• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 10:00
CEST 16:00
KST 23:00
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Code S RO8 Preview: Rogue, GuMiho, Solar, Maru3BGE Stara Zagora 2025: Info & Preview27Code S RO12 Preview: GuMiho, Bunny, SHIN, ByuN3The Memories We Share - Facing the Final(?) GSL47Code S RO12 Preview: Cure, Zoun, Solar, Creator4
Community News
BGE Stara Zagora 2025 - Replay Pack2Weekly Cups (June 2-8): herO doubles down1[BSL20] ProLeague: Bracket Stage & Dates9GSL Ro4 and Finals moved to Sunday June 15th13Weekly Cups (May 27-June 1): ByuN goes back-to-back0
StarCraft 2
General
The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation Jim claims he and Firefly were involved in match-fixing DreamHack Dallas 2025 - Official Replay Pack BGE Stara Zagora 2025 - Replay Pack Code S RO8 Preview: Rogue, GuMiho, Solar, Maru
Tourneys
[GSL 2025] Code S:Season 2 - RO8 - Group A Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) Bellum Gens Elite: Stara Zagora 2025 $3,500 WardiTV European League 2025
Strategy
[G] Darkgrid Layout Simple Questions Simple Answers [G] PvT Cheese: 13 Gate Proxy Robo
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 477 Slow and Steady Mutation # 476 Charnel House Mutation # 475 Hard Target Mutation # 474 Futile Resistance
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion BGH auto balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ FlaSh Witnesses SCV Pull Off the Impossible vs Shu StarCraft & BroodWar Campaign Speedrun Quest Will foreigners ever be able to challenge Koreans?
Tourneys
[ASL19] Grand Finals [BSL20] GosuLeague RO16 - Tue & Wed 20:00+CET NA Team League 6/8/2025 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues
Strategy
I am doing this better than progamers do. [G] How to get started on ladder as a new Z player
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile What do you want from future RTS games? Armies of Exigo - YesYes?
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
LiquidLegends to reintegrate into TL.net
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread UK Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Vape Nation Thread
Fan Clubs
Maru Fan Club Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Korean Music Discussion [Manga] One Piece
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
A Better Routine For Progame…
TrAiDoS
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Heero Yuy & the Tax…
KrillinFromwales
I was completely wrong ab…
jameswatts
Need Your Help/Advice
Glider
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 31079 users

World at War 2 Mafia

Forum Index > TL Mafia
Post a Reply
1 2 3 4 Next All
chaos13
Profile Joined April 2011
Canada885 Posts
June 27 2011 19:30 GMT
#15
This looks like it will hurt my brain.

/in
chaos13
Profile Joined April 2011
Canada885 Posts
July 04 2011 03:12 GMT
#98
When are we starting?
chaos13
Profile Joined April 2011
Canada885 Posts
July 05 2011 00:51 GMT
#121
Dibs on Conspirator.

chaos13
Profile Joined April 2011
Canada885 Posts
July 05 2011 04:22 GMT
#146
DON'T GO. I WANT MY ROLE.


chaos13
Profile Joined April 2011
Canada885 Posts
July 05 2011 04:30 GMT
#150
Thanks Original

This game looks like it will be confusing as hell.

I basically agree with what has already been said. Do not nuke without great cause
chaos13
Profile Joined April 2011
Canada885 Posts
July 05 2011 06:15 GMT
#160
I shouldn't have to tell you why that is a bad idea.

How many lives do you have?

Uhh one.

Okay, let's test that. *Nuke*

*dies* told you so


Not only does that raise the radiation level, it also kills more people. Our scum reads in this game will probably be less accurate than normal.

So, let me say this.

Play this like you would a normal mafia game

Forget about nukes. Use them if need be. Do not make up shitty plans utilizing them. They will not help us. Treat them as vigi shots to use if people are being anti-town or are confirmed scum. They are not to be used in any other situation.
chaos13
Profile Joined April 2011
Canada885 Posts
July 05 2011 13:08 GMT
#254
On July 05 2011 21:41 Palmar wrote:
Here's what I think about your plan

##Nuke: Sandroba


Don't try to be a hero. Not only have you already stated you have no nukes, making this worthless and not about to help anything, but it's the night phase and you can't even use actions. If you don't agree with his plan, don't follow it. Simple as that. So far I'm seeing ten pages of "herp" "derp" "herp" "derp".
I don't agree with any of the plans that have been proposed, and people didn't agree with what I suggested in lieu of them. All this arguing is doing is giving scum and conspirators a barrier to hide behind, and I can guarantee you that the conspirator(s) are somewhere in this discussion trying to influence our nuke policies. Have we done any scumhunting so far? No.

