• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 03:38
CET 09:38
KST 17:38
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 3 - Playoffs Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups C & D Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups A & B Preview2TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners12Intel X Team Liquid Seoul event: Showmatches and Meet the Pros10
Community News
[BSL21] Ro.16 Group Stage (C->B->A->D)4Weekly Cups (Nov 17-23): Solar, MaxPax, Clem win2RSL Season 3: RO16 results & RO8 bracket13Weekly Cups (Nov 10-16): Reynor, Solar lead Zerg surge2[TLMC] Fall/Winter 2025 Ladder Map Rotation14
StarCraft 2
General
When will we find out if there are more tournament Weekly Cups (Nov 17-23): Solar, MaxPax, Clem win SC: Evo Complete - Ranked Ladder OPEN ALPHA Weekly Cups (Nov 10-16): Reynor, Solar lead Zerg surge RSL Season 3: RO16 results & RO8 bracket
Tourneys
Tenacious Turtle Tussle [Alpha Pro Series] Nice vs Cure RSL Revival: Season 3 $5,000+ WardiTV 2025 Championship StarCraft Evolution League (SC Evo Biweekly)
Strategy
Custom Maps
kubetno179 Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 501 Price of Progress Mutation # 500 Fright night Mutation # 499 Chilling Adaptation Mutation # 498 Wheel of Misfortune|Cradle of Death
Brood War
General
Which season is the best in ASL? [BSL21] Ro.16 Group Stage (C->B->A->D) Data analysis on 70 million replays FlaSh on: Biggest Problem With SnOw's Playstyle soO on: FanTaSy's Potential Return to StarCraft
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL21] RO16 Tie Breaker - Group B - Sun 21:00 CET [BSL21] GosuLeague T1 Ro16 - Tue & Thu 22:00 CET [BSL21] RO16 Tie Breaker - Group A - Sat 21:00 CET
Strategy
Game Theory for Starcraft How to stay on top of macro? Current Meta PvZ map balance
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Beyond All Reason The Perfect Game Should offensive tower rushing be viable in RTS games?
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas
Community
General
Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The China Politics Thread US Politics Mega-thread Artificial Intelligence Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine
Fan Clubs
White-Ra Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion! Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NBA General Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023 TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Where to ask questions and add stream? The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Thanks for the RSL
Hildegard
The Health Impact of Joining…
TrAiDoS
Saturation point
Uldridge
DnB/metal remix FFO Mick Go…
ImbaTosS
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1984 users

4.12.0 Patch Notes - Page 3

Forum Index > SC2 General
130 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next All
Ben...
Profile Joined January 2011
Canada3485 Posts
June 10 2020 19:04 GMT
#41
I'm disappointed they didn't think this patch through more and try other changes. That battery change is probably going to have side effects that aren't currently known and already in my games of PvP it feels like things have gone too far. People are throwing down several batteries then playing super passive and turtling.

The mine change should not have gone through. It will have little or no impact at the top level but will have a negative effect for folks on ladder. Widow mine drops are already one of the worst things in the game from a gameplay perspective and their decision to encourage more of these drops is a poor choice. We want to get away from stupid coinflip strategies that decide entire games in under 10 seconds, not encourage them.
"Cliiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiide" -Tastosis
GrandSmurf
Profile Joined July 2003
Netherlands462 Posts
Last Edited: 2020-06-10 19:09:53
June 10 2020 19:04 GMT
#42
On June 11 2020 01:49 freelifeffs wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 11 2020 00:08 GrandSmurf wrote:
On June 10 2020 23:08 freelifeffs wrote:
On June 10 2020 21:29 BonitiilloO wrote:
i love the changes, people need to understand that is very easy for Z to be in the game and dont have to worry about basically anything, now they need to rethink when they are engaging a terran army since baneling won't be able to deal with everything.


and you need to understand that you dont start a message with 'people need to understand' if you clearly dont understand anything yourself.


do tell, explain it to us then.



whats there to explain? its obviously biased and idiotic thinking to say stuff like 'zerg doesnt need to worry about anything' and 'zerg doesnt need to think and can just always engage no matter how and what'. stuff like that is not productive for any kind of discussion and people who think like that have no right to tell others they 'need to understand' things first.


granted, it is a bit of a hyperbole to state zerg have nothing to worry about. but lets be real here, they do have a rather care-free early game and can/could shrug off any harrasment pretty effortlessly and double expand.

