|
On August 06 2011 10:14 Curu wrote: tbh I just want to kill Coagulation cause he's going to have exactly 0 posts the rest of the game.
if you say so.
I voted trotske cause of the stupid breadcrumbs he was oblivious about. I dont see anyone scummier. I noticed alot of people ignored the question tho and Its probably a good idea to keep an eye on them also.
|
Exactly 1 post the rest of the game*
If this whole cult idea thing is legit, I think scumhunting is going to be a lot different than normal games. I don't have too much experience in games with cults though.
|
On August 06 2011 11:21 Coagulation wrote:Show nested quote +On August 06 2011 10:14 Curu wrote: tbh I just want to kill Coagulation cause he's going to have exactly 0 posts the rest of the game. if you say so. I voted trotske cause of the stupid breadcrumbs he was oblivious about. I dont see anyone scummier. I noticed alot of people ignored the question tho and Its probably a good idea to keep an eye on them also.
sorry for not thinking back to my PM before I posted.
|
United States4714 Posts
On August 06 2011 11:21 Coagulation wrote:
if you say so.
I voted trotske cause of the stupid breadcrumbs he was oblivious about. I dont see anyone scummier. I noticed alot of people ignored the question tho and Its probably a good idea to keep an eye on them also.
So why didn't you post that reason at the time of your vote? And trotske has done plenty of suspicious things since then. Last page he said red was the scummiest person yet voted curu. Every time someone asks troske his opinion he lists a different person he is suspicious of. But instead of bringing any of these points up you lurk not posting then only show up once someone votes for you. If you actually thought trotske was still the scummiest you could have made a case to actual push him for a lynch but you chose not to.
|
On August 06 2011 12:08 Mig wrote:Show nested quote +On August 06 2011 11:21 Coagulation wrote:
if you say so.
I voted trotske cause of the stupid breadcrumbs he was oblivious about. I dont see anyone scummier. I noticed alot of people ignored the question tho and Its probably a good idea to keep an eye on them also.
So why didn't you post that reason at the time of your vote? And trotske has done plenty of suspicious things since then. Last page he said red was the scummiest person yet voted curu. Every time someone asks troske his opinion he lists a different person he is suspicious of. But instead of bringing any of these points up you lurk not posting then only show up once someone votes for you. If you actually thought trotske was still the scummiest you could have made a case to actual push him for a lynch but you chose not to.
yes I did say I thought the scummiest person was red based off of a one game meta.....
|
On August 06 2011 12:44 Trotske wrote:Show nested quote +On August 06 2011 12:08 Mig wrote:On August 06 2011 11:21 Coagulation wrote:
if you say so.
I voted trotske cause of the stupid breadcrumbs he was oblivious about. I dont see anyone scummier. I noticed alot of people ignored the question tho and Its probably a good idea to keep an eye on them also.
So why didn't you post that reason at the time of your vote? And trotske has done plenty of suspicious things since then. Last page he said red was the scummiest person yet voted curu. Every time someone asks troske his opinion he lists a different person he is suspicious of. But instead of bringing any of these points up you lurk not posting then only show up once someone votes for you. If you actually thought trotske was still the scummiest you could have made a case to actual push him for a lynch but you chose not to. yes I did say I thought the scummiest person was red based off of a one game meta..... and then you immediately voted someone else. What gives?
|
Yeah the votes are really spread out. Perhaps we should narrow down candidates, so that we can actually have something to go on for later. In a recruiting set-up, it is generally accepted that vets get picked up nearly 90% of the time. The recruiter forces town to lose a valuable asset, while bolstering his team more effectively then normal. Aside from that, we don't have any evidence supporting that this so it shouldn't have any impact on who we lynch.
Mig, Curu, or redff are all viable picks, and we should probably keep it between these three unless someone feels otherwise.
|
btw, amber is grasping at straws for making people look scummy. A pretty obvious cult joke and he decides I'm the biggest threat to town?
Also, compare this game to both his day 1 in AA and his day 1 in PTP mafia. This looks so much more like his scum play
OMGUS
##Unvote ##Vote Amber[LighT]
|
Mig,curu and redff are all viable picks based on what? If it's because you consider those the most likely recruiter targets, I disagree. We should keep between them unless someone feels otherwise? We already have people mostly voting for other candidates so that seems rather nonsensical
|
I agree bum that curu is a fine choice if we have no other options but I'd really like to know why you think the other two are viable.
I'm about to go on car trip which will last 11 or 12 hours so I won't be here for the lynch. My vote is staying on Amber, his one post did nothing to sway me and in fact it made me even more suspicious.
|
On August 06 2011 18:12 Palmar wrote: btw, amber is grasping at straws for making people look scummy. A pretty obvious cult joke and he decides I'm the biggest threat to town?
