonstrate that I've lacked interest and effort in this game - as is true for every game I play in - but now can you demonstrate why that makes me scum and what my scum motivations are for not even reading what happens? So I can reference my disinterested town meta that you have no idea about since it's been almost a year since I've been active? So I can make a meta defense (which I hate doing) against people who don't know me? That's a conspiracy theory at best. Nope, but I already demonstrated your 2rd party motivations. YOU ARE THE BARTENDER. | ||
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
So far you've managed to demonstrate that I've lacked interest and effort in this game - as is true for every game I play in - but now can you demonstrate why that makes me scum and what my scum motivations are for not even reading what happens? So I can reference my disinterested town meta that you have no idea about since it's been almost a year since I've been active? So I can make a meta defense (which I hate doing) against people who don't know me? That's a conspiracy theory at best. Nope, but I already demonstrated your 2rd party motivations. | ||
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
Anyway now it all depends on whether the other two town in here (if anyone else besides me actually cares about salvaging this clusterfuck of a game) want to lynch DrH first or try to find who the actual scum is. | ||
DoctorHelvetica
United States15034 Posts
oh i see | ||
DoctorHelvetica
United States15034 Posts
| ||
DoctorHelvetica
United States15034 Posts
| ||
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
On March 11 2013 11:42 DoctorHelvetica wrote: I'm the bartender who doesn't even know what the bartender does until now oh i see Or you are lying and you are covering it up using the earlier laziness precedent you set up. | ||
randombum
United States2378 Posts
| ||
randombum
United States2378 Posts
| ||
randombum
United States2378 Posts
| ||
grush57
Korea (South)2582 Posts
##Vote: randombum | ||
TestSubject893
United States774 Posts
##Vote: WaveofShadow | ||
| ||