• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 13:07
CEST 19:07
KST 02:07
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: Within Reach5[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: In A Tizzy11[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Holy Diver5[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Rough Waters10[ASL22] Ro24 Preview: Siren's Call8
Community News
StarCraft II 5.0.17 PTR Patch Notes (Sept 30, 2026)58Weekly Cups (Sept 21-27): herO and ByuN double2Weekly Cups (Sep 13-20): herO scores triple3BSL Season 2313Weekly Cups (Sep 7-12): SHIN, ByuN, MaxPax double down1
StarCraft 2
General
StarCraft II 5.0.17 PTR Patch Notes (Sept 30, 2026) How do you feel about the mass reverts in the 5.0.17 PTR? SC4ALL: II SC2 Complete Invited Player Lineup StarCraft open world shooter announced at BlizzCon Weekly Cups (Sept 21-27): herO and ByuN double
Tourneys
2026 GSTL Grand Finals Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) Stellar Fest TWO the Moon (Dec 16-20) SC2 INu's Battles#21 [ 3-Days tournament ] ScienceCraft (October 24-25) - Live Event
Strategy
[H] ZvP Mid-Late Game: Stalkers Collossi HT
Custom Maps
[M] (2) Sweltering Sands [M] (2) Frigid Storage
External Content
The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 545 And Drops and Rifts Mutation # 544 Double Trouble Mutation # 543 Enhanced Defenses
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion Bot on ladder JaeDong's ASL S22 Ro. 8 Review Fantasy returning? ASL22 General Discussion
Tourneys
[ASL22] Ro8 Day 4 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [ASL22] Ro8 Day 3 [ASL22] Ro8 Day 2
Strategy
Cliff Jump Revisited (1 in a 1000 strategy) Replay Review Process - What do you do? Simple Questions, Simple Answers Odyssey Mineral Stack Saturation
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread General RTS Discussion Thread Warcraft III: The Frozen Throne Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Total Annihilation Zero
Dota 2
Dota 2 Champions League Season 3 Begins April 25! Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread Artificial Intelligence Thread
Fan Clubs
Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Diablo Animated Series on Netflix
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
[ASL22] Ro4 Day1 Ticket Giv…
bITt.mAN
Escaping Into Video Games: G…
TrAiDoS
38 yo Retired SWE loo…
PurE)Rabbit-SF
Can Bots Beat Pros?? Starcr…
namkraft
[meme] I finally understa…
LUCKY_NOOB
Regacy Esports:Our Goa…
regacyesports
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 8047 users

4.12.0 Patch Notes - Page 3

Forum Index > SC2 General
130 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next All
Ben...
Profile Joined January 2011
Canada3485 Posts
June 10 2020 19:04 GMT
#41
I'm disappointed they didn't think this patch through more and try other changes. That battery change is probably going to have side effects that aren't currently known and already in my games of PvP it feels like things have gone too far. People are throwing down several batteries then playing super passive and turtling.

The mine change should not have gone through. It will have little or no impact at the top level but will have a negative effect for folks on ladder. Widow mine drops are already one of the worst things in the game from a gameplay perspective and their decision to encourage more of these drops is a poor choice. We want to get away from stupid coinflip strategies that decide entire games in under 10 seconds, not encourage them.
"Cliiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiide" -Tastosis
GrandSmurf
Profile Joined July 2003
Netherlands462 Posts
Last Edited: 2020-06-10 19:09:53
June 10 2020 19:04 GMT
#42
On June 11 2020 01:49 freelifeffs wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 11 2020 00:08 GrandSmurf wrote:
On June 10 2020 23:08 freelifeffs wrote:
On June 10 2020 21:29 BonitiilloO wrote:
i love the changes, people need to understand that is very easy for Z to be in the game and dont have to worry about basically anything, now they need to rethink when they are engaging a terran army since baneling won't be able to deal with everything.


and you need to understand that you dont start a message with 'people need to understand' if you clearly dont understand anything yourself.