edit: within reason ofc. notwithstanding certain all-ins.
One time that happened and I just stopped everything, selected the offending SCV, hit Cancel, moved it over to my Barracks, made a Marine, had the Marine shoot it to death, then left the game.
chipmonklord17
Profile Joined February 2011
United States11944 Posts
Last Edited: 2020-06-10 19:17:43
June 10 2020 19:16 GMT
#43
On June 11 2020 03:47 GrandSmurf wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 11 2020 02:23 Rubicant1 wrote:
On June 11 2020 00:40 chipmonklord17 wrote:
On June 11 2020 00:32 GrandSmurf wrote:
On June 11 2020 00:09 chipmonklord17 wrote:
Honestly Banelings are a mistake. There's just no fixing that they're significantly the unit with the worst ratio of "ability to use" versus "ability to defend against" with absurdly high use cases and ease of access and next to no counter-balances (I.E splitting takes so much more effort / APM than just A-moving into a clump of units).


fixed it for you.


Lol what?

Banelings:
LITERALLY DIE on use
Can be split against
Require a speed upgrade to not get dumpstered by anyone doing any kind of splitting
Slower speed off creep
Cannot hit air
Are bad against Mech/Immortals/Marauders
Require Larva, which is the same resource as Drones
Require +2 attack to one shot workers
Have splash damage

Mines:
Can be used infinitely
Can be invisible and will automatically work with no player activation while underground
Massive Splash damage
Made out of a reactor
Can be used in literally any comp against literally any units at literally any time in the game and be useful
Cannot hit buildings
Friendly Fire
1 shot workers at any point in the game

Any comparison to Zerg for the sake of balance whine, you may as well use old BLord Infestor because I'd totally agree with you. Using banelings as an example is hilarious, given all of their natural weaknesses to balance out what they can do

On June 11 2020 00:28 ilax30 wrote:
On June 11 2020 00:09 chipmonklord17 wrote:
Honestly Widow Mines are a mistake. There's just no fixing that they're significantly significantly the unit with the worst ratio of "ability to use" versus "ability to defend against" with absurdly high use cases and ease of access and next to no counter-balances (I.E banelings counter balances are their lack of hitting air and their single use only).


I would say a big counter balance is them dealing friendly fire. Can damage loads of bio or even kill a chunk of marines which happens in pro play all the time.

And at a lower lvl players have a tougher time dealing with widow mines, then again the terrans there kill their own units way more than at a higher lvl which evens it up a bit as well


Never really considered friendly fire as such an enormous counter balance to make them a well designed unit, but that's a good point


Goddam, you dumpstered that guy into oblivion. But yeah, like BL/Infestor, Swarmhosts, etc (which were all rightly nerfed), mines are exponentially harder to play against than use, with no real counters, at all levels of play. Banelings would fall more into this category if they didn't die upon use--also, they're basically the only supply-efficient unit Zerg has in non-mirrors these days.


i dont feel particularly dumpster fired though :O.

banelings are more useful than ducttape. they will fix most issues without too much effort.
also, uses literally 3 times in one sentence. i cant take that seriously in any context. also since it not true.

and the only one who is balance whining was the poster i responded to.

ill concede i was being snarky and not entirely serious. i do take great pride in the fact he was probably frothing from the mouth when he posted that comment. heh.


Because you seem so interested in feelings, if you must know, I laughed out loud at how idiotic a statement it would be to call one of the best designed new units brought to SC2 (The Baneling) a badly designed unit. Because interestingly enough, balance =/= game design, a unit doesn't have to be OP to be poorly designed, and OP units that are well designed can have their numbers changed and be back to a good spot.

Interesting to say that Terran can make widow mines in any situation at any time is a false statement. Considering Bio Mine, Battle Mech, and standard mech heavily use mines, and they can be used against any composition that zerg or protoss makes at any time in the game as either harassers (because again they 1 shot workers at any time in the game) or as army units. But please, inform me of when mines aren't useful to a Terran?
Slydie
Profile Joined August 2013
1927 Posts
June 10 2020 19:27 GMT
#44
On June 11 2020 02:23 Rubicant1 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 11 2020 00:40 chipmonklord17 wrote:
On June 11 2020 00:32 GrandSmurf wrote:
On June 11 2020 00:09 chipmonklord17 wrote:
Honestly Banelings are a mistake. There's just no fixing that they're significantly the unit with the worst ratio of "ability to use" versus "ability to defend against" with absurdly high use cases and ease of access and next to no counter-balances (I.E splitting takes so much more effort / APM than just A-moving into a clump of units).


fixed it for you.


