• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 04:33
CEST 10:33
KST 17:33
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Code S Season 2 - RO4 & Finals Results (2025)8Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy4Code S RO8 Preview: herO, Zoun, Bunny, Classic7Code S RO8 Preview: Rogue, GuMiho, Solar, Maru3
Community News
Weekly Cups (June 9-15): herO doubles on GSL week0Firefly suspended by EWC, replaced by Lancer12Classic & herO RO8 Interviews: "I think it’s time to teach [Rogue] a lesson."2Rogue & GuMiho RO8 interviews: "Lifting that trophy would be a testament to all I’ve had to overcome over the years and how far I’ve come on this journey.8Code S RO8 Results + RO4 Bracket (2025 Season 2)14
StarCraft 2
General
Code S Season 2 - RO4 & Finals Results (2025) Nexon wins bid to develop StarCraft IP content, distribute Overwatch mobile game Rain's Behind the Scenes Storytime Firefly suspended by EWC, replaced by Lancer How herO can make history in the Code S S2 finals
Tourneys
RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series SOOP Starcraft Global #22 $3,500 WardiTV European League 2025 [GSL 2025] Code S: Season 2 - Semi Finals & Finals WardiTV Mondays
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers [G] Darkgrid Layout
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 478 Instant Karma Mutation # 477 Slow and Steady Mutation # 476 Charnel House Mutation # 475 Hard Target
Brood War
General
ASL20 Preliminary Maps BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW General Discussion Recent recommended BW games FlaSh Witnesses SCV Pull Off the Impossible vs Shu
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET Small VOD Thread 2.0 [BSL20] ProLeague Bracket Stage - Day 4
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do. [G] How to get started on ladder as a new Z player
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile Nintendo Switch Thread Beyond All Reason What do you want from future RTS games?
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread UK Politics Mega-thread Echoes of Revolution and Separation
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Korean Music Discussion [Manga] One Piece
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NHL Playoffs 2024 TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
A Better Routine For Progame…
TrAiDoS
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Heero Yuy & the Tax…
KrillinFromwales
I was completely wrong ab…
jameswatts
Need Your Help/Advice
Glider
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 32665 users

Dynamic Unit Movements, Your Thoughts?

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
1 2 3 4 5 38 39 40 Next All
CanucksJC
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
Canada1241 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-05-17 23:08:48
May 17 2011 00:55 GMT
#1
This is a translation from a thread posted on PlayXP.
Sorry for the messy translation lol :D

[edit] I'm adding the link to the petition Zapdos_Smithh started to get this change implemented in the future:
http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/dynamicmovementsc2/

[image loading]
[image loading]
[image loading]
[image loading]
[image loading]
[image loading]

In SCBW and W3, units move while avoiding friendly units,
but in SC2, units move while pushing their own friendly units. (when on hold position, they avoid each other)
This is where units tend to clump up, and this happens even when you move them just a couple of times.
Units also clump up in small numbers as well.

If you watch SCBW games, units don't push each other around, so the space around each unit is always changning, and this results in a dynamic movement.
If you only move with one control group, units show the same dynamic movement.
I think this is very important for e-sports.

If I had to list the advantages of removing the clumping of units:

1. (the most important) Unit movements become more dynamic.
Even if you hotkey them separately, those small groups will move like a clump of jelly anyways. It doesn't look natural, and your army looks smaller than it actually is.

2. It's easier to tell the difference between units.
SCBW is in 2-d and it uses less colours, while SC2 is 3-d and uses a variety of colours. So it's easier to differentiate units in SCBW. You can tell this by playing SC2 in the lowest graphic settings.
The lowest graphic setting allows you to tell the difference between units and the difference between units and map tiles much more effectively.

3. You can weaken the power of splash units.
If you look at the units that do splash damage,
siege mode tanks, thor's air attack, ghost's EMP and nuclear missile, raven's HSM, colossus, high templar's storm, infestor's fungal growth,
most of them have been nerfed since beta.
One reason why they are so strong is because units always move together in clumps.
Some people will tell you to separate your units beforehand, but they clump up again when you move them around to attack.

4. The firepower decreases and the duration of battles increases.
One of the main issues with SC2 since the release was that the battles didn't last very long.
Along with complaints such as 'the maps are too narrow', 'the game time is too fast', I think this is a legit explanation as well. This is why we should change the tendency for units to clump together.

If we end up getting rid of this issue, or units move more like in SCBW and W3, we probably need to tweak the balance again.
However, if balance is something that needs to be gradually fixed, this issue should be something we need to change right now.
As a SCBW and SC2 player, and an e-sports viewer, I write this to plead my case.