do tell, explain it to us then.



whats there to explain? its obviously biased and idiotic thinking to say stuff like 'zerg doesnt need to worry about anything' and 'zerg doesnt need to think and can just always engage no matter how and what'. stuff like that is not productive for any kind of discussion and people who think like that have no right to tell others they 'need to understand' things first.


granted, it is a bit of a hyperbole to state zerg have nothing to worry about. but lets be real here, they do have a rather care-free early game and can/could shrug off any harrasment pretty effortlessly and double expand.

edit: within reason ofc. notwithstanding certain all-ins.
One time that happened and I just stopped everything, selected the offending SCV, hit Cancel, moved it over to my Barracks, made a Marine, had the Marine shoot it to death, then left the game.
chipmonklord17
Profile Joined February 2011
United States11944 Posts
Last Edited: 2020-06-10 19:17:43
June 10 2020 19:16 GMT
#43
On June 11 2020 03:47 GrandSmurf wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 11 2020 02:23 Rubicant1 wrote:
On June 11 2020 00:40 chipmonklord17 wrote:
On June 11 2020 00:32 GrandSmurf wrote:
On June 11 2020 00:09 chipmonklord17 wrote:
Honestly Banelings are a mistake. There's just no fixing that they're significantly the unit with the worst ratio of "ability to use" versus "ability to defend against" with absurdly high use cases and ease of access and next to no counter-balances (I.E splitting takes so much more effort / APM than just A-moving into a clump of units).


fixed it for you.


Lol what?

Banelings:
LITERALLY DIE on use
Can be split against
Require a speed upgrade to not get dumpstered by anyone doing any kind of splitting
Slower speed off creep
Cannot hit air
Are bad against Mech/Immortals/Marauders
Require Larva, which is the same resource as Drones
Require +2 attack to one shot workers
Have splash damage

Mines:
Can be used infinitely
Can be invisible and will automatically work with no player activation while underground
Massive Splash damage
Made out of a reactor
Can be used in literally any comp against literally any units at literally any time in the game and be useful
Cannot hit buildings
Friendly Fire
1 shot workers at any point in the game

Any comparison to Zerg for the sake of balance whine, you may as well use old BLord Infestor because I'd totally agree with you. Using banelings as an example is hilarious, given all of their natural weaknesses to balance out what they can do

On June 11 2020 00:28 ilax30 wrote:
On June 11 2020 00:09 chipmonklord17 wrote:
Honestly Widow Mines are a mistake. There's just no fixing that they're significantly significantly the unit with the worst ratio of "ability to use" versus "ability to defend against" with absurdly high use cases and ease of access and next to no counter-balances (I.E banelings counter balances are their lack of hitting air and their single use only).


I would say a big counter balance is them dealing friendly fire. Can damage loads of bio or even kill a chunk of marines which happens in pro play all the time.

And at a lower lvl players have a tougher time dealing with widow mines, then again the terrans there kill their own units way more than at a higher lvl which evens it up a bit as well


Never really considered friendly fire as such an enormous counter balance to make them a well designed unit, but that's a good point


Goddam, you dumpstered that guy into oblivion. But yeah, like BL/Infestor, Swarmhosts, etc (which were all rightly nerfed), mines are exponentially harder to play against than use, with no real counters, at all levels of play. Banelings would fall more into this category if they didn't die upon use--also, they're basically the only supply-efficient unit Zerg has in non-mirrors these days.


i dont feel particularly dumpster fired though :O.

banelings are more useful than ducttape. they will fix most issues without too much effort.
also, uses literally 3 times in one sentence. i cant take that seriously in any context. also since it not true.

and the only one who is balance whining was the poster i responded to.

ill concede i was being snarky and not entirely serious. i do take great pride in the fact he was probably frothing from the mouth when he posted that comment. heh.


