• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 07:36
CEST 13:36
KST 20:36
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Classic Games #3: Rogue vs Serral at BlizzCon7[ASL20] Ro16 Preview Pt1: Ascent10Maestros of the Game: Week 1/Play-in Preview12[ASL20] Ro24 Preview Pt2: Take-Off7[ASL20] Ro24 Preview Pt1: Runway13
Community News
Weekly Cups (Sept 1-7): MaxPax rebounds & Clem saga continues23LiuLi Cup - September 2025 Tournaments3Weekly Cups (August 25-31): Clem's Last Straw?39Weekly Cups (Aug 18-24): herO dethrones MaxPax6Maestros of The Game—$20k event w/ live finals in Paris76
StarCraft 2
General
Weekly Cups (Sept 1-7): MaxPax rebounds & Clem saga continues #1: Maru - Greatest Players of All Time Classic Games #3: Rogue vs Serral at BlizzCon Team Liquid Map Contest #21 - Presented by Monster Energy [G] How to watch Korean progamer Streams.
Tourneys
LiuLi Cup - September 2025 Tournaments Maestros of The Game—$20k event w/ live finals in Paris WardiTV Mondays Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series
Strategy
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 490 Masters of Midnight Mutation # 489 Bannable Offense Mutation # 488 What Goes Around Mutation # 487 Think Fast
Brood War
General
alas... i aint gon' lie to u bruh... BW General Discussion [ASL20] Ro16 Preview Pt1: Ascent BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ The Korean Terminology Thread
Tourneys
[ASL20] Ro16 Group A [ASL20] Ro16 Group B [Megathread] Daily Proleagues Is there English video for group selection for ASL
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Muta micro map competition Fighting Spirit mining rates [G] Mineral Boosting
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread General RTS Discussion Thread Iron Harvest: 1920+ Nintendo Switch Thread Warcraft III: The Frozen Throne
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Laptop on Rent in Delhi – Smart Choice for Student
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Games Industry And ATVI UK Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The Happy Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023 TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Linksys AE2500 USB WIFI keeps disconnecting Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread High temperatures on bridge(s)
TL Community
BarCraft in Tokyo Japan for ASL Season5 Final The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Collective Intelligence: Tea…
TrAiDoS
A very expensive lesson on ma…
Garnet
hello world
radishsoup
Lemme tell you a thing o…
JoinTheRain
RTS Design in Hypercoven
a11
Evil Gacha Games and the…
ffswowsucks
INDEPENDIENTE LA CTM
XenOsky
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1452 users

An Introduction to 2v2

Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Strategy
Post a Reply
1 2 3 Next All
EtherealDeath
Profile Blog Joined July 2007
United States8366 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-12-01 16:43:07
September 30 2010 07:10 GMT
#1
This post will get updated periodically, as I doubt I can think of everything I would write all at once. So, let's do this by topics!

Obligatory OP credentials..
+ Show Spoiler [As of 12/01/2010] +
2407 Diamond 2v2 RT, #7 World #3 NA on SC2Ranks, and #1 Protoss World/NA



11.30.2010
This new post should be relatively long - have plenty of time to waste while watching GSL . Noting something involving the games currently going on... the topic of the day is when to attack. Before we go into matchup specifics, it will be necessary to look at the different variety of 2v2 maps, as the type of map has a severe effect on whether or not you have good chances with aggression. We will proceed from the viewpoint of either a PZ or PT team (sorry I hate PP so much).



The SAFE maps
All 4 maps share the property of a shared ramp. High Orbit has a backdoor entrance via destructible rocks whereas Twilight Fortress does not, but the ramp on Twilight Fortress is somewhat large, and the back rocks on High Orbit can only be accessed from the main ramp via a long path when attacking. So, once they commit at one location, they cannot have a large number of forces at the other very quickly, so you have an advantage defending due to the extremely short distance you need to move in order to go from one entrance to the other. Tempest is a bit special - I'll get to that.

In order of safeness from supersafe to less supersafe,
  1. Tempest + Show Spoiler [Map Image] +
    [image loading]

  2. Discord IV + Show Spoiler [Map Image] +
    [image loading]

  3. High Orbit + Show Spoiler [Map Image] +
    [image loading]

  4. Twilight Fortress + Show Spoiler [Map Image] +
    [image loading]



The AVERAGE maps
In the same decreasing order of safeness,
  1. Scorched Haven + Show Spoiler [Map Image] +
    [image loading]

    Scorched Haven has the property that while there is not a shared ramp, the entrance between the two cliffs is not very large. In fact, if you are a PT team, you can safely wall it off. You may have to cut probes to do it though.
  2. War Zone + Show Spoiler [Map Image] +
    [image loading]

    War Zone is interesting. While there is a common ramp, there are 2 side entrances blocked by destructible rocks, for which you actually have a slight defender's disadvantage since the attacker can actually bounce from location to location faster than you can. You are forced into building a lot of early units, especially sentry, unless you are absolutely certain there is no early pressure coming. So, this map CAN be safe, but at the same time it can be very, very difficult to defend, due to the general slowness of protoss and the wideness of each ramp.


The DIVORCED rest
These maps all share the property of separate ramps wherein the space between is not particularly easy to defend. If the opponents push hard early and you are both defending on your own ramps, you will have a very difficult defending time as PZ, and even as PT, though to a lesser extent. If you are out in the open there are many harassive options open to the opponent unless you went double early pressure as well.

In no particular order of safeness...
  • Arid Wastes + Show Spoiler [Map Image] +
    [image loading]

  • Monlyth Ridge + Show Spoiler [Map Image] +
    [image loading]

  • Tarsonis Assault + Show Spoiler [Map Image] +
    [image loading]



We will discuss the safe maps from a PT perspective.