Lol what?

Banelings:
LITERALLY DIE on use
Can be split against
Require a speed upgrade to not get dumpstered by anyone doing any kind of splitting
Slower speed off creep
Cannot hit air
Are bad against Mech/Immortals/Marauders
Require Larva, which is the same resource as Drones
Require +2 attack to one shot workers
Have splash damage

Mines:
Can be used infinitely
Can be invisible and will automatically work with no player activation while underground
Massive Splash damage
Made out of a reactor
Can be used in literally any comp against literally any units at literally any time in the game and be useful
Cannot hit buildings
Friendly Fire
1 shot workers at any point in the game

Any comparison to Zerg for the sake of balance whine, you may as well use old BLord Infestor because I'd totally agree with you. Using banelings as an example is hilarious, given all of their natural weaknesses to balance out what they can do

On June 11 2020 00:28 ilax30 wrote:
On June 11 2020 00:09 chipmonklord17 wrote:
Honestly Widow Mines are a mistake. There's just no fixing that they're significantly significantly the unit with the worst ratio of "ability to use" versus "ability to defend against" with absurdly high use cases and ease of access and next to no counter-balances (I.E banelings counter balances are their lack of hitting air and their single use only).


I would say a big counter balance is them dealing friendly fire. Can damage loads of bio or even kill a chunk of marines which happens in pro play all the time.

And at a lower lvl players have a tougher time dealing with widow mines, then again the terrans there kill their own units way more than at a higher lvl which evens it up a bit as well


Never really considered friendly fire as such an enormous counter balance to make them a well designed unit, but that's a good point


Goddam, you dumpstered that guy into oblivion. But yeah, like BL/Infestor, Swarmhosts, etc (which were all rightly nerfed), mines are exponentially harder to play against than use, with no real counters, at all levels of play. Banelings would fall more into this category if they didn't die upon use--also, they're basically the only supply-efficient unit Zerg has in non-mirrors these days.


Did you ever try to play against banelings? Their main strength vs mines is that they are much more reliable and can be manually triggered. Mines have a delay and range, so it can be almost impossible to control where they go off.

I agree Mines are not a good solution to force Zergs to micro and Protoss to be attentive, though. Removing them for stronger tanks and/or helbats could be a better solution.
Buff the siegetank
mikedupp
Profile Joined May 2020
233 Posts
June 10 2020 19:38 GMT
#45
On June 10 2020 18:12 xelnaga_empire wrote:
I hope the new shield battery overcharge buff doesn't make PvsT worse at the top pro level. For the GSL Season 2 qualifiers, PvT was 76–34 (69.09%) as per Aligulac: http://aligulac.com/results/events/110098-GSL-2020-Season-2/.

I hope the changes by the balance team will help PvsT return close to 50%, rather than the 69% win rate by Protoss over Terran in the GSL Season 2 qualifiers.

do you take into consideration who the players are in your %? Because you could easily throw away a bunch of PvTs in this qualifier as mismatches.
GrandSmurf
Profile Joined July 2003
Netherlands462 Posts
June 10 2020 19:40 GMT
#46
On June 11 2020 04:16 chipmonklord17 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 11 2020 03:47 GrandSmurf wrote:
On June 11 2020 02:23 Rubicant1 wrote:
On June 11 2020 00:40 chipmonklord17 wrote:
On June 11 2020 00:32 GrandSmurf wrote:
On June 11 2020 00:09 chipmonklord17 wrote:
Honestly Banelings are a mistake. There's just no fixing that they're significantly the unit with the worst ratio of "ability to use" versus "ability to defend against" with absurdly high use cases and ease of access and next to no counter-balances (I.E splitting takes so much more effort / APM than just A-moving into a clump of units).


fixed it for you.


Lol what?