Source:http://www.playxp.com/sc2/forum/view.php?article_id=2766172
UBC StarCraft Club is official @ UBC Vancouver campus! Your first eSport community on campus. Welcomes players of all levels at UBC. Follow us on facebook page: http://www.facebook.com/home.php#!/group.php?gid=155630424470014 or IRC @ irc.rizon.net #ubcsc
HawaiianPig
Profile Blog Joined July 2008
Canada5155 Posts
May 17 2011 00:57 GMT
#2
This is really promising, and I've always maintained that blob on blob action is a big part of why SC2 is... the way it is, but I have trouble imagining Blizzard would implement such a massive change.
AdministratorNot actually Hawaiian.
snozberry
Profile Joined May 2011
United States126 Posts
May 17 2011 00:57 GMT
#3
it would be excellent, battles seem like a crapshoot sometimes with all the clumping
Koshi
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
Belgium38799 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-05-17 01:00:32
May 17 2011 01:00 GMT
#4
Everything you state would make this game more interesting IF it pays out like you say it will. However, by changing the dynamic unit movement you will also change the game. I don't know if I like that part.

SCII is good as it is. For now.
I had a good night of sleep.
Tarot
Profile Joined February 2011
Canada440 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-05-17 01:18:06
May 17 2011 01:00 GMT
#5
This change would be amazing, but its very unlikely that Blizzard would do such a thing.

edit: Watching a 200 protoss "deathball" with half a dozen colossus move around looks so... bad...

There was a thread before:
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=198840
Where the unit collision sizes were all increased. I think this is a pretty good way of 'fixing' the issue without having to revamp the pathing AI in the game.
VGhost
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States3613 Posts
May 17 2011 01:01 GMT
#6
I'm all for reducing the clumping effect (I've thought for a while that it looks unnatural), but it seems to me that it runs the risk of (re?)introducing stupid AI when moving large control groups around - blocked units will go up ramps etc.

Of course, depending on your point of view that might not be a bad this (more micro potentially?).

And even if it is a good idea for gameplay reasons, how would something like that be changed, reasonably speaking? It might be possible to introduce it in HotS but it's changing a big thing in the game - beta would have been the time to do this.
#4427 || I am not going to scan a ferret.
WinteRR
Profile Joined May 2011
Australia201 Posts
May 17 2011 01:01 GMT
#7
Very good article. I agree with it. This is probably the reason why siege tanks in SC2 seem so 'strong' when in comparison to their BW counterpart do relatively little damage. I feel this would be a good change to the game (especially to the colossus IMHO).
joshboy42
Profile Joined August 2010
Australia116 Posts
May 17 2011 01:01 GMT
#8
I think it would be difficult to implement this option now, because a lot of the aoe/splash damage abilities in sc2 are balanced around the fact that units generally clump (and it becomes the responsibility of the user's micro ability to keep them spread).

Micro battles like marine splitting against banelings, for instance, would become almost obsolete (and banelings themselves would be significantly weakened). It wasn't such an issue in wc3 I don't think, because of the size of the armies you would be individually controlling units anyway, but with 200/200 armies auto spreading I don't know if that would be a good thing for the game.
eat this cheese without farting and you can sleep with my sister
gogogadgetflow
Profile Joined March 2010
United States2583 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-05-17 01:02:52
May 17 2011 01:01 GMT
#9
PlayXP is really stuck in the past eh? I'm not a fan of zeroing out all of the balance work blizzard has done so far in pursuit of something which may or may not improve the game, and where all the arguments come from different games.
RinconH
Profile Joined April 2010
United States512 Posts
May 17 2011 01:01 GMT
#10
It's a cool idea and I'd like to see it but it would change the game dramatically imo.
jrkirby
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States1510 Posts
May 17 2011 01:02 GMT
#11
This (realistically) would never be implemented. But it's pretty damn cool. I hope someone makes a custom mod where the units behave like this.

And if someone can find a video (not just screenshots), that would be awesome.
archonOOid
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
1983 Posts
May 17 2011 01:03 GMT
#12
I like this idea, aoe spells would require more skill on the other hand in the current pathing system spreading is a skill. But I prefer longer battles over spreading micro
I'm Quotable (IQ)
stokes17
Profile Joined January 2011
United States1411 Posts
May 17 2011 01:03 GMT
#13
My god those second pictures in each set look so much more natural...

But by the same token.... if in a few years pro can accomplish this on their own.... it would make it that much more impressive wouldn't it?


Toastmold
Profile Joined April 2010
Canada207 Posts
May 17 2011 01:07 GMT
#14
Clumping is just part of the challenge of microing in SC2. Yearning for archaic unit movement seems pointless.
hi.
DotADeMoN
Profile Joined June 2010
United States517 Posts
May 17 2011 01:09 GMT
#15
Good article. I agree with most of what it says. The increased clumping of units in SC2 really turns the game into a-moved ball vs a-moved ball. It's something that I hope blizzard is considering for HotS.

Un-clumped units make for a more exciting game from a viewer's perspective IMO.
johanngrunt
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Hong Kong1555 Posts
May 17 2011 01:09 GMT
#16
Is there any way to force them not to clump?
K3Nyy
Profile Joined February 2010
United States1961 Posts
May 17 2011 01:10 GMT
#17
On May 17 2011 10:01 WinteRR wrote:
Very good article. I agree with it. This is probably the reason why siege tanks in SC2 seem so 'strong' when in comparison to their BW counterpart do relatively little damage. I feel this would be a good change to the game (especially to the colossus IMHO).


Wait what? Siege tanks in SC2 are shit compared to SC1 tanks lol.