On Safe Maps

On the safe maps, it is not recommended that you go for any early game all in, or any early game push that involves econ cutting due to the ease with which any such shenanigans can be defended - you're really relying on your opponent to make a trivial error if you want any success with such play.

On Twilight Fortress, due to the fact that you can both expo fairly easily, and due to the long rush distance (if you don't want to be spotted by watch towers which are not easy to take simultaneously without being caught), any attack that does not rely heavily on opponent error will hit mid game. So, if you want to all in (bring scvs and whatnot) do it after you take your nat, then cut probes at around 44 (16 per base on minerals, 3 on each gas), and you may have slightly more probes on minerals, and go for an all in push once you have a few colossus and a few tank or thor. Otherwise, try to take position at the ramp in front of the opponent's nat, hold it, and expand whenever you scout that your army is capable of holding theirs, and you have at least equivalent reinforcing ability.

Note that the shared ramp is quite large, so if you scout a 10 pool speed or 7 pool coming along with comparable early game pressure from the zerg's ally, you will have to help your terran ally wall off. Thus, you should build your first pylon at the ramp. Choose the side you will be walling off - your ally starts from the other side of the ramp. In case of double 7 pool, cut probes and wall off immediately with 2 gateways to help your ally wall off - do not build a forge UNLESS you intend on pushing after 4 warpgate, because if you do so intend, then immediately put down a forge after first gateway at 12, and get +1 attack. Then,

- Go for 4 warpgate with double gas, chronoing the warpgate research. Your ally goes 4rax pure marine, no tech. Do get combat shield and stime though
- Scan one of the zerg mains after first round of gateway units warp in.

Now, if you scout very few drones still, you do not need to push (although you can, and will probably win - slight element of risk though, and if you do, make sure to chrono +1 attack and have a lot of zealot). Spend chrono boost on probes, expand, and make a lot of sentries. Your ally expands as well, and techs medivac. You don't need to worry about banelings EXCEPT through burrowed banelings, as any unborrowed ones will be dealt with via your copious sentry energy. You can then transition into a mid game attack with 1/0/1 (def/shield/atk) upgrades.

Other than this, there is no early game pressure you really need to worry about. Anything else you can handle through a 3rax expand and a 3 gate expand. Mid-game play is really quite variable based on what your opponents do. Just make sure to get a robo immediately after expand, or, if you suspect fast dt rush, go 3 gate robo expand. Really funny stuff can happen in 2v2 that seems crazy but is hard to deal with if you don't scout it - for example, cloaked banshee + phoenix. It may sound funny, but when you can safely expand relatively quickly by 2v2 standards, such play is completely possible, and has a tendency of killing observers and forcing scan. You have to go phoenix yourself in such cases, and have terran go marine, and some thor if possible, as thor prevent his phoenix from clumping, and if his phoenix cannot clump but yours can, you can always engage a small portion of his force with your entire force.

High Orbit and Discord IV are similar in that while the shared ramp is easy to defend and easy to fully wall off if necessary, expos are harder to secure. On High Orbit, expoing at the double natural is hard to defend since it makes the distance you have to move to defend your destructible rocks abhorrent. It is possible to for you to both expo by your rocks and hold the cliff by the watch tower, but then your main is very, very vulnerable to mobile air play. On Discord IV, expoing past the sole natural is difficult.

On Discord IV your best option is either to play to take a natural, leaving your team with 2 bases + 1 base, or double one base tech cheese. For the former, you then either power units to push down their team's 4th base whenever it is about to finish OR, if you want to play it safer, temporarily gas trade to one person so as to gain more t2 units of a particular flavor faster - the strongest version I think is 2 robo colossus + 1 gate zealot (which is actually sustainable off 1 protoss base funny enough, with terran resource support). Your terran ally builds barracks units (this is before expanding). You will almost certainly have a timing window wherein you have more colossus than they have colossus + tank due to your chrono boost being used purely for robo, and your terran ally will have more bio than the opposing team does. At this time you can push them purely for the intent of at least trading armies and forcing them to cancel any expands, and you both expand behind it whereas they cannot unless they mirrored your build due to the power of many colossus.

Whatever builds you choose, know that on High Orbit and Discord IV you must have a mobile army if you intend on playing a macro game past 3 bases. There are just so many directions from which you can be harassed when your team has 4 bases. For example, on Discord IV warpins can be done into your main across the gap from the 3 and 9 o'clock double expands. There may also be warp prism play, or a warp in to the main while pushing your team's 4th, or a small warp in to your 3rd via warp prism. Nydus is actually not as worrisome, because it is not really cheap and you can scout for that.

I don't really have a set build for High Orbit because so many things can happen on that map, as there is not a single "safe" expo. However, against TZ I often go fast upgrade (it's in one of the replays in the part 2 replay pack), where I get fast +3 armor with blink stalkers, or 2/0/1 if I see them get an armor upgrade + roach/marauder. That build lets us expand pretty safely after blink is complete. and we have good mobility. Plus, marines and zerglings don't do anything to you! You will need colossus or templar for later in the game though. You don't play aggressively with this build though, as they can defend in prepared positions. However, if you are the one in the prepared positions, you can defend as well, and your mobility allows you to move to new prepared positions quickly, so this is really a management build despite the fast upgrades (literally all chronos going to upgrades).

In general, on the safe maps I'd prefer to play a safe, macro game where I work to never be vulnerable, take expansions, and play my opponent into an inferior position from which I gain accumulated advantages. I usually don't try to force a win until the advantage is pretty high. That's not to say you shouldn't be constantly harassing, because you should. Just shouldn't be devoting too much to a concentrated attack in early or mid game.

The "odd" safe map
I did mention that Tempest is a bit of an oddity. Indeed it is because it actually is a 4 team 2v2 map. So, one extra consideration on this map is that you must double scout - both you and your terran ally send out an early scout, so you can quickly determine if there is some sort of a superb all in coming. However, once you scout it, you will be able to prepare against whatever it is they are trying to throw at you.