So here's the deal. Come day 1, absolutely no more discussion about nuke policy. If we haven't decided on anything by then, too bad, but at that point we start scumhunting. This means that if you have a plan that you want put into effect, you need to be persuasive. If you have a plan, outline it as follows.

(Your Name)'s Plan for Not Letting the Conspirator Win

Nuke Policy
Fire/Don't Fire under the following circumstances:

Punishment
This is what happens if you break the rules:

Why
Explanation for why this is the best plan:

Support
How does this plan compare to WaW 1? How could it have affected the results of that game?

Other Tidbits
Anything else you want to say.

##Vote: (Your Name)'s Plan


And people will vote on your plan. The goal for these plans will be to have 12/29 players vote for them. This is relatively close to a majority, and is achievable for anyone. If we're getting close to the end of day and no plan is close to achieving it, you'll have to consider moving your vote to a different one. If no plan results in 12/29 votes, we don't follow through with it. If we do, every player is required to follow it, and if you do not, you are lynched. A plan must follow the format as outlined above in order to be eligible for voting.

Now stop derping and get stuff done.
chaos13
Profile Joined April 2011
Canada885 Posts
July 05 2011 13:24 GMT
#264
On July 05 2011 22:20 sandroba wrote:
@chaos13 as you can see my plan is extremelly pro-town and is gaining momentum. Now is the perfect time to discuss plans since the game has not even started. Most reasonable people are agreeing with it and others are trying to shut it down for no sane reason. If you don't agree with it you better provide some reason. We will not leave it to be discussed day1 when we have to focus on who to lynch. Also if you think I haven't done scum hunting so far you are in for a surprise.


That's exactly why I posted that. This has it outlined in a clear manner that I can easily see, and I'm making sure I know what's going on by day 1. After sleeping on it I came to the conclusion that we do need some form of structure in regards to nukes. The plan GM just outlined looks good to me, so long as it isn't the 24 hour lynch-nuke-24 hour lynch. I say we do 1 lynch/day. That needs some clarification to me before I vote on it. Will we nuke the top lynch target at 24 hours?
chaos13
Profile Joined April 2011
Canada885 Posts
July 05 2011 13:30 GMT
#267
On July 05 2011 22:26 sandroba wrote:
@chaos13 LOL why would you pass on the opportunity of having 2 lynches per night cylce?


Because one of those lynches raises the radiation level and we have half the time to decide on each lynch. 1 well-discussed, well-thought out lynch > 2 hasty lynches that +1 Radiation

Other than that I think the GMroba plan is brilliant, and I would vote for it without that. As it is though, I'm leaning towards Palmar's. The only problem with his is that I'm not sure there is great enough deterrence for nuking someone without good enough reason.
chaos13
Profile Joined April 2011
Canada885 Posts
July 05 2011 13:34 GMT
#272
I respectfully disagree

##Vote: Palmar's plan
chaos13
Profile Joined April 2011
Canada885 Posts
July 05 2011 17:11 GMT
#312
I will support the GMroba plan as outlined here since Palmar retracted his. I didn't realize day was starting so soon, so we didn't have time to get 12 votes, but this will work anyway. From now on, no more arguing nuke policy. This is it.

On July 05 2011 22:17 GMarshal wrote:
GMrobas's Plan for Not Letting the Conspirator Win

Nuke Policy
One nuke is shot per day, if a majority of players (50%) agrees to it. no other nukes are fired for any reason

Punishment
Policy lynched, no excuses allowed, you fire, you die.

Why
double lynch, increased information, decent use of kp, no need to fire if its not necessary/an appropriate target cannot be deiced upon

Support
Its not a clusterfuck

Other Tidbits
Hi coag.

##Vote: GMroba's plan


And I am all for not nuking anyone or anything today. If someone nukes, I say we lynch them.


As for the campaigns, what I think it comes down to is whether we think the Axis or the Conspirator are a bigger threat.

The Dunkirk Operation will be good if we manage to get rid of the conspirator quickly, but as it is the Axis will just use more nukes killing these players and we end up with dead Allies and higher radiation levels.

Operation Watchtower is decent. It stops the Conspirator's progress completely for a day, removes Axis firepower, but also removes Allied firepower. This one would be more powerful later in the game when we need to keep ourselves alive.

Operation Gunnerside is brilliant. Not only does it remove Axis firepower, it helps keep radiation levels down. It helps us and harms two threats - both Conspirator and Axis.