Because you seem so interested in feelings, if you must know, I laughed out loud at how idiotic a statement it would be to call one of the best designed new units brought to SC2 (The Baneling) a badly designed unit. Because interestingly enough, balance =/= game design, a unit doesn't have to be OP to be poorly designed, and OP units that are well designed can have their numbers changed and be back to a good spot.

Interesting to say that Terran can make widow mines in any situation at any time is a false statement. Considering Bio Mine, Battle Mech, and standard mech heavily use mines, and they can be used against any composition that zerg or protoss makes at any time in the game as either harassers (because again they 1 shot workers at any time in the game) or as army units. But please, inform me of when mines aren't useful to a Terran?
Slydie
Profile Joined August 2013
2011 Posts
June 10 2020 19:27 GMT
#44
On June 11 2020 02:23 Rubicant1 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 11 2020 00:40 chipmonklord17 wrote:
On June 11 2020 00:32 GrandSmurf wrote:
On June 11 2020 00:09 chipmonklord17 wrote:
Honestly Banelings are a mistake. There's just no fixing that they're significantly the unit with the worst ratio of "ability to use" versus "ability to defend against" with absurdly high use cases and ease of access and next to no counter-balances (I.E splitting takes so much more effort / APM than just A-moving into a clump of units).


fixed it for you.


Lol what?

Banelings:
LITERALLY DIE on use
Can be split against
Require a speed upgrade to not get dumpstered by anyone doing any kind of splitting
Slower speed off creep
Cannot hit air
Are bad against Mech/Immortals/Marauders
Require Larva, which is the same resource as Drones
Require +2 attack to one shot workers
Have splash damage

Mines:
Can be used infinitely
Can be invisible and will automatically work with no player activation while underground
Massive Splash damage
Made out of a reactor
Can be used in literally any comp against literally any units at literally any time in the game and be useful
Cannot hit buildings
Friendly Fire
1 shot workers at any point in the game

Any comparison to Zerg for the sake of balance whine, you may as well use old BLord Infestor because I'd totally agree with you. Using banelings as an example is hilarious, given all of their natural weaknesses to balance out what they can do

On June 11 2020 00:28 ilax30 wrote:
On June 11 2020 00:09 chipmonklord17 wrote:
Honestly Widow Mines are a mistake. There's just no fixing that they're significantly significantly the unit with the worst ratio of "ability to use" versus "ability to defend against" with absurdly high use cases and ease of access and next to no counter-balances (I.E banelings counter balances are their lack of hitting air and their single use only).


I would say a big counter balance is them dealing friendly fire. Can damage loads of bio or even kill a chunk of marines which happens in pro play all the time.

And at a lower lvl players have a tougher time dealing with widow mines, then again the terrans there kill their own units way more than at a higher lvl which evens it up a bit as well


Never really considered friendly fire as such an enormous counter balance to make them a well designed unit, but that's a good point


Goddam, you dumpstered that guy into oblivion. But yeah, like BL/Infestor, Swarmhosts, etc (which were all rightly nerfed), mines are exponentially harder to play against than use, with no real counters, at all levels of play. Banelings would fall more into this category if they didn't die upon use--also, they're basically the only supply-efficient unit Zerg has in non-mirrors these days.


Did you ever try to play against banelings? Their main strength vs mines is that they are much more reliable and can be manually triggered. Mines have a delay and range, so it can be almost impossible to control where they go off.

I agree Mines are not a good solution to force Zergs to micro and Protoss to be attentive, though. Removing them for stronger tanks and/or helbats could be a better solution.
Buff the siegetank
mikedupp
Profile Joined May 2020
233 Posts
June 10 2020 19:38 GMT
#45
On June 10 2020 18:12 xelnaga_empire wrote:
I hope the new shield battery overcharge buff doesn't make PvsT worse at the top pro level. For the GSL Season 2 qualifiers, PvT was 76–34 (69.09%) as per Aligulac: http://aligulac.com/results/events/110098-GSL-2020-Season-2/.