Notice that although you don't have a shared ramp, the space between the ramps is actually quite small, so you can easily do a shared block at that common choke. You can then play for an expand. However, any bases beyond your natural are not easy to take unless you control the watchtower and have mobility to deal with any attacks, as the ground distance that you will have to cover to defend your bases is quite large. As such, if your opponents go air, you will have to as well unless they do it badly and there is a window of opportunity for you to simply push them down.

In practice, there are often many vulnerabilities and the army positioning and base setup weaknesses on this map due to the many angles of attack, so do poke around and look for openings after taking your nat. In particular, there are openings for drops and reapers from the direction of the adjacent spawn positions, so reaper transitions are quite powerful here if they do not expect it.

On Average maps

Although Scorched Haven is a bit safer than the "divorced" maps, oftentimes the opponents do not or cannot wall their common choke. Thus, they effectively have separate ramps. Now, on separate ramps, early attacks are very strong. If you can get into position before they have many units, you can permanently ff one of them in their base. I like to 4gate (but with 2 gas) + 3rax into expand quite a bit.

Otherwise, if you do not go for early game fun, note that you cannot take a 3rd base very easily - there are so many attack routes into any 3rd you can take, and the golds are spectacularly difficult to hold. Thus, if you are diligent on scouting and find then taking a third, and you have tanks/colo (which you should if you didn't go for early game weirdness and there is not something strange coming out of the opposing team), scout where their army is, and then position yourself so as to split their base + army in half, so that there is some base they cannot defend without attacking into your pre-set army.

On War Zone, if your opponent is 1 basing, you are forced into 1 basing until you have a sufficiently large force to defend your ramps. If there is a zerg on the opposing team, I like to take the initiative and get a lot of units out as fast as possible due to the ridiculous mobility of zerg. If he tries to expand, or if I scout that there seems to be slightly fewer units than usual, and both of my rocks are still up, I go balls deep on the other team, which is easy to do since at any rate my terran ally opens up 3rax regardless. With no zerg on the opposing team, I try to play a management game with a slightly faster expand than they get, and go for a mid game push with the goal of at least gaining map control and preventing them from expanding past their elevated area.

There is a lot of air space around your elevated area, so be wary of drops and warp prisms. Your main and side naturals are not as safe as they seem to be....

On a related note regarding your naturals, notice that you actually have 3 - one on each side and one in the middle. I prefer to take the middle and the one by the closest rocks. For example, if you spawn at the bottom, then you take the middle natural + the right natural. The reason for this is the two ramps there are the easiest ones for the attacking force to bounce between, so chances are that they will be harassing both simultaneously while have a smaller force breaking down the left rocks. At any rate, you will want to wall off two then 3 ramps as quickly as economically feasible if there is a zerg on the other team, because otherwise the threat of speedling backstabs makes it very difficult to hold your entire plateau safely.

On "Divorced" maps
These maps feature separate main ramps without easily wallable common chokes. As such, early pressure is a very common thing to do. In fact, I really like to do high early game pressure on these maps. Sometimes it kills the opponent outright, if they are a bit too greedy, sometimes we end up expoing and doing a mid game push, and sometimes it goes late game, but these maps are really built for early game aggression, so that is what I will be discussing here.

There are a few different considerations based on the different map structures. Note that Tarsonis Assault has a large ramp, so if you scout zergling cheese, then you must cut probes and quickly wall off. Otherwise, you will be in some trouble. Also, it is possible to warp in across the ditch into either base, so be aware of proxy pylons above your main! Note that Arid Wastes has a nromal ramp at the mains, but a Tarsonis Assault type ramp at the naturals. Note also how far apart the mains are, and how if an attacking army manages to go up one of the naturals, they effectively have split the opposition in half, because you will not be able to easily go up that natural ramp against two armies. As such, I prefer to wall off at the natural ramp, with my terran ally doing the same. Note also that there is a backdoor for exactly one person of each team. Whoever spawns in the position with the backdoor will have to make extra early game units in order to be able to hold so that your ally can get into position to help defend. Arid Wastes is simply a normal ramp at each main with separate ramps, so it is similar in considerations to Scorched Haven, with the caveat that you can't really do an effective combined wall off even if you wanted to.

Now, on to the build order matchups. Here we assume your terran ally opens 3 rax regardless, and the protoss might 4 gate with 20 probes, or maybe not chrono the warpgate research and instead chrono unit production off 3 gate and get a slightly later warpgate, or a variety of other builds. If you end up going to midgame, I prefer having my terran ally going part mech part bio, and I go 2x chronoed robo if there is not heavy air play from the opposition (scouted by scan + obs), or otherwise transition into stargate + gateway.

These will necessarily be brief - ask in thread for any clarifications/more detailed explanations.

  • vs ZZ
    • vs double 7 pool
      Immediately wall off your ramp (COMPLETE wall off - no gaps at all, no pylon in wall in), with the protoss going 12 gate, then forge (+another gateway on wide ramps) before restarting probe production. Then transition into a 4gate + 4 rax push, spending an extra chrono on probes.
    • vs double 10 pool
      Wall off completely again, but this time do a 4gate + 3rax expand, as the zerg can actually manage to defend if you go for a real serious push. Threaten pressure though - if there are overlords nearby, kill them, and keep pushing towards their base, showing a probe along with your army as if you are going for a forward pylon into serious pressure, but then pull back after the remnant overlord vision fades away.
    • vs both pools after overlord
      Go for a double gas 4 gate, with your terran ally going 3rax. Make sure you have a lot of sentries, and then push hard into one of the zergs, making sure to use ff to split the other zerg away.
    • vs 7 pool + a non rushing ally
      Full wall off again, but this time when you transition into 4gate + 4rax, push hard.
    • 10 pool + non rushing ally
      3gate 3rax expand.
    • vs any sort of double fe or double tech or fe/tech build
      Mass marine/zealot all in. All chrono on zealot after you scout the double eco/tech.

