On November 30 2012 08:58 iamperfection wrote:
whens the deadline 2 min?
whens the deadline 2 min?
23 hours :o
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Keirathi
United States4679 Posts
On November 30 2012 08:58 iamperfection wrote: whens the deadline 2 min? 23 hours :o | ||
iamperfection
United States9634 Posts
| ||
Hapahauli
United States9305 Posts
| ||
iamperfection
United States9634 Posts
| ||
iamperfection
United States9634 Posts
On November 30 2012 09:01 Hapahauli wrote: And will someone read my goddamn case on Phagga already? The fact that a bunch of near-confirmed townies are herp-derping around is maddening. we read its just hard to trust the speaker. You can complain about it all you want but which you gonna do | ||
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
@ Hapa It's late, and I don't want to go through phagga's filter. Setup speculation is easy, and in a themed game it is also useful to an extent. You wanna be pissed go right ahead but it's not helping anyone. THINGS happened and you are at the shitty end of it at the moment, just keep doing what you're doing because no one is going to lynch you on this alone. I do however plan on reading phagga's and your filter tomorrow and try to get to some conclusions. Even Keir's "leaning scum" wasn't solely off of the setup stuff, so take a breath. | ||
Hapahauli
United States9305 Posts
On November 30 2012 09:02 iamperfection wrote: Show nested quote + On November 30 2012 09:01 Hapahauli wrote: And will someone read my goddamn case on Phagga already? The fact that a bunch of near-confirmed townies are herp-derping around is maddening. we read its just hard to trust the speaker. You can complain about it all you want but which you gonna do Just read the fucking case and see if you agree with my analysis. Hell for all you know I'm bussing my "scumbuddy" or whatever, so pay freggin attention. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=382922¤tpage=253#5045 Read this and tell me that he's town. I've offered you so much evidence against the fact, and as far as I can see, you're either maddeningly lazy or scum. Unfortunately, I think you're the former. | ||
phagga
Switzerland2194 Posts
On November 30 2012 08:32 Hapahauli wrote: Oh, you imply that I hit on GK only because other people now wrote about him too? Wrong. Can I prove it? no. But in similar way I can say that you just started building a case on my after z-boson came at me.@ Phagga Regarding "Odds on your side" Your suspicions on GoodKarma ebb and flow with the general attitude on the thread. You initially find GK scummy, then when that doesn't gain any traction, you read him as null and soft defend him: Show nested quote + On November 26 2012 07:27 phagga wrote: Ok, I've updated my read on GK and I would no longer lynch him. When the D2 lynch came to a close, he asked people to consolidate on either sandroba or Toad. He tried to shut down any discussion that would bring in new candidates. considering that Sandro is confirmed scum and Toad is very very likely scum, I don't see the mafia motivation behind is behaviour. also, the way he acts D3 seems more pro-town than on the first day. All in all, I put GK on null for the moment. Show nested quote + On November 26 2012 07:31 phagga wrote: On November 26 2012 07:29 Promethelax wrote: On November 26 2012 07:27 phagga wrote: Ok, I've updated my read on GK and I would no longer lynch him. When the D2 lynch came to a close, he asked people to consolidate on either sandroba or Toad. He tried to shut down any discussion that would bring in new candidates. considering that Sandro is confirmed scum and Toad is very very likely scum, I don't see the mafia motivation behind is behaviour. also, the way he acts D3 seems more pro-town than on the first day. All in all, I put GK on null for the moment. he tried to get us to consolidate on one of two scum players and you are null on him? I'm confused. Why? Scum would benefit in this situation when the thread derails/new candidates are brought forths, so I don't see the scum motivation in doing what GK did. Show nested quote + tl;dr, i said I doubt GK is scum partially because of his behaviiour before the D2 lynch, z-boson says it could have been a buss, we disagree a bit. Then when suspicion starts to shift on GK again, you up your rhetoric and start railing him. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=382922¤tpage=222#4436 http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=382922¤tpage=225#4481 All I can say about that is that I really saw things I did not like and tried to point them out. I also think I do have some points that others did not mention. Others have written about GK too? Well, bad luck, there is a case about almost everyone in the game floating around by now, if it is about that I cannot go after anyone. ... which is also kinda comical because you seemingly forgot that you 180'd your read on GK: Show nested quote + @Prom I haven't read your case completely yet, but there are good points in it. However, I might have confirmation bias as I was already leaning scum on GK beforehand. But that quote was posted after http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=382922¤tpage=225#4481, where I said I lean scum on GK. So what's comical about that? Regarding your Stance on Sandro Show nested quote + Wrong. I wanted to get GKs reaction. I did not have a scum read on him yet. I also did not have a town read on Sandro. It was hypothetical. That's the very reason why I worded it exactly this way: "What do you say to the following". If I thought that he was scum I would have written that completely different. And yes, I still find it strange that he likes Sandros approach to the game, that he thinks Sandro is town, but that he wants to be leader himself with sandro on his team and a different appraoch? Why should I vote him then when he said himself that Sandros approach was good? That was the confusion behind it. I beg to differ. Your entire line of questioning against GK was under the assumption that Sandro was town. GK saw Sandro as town. If GK were scum, he would at least know that Sandro is not scum. GK wants to have sandro in his team. I don't like the reasoning of GK, I think its contradicting. I therefore make the hypothesis that if GK is scum, he takes Sandro (whom he knows not to be scum) on his team to look more townie. That's the whole story. I did not say anywhere in that post that I think that Sandro is town. Hell, i even write one paragraph earlier: " If GK thinks Sandro is so townie that you includes him in your team" (it should actually say "you" instead of "GK", but whatever). Show nested quote + Why do I HAVE to mention that? It's obvious that he is at least a slight town read for me when I vote him over Syllo who I also lean town. At least I thought it would be obvious.... Also, I wrote clearly why I do not vote Syllo: I was leaning town on him, but I have no idea how he plays, so I feared in the back of my head that he might be mafia and I'm too blind to see it. Hence Kita. The thing is you never attempted to make a read on Sandro at all. In addition, you seemingly liked his ideas, thought he was slightly town, yet you were comfortable voting Kita despite having huge reservations about one of his party members (Promethelax). Eh, contradiction? I never attempted to make a read on Sandroba but wrote that he was slightly town? Also, I wrote why I voted kita. Because I don't know how Sandro and Syllo play, I therefore did not trust them. However, I only have a very rough idea on how these guys play scum, and I don't trust them enough yet. And yes, I wrote I liked his ideas, and I wrote in the very same paragraph that this is no reason to trust him, cause scum can come up with such good ideas as well. So what's the problem with that? Regarding your stance on Cave Johnson Show nested quote + On November 30 2012 08:14 phagga wrote: On November 30 2012 08:08 Hapahauli wrote: I mean really, just look at his D2 play: My list with reads on everyone has one person painted in bright red: CaveJohnson. That's were my vote goes for now. My vote is currently on CaveJohnson. Not finished with reading everything. Not feeling sure enough with Toad yet. I can agree to a Sandro lynch. His reluctance to defend himself, the way he talked about his scumreads (only mentioning names, barely any reasoning) and his lurking when under pressure are enough reasons for me to justify a vote. And even then this could be excusable... but he never mentions CaveJohnson as a scumread ever again in his filter. He's scum that forgot about one of his suspicions. In fact, the next time he metnions him, he's cooperative towards him: On November 29 2012 07:38 phagga wrote: CaveJohnson, I have 600 max HP, if you use me as Target A, I will be able to use this skill next night as well. Your action goes through normally, I get the same skill to use next