In SC1, every time tanks shoot, my dragoons turn to blue goo.
Falcor
Profile Joined February 2010
Canada894 Posts
May 17 2011 01:11 GMT
#18
This is never going to happen imo. The game was balanced around "balls" so if they implemented this everything would have to change
nexitustl1
Profile Joined December 2010
156 Posts
May 17 2011 01:11 GMT
#19
Micro battles like marine splitting against banelings, for instance, would become almost obsolete (and banelings themselves would be significantly weakened). It wasn't such an issue in wc3 I don't think, because of the size of the armies you would be individually controlling units anyway, but with 200/200 armies auto spreading I don't know if that would be a good thing for the game.


thats the first the that came to mind when i was thinking about this and the possibilities behind it. Changing something in the game that players should be doing themselves to better improve their chances in fights to me is a little overboard. Yes with how SC2 has been made tons of things are possible in the realm of making fights more safe for players who don't use important area of effect units. The real question is it the right thing to do, i personally don't think so in the future of sc2 i see more and more scenario's involving unit spread to be key to micro and battle engagements just like how the marine spread has been up to now.
Navillus
Profile Joined February 2011
United States1188 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-05-17 01:12:50
May 17 2011 01:12 GMT
#20

1. (the most important) Unit movements become more dynamic.
Even if you hotkey them separately, those small groups will move like a clump of jelly anyways. It doesn't look natural, and your army looks smaller than it actually is.


Ok this is apparently the most important point you have but all it is is an aesthetic complaint, I'd just as soon not change a major part of the game so it looks nicer to you.


2. It's easier to tell the difference between units.
SCBW is in 2-d and it uses less colours, while SC2 is 3-d and uses a variety of colours. So it's easier to differentiate units in SCBW. You can tell this by playing SC2 in the lowest graphic settings.
The lowest graphic setting allows you to tell the difference between units and the difference between units and map tiles much more effectively.


Somewhat more legitimate complaint (mostly because there actually is one) but again just aesthetics, when it comes to players, just play on low (most pros do anyway, if you don't want to... again don't change the game to make it easier on your eyes) Perhaps when it comes to spectating this makes sense, but first I don't want to change the game for spectators, also I have no problem seeing anything, I think it looks nice.


3. You can weaken the power of splash units.
If you look at the units that do splash damage,
siege mode tanks, thor's air attack, ghost's EMP and nuclear missile, raven's HSM, colossus, high templar's storm, infestor's fungal growth,
most of them have been nerfed since beta.
One reason why they are so strong is because units always move together in clumps.
Some people will tell you to separate your units beforehand, but they clump up again when you move them around to attack.


This one's just silly, yes they've been nerfed a decent amount to balance the game this would undo all of that you're basically trying to say this would be good for balance when it would just throw everything off again.


4. The firepower decreases and the duration of battles increases.
One of the main issues with SC2 since the release was that the battles didn't last very long.
Along with complaints such as 'the maps are too narrow', 'the game time is too fast', I think this is a legit explanation as well. This is why we should change the tendency for units to clump together.


And last another basically noncomplaint, I have no problem with the length of battles or the game, have not seen a trend of complaints to that effect and also think that this would just make battles less predictable and harder to play legitimately, also I don't think that battles are the major factor in game length, if it's a macro game it will go long no matter what, if it's all one base play (the more realistic cause for short games) then long battles will add a minute or two tops.
"TL gives excellent advice 99% of the time. The problem is no one listens to it." -Plexa
1 2 3 4 5 38 39 40 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 1h 27m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
trigger 31
StarCraft: Brood War
actioN 474
Mong 221
EffOrt 143
JulyZerg 108
Leta 99
Zeus 44
NaDa 39
Sacsri 38
ToSsGirL 34
ajuk12(nOOB) 11
Dota 2
XaKoH 327
ODPixel184
XcaliburYe162
420jenkins62
League of Legends
JimRising 501
Counter-Strike
olofmeister953
shoxiejesuss351
PGG 72
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor161
Other Games
C9.Mang01067
ceh9614
Happy299
Mew2King176
Trikslyr22
Pyrionflax19
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick647
StarCraft: Brood War
UltimateBattle 55
lovetv 4
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 12 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• LUISG 50
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Lourlo1219
Upcoming Events
RSL Revival
1h 27m
herO vs sOs
Zoun vs Clem
Replay Cast
15h 27m
The PondCast
1d 1h
RSL Revival
1d 1h
Harstem vs SHIN
Solar vs Cham
Replay Cast
1d 15h
RSL Revival
2 days
Reynor vs Scarlett
ShoWTimE vs Classic
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
2 days
SC Evo League
3 days
Road to EWC
3 days
Circuito Brasileiro de…
3 days
[ Show More ]
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
Road to EWC
4 days
Online Event
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Acropolis #3 - GSC
2025 GSL S2
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
BSL Season 20
Acropolis #3
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
NPSL S3
Rose Open S1
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025
YaLLa Compass Qatar 2025
PGL Bucharest 2025

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
SEL Season 2 Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
HSC XXVII
Championship of Russia 2025
BLAST Open Fall 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.