  • vs TZ
    • vs mass speedling + marine
      Quite a powerful early game rush this is, especially on wide ramps. If you don't scout a gas on terran, or it is late, or scout the zerg and see that he is going speedling and foregoing expand, then spend all your chrono on units, and your terran ally going mass marine, with combat shield and stim as fast as possible. You need stalker sentry as fast as possible - don't wait for warpgate research to finish before building units. It will be too late. Your job is hold until you have a noticeably superior force of stalker as opposed to the opposing marines, and then you and your army can move out simultaneously and push.
    • vs 3rax + mass speedling
      Same as vs mass speedling + marine, but you can get your second gas and have a stronger economy, as the early game push is actually not as strong at the outset. you then transition into stalker sentry, and let ff win the day for you. Don't screw up on micro though - the entire point is to keep your units alive and get a lot of sentries with a lot of energy. You then push before siege tank, and you should be able to deal a lot of damage and possibly kill the opponent. Make sure to use ff to block reinforcements from the player you choose NOT to attack. Preferably, this would be the terran, as going up a terran ramp is difficult.
    • vs bio/roach
      Same 4 gate with sentry + 3rax, but do not go up the zerg's ramp until you have cleared out any nearby terran units and ff the terran's ramp. Bad things can happen if you are shooting at roaches up a ramp and stimmed bio shows up in your rear.
    • vs one or more fast teching/expanding
      All-in fast and hard.

  • vs PZ
    • Korean 4 warpgate + mass speedling
      Full wall of at ramp, and then just play to counter a 4 warpgate, that is, chrono your units. Don't bother trying to push them, just play for an expand.
    • Korean 4 warpgate + econ or tech
      Move out and kill the pylon/probe - you cannot risk doing this against mass speedling zerg. When you are sure there is not a hidden pylon somewhere that will bite you in the ass, push them. Immediately.
    • Korean 4 warpgate + roach
      Once again you can move out and kill the pylon/probe, but this time pushing them is not a good idea until you have sentries, which you should have faster than the opposing protoss. Make sure to ff his zealots out of the battle, and shoot/pull back to kill as many zealots as possible before stimming and engaging the bulk of their army.
    • 4 warpgate + non fast expo/tech
      All up to your control . Enjoy!
    • One or more fast tech/expand
      Just attack. No need even to make it all in.


    Against PT, it's a mirror, so whoever executes better... wins! I actually don't particularly like doing early aggression against mirrors unless one of them techs or expands. Otherwise, I just try to defend into expo.

    Haven't really played against much TT or PP . I think PP sucks though ^^;;


Whew, finally finished typing all that. Ask away ~!

+ Show Spoiler [Part 2 (Replay Pack)] +

11.12.2010
Haven't had the time lately for a lot of writing. Hopefully I'll get some done during the upcoming thanksgiving break ><

Until then, here are some replays (7) of various qualities to maybe keep you 2v2 lovers entertained! Played all of these today, finally remembering to save them since there is no lovely iccup autosave . All of the games are playing while above 2k diamond in RT (currently 2072 diamond RT, 189-117). Hope you enjoy!

http://www.2shared.com/file/CtXYSB86/2v2.html

PS I'm Protoss.


+ Show Spoiler [Part 1 (Outdated - patch 1.1.1 stuff)] +

Episode 1: What should I play?
Well, that depends on what you are asking. Perhaps you are concerned with team composition, that is, should I play PT or PP or ZZ, etc. Or, perhaps you are thinking of a playstyle, about how you want to try to control the game. Let's start with the former.

You cannot simply choose any two races, combine them together, and expect to get to the top unless you are insanely better than everyone else you play. Some combinations just are no good, or rather, they seem no good at my current level (1299 Random 2v2, 107-61 as P).

Consider PP vs TZ on Scorched Haven:
+ Show Spoiler [Scorched Haven preview] +
[image loading]


Terran opens with 7 rax reaper, zerg with 7 pool. There a few popular options currently for protoss. Either you initially 1 gate, with gate around 10 to 12, or you 2gate, or you build at the common choke and try to expand. If you try to do the latter as PP again TZ, it doesn't matter if you go the forge route or with gateway. With gateway, you cannot cover all your options against reaper. If you go forge, you certainly cannot cover all the reapers' options.

Suppose you don't build at your choke. Let's say you build at your ramp. The TZ focus on one protoss, whichever one seems more vulnerable. The other one will not be able to help him. Stalkers will not be out, only zealots. The reaper/ling will deal with zealots easily. If you go down your ramp to try to help your ally, TZ can simply pull back, surround your zealot, and kill. If you don't block at your ramp, you have even less of a chance because now the TZ has plenty of maneuvering room in your base.

Another possibility is to simply sac one of the protosses, so that they simply try to delay/mine resources and give it to their ally for a timing push. While this might work against lower level TZ as they focus too heavily on completely killing someone before moving on, the weakness with this strategy is that the TZ need only conquer the ramp. Once that is done, it is expedient to keep just one reaper in the base of the protoss that has just been defeated, and immediately turn the rest of the army and reinforcements to the other protoss so that he cannot execute a timing attack. Note this assumes that the first protoss to be attacked built at his ramp. If not, simply unpower the gateways/any cannons and proceed from there.

The amazing thing about opening 7rax/7pool again PP is that even if by some miracle the protosses pull off the sexiest micro ever and survive, you are NOT dead. You do not go hardcore reaper or hardcore ling. Terran immediately switches to factory + tech lab for siege tanks around 22 supply assuming that the protosses are being controlled well, which they should be, and zerg transitions into roach/hydra. You research siege immediately, hold your choke, and expand. You then attack in that time interval where you have expansion, the effects of theirs have not kicked in yet, and the difference between your forces is greatest.