night. If you trust me to be town, make me Target A instead of Acro. He improved. There was no need push him anymore on D3. Also, i was absent of the thread for most of D2 (which I announced beforehand). Regarding the last post, yes, I was pretty sure at that point that he is at least not scum. However, i was overeager when I wrote that post, I should have gone into this more cautiously, not revealing that much about me. I find it inconceivable that you thought CaveJohnson improved so much that you all of a sudden trusted him here. You went from convinced he was scum, to not mentioning him for days, to being super-cooperative with him. Cave maintained his "trolliness" throughout. Show nested quote + On November 30 2012 08:27 phagga wrote: On November 30 2012 08:14 phagga wrote: On November 30 2012 08:08 Hapahauli wrote: I mean really, just look at his D2 play: My list with reads on everyone has one person painted in bright red: CaveJohnson. That's were my vote goes for now. My vote is currently on CaveJohnson. Not finished with reading everything. Not feeling sure enough with Toad yet. I can agree to a Sandro lynch. His reluctance to defend himself, the way he talked about his scumreads (only mentioning names, barely any reasoning) and his lurking when under pressure are enough reasons for me to justify a vote. And even then this could be excusable... but he never mentions CaveJohnson as a scumread ever again in his filter. He's scum that forgot about one of his suspicions. In fact, the next time he metnions him, he's cooperative towards him: On November 29 2012 07:38 phagga wrote: CaveJohnson, I have 600 max HP, if you use me as Target A, I will be able to use this skill next night as well. Your action goes through normally, I get the same skill to use next night. If you trust me to be town, make me Target A instead of Acro. He improved. There was no need push him anymore on D3. Also, i was absent of the thread for most of D2 (which I announced beforehand). Regarding the last post, yes, I was pretty sure at that point that he is at least not scum. However, i was overeager when I wrote that post, I should have gone into this more cautiously, not revealing that much about me. Regarding the bolded, it was specifically the conversation about acro that made me rethink my stance on it. In his filter from here on: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=17025482 Also, several players stated that drazerk often plays irritating as town and scum. Many called him a coinflip. I took this into consideration. So my read changed from scum to null. Thing is, you didn't go from scum to null - you went from scum to seemingly complete trust in his ability. I can't rationalize that from a town perspective. I read his post like 30 minutes before deadline. I saw a chance for town to get a cool ability twice instead of only once. I got overexcited, posted to open without thinking. It's 1 am here, I will answer to your posts in the next 24 hours, hopefully in about 8. | ||
iamperfection
United States9634 Posts
On November 30 2012 09:03 Clarity_nl wrote: You scared me there iamp, thought I was pulling a Dieno. @ Hapa It's late, and I don't want to go through phagga's filter. Setup speculation is easy, and in a themed game it is also useful to an extent. You wanna be pissed go right ahead but it's not helping anyone. THINGS happened and you are at the shitty end of it at the moment, just keep doing what you're doing because no one is going to lynch you on this alone. I do however plan on reading phagga's and your filter tomorrow and try to get to some conclusions. Even Keir's "leaning scum" wasn't solely off of the setup stuff, so take a breath. maybe you should send actions in now you can always change it | ||
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
On November 30 2012 09:04 iamperfection wrote: Show nested quote + On November 30 2012 09:03 Clarity_nl wrote: You scared me there iamp, thought I was pulling a Dieno. @ Hapa It's late, and I don't want to go through phagga's filter. Setup speculation is easy, and in a themed game it is also useful to an extent. You wanna be pissed go right ahead but it's not helping anyone. THINGS happened and you are at the shitty end of it at the moment, just keep doing what you're doing because no one is going to lynch you on this alone. I do however plan on reading phagga's and your filter tomorrow and try to get to some conclusions. Even Keir's "leaning scum" wasn't solely off of the setup stuff, so take a breath. maybe you should send actions in now you can always change it What, just in case I get trapped down a hole for 24 hours? Ye of little faith | ||
