• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 12:01
CEST 18:01
KST 01:01
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy4Code S RO8 Preview: herO, Zoun, Bunny, Classic7Code S RO8 Preview: Rogue, GuMiho, Solar, Maru3BGE Stara Zagora 2025: Info & Preview27Code S RO12 Preview: GuMiho, Bunny, SHIN, ByuN3
Community News
Code S RO8 Results + RO4 Bracket (2025 Season 2)10BGE Stara Zagora 2025 - Replay Pack2Weekly Cups (June 2-8): herO doubles down1[BSL20] ProLeague: Bracket Stage & Dates9GSL Ro4 and Finals moved to Sunday June 15th13
StarCraft 2
General
Code S RO8 Results + RO4 Bracket (2025 Season 2) feardragon: Blizzards biggest blunder with SC was… TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation How herO can make history in the Code S S2 finals
Tourneys
RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series [GSL 2025] Code S: Season 2 - Ro8 - Group A [GSL 2025] Code S: Season 2 - Ro8 - Group B SOOPer7s Showmatches 2025 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament
Strategy
[G] Darkgrid Layout Simple Questions Simple Answers [G] PvT Cheese: 13 Gate Proxy Robo
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 477 Slow and Steady Mutation # 476 Charnel House Mutation # 475 Hard Target Mutation # 474 Futile Resistance
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion BGH auto balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Recent recommended BW games FlaSh Witnesses SCV Pull Off the Impossible vs Shu StarCraft & BroodWar Campaign Speedrun Quest
Tourneys
Small VOD Thread 2.0 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL20] ProLeague Bracket Stage - Day 4 [BSL20] ProLeague Bracket Stage - Day 3
Strategy
I am doing this better than progamers do. [G] How to get started on ladder as a new Z player
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile Beyond All Reason What do you want from future RTS games?
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine UK Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Vape Nation Thread
Fan Clubs
Maru Fan Club Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Korean Music Discussion [Manga] One Piece
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread NHL Playoffs 2024 TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
A Better Routine For Progame…
TrAiDoS
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Heero Yuy & the Tax…
KrillinFromwales
I was completely wrong ab…
jameswatts
Need Your Help/Advice
Glider
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 24912 users

Dynamic Unit Movements, Your Thoughts?

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
1 2 3 4 5 38 39 40 Next All
CanucksJC
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
Canada1241 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-05-17 23:08:48
May 17 2011 00:55 GMT
#1
This is a translation from a thread posted on PlayXP.
Sorry for the messy translation lol :D

[edit] I'm adding the link to the petition Zapdos_Smithh started to get this change implemented in the future:
http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/dynamicmovementsc2/

[image loading]
[image loading]
[image loading]
[image loading]
[image loading]
[image loading]

In SCBW and W3, units move while avoiding friendly units,
but in SC2, units move while pushing their own friendly units. (when on hold position, they avoid each other)
This is where units tend to clump up, and this happens even when you move them just a couple of times.
Units also clump up in small numbers as well.

If you watch SCBW games, units don't push each other around, so the space around each unit is always changning, and this results in a dynamic movement.
If you only move with one control group, units show the same dynamic movement.
I think this is very important for e-sports.

If I had to list the advantages of removing the clumping of units:

1. (the most important) Unit movements become more dynamic.
Even if you hotkey them separately, those small groups will move like a clump of jelly anyways. It doesn't look natural, and your army looks smaller than it actually is.

2. It's easier to tell the difference between units.
SCBW is in 2-d and it uses less colours, while SC2 is 3-d and uses a variety of colours. So it's easier to differentiate units in SCBW. You can tell this by playing SC2 in the lowest graphic settings.
The lowest graphic setting allows you to tell the difference between units and the difference between units and map tiles much more effectively.

3. You can weaken the power of splash units.
If you look at the units that do splash damage,
siege mode tanks, thor's air attack, ghost's EMP and nuclear missile, raven's HSM, colossus, high templar's storm, infestor's fungal growth,
most of them have been nerfed since beta.
One reason why they are so strong is because units always move together in clumps.
Some people will tell you to separate your units beforehand, but they clump up again when you move them around to attack.