I hope the changes by the balance team will help PvsT return close to 50%, rather than the 69% win rate by Protoss over Terran in the GSL Season 2 qualifiers.

do you take into consideration who the players are in your %? Because you could easily throw away a bunch of PvTs in this qualifier as mismatches.
GrandSmurf
Profile Joined July 2003
Netherlands462 Posts
June 10 2020 19:40 GMT
#46
On June 11 2020 04:16 chipmonklord17 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 11 2020 03:47 GrandSmurf wrote:
On June 11 2020 02:23 Rubicant1 wrote:
On June 11 2020 00:40 chipmonklord17 wrote:
On June 11 2020 00:32 GrandSmurf wrote:
On June 11 2020 00:09 chipmonklord17 wrote:
Honestly Banelings are a mistake. There's just no fixing that they're significantly the unit with the worst ratio of "ability to use" versus "ability to defend against" with absurdly high use cases and ease of access and next to no counter-balances (I.E splitting takes so much more effort / APM than just A-moving into a clump of units).


fixed it for you.


Lol what?

Banelings:
LITERALLY DIE on use
Can be split against
Require a speed upgrade to not get dumpstered by anyone doing any kind of splitting
Slower speed off creep
Cannot hit air
Are bad against Mech/Immortals/Marauders
Require Larva, which is the same resource as Drones
Require +2 attack to one shot workers
Have splash damage

Mines:
Can be used infinitely
Can be invisible and will automatically work with no player activation while underground
Massive Splash damage
Made out of a reactor
Can be used in literally any comp against literally any units at literally any time in the game and be useful
Cannot hit buildings
Friendly Fire
1 shot workers at any point in the game

Any comparison to Zerg for the sake of balance whine, you may as well use old BLord Infestor because I'd totally agree with you. Using banelings as an example is hilarious, given all of their natural weaknesses to balance out what they can do

On June 11 2020 00:28 ilax30 wrote:
On June 11 2020 00:09 chipmonklord17 wrote:
Honestly Widow Mines are a mistake. There's just no fixing that they're significantly significantly the unit with the worst ratio of "ability to use" versus "ability to defend against" with absurdly high use cases and ease of access and next to no counter-balances (I.E banelings counter balances are their lack of hitting air and their single use only).


I would say a big counter balance is them dealing friendly fire. Can damage loads of bio or even kill a chunk of marines which happens in pro play all the time.

And at a lower lvl players have a tougher time dealing with widow mines, then again the terrans there kill their own units way more than at a higher lvl which evens it up a bit as well


Never really considered friendly fire as such an enormous counter balance to make them a well designed unit, but that's a good point


Goddam, you dumpstered that guy into oblivion. But yeah, like BL/Infestor, Swarmhosts, etc (which were all rightly nerfed), mines are exponentially harder to play against than use, with no real counters, at all levels of play. Banelings would fall more into this category if they didn't die upon use--also, they're basically the only supply-efficient unit Zerg has in non-mirrors these days.


i dont feel particularly dumpster fired though :O.

banelings are more useful than ducttape. they will fix most issues without too much effort.
also, uses literally 3 times in one sentence. i cant take that seriously in any context. also since it not true.

and the only one who is balance whining was the poster i responded to.

ill concede i was being snarky and not entirely serious. i do take great pride in the fact he was probably frothing from the mouth when he posted that comment. heh.


Because you seem so interested in feelings, if you must know, I laughed out loud at how idiotic a statement it would be to call one of the best designed new units brought to SC2 (The Baneling) a badly designed unit. Because interestingly enough, balance =/= game design, a unit doesn't have to be OP to be poorly designed, and OP units that are well designed can have their numbers changed and be back to a good spot.

Interesting to say that Terran can make widow mines in any situation at any time is a false statement. Considering Bio Mine, Battle Mech, and standard mech heavily use mines, and they can be used against any composition that zerg or protoss makes at any time in the game as either harassers (because again they 1 shot workers at any time in the game) or as army units. But please, inform me of when mines aren't useful to a Terran?


you sure 'sound' angry for someone so amused

keep fighting brother !