iamperfection
United States9634 Posts
On November 30 2012 09:05 Clarity_nl wrote: Show nested quote + On November 30 2012 09:04 iamperfection wrote: On November 30 2012 09:03 Clarity_nl wrote: You scared me there iamp, thought I was pulling a Dieno. @ Hapa It's late, and I don't want to go through phagga's filter. Setup speculation is easy, and in a themed game it is also useful to an extent. You wanna be pissed go right ahead but it's not helping anyone. THINGS happened and you are at the shitty end of it at the moment, just keep doing what you're doing because no one is going to lynch you on this alone. I do however plan on reading phagga's and your filter tomorrow and try to get to some conclusions. Even Keir's "leaning scum" wasn't solely off of the setup stuff, so take a breath. maybe you should send actions in now you can always change it What, just in case I get trapped down a hole for 24 hours? Ye of little faith well ya. wouldn't want your demise getting in the way of victory | ||
Promethelax
Canada7089 Posts
On November 30 2012 09:05 Clarity_nl wrote: Show nested quote + On November 30 2012 09:04 iamperfection wrote: On November 30 2012 09:03 Clarity_nl wrote: You scared me there iamp, thought I was pulling a Dieno. @ Hapa It's late, and I don't want to go through phagga's filter. Setup speculation is easy, and in a themed game it is also useful to an extent. You wanna be pissed go right ahead but it's not helping anyone. THINGS happened and you are at the shitty end of it at the moment, just keep doing what you're doing because no one is going to lynch you on this alone. I do however plan on reading phagga's and your filter tomorrow and try to get to some conclusions. Even Keir's "leaning scum" wasn't solely off of the setup stuff, so take a breath. maybe you should send actions in now you can always change it What, just in case I get trapped down a hole for 24 hours? Ye of little faith Send in your party now. You can always change it later. | ||
Promethelax
Canada7089 Posts
On November 30 2012 09:01 Hapahauli wrote: And will someone read my goddamn case on Phagga already? The fact that a bunch of near-confirmed townies are herp-derping around is maddening. I read it. It wasn't the most convincing thing ever. I wish Phag posted more and some of his d1 stuff is incriminating but I feel like I couldn't build a case that would convince me he is scum. | ||
Hapahauli
United States9305 Posts
Oh, you imply that I hit on GK only because other people now wrote about him too? Wrong. Can I prove it? no. But in similar way I can say that you just started building a case on my after z-boson came at me. All I can say about that is that I really saw things I did not like and tried to point them out. I also think I do have some points that others did not mention. Others have written about GK too? Well, bad luck, there is a case about almost everyone in the game floating around by now, if it is about that I cannot go after anyone. Thing is, this is not just about GoodKarma. This is a well-established pattern of doing things that are "convenient." In addition to the stuff on GoodKarma, you also voted for Syllo when it was popular to do so. You also voted to lynch Sandrob under the same circumstances. It is the pattern, and not just your individual stance on GoodKarma that is damning. GK saw Sandro as town. If GK were scum, he would at least know that Sandro is not scum. GK wants to have sandro in his team. I don't like the reasoning of GK, I think its contradicting. I therefore make the hypothesis that if GK is scum, he takes Sandro (whom he knows not to be scum) on his team to look more townie. That's the whole story. I did not say anywhere in that post that I think that Sandro is town. Hell, i even write one paragraph earlier: " If GK thinks Sandro is so townie that you includes him in your team" (it should actually say "you" instead of "GK", but whatever). What about GK's previous analysis was "contradictory?" He wanted someone he thought was town on his team - that's pretty straightfoward to me. Eh, contradiction? I never attempted to make a read on Sandroba but wrote that he was slightly town? Also, I wrote why I voted kita. Because I don't know how Sandro and Syllo play, I therefore did