4. The firepower decreases and the duration of battles increases.
One of the main issues with SC2 since the release was that the battles didn't last very long.
Along with complaints such as 'the maps are too narrow', 'the game time is too fast', I think this is a legit explanation as well. This is why we should change the tendency for units to clump together.

If we end up getting rid of this issue, or units move more like in SCBW and W3, we probably need to tweak the balance again.
However, if balance is something that needs to be gradually fixed, this issue should be something we need to change right now.
As a SCBW and SC2 player, and an e-sports viewer, I write this to plead my case.

Source:http://www.playxp.com/sc2/forum/view.php?article_id=2766172
UBC StarCraft Club is official @ UBC Vancouver campus! Your first eSport community on campus. Welcomes players of all levels at UBC. Follow us on facebook page: http://www.facebook.com/home.php#!/group.php?gid=155630424470014 or IRC @ irc.rizon.net #ubcsc
HawaiianPig
Profile Blog Joined July 2008
Canada5155 Posts
May 17 2011 00:57 GMT
#2
This is really promising, and I've always maintained that blob on blob action is a big part of why SC2 is... the way it is, but I have trouble imagining Blizzard would implement such a massive change.
AdministratorNot actually Hawaiian.
snozberry
Profile Joined May 2011
United States126 Posts
May 17 2011 00:57 GMT
#3
it would be excellent, battles seem like a crapshoot sometimes with all the clumping
Koshi
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
Belgium38797 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-05-17 01:00:32
May 17 2011 01:00 GMT
#4
Everything you state would make this game more interesting IF it pays out like you say it will. However, by changing the dynamic unit movement you will also change the game. I don't know if I like that part.

SCII is good as it is. For now.
I had a good night of sleep.
Tarot
Profile Joined February 2011
Canada440 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-05-17 01:18:06
May 17 2011 01:00 GMT
#5
This change would be amazing, but its very unlikely that Blizzard would do such a thing.

edit: Watching a 200 protoss "deathball" with half a dozen colossus move around looks so... bad...

There was a thread before:
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=198840
Where the unit collision sizes were all increased. I think this is a pretty good way of 'fixing' the issue without having to revamp the pathing AI in the game.
VGhost
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States3613 Posts
May 17 2011 01:01 GMT
#6
I'm all for reducing the clumping effect (I've thought for a while that it looks unnatural), but it seems to me that it runs the risk of (re?)introducing stupid AI when moving large control groups around - blocked units will go up ramps etc.

Of course, depending on your point of view that might not be a bad this (more micro potentially?).

And even if it is a good idea for gameplay reasons, how would something like that be changed, reasonably speaking? It might be possible to introduce it in HotS but it's changing a big thing in the game - beta would have been the time to do this.
#4427 || I am not going to scan a ferret.
WinteRR
Profile Joined May 2011
Australia201 Posts
May 17 2011 01:01 GMT
#7
Very good article. I agree with it. This is probably the reason why siege tanks in SC2 seem so 'strong' when in comparison to their BW counterpart do relatively little damage. I feel this would be a good change to the game (especially to the colossus IMHO).
joshboy42
Profile Joined August 2010
Australia116 Posts
May 17 2011 01:01 GMT
#8
I think it would be difficult to implement this option now, because a lot of the aoe/splash damage abilities in sc2 are balanced around the fact that units generally clump (and it becomes the responsibility of the user's micro ability to keep them spread).

Micro battles like marine splitting against banelings, for instance, would become almost obsolete (and banelings themselves would be significantly weakened). It wasn't such an issue in wc3 I don't think, because of the size of the armies you would be individually controlling units anyway, but with 200/200 armies auto spreading I don't know if that would be a good thing for the game.
eat this cheese without farting and you can sleep with my sister
gogogadgetflow
Profile Joined March 2010
United States2583 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-05-17 01:02:52
May 17 2011 01:01 GMT
#9
PlayXP is really stuck in the past eh? I'm not a fan of zeroing out all of the balance work blizzard has done so far in pursuit of something which may or may not improve the game, and where all the arguments come from different games.
RinconH
Profile Joined April 2010
United States512 Posts
May 17 2011 01:01 GMT
#10
It's a cool idea and I'd like to see it but it would change the game dramatically imo.
jrkirby
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States1510 Posts
May 17 2011 01:02 GMT
#11
This (realistically) would never be implemented. But it's pretty damn cool. I hope someone makes a custom mod where the units behave like this.

