|
http://us.battle.net/sc2/en/blog/20175310/legacy-of-the-void-balance-update-july-6-2016-7-6-2016
After thorough consideration and reviewing the feedback of players all over the world, we've made a few changes to the balance of the game. We previously tested these changes in the Balance Test Map and are now ready to move forward with them. You can expect to see the following adjustments applied to Legacy of the Void multiplayer today.
Balance Changes
Zerg
Queen:
Anti-air weapon range increased from 7 to 8
Spore Crawler:
Root time decreased from 6 to 4
If you're interested in the StarCraft II Balance Team's reasoning behind each change, you can check out David Kim's recent forum post on the changes.
We continue to appreciate all the feedback we’ve received from the community as it helps shape each of our updates, and we hope you’ll continue to participate in future balance testing. Until next time, we hope you enjoy these changes!
|
Is this live?
And first, maybe now I can actually use Queens for reliable Liberator killing, Spore change seems meh to be honest.
|
|
i'm not sure what to think about queen buff.
spore buff seems okay.
|
I remember when spores and spines took 30 seconds or a year
|
Another nail in the coffin for banshee openers.
|
nice work guys. as i've been saying for a long long time Air is just too strong. From a purely subjective perspective a ground unit should be a lot stronger than an air unit on a $ for $ basis. Thanks for strengthening Ground based Anti-Air again.
On July 07 2016 06:40 Loccstana wrote: Another nail in the coffin for banshee openers. i play as terran 60% of the time and if my stupid banshee opener becomes a casualty or is substantially nerfed so be it. there is just too much Terran air in general in this game and i'm glad to see Terran air getting hit by balance patches.
DKs BNet Forum Post for those of you at work or school with BNet blocked ... here u go people... + Show Spoiler + Patch next week After more playtests and more discussions with various people, we believe that it’ll be better to patch the current two changes to the live game sooner than later given the current situation. However, we do also want to point out that we definitely see the foreign community’s concern regarding the Queen buff, and we will definitely make sure to react quick if something breaks. But the two main reasons we would like to hurry up with this update is due to heavy feedback in favor of these changes on the KR pro side, and we also have a major tournament coming up in 2-3 weeks outside of Korea, so we would really love to push the change out to live as quickly as possible so that we can make necessary fixes before the WCS tournament if needed. So looking at this from both regions, it looks to be the right decision to patch quickly.
After the patch next week We definitely hear your feedback regarding the potential for Ultralisk armor needing nerfs and the Liberator needing nerfs. We would really love to look at the impact of the Spore and Queen changes first before we start testing further changes. For example, if Zerg is performing much better in the early/mid game and are dominating in the late game, we can definitely take a look at the Ultralisk armor nerf, whereas if these changes were steps in the right direction but not enough, we can look at potential Liberator +light damage removal to its AA weapon.
Playing Skill vs. Game Design Skill It’s been a while since we discussed more design philosophy based topics, and we noticed a topic being very big in the past couple weeks, so we wanted to share our thoughts regarding this. Specifically, we’re seeing a lot of posts discussing the importance of playing at a high skill level in order to be a good game designer.
Our thought is that these two have some overlap, but are different skillsets. We have seen so many examples of every mix of the two: A top player being so bad at game analysis, a top player being so good at game analysis, a bad player being so good at game design, and a bad player being also bad at game design. They’re just separate skills that one person can be good at none, one, or both of them. And the definition of a good player is so opinion based. For example, I’m currently in master league using random and if I say this to a pro player, they would think I’m pretty bad at the game. As compared to if I say this to a silver level player, they would think I’m good at the game.
The same goes for game design skills. Often times, game design skills are more difficult to quantify than say like awesome concept art skills or awesome programming skills. Interestingly, this is an area game designers on our team have a lot of discussions on regarding what an ideal game designer at Blizzard is, which is another fun topic that we can go into if there is desire for it for this in a future weekly update. And going more into detail on this current topic, the important thing for game designers working on SC2 is the ability to analyze game mechanics well. This is clearly a higher priority than playing the game at a pro level.
