The Automated Ban List - Page 3060
Forum Index > TL Community |
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil. NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ | ||
Dangermousecatdog
United Kingdom7084 Posts
| ||
Aveng3r
United States2411 Posts
| ||
Ben...
Canada3485 Posts
On July 21 2019 22:50 PhoenixVoid wrote: There was a time where I'd agree with you, but for the last while the tone of his posts had become incredibly toxic and negative. He would constantly talk down to everyone while refusing to answer simple questions or justify his increasingly unbelievable claims in any way (process crimes aren't crimes, lies are not necessarily lies. Stuff like that). He frequently derailed constructive discussions to the detriment of the thread. When he would respond to those questioning him, it would never be in a productive way. For example, he would either find some tiny tidbit in a post to nitpick or he would answer a question you didn't ask in an attempt to divert away from the actual topic at hand. It once took Kwark roughly 6 responses to get xDaunt to actually answer a question, and the answer he gave turned out to be that his opinion wasn't actually based on anything. In doing this he basically shut down all discussion in the thread for multiple pages for no reason. This type of thing happened multiple times per week. It became clear to me just how harmful xDaunt was to the thread when last time he was temp banned, not only were there several constructive, inclusive conversations that had multiple viewpoints, but a bunch of other posters I hadn't seem post in a long time had started to post again, and discussion became much more lively.Much as I disagreed with xDaunt on virtually everything, I do feel a bit saddened our liberal-progressive adversary is gone. He kept US Pol interesting, to say the least. The initial ban note says it all: xDaunt was just temp banned for 30 days by EvilTeletubby. Since coming back from his last ban his posts had become much more extreme. He recently had used a racist nickname for one of the presidential candidates during the debates, expressed agreement with the substance of some tweets generally regarded as being openly racist and around the same time said some pretty eyebrow-raising things about some ethnic minority political figures that could fairly easily be interpreted as bigoted:That account was created on 2010-03-05 03:09:59 and had 17732 posts. Reason: Holy shit your posting is toxic and about as counter-productive to worthwhile discussion as you can make it. I really don't care about your political beliefs, but I do care about your horrible attitude towards others. You're dismissive of any other point of view without actually having a discussion around why. The "I'm right, you're wrong" mentality is not what we care to see around here. You're actively discouraging critical thinking. Your recent posting and moderation history here is complete trash. This isn't a permanent because we do respect tenure here, but god damn. Chill out and step away from the PC if you're not going to add anything. On July 19 2019 01:16 xDaunt wrote: I'm not so sure that she's going to be an American for long. And beyond that, I have zero patience for incorporating people into the American tent who hate the tent. The same goes for the other politicians who hate America, like AOC. These are people who need to be ridiculed, humiliated, and marginalized. User was temp banned for this post. | ||
Ej_
47656 Posts
Surprised this one didn't play a game where you shoot terrorists. | ||
![]()
SirJolt
the Dagon Knight4002 Posts
On July 22 2019 17:59 Ej_ wrote: Is that a 2nd time that a TL writer turns out to be a far-right extremist? Surprised this one didn't play a game where you shoot terrorists. Just out of curiosity, who was the first? | ||
Jealous
10096 Posts
amazingxkcd | ||
Dangermousecatdog
United Kingdom7084 Posts
| ||
farvacola
United States18818 Posts
| ||
GreenHorizons
United States22673 Posts
On July 23 2019 00:50 farvacola wrote: And yet, some of us still remember.... I had forgotten, ironic huh? | ||
WombaT
Northern Ireland23759 Posts
On July 22 2019 17:35 Ben... wrote: There was a time where I'd agree with you, but for the last while the tone of his posts had become incredibly toxic and negative. He would constantly talk down to everyone while refusing to answer simple questions or justify his increasingly unbelievable claims in any way (process crimes aren't crimes, lies are not necessarily lies. Stuff like that). He frequently derailed constructive discussions to the detriment of the thread. When he would respond to those questioning him, it would never be in a productive way. For example, he would either find some tiny tidbit in a post to nitpick or he would answer a question you didn't ask in an attempt to divert away from the actual topic at hand. It once took Kwark roughly 6 responses to get xDaunt to actually answer a question, and the answer he gave turned out to be that his opinion wasn't actually based on anything. In doing this he basically shut down all discussion in the thread for multiple pages for no reason. This type of thing happened multiple times per week. It became clear to me just how harmful xDaunt was to the thread when last time he was temp banned, not only were there several constructive, inclusive conversations that had multiple viewpoints, but a bunch of other posters I hadn't seem post in a long time had started to post again, and discussion became much more lively. The initial ban note says it all: Since coming back from his last ban his posts had become much more extreme. He recently had used a racist nickname for one of the presidential candidates during the debates, expressed agreement with the substance of some tweets generally regarded as being openly racist and around the same time said some pretty eyebrow-raising things about some ethnic minority political figures that could fairly easily be interpreted as bigoted: I met a lot of Daunts in my time in certain corners of the internet. I preferred to go talk to folks of the right and find what makes them tick, rather than be told by others what they think. Met plenty of interesting and reasonable folks in my travels. Met plenty who I initially liked and had interesting discussions with who just seemed to gradually retrench into positions and rhetoric that were so skewed and to my mind ultimately irrational that I couldn’t have the kind of conversations I used to enjoy with them any more. Daunt seemed to gradually go further down that rabbit hole, was a pity to me as I enjoyed his contributions back in the day. Even the thing you quote being a case in point, AOC can’t hate the tent, Trump can run a hat saying ‘Make America Great Again’ with the obvious message that it isn’t currently great and that’s fine. | ||