And if someone can find a video (not just screenshots), that would be awesome.
archonOOid
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
1983 Posts
May 17 2011 01:03 GMT
#12
I like this idea, aoe spells would require more skill on the other hand in the current pathing system spreading is a skill. But I prefer longer battles over spreading micro
I'm Quotable (IQ)
stokes17
Profile Joined January 2011
United States1411 Posts
May 17 2011 01:03 GMT
#13
My god those second pictures in each set look so much more natural...

But by the same token.... if in a few years pro can accomplish this on their own.... it would make it that much more impressive wouldn't it?


Toastmold
Profile Joined April 2010
Canada207 Posts
May 17 2011 01:07 GMT
#14
Clumping is just part of the challenge of microing in SC2. Yearning for archaic unit movement seems pointless.
hi.
DotADeMoN
Profile Joined June 2010
United States517 Posts
May 17 2011 01:09 GMT
#15
Good article. I agree with most of what it says. The increased clumping of units in SC2 really turns the game into a-moved ball vs a-moved ball. It's something that I hope blizzard is considering for HotS.

Un-clumped units make for a more exciting game from a viewer's perspective IMO.
johanngrunt
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Hong Kong1555 Posts
May 17 2011 01:09 GMT
#16
Is there any way to force them not to clump?
K3Nyy
Profile Joined February 2010
United States1961 Posts
May 17 2011 01:10 GMT
#17
On May 17 2011 10:01 WinteRR wrote:
Very good article. I agree with it. This is probably the reason why siege tanks in SC2 seem so 'strong' when in comparison to their BW counterpart do relatively little damage. I feel this would be a good change to the game (especially to the colossus IMHO).


Wait what? Siege tanks in SC2 are shit compared to SC1 tanks lol.

In SC1, every time tanks shoot, my dragoons turn to blue goo.
Falcor
Profile Joined February 2010
Canada894 Posts
May 17 2011 01:11 GMT
#18
This is never going to happen imo. The game was balanced around "balls" so if they implemented this everything would have to change
nexitustl1
Profile Joined December 2010
156 Posts
May 17 2011 01:11 GMT
#19
Micro battles like marine splitting against banelings, for instance, would become almost obsolete (and banelings themselves would be significantly weakened). It wasn't such an issue in wc3 I don't think, because of the size of the armies you would be individually controlling units anyway, but with 200/200 armies auto spreading I don't know if that would be a good thing for the game.


thats the first the that came to mind when i was thinking about this and the possibilities behind it. Changing something in the game that players should be doing themselves to better improve their chances in fights to me is a little overboard. Yes with how SC2 has been made tons of things are possible in the realm of making fights more safe for players who don't use important area of effect units. The real question is it the right thing to do, i personally don't think so in the future of sc2 i see more and more scenario's involving unit spread to be key to micro and battle engagements just like how the marine spread has been up to now.
Navillus
Profile Joined February 2011
United States1188 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-05-17 01:12:50
May 17 2011 01:12 GMT
#20

1. (the most important) Unit movements become more dynamic.
Even if you hotkey them separately, those small groups will move like a clump of jelly anyways. It doesn't look natural, and your army looks smaller than it actually is.


Ok this is apparently the most important point you have but all it is is an aesthetic complaint, I'd just as soon not change a major part of the game so it looks nicer to you.


2. It's easier to tell the difference between units.
SCBW is in 2-d and it uses less colours, while SC2 is 3-d and uses a variety of colours. So it's easier to differentiate units in SCBW. You can tell this by playing SC2 in the lowest graphic settings.
The lowest graphic setting allows you to tell the difference between units and the difference between units and map tiles much more effectively.


Somewhat more legitimate complaint (mostly because there actually is one) but again just aesthetics, when it comes to players, just play on low (most pros do anyway, if you don't want to... again don't change the game to make it easier on your eyes) Perhaps when it comes to spectating this makes sense, but first I don't want to change the game for spectators, also I have no problem seeing anything, I think it looks nice.