Just to finish off, we did want to ask a question that we ask ourselves often: In a perfect world scenario, would it be best to aim to have only game designers who are also the very best players at the game? Granted this might be near impossible to achieve, it is an interesting question because we can look at it from many different points of view. For example, I can argue that this is the best because the best player understand more parts of playing the game so he can analyze the game better as well. But I can also argue this isn’t ideal because he would be unable to see the game from a different perspective other than the top skill level, and the more ideal is to have a good mix of every type of gamer who all are good game designers.
We wanted to share our thoughts here because this is a fun topic to discuss, and we’ve also been leaning a bit more towards one way or another over the years on our team as well. Because there necessarily isn’t one, clear, perfect answer to this question, please let us know your thoughts as well and we will look forward to exploring this discussion from a potentially different angle!
|
United Kingdom20275 Posts
nice work guys. as i've been saying for a long long time Air is just too strong. From a purely subjective perspective a ground unit should be a lot stronger than an air unit on a $ for $ basis. Thanks for strengthening Ground based Anti-Air again.
Stalker AA-vs-light buff next up?
|
This buff is a joke for anyone who really tried the change in the balance test.
- it doesnt help against liberator at all - it only helps a bit vs oracles and medivacs who are already very strong
And above else it promotes turtle.
Why would i go harass and counter when i have to defend meditanks/liberators/medivacs or oracles/phoenix/adepts
It doesnt fix shit in nerfing Terran midgame or making LBM a viable strategy.
|
RIP carriers and oracles. The former will have to face queen fire when launching interceptors normally, the later can no longer face queen 1 on 1.
|
On July 07 2016 06:48 Cyro wrote:Show nested quote +nice work guys. as i've been saying for a long long time Air is just too strong. From a purely subjective perspective a ground unit should be a lot stronger than an air unit on a $ for $ basis. Thanks for strengthening Ground based Anti-Air again. Stalker AA-vs-light buff next up?
i only play as Protoss 20% of the time and i'm in Diamond ... so i'm not really the guy to ask. what do u think about it?
|
Still don't think these changes are the right way to go, it will just promote turtle play and let's them get to ultras a bit easier.
Zerg midgame is still non existent in ZvT.
|
On July 07 2016 06:45 JimmyJRaynor wrote:nice work guys. as i've been saying for a long long time Air is just too strong. From a purely subjective perspective a ground unit should be a lot stronger than an air unit on a $ for $ basis. Thanks for strengthening Ground based Anti-Air again. Show nested quote +On July 07 2016 06:40 Loccstana wrote: Another nail in the coffin for banshee openers. i play as terran 60% of the time and if my stupid banshee opener becomes a casualty or is substantially nerfed so be it. there is just too much Terran air in general in this game and i'm glad to see Terran air getting hit by balance patches. DKs BNet Forum Postfor those of you at work or school with BNet blocked ... here u go people... + Show Spoiler + Patch next week After more playtests and more discussions with various people, we believe that it’ll be better to patch the current two changes to the live game sooner than later given the current situation. However, we do also want to point out that we definitely see the foreign community’s concern regarding the Queen buff, and we will definitely make sure to react quick if something breaks. But the two main reasons we would like to hurry up with this update is due to heavy feedback in favor of these changes on the KR pro side, and we also have a major tournament coming up in 2-3 weeks outside of Korea, so we would really love to push the change out to live as quickly as possible so that we can make necessary fixes before the WCS tournament if needed. So looking at this from both regions, it looks to be the right decision to patch quickly.
After the patch next week We definitely hear your feedback regarding the potential for Ultralisk armor needing nerfs and the Liberator needing nerfs. We would really love to look at the impact of the Spore and Queen changes first before we start testing further changes. For example, if Zerg is performing much better in the early/mid game and are dominating in the late game, we can definitely take a look at the Ultralisk armor nerf, whereas if these changes were steps in the right direction but not enough, we can look at potential Liberator +light damage removal to its AA weapon.