Vindicare605
United States16032 Posts
On July 22 2019 17:35 Ben... wrote: There was a time where I'd agree with you, but for the last while the tone of his posts had become incredibly toxic and negative. He would constantly talk down to everyone while refusing to answer simple questions or justify his increasingly unbelievable claims in any way (process crimes aren't crimes, lies are not necessarily lies. Stuff like that). He frequently derailed constructive discussions to the detriment of the thread. When he would respond to those questioning him, it would never be in a productive way. For example, he would either find some tiny tidbit in a post to nitpick or he would answer a question you didn't ask in an attempt to divert away from the actual topic at hand. It once took Kwark roughly 6 responses to get xDaunt to actually answer a question, and the answer he gave turned out to be that his opinion wasn't actually based on anything. In doing this he basically shut down all discussion in the thread for multiple pages for no reason. This type of thing happened multiple times per week. It became clear to me just how harmful xDaunt was to the thread when last time he was temp banned, not only were there several constructive, inclusive conversations that had multiple viewpoints, but a bunch of other posters I hadn't seem post in a long time had started to post again, and discussion became much more lively. The initial ban note says it all: Since coming back from his last ban his posts had become much more extreme. He recently had used a racist nickname for one of the presidential candidates during the debates, expressed agreement with the substance of some tweets generally regarded as being openly racist and around the same time said some pretty eyebrow-raising things about some ethnic minority political figures that could fairly easily be interpreted as bigoted: It's unfortunate that the behavior you're describing has become so common online when discussing any kind of American politics. It's becoming so increasingly polarizing that even in a forum like this it's becoming almost impossible to have real discussions. | ||
Nebuchad
Switzerland11915 Posts
| ||
Alejandrisha
United States6565 Posts
| ||
fluidrone
France1478 Posts
i wouldn't mind a week off please, thank you for your time <3 User was temp banned for this post. | ||
WombaT
Northern Ireland23759 Posts
On July 23 2019 20:23 Nebuchad wrote: One of the issues with american (but not only) politics is that we keep talking about the polarization of discourse, like it's our fault as speakers, when it's the position of the parties that are getting more polar. XDaunt may have thought what he thought for a while but it wouldn't have been apparent if he didn't have to defend all the shit from the Trump admin every day I feel it’s more a bottom-up phenomenon than a top-down one personally, if the wider populace didn’t have an appetite to sustain it and feed the flames it wouldn’t be nearly as pronounced. Daunt, as many others have ended up tied up in knots defending a man with no real consistent political principles who is pretty damn erratic to boot, but that’s a choice one makes in tethering themselves to an individual over political positions and whatnot. | ||
fluidrone
France1478 Posts
mmm?! make that two then! thank you for your time and your great work on the site <3 User was temp banned for this post. | ||
opisska
Poland8852 Posts
On August 04 2019 06:47 fluidrone wrote: Can i please bother you for another week off.. mmm no check that .. that seems boring.. borderline lame mmm?! make that two then! thank you for your time and your great work on the site <3 User was temp banned for this post. One of the most unbelievable things to read on this website is fluidrone's post count. Yeah, I know this is by far not his first account, but still it's amazing that he has managed to make such a big impact in 1400 posts. | ||
Dangermousecatdog
United Kingdom7084 Posts
| ||
opisska
Poland8852 Posts
On August 05 2019 21:15 Dangermousecatdog wrote: How would you measure impact? He makes no impact at all. He has changed no one's opinion or outlook on any particular subject. The most you can say is that he makes posts where people may talk about himself, due to his deliberately unreadable typing. Well there are two sides to it: he is definitely well known, literally every mildly frequent visitor recognizes him. That's what I meant - name any other poster with sub 2000 posts who is so publicly known here. As to your post itself, I must say that he definitely influenced me personally. The point of human interaction isn't to immediately reverse the opinion of the other person, how frequently does that happen? But some of my interactions with him influenced my thoughts - granted some of that is also due to PMs, not just public posts. I think that when it comes to fluidrone posts, it is totally up to the reader how much do they want to take away from them - surely if you are not willing to put in any effort, you will always get stuck at the "incomprehensible drivel" level, but it's not all that is to it. I am quite certain he is not just a stupid troll typing nonsense to annoy people, he is just a very complex person. | ||
Dangermousecatdog
United Kingdom7084 Posts
| ||
| ||