All in all, TZ vs PP is pretty damn hard for the PP, if it is even possible given equally (very) skilled players...

I like playing as PT the most. I play either the P or T in this, I'm about the same with both, and perhaps a little better with T in 2v2. The reason is that the T can exert insane map control while the P helps, expands, and utilizes the amazing power of protoss warpgate/robo tech along with casters. Terran has the amazing ability to be extremely effective at harassing no matter how small the numbers, especially on 2v2 maps, which have many avenues of entry for reapers, vikings, banshees, medivacs. One of my favorite builds as T against PZ is to open 2 or 3 rax reaper into helion if the Z goes ling, or banshee if he goes roach, while my protoss ally goes stalker/sentry. I strive to keep my reapers alive as long as possible, so that hopefully by the time my next phase of harass arives, be it helion/medivac or banshee, the reapers are still alive, so I can attack from many angles at once, while my ally safely expands and goes colossus.

I really cannot imagine playing without a T in 2v2 - they are just so good for it. Also, if you are playing PT, please Mr. P, go scout at 9. It makes a terran sad to have to go scout

Controlling the game
If you plan to play aggressively, play very aggressively. If you plan to play a passive macro game, do it like Savior in 2006. It's really hard to strike a balance between the two extremes and do well. Of course, if you have just dealt a tremendous blow to your opponents, say you killed their expansions and they will momentarily be mined out. You should stop your aggression and play defensively so as to absorb the attack that is almost certainly imminent, assuming you have and they know you have a great economic advantage. That's an easy case of walking the line between the extremes. In general you just have to play a lot and get experience so as to better judge what you need to do. The general rules are just like those in 1v1, so I won't get into those. However, it is supremely important to coordinate with your ally.

One should not simply mass units. Coordinate with your ally what you are building. Zerg forced to switch to mass ling because of something you did to his economy? Fine, let the protoss continue with stalker/sentry to deal with what the zerg's ally could do. You go helion and everything is fine if you keep your armies positioned together properly. If you go helion, don't say anything, and he goes zealot, well, that's a waste. It probably won't make you lose, but it's a waste regardless because you already have what you needed to counter the lings, and not having stalkers makes you more vulnerable against say, mutas.

Are you harassing from a certain angle? Well, have your ally hit from another simultaneously. Count it down if you must. Alternatively, have your ally focus purely on his economy and army while you keep the opponents busy. Your actions should complement each other. Playing two 1v1s on the same map is not how one plays 2v2.

Force different counters -> if my ally goes speedling/baneling, a PP team will be hard pressed if they go stalker/sentry because I will have marauder. In that case, they will have to build some zealots and rely on positioning along with force field. Well, I will just make some ghosts and bring them with our attack, and emp the zealots and sentries. If possible, empd stalkers are nice too. The point is that once the zealots are dead, the stalkers are done for. Sentries that can't cast force field are a bonus, so they get the next priority.

Ghosts are super powerful in 2v2, especially against protoss. It is incredible how fast you will melt the protoss army if you have ghosts. The best part is that if the protoss goes heavily stalker/sentry, his concave will take a lot of space. Stalkers have long range, so it is possible that they might block his terran ally, and prevent his mmm from hitting you until the stalkers die. Given that your ally can make whatever while you making ghosts, and Stalker/sentry die easily enough as it is in 1v1.... you can imagine what happens when you give an army (your ally's) free emps.

Do not get caught in places where there is not much room for your army to arc! 2v2 maps are not that much more open than 1v1 maps - in many cases, they are even less open in important areas. That is disastrous if you and your ally get stuck in a place where half your army can't attack while the other part fights! To keep this from happening, keep observers or burrowed units in the areas where armies would normally have to pass through.

Well, that's a few things that I could find off the top of my mind. Any suggestions for the next topic? Post it here if you have any D:

P.S. CSL has 2v2 this season fuck yea~!


Time's a burning while weaiting for GSL. Give me an Episode 2 topic suggestion someone!
EtherealDeath
Profile Blog Joined July 2007
United States8366 Posts
September 30 2010 07:10 GMT
#2
Oops general forumed ~_~
morimacil
Profile Joined March 2010
France921 Posts
September 30 2010 07:54 GMT
#3
Im pretty sure that any combo can be viable in 2v2.
Just because you lost as PP against TZ cheese doesnt mean its unbeatable. If you scout on 8, you can just make a forge and a cannon next to your nexus when you scout the double cheese, and then go on as normal.
The cannon and forge arent wasted, they will be good against possible muta/banshee harass later on, and your opponents sacrificed a ton of economy, and probably dont have any idea how to play a non-cheese game.
Depending on your combo, and what kind of double cheese your opponent is doing, you might have to make bigger adjustments, but its never impossible.
EtherealDeath
Profile Blog Joined July 2007
United States8366 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-09-30 08:04:48
September 30 2010 08:04 GMT
#4
On September 30 2010 16:54 morimacil wrote:
Im pretty sure that any combo can be viable in 2v2.
Just because you lost as PP against TZ cheese doesnt mean its unbeatable. If you scout on 8, you can just make a forge and a cannon next to your nexus when you scout the double cheese, and then go on as normal.
The cannon and forge arent wasted, they will be good against possible muta/banshee harass later on, and your opponents sacrificed a ton of economy, and probably dont have any idea how to play a non-cheese game.
Depending on your combo, and what kind of double cheese your opponent is doing, you might have to make bigger adjustments, but its never impossible.



Cannon at nexus nevertheless leaves angles from which reapers can hit mineral line and or nexus or at least assimilators without receiving return fire. As such, you are limited to either no gas units or your nexus is dead. You simply cannot get enough cannons up to cover all angles in time. And obviously, whoever does it cannot help their ally for quite a while, and that ally will simply be 2v1'd. If both do it, just exploit the angles on one of them.

p.s. i usually win vs it with a competent ally simply because most people who do it on bnet cant control and multitask well
FetTerBender
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
Germany1393 Posts
September 30 2010 08:07 GMT
#5
Thanks for the nice introduction, Ethereal!