Playing Skill vs. Game Design Skill It’s been a while since we discussed more design philosophy based topics, and we noticed a topic being very big in the past couple weeks, so we wanted to share our thoughts regarding this. Specifically, we’re seeing a lot of posts discussing the importance of playing at a high skill level in order to be a good game designer.
Our thought is that these two have some overlap, but are different skillsets. We have seen so many examples of every mix of the two: A top player being so bad at game analysis, a top player being so good at game analysis, a bad player being so good at game design, and a bad player being also bad at game design. They’re just separate skills that one person can be good at none, one, or both of them. And the definition of a good player is so opinion based. For example, I’m currently in master league using random and if I say this to a pro player, they would think I’m pretty bad at the game. As compared to if I say this to a silver level player, they would think I’m good at the game.
The same goes for game design skills. Often times, game design skills are more difficult to quantify than say like awesome concept art skills or awesome programming skills. Interestingly, this is an area game designers on our team have a lot of discussions on regarding what an ideal game designer at Blizzard is, which is another fun topic that we can go into if there is desire for it for this in a future weekly update. And going more into detail on this current topic, the important thing for game designers working on SC2 is the ability to analyze game mechanics well. This is clearly a higher priority than playing the game at a pro level.
Just to finish off, we did want to ask a question that we ask ourselves often: In a perfect world scenario, would it be best to aim to have only game designers who are also the very best players at the game? Granted this might be near impossible to achieve, it is an interesting question because we can look at it from many different points of view. For example, I can argue that this is the best because the best player understand more parts of playing the game so he can analyze the game better as well. But I can also argue this isn’t ideal because he would be unable to see the game from a different perspective other than the top skill level, and the more ideal is to have a good mix of every type of gamer who all are good game designers.
We wanted to share our thoughts here because this is a fun topic to discuss, and we’ve also been leaning a bit more towards one way or another over the years on our team as well. Because there necessarily isn’t one, clear, perfect answer to this question, please let us know your thoughts as well and we will look forward to exploring this discussion from a potentially different angle!
Don't you think they should target the air units though?
|
I cant belive that both modifications make it to the game without any other compensation... The queen will become the new marine
|
This occurred right after the first GSL group was played... Not that it would have made a difference but the timing is a bit poor.
|
On July 07 2016 07:02 geokilla wrote: This occurred right after the first GSL group was played... Not that it would have made a difference but the timing is a bit poor. I'm sure Solar is furious and he had every right to be
|
TBH I have no idea how this will affect Korea, it could be almost unnoticeable or it could be the old Queen patch all over again, but I feel certain it's a huge buff to foreign zerg's (I.e. Snute) defensive styles where they're already performing pretty well. Spore buff especially is a big deal vs Liberators imo.
|
On July 07 2016 06:48 Cyro wrote:Show nested quote +nice work guys. as i've been saying for a long long time Air is just too strong. From a purely subjective perspective a ground unit should be a lot stronger than an air unit on a $ for $ basis. Thanks for strengthening Ground based Anti-Air again. Stalker AA-vs-light buff next up?
It's absolutely needed because phoenixes (in team games especially) and mutalisks laugh at stalkers. I'm 1vs1 low masters protoss, but stalkers have been weak against light air units since WoL.
|
United Kingdom20275 Posts
|
Hi, TL! I come from near distant future 3 seasons after this patch. 1. Zerg Users: I feel the new AA buff for zerg promotes only Roach ravager play and I can't use mutas anymore its so unfair and everything sucks wah wah wah 2. DK buffs mutas 3. Toss, Terran players: Mutas are too strong they don't even die anymore seriously screw this we need buffs 4. DK buffs libs and photon overcharge 5. Toss, Zerg players: wah wah libs are too strong again we need buffs Terran, Zerg players: PO is now one click defense against anything blah bla I have warned you all.
|
|
|
|