Banelings:
LITERALLY DIE on use
Can be split against
Require a speed upgrade to not get dumpstered by anyone doing any kind of splitting
Slower speed off creep
Cannot hit air
Are bad against Mech/Immortals/Marauders
Require Larva, which is the same resource as Drones
Require +2 attack to one shot workers
Have splash damage

Mines:
Can be used infinitely
Can be invisible and will automatically work with no player activation while underground
Massive Splash damage
Made out of a reactor
Can be used in literally any comp against literally any units at literally any time in the game and be useful
Cannot hit buildings
Friendly Fire
1 shot workers at any point in the game

Any comparison to Zerg for the sake of balance whine, you may as well use old BLord Infestor because I'd totally agree with you. Using banelings as an example is hilarious, given all of their natural weaknesses to balance out what they can do

On June 11 2020 00:28 ilax30 wrote:
On June 11 2020 00:09 chipmonklord17 wrote:
Honestly Widow Mines are a mistake. There's just no fixing that they're significantly significantly the unit with the worst ratio of "ability to use" versus "ability to defend against" with absurdly high use cases and ease of access and next to no counter-balances (I.E banelings counter balances are their lack of hitting air and their single use only).


I would say a big counter balance is them dealing friendly fire. Can damage loads of bio or even kill a chunk of marines which happens in pro play all the time.

And at a lower lvl players have a tougher time dealing with widow mines, then again the terrans there kill their own units way more than at a higher lvl which evens it up a bit as well


Never really considered friendly fire as such an enormous counter balance to make them a well designed unit, but that's a good point


Goddam, you dumpstered that guy into oblivion. But yeah, like BL/Infestor, Swarmhosts, etc (which were all rightly nerfed), mines are exponentially harder to play against than use, with no real counters, at all levels of play. Banelings would fall more into this category if they didn't die upon use--also, they're basically the only supply-efficient unit Zerg has in non-mirrors these days.


i dont feel particularly dumpster fired though :O.

banelings are more useful than ducttape. they will fix most issues without too much effort.
also, uses literally 3 times in one sentence. i cant take that seriously in any context. also since it not true.

and the only one who is balance whining was the poster i responded to.

ill concede i was being snarky and not entirely serious. i do take great pride in the fact he was probably frothing from the mouth when he posted that comment. heh.


Because you seem so interested in feelings, if you must know, I laughed out loud at how idiotic a statement it would be to call one of the best designed new units brought to SC2 (The Baneling) a badly designed unit. Because interestingly enough, balance =/= game design, a unit doesn't have to be OP to be poorly designed, and OP units that are well designed can have their numbers changed and be back to a good spot.

Interesting to say that Terran can make widow mines in any situation at any time is a false statement. Considering Bio Mine, Battle Mech, and standard mech heavily use mines, and they can be used against any composition that zerg or protoss makes at any time in the game as either harassers (because again they 1 shot workers at any time in the game) or as army units. But please, inform me of when mines aren't useful to a Terran?


you sure 'sound' angry for someone so amused

keep fighting brother !


One time that happened and I just stopped everything, selected the offending SCV, hit Cancel, moved it over to my Barracks, made a Marine, had the Marine shoot it to death, then left the game.
NinjaNight
Profile Joined January 2018
428 Posts
June 10 2020 20:05 GMT
#47
On June 11 2020 02:39 MockHamill wrote:
The mine change does nothing if you get an observer or an oracle.

Terran and Zerg need to get detection why should Protoss be any different?


easier and quicker for terran to fly an unseen mine drop into your base kill all your probes and win the game just cause you happened to be not looking and distracted by something else for a couple seconds
Vision_
Profile Joined September 2018
870 Posts
June 10 2020 20:13 GMT
#48
I do now understand nobody care about ideas in this forum...
Chocolate
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States2350 Posts
Last Edited: 2020-06-10 21:00:59
June 10 2020 20:59 GMT
#49
Can confirm at Diamond 3 the widow mine change is a huge source of pain for me. I lost three games in a row against the same Terran player who just widow mine dropped me all the time (to their credit they did a good job sniping obs or my micro was sloppy and they got killed by the mines)

It’s super frustrating. Now I just proxy robo 4gate against Terran every game lately
SC-Shield
Profile Joined December 2018
Bulgaria832 Posts
June 10 2020 21:11 GMT
#50
On June 11 2020 05:59 Chocolate wrote:
Can confirm at Diamond 3 the widow mine change is a huge source of pain for me. I lost three games in a row against the same Terran player who just widow mine dropped me all the time (to their credit they did a good job sniping obs or my micro was sloppy and they got killed by the mines)

It’s super frustrating. Now I just proxy robo 4gate against Terran every game lately