Some suggestions: No matter what the combo (i myself play with my allys dual random) the basics of 2on2 is scouting the enemies. If i see reapers and a 7 pool, i have the chance to react in a correct way, no matter which race i got.

The second important thing is, to know when to help your ally to defend or when to counter - push the eco of your enemies. It needs quite some time to get a feeling for the "what could turn this game around", thus making 2on2 so interesting.

Cheers!
There's a fine line between bravery and stupidity.
Jaug
Profile Joined February 2010
Sweden249 Posts
September 30 2010 08:09 GMT
#6
PP vs TZ/TP is unbeatable with the early reaper/zealot reaper/ling. Don't try to make it out like scouting will help, you can not even counteract it at that point. This does not even have to assume same skill, just a minimum skill for the TZ/TP.
EtherealDeath
Profile Blog Joined July 2007
United States8366 Posts
September 30 2010 08:14 GMT
#7
On September 30 2010 17:09 Jaug wrote:
PP vs TZ/TP is unbeatable with the early reaper/zealot reaper/ling. Don't try to make it out like scouting will help, you can not even counteract it at that point. This does not even have to assume same skill, just a minimum skill for the TZ/TP.



TP reaper/zealot is a bit easier to deal with. Problem is that i can't effectively deal with lings while keeping reapers busy due to their speed and ability to surround due to numbers. Zealots have neither of those properties, so while it is still damn hard to defend, it is at least a bit easier. It is actually possible you can survive with enough probes intact for your ally to get stalkers while you get enough zealots... but it is a razor thin edge you walk.
EtherealDeath
Profile Blog Joined July 2007
United States8366 Posts
September 30 2010 08:15 GMT
#8
On September 30 2010 17:07 FetTerBender wrote:
Thanks for the nice introduction, Ethereal!

Some suggestions: No matter what the combo (i myself play with my allys dual random) the basics of 2on2 is scouting the enemies. If i see reapers and a 7 pool, i have the chance to react in a correct way, no matter which race i got.

The second important thing is, to know when to help your ally to defend or when to counter - push the eco of your enemies. It needs quite some time to get a feeling for the "what could turn this game around", thus making 2on2 so interesting.

Cheers!


How would you defend 7rax/7pool as PP?
Patriot.dlk
Profile Blog Joined October 2004
Sweden5462 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-09-30 08:39:40
September 30 2010 08:22 GMT
#9
2v2 team 1231 (107-77) TP
2v2 random 989 (52-37) T+whatever
2v2 team (35-15) TT

I am a TP or TT 2v2 player (can someone I know please learn zerg lol). I feel that the reaper nerf was a great thing for 2v2 and since then we can survive the reaper/ling rush. It's also decreasing in popularity as far as I have noted anyways.

I would also like to note that I never lost a game to the racial matchup being unbalanced against my favor. I think people focus to much one these things. This is why we lose:

Positioning is still the number one reason for us to lose the game. As described in the OP you can get fucking owned if you get the stalkers in the front and silly terran units doing nothing in the back.

Number two reason for losing games is that our teams second expand comes to fast. Taking that first one was often a winning idea as we had good control of the game so far but the second one gets scouted and they just attack and have more stuff and win. Not saying you can't have 2 expand but you need to time it well.

We get rushed and die Yes, this includes losses from the reaper+ling rush, rally rushes, banelings busts and whatever you can think of. We die a lot from rushes still. BUT this used the be the number one reason and it feels like we keep getting better at blocking these things

ps: I would also imagine the builds being very similar on the asian server because I've heard casters say that. Europe people do all kinds of things and reaper ling not even standard play (talking about my experience only here could be wrong)
Patriot.dlk
Profile Blog Joined October 2004
Sweden5462 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-09-30 08:37:37
September 30 2010 08:33 GMT
#10
On September 30 2010 17:15 EtherealDeath wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 30 2010 17:07 FetTerBender wrote:
Thanks for the nice introduction, Ethereal!

Some suggestions: No matter what the combo (i myself play with my allys dual random) the basics of 2on2 is scouting the enemies. If i see reapers and a 7 pool, i have the chance to react in a correct way, no matter which race i got.

The second important thing is, to know when to help your ally to defend or when to counter - push the eco of your enemies. It needs quite some time to get a feeling for the "what could turn this game around", thus making 2on2 so interesting.

Cheers!


How would you defend 7rax/7pool as PP?

I have no experience with the race protoss so it's hard for me to imagine. But using offensive cannons could be one idea.

as TT/TP If we have the same base Discord IV, High Orbit, Twilight Fortress then I wall off and get bunker after 9 barrack and he just goes all out to get maruders/stalkers.

If we get any time to take a breath I make a tech addon and start going reapers to or if my ally is terran he gets the reapers and I get a reactor focusing on the lings.

Maps were the bases are seperate we have nothing solid figured out. Just get shit out early and try to defend

edit: I will repair that first stalker with all my scvs if it comes down to that. we won several times by doing that
4Servy
Profile Joined August 2008
Netherlands1542 Posts
September 30 2010 08:40 GMT
#11
t/z is like unbeateble in 2n2 except vs t/z ofc. Zerg has the speed, terran has the harras options and support tools aka medivacs/tanks its just damm hard to play vs tihs combo.
Heyoka
Profile Blog Joined March 2008
Katowice25012 Posts
September 30 2010 08:40 GMT
#12
On September 30 2010 16:10 EtherealDeath wrote:
Oops general forumed ~_~


Moved to strategy!
@RealHeyoka | ESL / DreamHack StarCraft Lead
FetTerBender
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
Germany1393 Posts
September 30 2010 08:54 GMT
#13
On September 30 2010 17:15 EtherealDeath wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 30 2010 17:07 FetTerBender wrote:
Thanks for the nice introduction, Ethereal!