One time that happened and I just stopped everything, selected the offending SCV, hit Cancel, moved it over to my Barracks, made a Marine, had the Marine shoot it to death, then left the game.
NinjaNight
Profile Joined January 2018
428 Posts
June 10 2020 20:05 GMT
#47
On June 11 2020 02:39 MockHamill wrote:
The mine change does nothing if you get an observer or an oracle.

Terran and Zerg need to get detection why should Protoss be any different?


easier and quicker for terran to fly an unseen mine drop into your base kill all your probes and win the game just cause you happened to be not looking and distracted by something else for a couple seconds
Vision_
Profile Joined September 2018
877 Posts
June 10 2020 20:13 GMT
#48
I do now understand nobody care about ideas in this forum...
Chocolate
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States2350 Posts
Last Edited: 2020-06-10 21:00:59
June 10 2020 20:59 GMT
#49
Can confirm at Diamond 3 the widow mine change is a huge source of pain for me. I lost three games in a row against the same Terran player who just widow mine dropped me all the time (to their credit they did a good job sniping obs or my micro was sloppy and they got killed by the mines)

It’s super frustrating. Now I just proxy robo 4gate against Terran every game lately
SC-Shield
Profile Joined December 2018
Bulgaria885 Posts
June 10 2020 21:11 GMT
#50
On June 11 2020 05:59 Chocolate wrote:
Can confirm at Diamond 3 the widow mine change is a huge source of pain for me. I lost three games in a row against the same Terran player who just widow mine dropped me all the time (to their credit they did a good job sniping obs or my micro was sloppy and they got killed by the mines)

It’s super frustrating. Now I just proxy robo 4gate against Terran every game lately


This problem isn't any different from playing vs lurker zerg who snipes obs. You said it, you need to control your obs better.
Ciaus_Dronu
Profile Joined June 2017
South Africa1848 Posts
June 10 2020 21:21 GMT
#51
On June 11 2020 06:11 SC-Shield wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 11 2020 05:59 Chocolate wrote:
Can confirm at Diamond 3 the widow mine change is a huge source of pain for me. I lost three games in a row against the same Terran player who just widow mine dropped me all the time (to their credit they did a good job sniping obs or my micro was sloppy and they got killed by the mines)

It’s super frustrating. Now I just proxy robo 4gate against Terran every game lately


This problem isn't any different from playing vs lurker zerg who snipes obs. You said it, you need to control your obs better.


I've never had lurkers fly into my mineral lines between minutes 5 and 7 of a game, and then proceed to have those same lurkers snipe an obs using scan from a hatchery.

Mines are awful to play against, and don't feel like a great unit to be buffing in terms of having much hope of enjoying vs Terran matchups.
SC-Shield
Profile Joined December 2018
Bulgaria885 Posts
Last Edited: 2020-06-10 21:42:12
June 10 2020 21:41 GMT
#52
On June 11 2020 06:21 Ciaus_Dronu wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 11 2020 06:11 SC-Shield wrote:
On June 11 2020 05:59 Chocolate wrote:
Can confirm at Diamond 3 the widow mine change is a huge source of pain for me. I lost three games in a row against the same Terran player who just widow mine dropped me all the time (to their credit they did a good job sniping obs or my micro was sloppy and they got killed by the mines)

It’s super frustrating. Now I just proxy robo 4gate against Terran every game lately


This problem isn't any different from playing vs lurker zerg who snipes obs. You said it, you need to control your obs better.


I've never had lurkers fly into my mineral lines between minutes 5 and 7 of a game, and then proceed to have those same lurkers snipe an obs using scan from a hatchery.

Mines are awful to play against, and don't feel like a great unit to be buffing in terms of having much hope of enjoying vs Terran matchups.