This problem isn't any different from playing vs lurker zerg who snipes obs. You said it, you need to control your obs better.
Ciaus_Dronu
Profile Joined June 2017
South Africa1848 Posts
June 10 2020 21:21 GMT
#51
On June 11 2020 06:11 SC-Shield wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 11 2020 05:59 Chocolate wrote:
Can confirm at Diamond 3 the widow mine change is a huge source of pain for me. I lost three games in a row against the same Terran player who just widow mine dropped me all the time (to their credit they did a good job sniping obs or my micro was sloppy and they got killed by the mines)

It’s super frustrating. Now I just proxy robo 4gate against Terran every game lately


This problem isn't any different from playing vs lurker zerg who snipes obs. You said it, you need to control your obs better.


I've never had lurkers fly into my mineral lines between minutes 5 and 7 of a game, and then proceed to have those same lurkers snipe an obs using scan from a hatchery.

Mines are awful to play against, and don't feel like a great unit to be buffing in terms of having much hope of enjoying vs Terran matchups.
SC-Shield
Profile Joined December 2018
Bulgaria832 Posts
Last Edited: 2020-06-10 21:42:12
June 10 2020 21:41 GMT
#52
On June 11 2020 06:21 Ciaus_Dronu wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 11 2020 06:11 SC-Shield wrote:
On June 11 2020 05:59 Chocolate wrote:
Can confirm at Diamond 3 the widow mine change is a huge source of pain for me. I lost three games in a row against the same Terran player who just widow mine dropped me all the time (to their credit they did a good job sniping obs or my micro was sloppy and they got killed by the mines)

It’s super frustrating. Now I just proxy robo 4gate against Terran every game lately


This problem isn't any different from playing vs lurker zerg who snipes obs. You said it, you need to control your obs better.


I've never had lurkers fly into my mineral lines between minutes 5 and 7 of a game, and then proceed to have those same lurkers snipe an obs using scan from a hatchery.

Mines are awful to play against, and don't feel like a great unit to be buffing in terms of having much hope of enjoying vs Terran matchups.


I don't know about zerg, but mines aren't much of a scouting problem in the current PvT meta. Protoss *always* has an obs before drop unless they're doing something sneaky. The meta is twilight into robo or robo 1st, so you have an obs anyway.
Chocolate
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States2350 Posts
June 10 2020 21:51 GMT
#53
On June 11 2020 06:41 SC-Shield wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 11 2020 06:21 Ciaus_Dronu wrote:
On June 11 2020 06:11 SC-Shield wrote:
On June 11 2020 05:59 Chocolate wrote:
Can confirm at Diamond 3 the widow mine change is a huge source of pain for me. I lost three games in a row against the same Terran player who just widow mine dropped me all the time (to their credit they did a good job sniping obs or my micro was sloppy and they got killed by the mines)

It’s super frustrating. Now I just proxy robo 4gate against Terran every game lately


This problem isn't any different from playing vs lurker zerg who snipes obs. You said it, you need to control your obs better.


I've never had lurkers fly into my mineral lines between minutes 5 and 7 of a game, and then proceed to have those same lurkers snipe an obs using scan from a hatchery.

Mines are awful to play against, and don't feel like a great unit to be buffing in terms of having much hope of enjoying vs Terran matchups.


I don't know about zerg, but mines aren't much of a scouting problem in the current PvT meta. Protoss *always* has an obs before drop unless they're doing something sneaky. The meta is twilight into robo or robo 1st, so you have an obs anyway.

It would be less of an issue if obs didn’t get killed by the splash targetting ground units. It also does happen much earlier in the game and to react in time in practice you need detection and enough damage dealers by each mineral line to counter it (maybe not if your natural is not exposed via air). I suppose I can spend 300+ minerals at each base for cannons that provide sufficient coverage and get better at spotting drops but I’d rather rush every game than deal with widow mine bullshit.

It seems like you also need to get fast obs before you push otherwise your army will probably just die in transit or on arrival unless you are very careful.
RandomPlayer416
Profile Joined January 2019
84 Posts
June 10 2020 22:30 GMT
#54
Battery Overcharge is the most overpowered thing its not even close to fair how broken it is. 1 stalker can literally hold off 3 marauders. . . How is this balanced?
SetGuitarsToKill
Profile Blog Joined December 2013
Canada28396 Posts
June 10 2020 23:07 GMT
#55
I'm not sure how much I like the idea of introducing an overcharge back to the game
Community News"As long as you have a warp prism you can't be bad at harassment" - Maru | @SetGuitars2Kill
ilax30
Profile Joined November 2019
720 Posts
June 10 2020 23:51 GMT
#56
On June 11 2020 07:30 RandomPlayer416 wrote:
Battery Overcharge is the most overpowered thing its not even close to fair how broken it is. 1 stalker can literally hold off 3 marauders. . . How is this balanced?