Also, compare this game to both his day 1 in AA and his day 1 in PTP mafia. This looks so much more like his scum play
OMGUS
##Unvote ##Vote Amber[LighT]
OMGUS? More like "I cant believe you're not dead already." Two people have chosen to use meta play as a reason for why I'm scummy, despite my meta changing each and every game. You're both on the radar since you haven't proven to me how you're not scum. Palmar you are the best lynch:
1. You were kidding around pre-game with your cult nonsense to draw out some people. Your most detailed post was one that didn't even matter to the game:
+ Show Spoiler +On August 04 2011 21:45 Palmar wrote: Cultist - Cult of Palmar Do you think you have what it takes to become a premier cultist? Then Cult of Palmar might be the right Cult for you! We are looking for world class cultists to bolster our ranks, bring in expertise and help us develop an even better Cult. As a Cultist your responsibilities would be to spread the ideas of the Cult to the uninitiated and of course eternal loyalty to the Cult leader. A successful candidate must possess these qualification: - A strong belief in the Cult's values
- Fierce loyalty
- The willingness to sacrifice his own time (or soul) for the good of the Cult
- Proficiency in Black Magic
In addition, the following skills would increase the chance of being hired - Knowledge of potions
- Owning a creepy black hooded cloak
- Photoshop experience
The right candidate will be someone who fulfills the above while showing passion and will to join the Cult. For the right person we can offer immortality, or at least an extended life cycle, in addition to power beyond imagination.* Please leave your applications in this thread, I will look them over and hire the best candidates tomorrow. The Cult of Palmar is a global Cult devoted to the ideas of it's glorious leader, Palmar. The Cult has followers in at least 2 countries and one planet. Our mission is to spread the Cult as far as we can and eventually bring darkness onto the world. * May not apply to individuals with very vivid imagination
2. Then you disappear and make silly accusations and useless posts. See:
+ Show Spoiler +On August 05 2011 17:54 Palmar wrote: I think we should lynch Mig or redFF On August 05 2011 18:32 Palmar wrote: ##Vote redFF On August 05 2011 18:42 Palmar wrote: it's not the intentions thing, it's the fact that he felt the need to back up his methodology with something like "they do it on that other forum". That's just a safety net for if the town hates him for it. On August 05 2011 19:14 Palmar wrote:Show nested quote +On August 05 2011 18:55 bumatlarge wrote:On August 05 2011 18:45 syllogism wrote: Varpulis riddle sounds somehow familiar; perhaps the same concept with different words but I can't quite place it. As to the card puzzle, it feels like there's information missing if it points to a safe combination. For instance, if LEVIATHAN refers to bible, the combination could be 41:1-41:34, but would that mean 41 right, 1 right, 41 left, 34 left or what? Also is there a significance to part of the word combination being cut off? In the light of first puzzle, I think we shouldn't overthink the answers. Jesus, you are smart. There is a reason my scumtell no1 is to kill syllo n1. On August 05 2011 19:24 Palmar wrote: And don't forget the basics, the number of the beast is 666 On August 06 2011 07:22 Palmar wrote: haha I dismissed that shit too.
3. It's not until someone finally decides to throw a vote onto you that you weasel your way out of the situation by piggy-backing onto another individual.
Palmar I'm wondering why the first post with content appeared to be a diversion post to cover your own ass. That's scummy play. You didn't even use an idea that was your own. Instead, you took the easy way out and just threw yourself onto Meapaks idea because you know I'm not a threat to the town, but you want to make this lynch "ezpz" for your cult.
4. Your "meta" is not consistent with your town play either.
I don't really want to go down this road, but since you prodded me I'll hit back. You want to talk about past games? I remember you being really active in EVERY game we've played together [PTP1, AA, PTP2, etc]. You were never scum afaik, aside from black, which is a whole different can of worms. This game you're not being so active. Your post count is a bit lower than normal, and I'm wondering why you're being so reserved. You weren't working on the puzzles the whole time, were you?
So Palmar I'll ask you:
What should we do about items? Should we disclose them or hide them from public view? Why?
Are there any details about your room that you didn't disclose?
|
Mig, I'm curious to hear what you think about Palmar's play so far
|
On August 06 2011 23:17 Meapak_Ziphh wrote: I agree bum that curu is a fine choice if we have no other options but I'd really like to know why you think the other two are viable.
I'm about to go on car trip which will last 11 or 12 hours so I won't be here for the lynch. My vote is staying on Amber, his one post did nothing to sway me and in fact it made me even more suspicious.
If you still think I'm scum there's not much I can do. There's no way for me to protect myself from a lynch.