I don't know about zerg, but mines aren't much of a scouting problem in the current PvT meta. Protoss *always* has an obs before drop unless they're doing something sneaky. The meta is twilight into robo or robo 1st, so you have an obs anyway.
Chocolate
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States2350 Posts
June 10 2020 21:51 GMT
#53
On June 11 2020 06:41 SC-Shield wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 11 2020 06:21 Ciaus_Dronu wrote:
On June 11 2020 06:11 SC-Shield wrote:
On June 11 2020 05:59 Chocolate wrote:
Can confirm at Diamond 3 the widow mine change is a huge source of pain for me. I lost three games in a row against the same Terran player who just widow mine dropped me all the time (to their credit they did a good job sniping obs or my micro was sloppy and they got killed by the mines)

It’s super frustrating. Now I just proxy robo 4gate against Terran every game lately


This problem isn't any different from playing vs lurker zerg who snipes obs. You said it, you need to control your obs better.


I've never had lurkers fly into my mineral lines between minutes 5 and 7 of a game, and then proceed to have those same lurkers snipe an obs using scan from a hatchery.

Mines are awful to play against, and don't feel like a great unit to be buffing in terms of having much hope of enjoying vs Terran matchups.


I don't know about zerg, but mines aren't much of a scouting problem in the current PvT meta. Protoss *always* has an obs before drop unless they're doing something sneaky. The meta is twilight into robo or robo 1st, so you have an obs anyway.

It would be less of an issue if obs didn’t get killed by the splash targetting ground units. It also does happen much earlier in the game and to react in time in practice you need detection and enough damage dealers by each mineral line to counter it (maybe not if your natural is not exposed via air). I suppose I can spend 300+ minerals at each base for cannons that provide sufficient coverage and get better at spotting drops but I’d rather rush every game than deal with widow mine bullshit.

It seems like you also need to get fast obs before you push otherwise your army will probably just die in transit or on arrival unless you are very careful.
RandomPlayer416
Profile Joined January 2019
84 Posts
June 10 2020 22:30 GMT
#54
Battery Overcharge is the most overpowered thing its not even close to fair how broken it is. 1 stalker can literally hold off 3 marauders. . . How is this balanced?
SetGuitarsToKill
Profile Blog Joined December 2013
Canada28396 Posts
June 10 2020 23:07 GMT
#55
I'm not sure how much I like the idea of introducing an overcharge back to the game
Community News"As long as you have a warp prism you can't be bad at harassment" - Maru | @SetGuitars2Kill
ilax30
Profile Joined November 2019
720 Posts
June 10 2020 23:51 GMT
#56
On June 11 2020 07:30 RandomPlayer416 wrote:
Battery Overcharge is the most overpowered thing its not even close to fair how broken it is. 1 stalker can literally hold off 3 marauders. . . How is this balanced?


Just walk away for 14 seconds Kappa
RandomPlayer416
Profile Joined January 2019
84 Posts
Last Edited: 2020-06-11 00:42:31
June 11 2020 00:34 GMT
#57
On June 11 2020 08:51 ilax30 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 11 2020 07:30 RandomPlayer416 wrote:
Battery Overcharge is the most overpowered thing its not even close to fair how broken it is. 1 stalker can literally hold off 3 marauders. . . How is this balanced?


Just walk away for 14 seconds Kappa



The 14 seconds it gives delays any early 2 rax pressure giving them enough time for gateways to come online as well as additional batteries.

Its flat out broken and pretty much gaurantee's toss can remain greedy early game vs both races. I dont even want to think about how disgusting its going to make PvP.

edit:

Im 99% sure theyre going to come out and nerf it some how. Maybe the unit being healed cant move or attack while shields are regening? I dunno but something has to tone it down a little.
Alpharius
Profile Joined September 2018
Vietnam40 Posts
Last Edited: 2020-06-11 03:25:19
June 11 2020 01:49 GMT
#58
Battery overcharge doesn't seems to be very useful in PvZ, beside holding early aggression. It doesn't really take much effort to use an overseer to disable that battery.
Edit: I haven't tested it yet, does that ability work on shield battery??? And I'm not sure how useful it will be to hold all-in, considering any kind of zerg early all-in will involve a number of ravager.
xelnaga_empire
Profile Joined March 2012
627 Posts
June 11 2020 08:39 GMT
#59
On June 11 2020 09:34 RandomPlayer416 wrote:
The 14 seconds it gives delays any early 2 rax pressure giving them enough time for gateways to come online as well as additional batteries.