Some suggestions: No matter what the combo (i myself play with my allys dual random) the basics of 2on2 is scouting the enemies. If i see reapers and a 7 pool, i have the chance to react in a correct way, no matter which race i got.

The second important thing is, to know when to help your ally to defend or when to counter - push the eco of your enemies. It needs quite some time to get a feeling for the "what could turn this game around", thus making 2on2 so interesting.

Cheers!


How would you defend 7rax/7pool as PP?


I tend to play "crazy" vs. such (obviously strong vs team) openings. However, i have to admit the success rate being ~30% at best.

At a 8 scout, i would possibly suggest to go instant forge and def at my mineral line. At the same time, the scout probes starts placing pylons in the gas and the mineral line of the Terran, to put pressure on the economy. If the reapers do not defend but attack, my focus would be on trying to warp in a cannon in the minerals of the Terran and defend the home bases with the rest. If the Terran can be economically crippeled, you stand a chance to pull 2 Gate mixed vs. the Zerg.

This is - in fact - not a sexy situation to be in. But with Pylons in the mineral and gas lines of the Terran you can delay the income massively, thus slowing down the reapers and reducing the threat to your home bases from 1v2 (cannons cant come help) to 1v1.5...

Suggestions?

Cheers!
There's a fine line between bravery and stupidity.
mathemagician1986
Profile Joined February 2010
Germany549 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-09-30 09:08:43
September 30 2010 09:06 GMT
#14
I always play Zerg with a good Terran friend. I'm much better than him, so we aren't really a top team(we're hovering at 900-950). We never cheese though, so I hope we will improve quickly.

Anyway, what I find is THE strategy for any 2v2 on any map, is denying the opponents 3rd base. Naturals on 2v2 maps are usually easily defendable, so you have to hurt them when they are trying to take their 3rd base. I think after we hit mid/high diamond we won 70%+ of our games by just starving them out, while we desperately defend the 1 base we have more than them. We've also started doing a build, where I hatch before pool, while he places some bunkers smartly and goes M&M. This deals very well with a lot of 1 base timing attacks I see a lot from TP teams, and leaves us with the economic advantage.

Another thing is air is extremely strong on the bigger 2v2 maps, so I always go mass mutalisk, no matter what I'm facing. roach hydra is terrible in team games imo, unless your opponents are noobs and don't deny your creeo spread. In 2v2 if you have 2+ bases to defend, you need speedy units, not slow ass roach hydra.
morimacil
Profile Joined March 2010
France921 Posts
September 30 2010 09:14 GMT
#15
On September 30 2010 17:04 EtherealDeath wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 30 2010 16:54 morimacil wrote:
Im pretty sure that any combo can be viable in 2v2.
Just because you lost as PP against TZ cheese doesnt mean its unbeatable. If you scout on 8, you can just make a forge and a cannon next to your nexus when you scout the double cheese, and then go on as normal.
The cannon and forge arent wasted, they will be good against possible muta/banshee harass later on, and your opponents sacrificed a ton of economy, and probably dont have any idea how to play a non-cheese game.
Depending on your combo, and what kind of double cheese your opponent is doing, you might have to make bigger adjustments, but its never impossible.



Cannon at nexus nevertheless leaves angles from which reapers can hit mineral line and or nexus or at least assimilators without receiving return fire. As such, you are limited to either no gas units or your nexus is dead. You simply cannot get enough cannons up to cover all angles in time. And obviously, whoever does it cannot help their ally for quite a while, and that ally will simply be 2v1'd. If both do it, just exploit the angles on one of them.

If both protoss make cannons, then the lings are pretty much useless. After that, you can make a gateway, and a cybercore, to get a stalker and repel the reaper(s). Send the sacrificial zealot to chase the reaper around for a bit while the stalker gets chronoboosted.
Sure, you cant cover your whole base with cannons, but as long as your mineral line doesnt get raped, you will be fine. a reaper wont kill your nexus in the time it takes to make a cybercore and a chronoboosted zealot.
And he definitly wont be able to kill it in time if he has to kite and kill the zealot you make while the cybercore is building.
If needed, you can pull a few probes to repel the reaper from your nexus. Thats a worse case scenario, but even if that does happen, and you lose a few probes, what you are left with, is one protoss with a bad economy, and one with a good economy, against a terran and a zerg, with both terrible economy.
WrathOfAiur
Profile Joined May 2010
Germany243 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-09-30 10:31:25
September 30 2010 10:26 GMT
#16
what would a "normal" opening as PT vs TZ be, if you face lings and reapers?

the T could get reapers himself I guess, but what to do as Protoss? Can I get a 10 Gate 12/13 Gas and then a zealot and a core as soon as the gate finishes and then get stalkers? Can this hold a rush like this?
Thonku
Profile Joined September 2010
8 Posts
September 30 2010 11:50 GMT
#17
On September 30 2010 18:06 mathemagician1986 wrote:
Anyway, what I find is THE strategy for any 2v2 on any map, is denying the opponents 3rd base. Naturals on 2v2 maps are usually easily defendable, so you have to hurt them when they are trying to take their 3rd base. I think after we hit mid/high diamond we won 70%+ of our games by just starving them out, while we desperately defend the 1 base we have more than them. We've also started doing a build, where I hatch before pool, while he places some bunkers smartly and goes M&M. This deals very well with a lot of 1 base timing attacks I see a lot from TP teams, and leaves us with the economic advantage.