My meta that game was pretty 'meh' compared to Palmars example anyway. The apathy thing really came into play once RoL rage-quitted the game :/
|
On August 06 2011 13:03 redFF wrote:Show nested quote +On August 06 2011 12:44 Trotske wrote:On August 06 2011 12:08 Mig wrote:On August 06 2011 11:21 Coagulation wrote:
if you say so.
I voted trotske cause of the stupid breadcrumbs he was oblivious about. I dont see anyone scummier. I noticed alot of people ignored the question tho and Its probably a good idea to keep an eye on them also.
So why didn't you post that reason at the time of your vote? And trotske has done plenty of suspicious things since then. Last page he said red was the scummiest person yet voted curu. Every time someone asks troske his opinion he lists a different person he is suspicious of. But instead of bringing any of these points up you lurk not posting then only show up once someone votes for you. If you actually thought trotske was still the scummiest you could have made a case to actual push him for a lynch but you chose not to. yes I did say I thought the scummiest person was red based off of a one game meta..... and then you immediately voted someone else. What gives?
know what I'm tired of this shit lets lynch redFF. for all I know he really is scum and is trying to make it look like i'm his scum buddy.
He falls under the vet category, I think his meta is wrong based off one game, and he won't tell us what his item is.
I feel like if there is a recruiter type role then they will come after people with items, RedFF has an item.
we need to watch syllogism for changes considering he is a beast at solving puzzles.
|
|
Vote count so far. ~7 hours left
Trotske: Coagulation
Amber[light]: Meapak_Ziphh Palmar
Mig: bumatlarge
redFF:
Palmar Trotske
Meapak_Ziphh:
Mig
Varpulis: redFF
Curu:
Trotske
Coagulation: Curu Mig
Palmar: Amber[LighT]
|
K my thoughts. Amber is actually making posts and fos'ing people and doing analysis, which is more then i've seen him do as scum. Trotske just isn't very good.
On August 06 2011 18:10 bumatlarge wrote: Yeah the votes are really spread out. Perhaps we should narrow down candidates, so that we can actually have something to go on for later. In a recruiting set-up, it is generally accepted that vets get picked up nearly 90% of the time. The recruiter forces town to lose a valuable asset, while bolstering his team more effectively then normal. Aside from that, we don't have any evidence supporting that this so it shouldn't have any impact on who we lynch.
Mig, Curu, or redff are all viable picks, and we should probably keep it between these three unless someone feels otherwise. I don't like the last part of his post. He's basically saying "let's lynch into these 3 people because I said so. Honestly all it loos like is mafia Trying to control town/divert lynches. Bum, why not keep it between coag, amber and Palmar instead?
|
On August 07 2011 00:16 redFF wrote:K my thoughts. Amber is actually making posts and fos'ing people and doing analysis, which is more then i've seen him do as scum. Trotske just isn't very good. Show nested quote +On August 06 2011 18:10 bumatlarge wrote: Yeah the votes are really spread out. Perhaps we should narrow down candidates, so that we can actually have something to go on for later. In a recruiting set-up, it is generally accepted that vets get picked up nearly 90% of the time. The recruiter forces town to lose a valuable asset, while bolstering his team more effectively then normal. Aside from that, we don't have any evidence supporting that this so it shouldn't have any impact on who we lynch.
Mig, Curu, or redff are all viable picks, and we should probably keep it between these three unless someone feels otherwise. I don't like the last part of his post. He's basically saying "let's lynch into these 3 people because I said so. Honestly all it loos like is mafia Trying to control town/divert lynches. Bum, why not keep it between coag, amber and Palmar instead?
isn't calling someone bad and dismissing their argument because of it a classic scum tell?
|
The votes are so spread out that I'll rather vote to lynch someone who isn't going to be useful or make his alignment apparent than risk lynching someone more active when scum can potentially just redirect the lynch. I'll be around for the lynch though so I'll re-evaluate if necessary.
##vote Coagulation
|
l-++[B]On August 06 2011 23:41 Amber[LighT] wrote:[/B
I don't really want to go down this road, but since you prodded me I'll hit back. You want to talk about past games? I remember you being really active in EVERY game we've played together [PTP1, AA, PTP2, etc]. You were never scum afaik, aside from black, which is a whole different can of worms. This game you're not being so active. Your post count is a bit lower than normal, and I'm wondering why you're being so reserved. You weren't working on the puzzles the whole time, were you?
You don't really want to go down this road? Why not? If you think I'm scum why wouldn't you want to use every possible way to nail me as scum? This is just you being wishy washy and trying to reduce the blame you take when I flip town, should you manage to get me lynched.
The reason for my lack of activity is simply that I'm 400km away from home doing a weekend in the country thing with my fiance's family.
You're not really into this lynch are you? you just want to slide by on an easy off-vote so you don't have to take responsibility.
Go for it town, it's time to kill Amber[LighT], I'm pretty damn sure he's scum.
|
|
|
|