##Operation Gunnerside

chaos13
Profile Joined April 2011
Canada885 Posts
July 05 2011 17:13 GMT
#315
Keep in mind the extra lives are granted only to Boreritish Commanders. There are plenty (probably majority) of Allied players who are not Boreritish Commanders.
chaos13
Profile Joined April 2011
Canada885 Posts
July 05 2011 23:30 GMT
#392
On July 06 2011 08:26 deconduo wrote:
There's quite a few people lurking, we should start pressuring a few of them at least.


I've been guilty of this, but I've been busy all day so I've just had a chance to skim through some posts and not be very active. I should be more active this evening and (hopefully?) tomorrow, but I've got stuff to do now that I'm done school.
chaos13
Profile Joined April 2011
Canada885 Posts
July 06 2011 01:33 GMT
#409
On July 05 2011 18:37 sandroba wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 05 2011 18:18 prplhz wrote:
I think the whole idea that nukes can be used in a controlled way is absurd .. it may work but if it backfires it could really mean disaster and I don't think it's worth the risk. I suggest we just go about this game as if noone would have any reason to nuke ever unless they are conspirators. The whole "I think maybe we can use this many nukes before the earth self destructs" is a pretty bad gamble. Imagine if someone suggested it irl.

So far I'm pretty skeptical towards sandroba and GMarshal 'cause they are quite foolishly proposing that we use nukes in a controlled way, something that can only lead to disaster. Not so much about Chaos13. Also stop talking about confirmed scum.


I sugest you go read WaW 1 before posting nonsense like this. How is controling nukes is gonna lead to disaster as oposed to NOT controling nukes? It's been proven already that if we don't control it leads to many townie deaths. People nuke each other out of spite and because someone else nuked a player and he flipped town. Mafia has measly 1 kp this game, if we get 2 days worth of lynch per night we are going to rape them, unless people go about killing each other.

@Palmar can you provide reasoning as to why this plan is bad?


Am I missing something, or is this a blatant scum slip? Where has Caller stated the mafia KP?
chaos13
Profile Joined April 2011
Canada885 Posts
July 06 2011 01:36 GMT
#410
Yeah, I don't see it posted anywhere.

##Vote: sandroba
chaos13
Profile Joined April 2011
Canada885 Posts
July 06 2011 01:42 GMT
#411
On July 06 2011 09:18 kitaman27 wrote:

Show nested quote +
On July 05 2011 22:08 chaos13 wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +
(Your Name)'s Plan for Not Letting the Conspirator Win

Nuke Policy
Fire/Don't Fire under the following circumstances:

Punishment
This is what happens if you break the rules:

Why
Explanation for why this is the best plan:

Support
How does this plan compare to WaW 1? How could it have affected the results of that game?

Other Tidbits
Anything else you want to say.

[b]##Vote: (Your Name)'s Plan[/b[


Why are you proposing a formatting for plan submission without posting a plan yourself? That seems kinda weird.



I didn't have a better plan, but I was confused about the ones that had already been suggested. This outline made sure that they were explained clearly, and organized people's opinions on them. Well, it would have if we had a longer N0. As it was, the day cycle started earlier than I expected it to.
chaos13
Profile Joined April 2011
Canada885 Posts
July 06 2011 01:47 GMT
#413
On July 06 2011 10:46 Curu wrote:
Sandroba has a scumslip but at least he didn't vote for Operation Gunnerside (if he had after initial conversations with him, I would have bandwagoned the fuck out of him).

That said IMO lurkers hurt Town more than anything else. With a full active playerbase Mafia has to be active meaning more chances for scumslips and important information leaking out. If they can just hide in the lurkers, we have nothing to go on.

I'd like to lure out Cthsazsa, Zona , ~OpZ~ or gtrsrs as they haven't posted -anything- at all. Looks like there's one other for Zona so let's get that started.

##Vote: Zona


..you agree that he made a scum slip...and you vote for someone else.





What the fuck?
chaos13
Profile Joined April 2011
Canada885 Posts
July 06 2011 01:50 GMT
#414
Ah, I see this has already been addressed.

On July 05 2011 19:12 sandroba wrote:
@Curu Based on last game. I thought I read it in the op, but it says "night kills", so I'm probably wrong. Still all the more incentive to have double lynches every day.
Vigs work well because they are hidden and can claim their shot in thread afterwards to confirm themselves etc (since they are protown in most setups). Nukes are NOTHING like that because they have to be announced in thread, which tends to generate hate and retaliation when the player flips green and turn into a chain reaction of townie deaths. Independant thinking is gonna lead us to disaster, you can mark my words (or read WaW 1). If you want to nuke a player that badly just fucking explain us why and we will vote on it.