Its flat out broken and pretty much gaurantee's toss can remain greedy early game vs both races. I dont even want to think about how disgusting its going to make PvP.


I agree. They need to do something about the shield battery buff. As it stands right now, the shield battery buff is too strong.
thenanox
Profile Joined June 2010
Spain73 Posts
Last Edited: 2020-06-11 09:23:40
June 11 2020 09:23 GMT
#60
i feel that Battery overcharge is too specific for a SC2 ability, usually good abilities in SC2 tend to be general, and players find a way to make it work for specifics.. they never gonna find a proper balance for the nexus/mothership abilities. its being a hell
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Stellar Fest
13:00
Stellar Fest 2 The Moon: Qualifier Day 3
IntoTheiNu 1182
ComeBackTV 767
SteadfastSC757
TaKeTV 516
IndyStarCraft 225
Rex137
EnkiAlexander 79
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
SteadfastSC 757
IndyStarCraft 225
Rex 133
ProTech130
BRAT_OK 39
MindelVK 16
UpATreeSC 3
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 42879
Shuttle 732
Larva 423
Mini 420
Rush 376
Hyuk 103
Dewaltoss 81
firebathero 77
Mong 70
Trap 31
[ Show more ]
ToSsGirL 29
Sexy 27
Bale 20
Rock 17
Sacsri 14
Shine 13
Terrorterran 12
Dota 2
Gorgc8902
qojqva1995
Counter-Strike
fl0m1368
Fnx 804
Heroes of the Storm
crisheroes1434
Khaldor1226
Other Games
hiko1337
FrodaN1028
DeMusliM305
Beastyqt255
ArmadaUGS195
XBOCT175
KnowMe116
XaKoH 99
C9.Mang092
Mew2King83
QueenE82
CosmosSc2 12
Mlord6
Organizations
Other Games
BasetradeTV258
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Main Stream65
[ Show 17 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH293
• StrangeGG 47
• poizon28 37
• Hinosc 20
• Kozan
• Migwel
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• IndyKCrew
StarCraft: Brood War
• FirePhoenix11
• Michael_bg 6
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
League of Legends
• Nemesis3239
Other Games
• Shiphtur340
• imaqtpie183
Upcoming Events
OSC
4h 53m
CranKy Ducklings
16h 53m
Online Event
17h 53m
FEL
22h 53m
AI Arena Tournament
23h 53m
BSL: Ladder Tournament
1d 1h
Sparkling Tuna Cup
1d 16h
INu's Battles
1d 18h
herO vs Classic
Percival vs Rogue
BSL Open Qualifier
2 days
BSL Open Qualifier
2 days
[ Show More ]
Replay Cast
2 days
Afreeca Starleague
2 days
Rush vs Light
WardiTV Weekly
2 days
Monday Night Weeklies
2 days
Replay Cast
3 days
Afreeca Starleague
3 days
Soma vs Soulkey
INu's Battles
3 days
SHIN vs Cure
ByuN vs Zoun
PiGosaur Cup
4 days
The PondCast
5 days
INu's Battles
5 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-09-30
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Calamity Invitational

Ongoing

ASL Season 22
Super Anchor Qualifying S3
CSL 2026 AUTUMN (S22)
Acropolis #5
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual

Upcoming

Acropolis #5 - GSB
Acropolis #5 - GSC
BSL Season 23
SC4ALL II: Brood War
BSL 23: Non-Korean Championship
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
Custodian Cup
Copium Cup
PGL Major Singapore 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 6
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
IEM Beijing 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
1win Private Club #2
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
ESL Pro League Season 24
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.