3. You can weaken the power of splash units.
If you look at the units that do splash damage,
siege mode tanks, thor's air attack, ghost's EMP and nuclear missile, raven's HSM, colossus, high templar's storm, infestor's fungal growth,
most of them have been nerfed since beta.
One reason why they are so strong is because units always move together in clumps.
Some people will tell you to separate your units beforehand, but they clump up again when you move them around to attack.


This one's just silly, yes they've been nerfed a decent amount to balance the game this would undo all of that you're basically trying to say this would be good for balance when it would just throw everything off again.


4. The firepower decreases and the duration of battles increases.
One of the main issues with SC2 since the release was that the battles didn't last very long.
Along with complaints such as 'the maps are too narrow', 'the game time is too fast', I think this is a legit explanation as well. This is why we should change the tendency for units to clump together.


And last another basically noncomplaint, I have no problem with the length of battles or the game, have not seen a trend of complaints to that effect and also think that this would just make battles less predictable and harder to play legitimately, also I don't think that battles are the major factor in game length, if it's a macro game it will go long no matter what, if it's all one base play (the more realistic cause for short games) then long battles will add a minute or two tops.
"TL gives excellent advice 99% of the time. The problem is no one listens to it." -Plexa
1 2 3 4 5 38 39 40 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
OSC
13:00
King of the Hill Weekly #213
CranKy Ducklings258
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
trigger 241
BRAT_OK 69
EnDerr 46
MindelVK 24
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 37427
Calm 4493
firebathero 685
Mini 643
Shuttle 549
Stork 408
Hyuk 361
Rush 92
Light 79
hero 72
[ Show more ]
Sea.KH 65
ToSsGirL 41
Nal_rA 32
scan(afreeca) 23
sSak 18
Noble 10
ajuk12(nOOB) 9
IntoTheRainbow 6
Dota 2
Gorgc6357
qojqva2381
boxi98151
Counter-Strike
fl0m5607
olofmeister2928
Super Smash Bros
C9.Mang0549
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu16
Other Games
tarik_tv16623
gofns11583
FrodaN1244
hiko829
crisheroes405
Beastyqt366
Lowko178
elazer107
XaKoH 72
Trikslyr62
QueenE43
FunKaTv 9
Organizations
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Main Stream5186
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 21 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• 3DClanTV 11
• Adnapsc2 2
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Migwel
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
StarCraft: Brood War
• HerbMon 30
• Rasowy 11
• Michael_bg 5
• FirePhoenix3
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 2226
League of Legends
• Nemesis12795
• Jankos1788
• TFBlade1045
Other Games
• WagamamaTV136
Upcoming Events
BSL 2v2 ProLeague S3
2h 59m
Korean StarCraft League
10h 59m
SOOP
16h 59m
sOs vs Percival
CranKy Ducklings
17h 59m
WardiTV Invitational
18h 59m
ByuN vs MaNa
MaxPax vs Solar
Reynor vs Creator
Gerald vs Spirit
Cheesadelphia
22h 59m
CSO Cup
1d
BSL: ProLeague
1d 1h
Hawk vs UltrA
Sziky vs spx
TerrOr vs JDConan
GSL Code S
1d 15h
Rogue vs herO
Classic vs GuMiho
Sparkling Tuna Cup
1d 17h
[ Show More ]
BSL: ProLeague
2 days
Bonyth vs Dewalt
Cross vs Doodle
MadiNho vs Dragon
Replay Cast
2 days
Wardi Open
2 days
Replay Cast
3 days
Replay Cast
3 days
RSL Revival
3 days
Cure vs Percival
ByuN vs Spirit
RSL Revival
4 days
herO vs sOs
Zoun vs Clem
Replay Cast
5 days
The PondCast
5 days
RSL Revival
5 days
Serral vs SHIN
Solar vs Cham
Replay Cast
6 days
RSL Revival
6 days
Reynor vs Scarlett
ShoWTimE vs Classic
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Season 17: Qualifier 2
BGE Stara Zagora 2025
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
BSL Season 20
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
NPSL S3
Rose Open S1
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
2025 GSL S2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025
YaLLa Compass Qatar 2025
PGL Bucharest 2025

Upcoming

Copa Latinoamericana 4
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
SEL Season 2 Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
HSC XXVII
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.