This is very interesting for me. Could you please elaborate on the "he places some bunkers smartly" ? Where does he place them ? On which map ? My zerg friend and I have a rather good mid-end game but we find ourself in difficult situations early game despite me going 3 rax + 1 bunker. Do you think several bunkers are necessary before first expand ?
FilthyCarlos
Profile Joined September 2010
United Kingdom1 Post
September 30 2010 15:43 GMT
#18
I've recently started playing some 2v2 and my introduction to 2v2 was games where i was rushed every single time.

I play TT, originally we tried to use similar tactics to those we use in 1v1 and go for a macro style game, but literally everyone, in the lower leagues at least, rushes. I guess beacuse attacking with an all-in rush is far easier than defending an all-in rush. The only problem with this is that it becomes very difficult to improve at 2v2 simply beacuse unless i rush myself i face losing in around 5-7mins.
hedgefund
Profile Joined August 2010
45 Posts
September 30 2010 15:49 GMT
#19
On September 30 2010 19:26 WrathOfAiur wrote:
what would a "normal" opening as PT vs TZ be, if you face lings and reapers?

the T could get reapers himself I guess, but what to do as Protoss? Can I get a 10 Gate 12/13 Gas and then a zealot and a core as soon as the gate finishes and then get stalkers? Can this hold a rush like this?


Depends on how early it is. If the Terran is proxying, then go 2 gate zealots (10/12-13 gate works) and the Terran needs to go Marauder, or reapers preferably. Either build so that you can funnel the zerglings at your ramp, or build close to your nexus. The point is that you want to protect your probes as much as possible. You should be able to hold off the lings easily, and just send a zealot around to chase a reaper until Terran help arrives.

Save your chronoboosts.

Now, the proxy is less common, but (bad) people do try saving up 4-5 reapers and then assaulting your front. If you suspect reaper/ling, scout it well but just go gate/gas/cyber (10,12,15 works).
Here a good wall and a few stalker/zealots/single sentry should hold you off just fine.
crayhasissues
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
United States682 Posts
September 30 2010 15:58 GMT
#20
My main 2v2 team usually plays with a TZ or TP combo, me being Terran. We have been RL friends since like 4th grade, which really helps. Our communication is probably a lot better than some of the online friends I have.

We moved from silver to top platinum (should be diamond soon), and have played about 200 games. We used to lose to cheese nearly everytime. I attribute this mainly to bad scouting. For example, my SCV would see a toss with nothing in his base except nexus, and then try to run back to near my base with that scout to find him. By then, it would be too late. Now, we will usually find the cheese much faster, and its pretty easy to deal with. Usually a matter of dancing back and forth between our bases and separating the enemy troops.

2v2 is super fun if you can find the right partner. I have done some 2v2 randoms, and man, it can be frustrating.
twitch.tv/crayhasissues ||| @crayhasissues on twitter ||| Dota 2 Streamer that loves to help new players!
1 2 3 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
RSL Revival
10:00
Season 2: Playoffs Day 1
Reynor vs ZounLIVE!
Tasteless839
Crank 690
IndyStarCraft 112
CranKy Ducklings111
Rex110
3DClanTV 53
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Tasteless 839
Crank 690
Harstem 134
Lowko117
IndyStarCraft 112
Rex 110
ProTech11
StarCraft: Brood War
Calm 3871
Sea 3535
Rain 3509
Flash 2133
GuemChi 1704
Bisu 1209
Jaedong 787
firebathero 445
sSak 391
BeSt 313
[ Show more ]
Stork 272
EffOrt 248
Shuttle 209
hero 207
Soulkey 202
Snow 195
Mini 160
Last 151
Light 128
Barracks 127
Soma 114
Backho 99
Pusan 75
ggaemo 67
TY 54
Mong 53
ToSsGirL 50
JulyZerg 43
Liquid`Ret 42
Aegong 42
Rush 35
Icarus 26
Sharp 26
sorry 24
soO 21
sas.Sziky 20
Sexy 14
Bale 11
HiyA 10
ajuk12(nOOB) 10
IntoTheRainbow 8
Terrorterran 7
zelot 4
Britney 0
Dota 2
The International87017
Gorgc6285
Dendi580
BananaSlamJamma112
Counter-Strike
olofmeister1578
shoxiejesuss644
x6flipin534
Other Games
B2W.Neo433
crisheroes325
DeMusliM282
Mew2King72
Organizations
StarCraft: Brood War
Kim Chul Min (afreeca) 1162
Other Games
gamesdonequick807
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 12 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• Ler69
League of Legends
• Jankos769
Upcoming Events
Kung Fu Cup
24m
TaeJa vs SHIN
ByuN vs Creator
The PondCast
1h 24m
RSL Revival
22h 24m
Classic vs TriGGeR
ByuN vs Maru
Online Event
1d
Kung Fu Cup
1d
BSL Team Wars
1d 7h
RSL Revival
1d 22h
Maestros of the Game
2 days
ShoWTimE vs Classic
Clem vs herO
Serral vs Bunny
Reynor vs Zoun
Cosmonarchy
2 days
Bonyth vs Dewalt
[BSL 2025] Weekly
2 days
[ Show More ]
RSL Revival
2 days
Maestros of the Game
3 days
BSL Team Wars
3 days
Afreeca Starleague
3 days
Snow vs Sharp
Jaedong vs Mini
Wardi Open
3 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
Afreeca Starleague
4 days
Light vs Speed
Larva vs Soma
LiuLi Cup
5 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Copa Latinoamericana 4
SEL Season 2 Championship
HCC Europe

Ongoing

BSL 20 Team Wars
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 3
BSL 21 Points
ASL Season 20
CSL 2025 AUTUMN (S18)
LASL Season 20
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
Chzzk MurlocKing SC1 vs SC2 Cup #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1

Upcoming

2025 Chongqing Offline CUP
BSL Polish World Championship 2025
BSL Season 21
BSL 21 Team A
EC S1
SL Budapest Major 2025
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters Fall
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.