not trust them. Not a contradiction. You never made a read on sandroba in your filter. In your defense, you mentioned that it was "implied" that you thought he was slightly town. And I absolutely don't buy your reasoning on Sandro and Syllo, since it's doubtful you knew how Kita played either. I read his (ed: CaveJohnson's) post like 30 minutes before deadline. I saw a chance for town to get a cool ability twice instead of only once. I got overexcited, posted to open without thinking. I really really doubt you magically "forgot" all your feelings about CaveJohnson after having him "bright red" in your "notes." I also doubt that you "forgot" to mention you read on him at all between D2 and now after heavily pushing for his lynch on D2. | ||
Hapahauli
United States9305 Posts
On November 30 2012 09:16 Promethelax wrote: Show nested quote + On November 30 2012 09:01 Hapahauli wrote: And will someone read my goddamn case on Phagga already? The fact that a bunch of near-confirmed townies are herp-derping around is maddening. I read it. It wasn't the most convincing thing ever. I wish Phag posted more and some of his d1 stuff is incriminating but I feel like I couldn't build a case that would convince me he is scum. How in the hell... Just look at his D2 actions: On November 23 2012 18:05 phagga wrote: My list with reads on everyone has one person painted in bright red: CaveJohnson. That's were my vote goes for now. However, my list is not up to date. I will try to go through several filters and update it, so I might make a more definite vote before Kita has to make his prediction. People who are also red in my list: - Goodkarma, although I REALLY have to go through his filter now. Have not done that yet. - BioSC, lurking hardcore although he was very excited pregame, as someone mentioned Other people I want to look into/know more about: - Sandroba, I read his filter yesterday. I want to hear more from him and what he says about the current accusations - Hopeless1der, I have "looks shady, check filter" note on him, but I don't know why anymore. Will clear this up. ##Vote CaveJohnson Read this and tell me it isn't a horrendously scummy post. He votes CaveJohnson for no reasoning. In fact he's never given any reasoning about his CJ read. He then proceeds to list 4 other potentially "scummy" players. Interestingly, his description of Sandroba is much milder than the others. He then affirms his vote on CJ (twice) before settling on Sandroba at the very end when it's clear Sandroba is going to get lynched. He never mentions CJ again until this: On November 29 2012 07:38 phagga wrote: CaveJohnson, I have 600 max HP, if you use me as Target A, I will be able to use this skill next night as well. Your action goes through normally, I get the same skill to use next night. If you trust me to be town, make me Target A instead of Acro. Where all of a sudden he's completely trusting of CJ's ability. Explain that 180 from a town perspective. Yet apparently you don't think he's scummy. Mmmmkay. | ||
Promethelax
Canada7089 Posts
| ||
Hapahauli
United States9305 Posts
On November 30 2012 09:32 Promethelax wrote: I would be super excited about taking that ability if it was possible and I had an ability which copied abilities directed at me I'd want a huge awesome sauce vig shot. Though Phag is an idiot for wanting it when he had 600 hp. Well duh yeah, but that doesn't change the fact that he thought CJ was scum throughout D2, never mentioned otherwise, then unequivocally trusts his ability in a last-minute scramble for night-actions. | ||
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
0 | ||
Hapahauli
United States9305 Posts
On November 30 2012 09:41 GreYMisT wrote: Bit late but 0 Oh snaaaaaaap. What's goin down? | ||
iamperfection
United States9634 Posts
Also that would be a pretty cool ability to steal if he is telling the truth. | ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 Counter-Strike Other Games Grubby2611 FrodaN2593 ceh9543 ArmadaUGS422 Lowko359 B2W.Neo289 Hui .244 XBOCT130 KnowMe118 Trikslyr69 mouzStarbuck29 OptimusSC24 Organizations StarCraft 2 Other Games StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War
StarCraft 2 • OhrlRock 2 StarCraft: Brood War• IndyKCrew • sooper7s • AfreecaTV YouTube • Migwel • Laughngamez YouTube • intothetv • LaughNgamezSOOP • Kozan Dota 2 League of Legends Other Games |
PiGosaur Monday
OlimoLeague
StarCraft2.fi
StarCraft2.fi
The PondCast
StarCraft2.fi
|
|