Rest assured sandroba that if I leave my vote on you, it won't be for this. I'm back reading through the thread and taking notes so I'll have a better idea of what's going on in a bit.

What time does Day 1 end?
chaos13
Profile Joined April 2011
Canada885 Posts
July 06 2011 01:56 GMT
#417
Yeah sorry about that Curu. I just got to where you called him out on it after I posted that.
chaos13
Profile Joined April 2011
Canada885 Posts
July 06 2011 02:02 GMT
#419
On July 06 2011 10:55 sinani206 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 06 2011 10:51 Curu wrote:
On July 06 2011 10:47 chaos13 wrote:
On July 06 2011 10:46 Curu wrote:
Sandroba has a scumslip but at least he didn't vote for Operation Gunnerside (if he had after initial conversations with him, I would have bandwagoned the fuck out of him).

That said IMO lurkers hurt Town more than anything else. With a full active playerbase Mafia has to be active meaning more chances for scumslips and important information leaking out. If they can just hide in the lurkers, we have nothing to go on.

I'd like to lure out Cthsazsa, Zona , ~OpZ~ or gtrsrs as they haven't posted -anything- at all. Looks like there's one other for Zona so let's get that started.

##Vote: Zona


..you agree that he made a scum slip...and you vote for someone else.





What the fuck?


Willing to give the benefit of the doubt for now. If you notice, I'm the one that called him out on the scumslip first so believe me I'm putting weight into it. sandroba's been more active than most though and his posts actually have content in them.

My vote on him hinged on what operation he voted for and the one he did choose didn't set off my alarms.

Nothing is more dangerous than scum being able to hide amongst Townie lurkers so that's my modus operandi until all the lurkers start doing something useful.


This post is scummy as fuck.

It sounds like you and sandroba are both scum, and you screwed up by sharing his scumslip and now you want to come back and defend your ally.

Why should your vote hinge (to use your word) on which operation he voted for? Your vote should be for the scummiest player.

The whole lurker excuse is complete bullshit.

##Vote: sandroba
I propose a nuke of Curu


Not only is this an OMGUS, it encourages nukes. Do you really think your reads will be that accurate on Day 1? No nukes Day 1.
1 2 3 4 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 10h
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Harstem 417
ProTech82
EnDerr 71
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 11549
Calm 4954
Rain 4376
Bisu 2729
Horang2 1912
Jaedong 1675
Shuttle 1515
ajuk12(nOOB) 713
BeSt 540
EffOrt 516
[ Show more ]
ZerO 365
Mini 339
Light 291
Soulkey 273
Snow 257
ggaemo 192
hero 148
Pusan 140
Last 138
Dewaltoss 106
TY 86
Sharp 72
Shine 58
JYJ51
[sc1f]eonzerg 46
Mong 42
ToSsGirL 42
Barracks 38
sSak 35
Movie 34
Sacsri 34
Aegong 19
Nal_rA 13
IntoTheRainbow 11
HiyA 11
zelot 10
Terrorterran 8
Dota 2
Gorgc2733
qojqva2663
XcaliburYe344
Fuzer 255
Counter-Strike
markeloff134
allub110
edward72
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor180
Other Games
singsing2930
B2W.Neo1876
DeMusliM592
XBOCT292
crisheroes244
Lowko176
XaKoH 115
ArmadaUGS70
QueenE34
ZerO(Twitch)12
Organizations
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Secondary Stream11102
Other Games
BasetradeTV31
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 11 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Other Games
• WagamamaTV169
Upcoming Events
Online Event
10h
Replay Cast
12h
GSL Code S
19h 30m
herO vs Zoun
Classic vs Bunny
The PondCast
20h
Replay Cast
1d 10h
WardiTV Invitational
1d 21h
OSC
1d 23h
Korean StarCraft League
2 days
SOOP
2 days
CranKy Ducklings
2 days
[ Show More ]
WardiTV Invitational
2 days
Cheesadelphia
3 days
CSO Cup
3 days
GSL Code S
3 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Wardi Open
4 days
Replay Cast
5 days
Replay Cast
5 days
RSL Revival
5 days
Cure vs Percival
ByuN vs Spirit
RSL Revival
6 days
herO vs sOs
Zoun vs Clem
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Season 17: Qualifier 2
BGE Stara Zagora 2025
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
BSL Season 20
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
NPSL S3
Rose Open S1
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
2025 GSL S2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025
YaLLa Compass Qatar 2025
PGL Bucharest 2025
BLAST Open Spring 2025

Upcoming

Copa Latinoamericana 4
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
SEL Season 2 Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
HSC XXVII
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.