Just walk away for 14 seconds Kappa
RandomPlayer416
Profile Joined January 2019
84 Posts
Last Edited: 2020-06-11 00:42:31
June 11 2020 00:34 GMT
#57
On June 11 2020 08:51 ilax30 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 11 2020 07:30 RandomPlayer416 wrote:
Battery Overcharge is the most overpowered thing its not even close to fair how broken it is. 1 stalker can literally hold off 3 marauders. . . How is this balanced?


Just walk away for 14 seconds Kappa



The 14 seconds it gives delays any early 2 rax pressure giving them enough time for gateways to come online as well as additional batteries.

Its flat out broken and pretty much gaurantee's toss can remain greedy early game vs both races. I dont even want to think about how disgusting its going to make PvP.

edit:

Im 99% sure theyre going to come out and nerf it some how. Maybe the unit being healed cant move or attack while shields are regening? I dunno but something has to tone it down a little.
Alpharius
Profile Joined September 2018
Vietnam39 Posts
Last Edited: 2020-06-11 03:25:19
June 11 2020 01:49 GMT
#58
Battery overcharge doesn't seems to be very useful in PvZ, beside holding early aggression. It doesn't really take much effort to use an overseer to disable that battery.
Edit: I haven't tested it yet, does that ability work on shield battery??? And I'm not sure how useful it will be to hold all-in, considering any kind of zerg early all-in will involve a number of ravager.
xelnaga_empire
Profile Joined March 2012
627 Posts
June 11 2020 08:39 GMT
#59
On June 11 2020 09:34 RandomPlayer416 wrote:
The 14 seconds it gives delays any early 2 rax pressure giving them enough time for gateways to come online as well as additional batteries.

Its flat out broken and pretty much gaurantee's toss can remain greedy early game vs both races. I dont even want to think about how disgusting its going to make PvP.


I agree. They need to do something about the shield battery buff. As it stands right now, the shield battery buff is too strong.
thenanox
Profile Joined June 2010
Spain73 Posts
Last Edited: 2020-06-11 09:23:40
June 11 2020 09:23 GMT
#60
i feel that Battery overcharge is too specific for a SC2 ability, usually good abilities in SC2 tend to be general, and players find a way to make it work for specifics.. they never gonna find a proper balance for the nexus/mothership abilities. its being a hell
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 1h 22m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft: Brood War
Shuttle 388
Hyun 218
EffOrt 195
Soma 134
zelot 117
Dewaltoss 98
Noble 98
sorry 53
Sacsri 42
Sharp 9
[ Show more ]
Bale 9
ToSsGirL 3
Rain 1
Dota 2
monkeys_forever408
NeuroSwarm142
League of Legends
JimRising 443
Other Games
summit1g11550
ceh9457
C9.Mang0297
Happy249
Fuzer 132
Mew2King109
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick628
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Main Stream265
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• practicex 116
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• iopq 2
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Rush1765
• Lourlo1112
• Stunt611
Upcoming Events
The PondCast
1h 22m
Replay Cast
14h 22m
OSC
1d 8h
LAN Event
1d 9h
Replay Cast
1d 14h
Replay Cast
2 days
WardiTV Korean Royale
2 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
WardiTV Korean Royale
3 days
Replay Cast
3 days
[ Show More ]
Wardi Open
4 days
Monday Night Weeklies
4 days
StarCraft2.fi
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Wardi Open
5 days
StarCraft2.fi
5 days
Wardi Open
6 days
StarCraft2.fi
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

SOOP Univ League 2025
RSL Revival: Season 3
Eternal Conflict S1

Ongoing

C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 4
YSL S2
BSL Season 21
CSCL: Masked Kings S3
Slon Tour Season 2
META Madness #9
SL Budapest Major 2025
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2

Upcoming

BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
HSC XXVIII
RSL Offline Finals
WardiTV 2025
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026: Closed Qualifier
eXTREMESLAND 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.